INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metro Muncipal Agreement Program
Advertisements

Guidance on New CEs Emergency Repair Projects Operational Right-of-Way Limited Federal Funds EUM – March questions to:
Section 4(f) Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation.
Section 4(f) Section 6(f). Section 4(f) Process Overview 2 Project Initiation Package Field Review 4(f) Property Present Use Coordination NEPA Document.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
NEW PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION AGREEMENT A WORK IN PROGRESS… ODOT—Office of Environmental Services Environmental Update Meeting20 November 2014.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
NEPA and Property Acquisition May 19, 2014 Elizabeth Patel Environmental Protection Specialist FTA Office of Planning and Environment.
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) – ROW Impacts Dianna Nausley, HQ RES Assistant Program Administrator Washington State Department.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
Update on Historic Bridges MaryAnn Naber Federal Highway Administration June 17, 2008.
1 Wetland Regulatory Programs Department of Natural Resources Legislative Audit Bureau July 2007.
Section 4(f) Updates questions to:
Section 4(f) Training May 2005 Presented by: Sharon P. Love, P.E. Environmental Program Manager FHWA Washington Division.
Engineer Circular Requests to Alter USACE Projects
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Endangered Species Act
WETLANDS and ODOT Environmental Services Oregon Department of Transportation.
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Future Transportation Projects within the Loxahatchee River Basin Florida Department of Transportation District IV 3400 W. Commercial Blvd W. Commercial.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
1 Welcome to the International Right of Way Association’s Course 606 Project Development and the Environmental Process 606-PT – Revision 5 – USA.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 Land Use Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
SAFETEA-LU Changes  Exemption of the Interstate System from Section 4(f) [Section 6007]  de minimis impacts to historic sites [Section 6009(a)]  de.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
Section 106: Historic Preservation Review and Compliance as it relates to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 “How Can State Agencies Assist.
Recreational Trails Program Federal Requirements.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
Section 4(f) Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Environmental Document Preparation WETLANDS BEST PRACTICES 33 rd Annual Airports Conference Marie.
Section 4(f)/6(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Overview of Proposed Alaska National Wildlife Refuges Regulatory Changes U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Fixing American’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act and NEPA Section 1309 – Program for Eliminating Duplication of Environmental Reviews 23 USC 330 – CEQA/NEPA.
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Director’s Order 12 contains information concerning review of other agency proposals.
Section 4(f) and 6(f) Training Class. Why Are You Here?  Pre-qualification requirement  Project management awareness  This class is designed for you!
Office of Real Estate 2045 Morse Road E2 Columbus Ohio /9/2016.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Section 4(f) and 6(f) Training Presented by the Office of Environmental Services September 21, 2017.
Section 4(f).
Construction Management & Inspection
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Environmental Prequalification Requirements
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
SPR-B Research Coordination Webinar
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Presentation transcript:

INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013

Overview 1.Background Information 2.General 4(f) Applicability 3.Protected 4(f) Resources 4.Types of 4(f) “Use” 5.Parks, Recreation Areas, and Refuges; other encumbrances 6.4(f) Process and Roles 7.Reference Resources BackgroundApplicabilityResourcesUseParks etc.ProcessReference

Background USDOT agencies have authority to administer 4(f) and make approvals; other agencies participate in consultation Called “4(f)” because it was originally section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation act of 1966 Codified in 23 USC 138 & 49 USC 303 Regulations in 23 CFR 774 Recently updated FHWA policy paper (2012) replaces 2005 version BackgroundApplicabilityResourcesUseParks etc.ProcessReference

General Applicability 1.Does the project require an approval from FHWA (funding or other)? 2.Is the project a transportation project? 3.Does the project require use of land from a protected 4(f) resource? 4.None of the regulatory applicability rules or exceptions applies (23 CFR & 13) BackgroundApplicabilityResourcesUseParks etc.ProcessReference

Protected 4(f) Resources 1.Parks and recreation areas of national, state, or local significance that are publicly owned and open to the public Resource assumed significant unless official with jurisdiction says it’s not 2.Publicly owned wildlife and waterfowl refuges of national, state, or local significance (may be open to the public) Resource assumed significant unless official with jurisdiction says it’s not 3.Historic sites of national, state, or local significance in public or private ownership regardless of whether they are open to the public Significant = eligible or listed on NRHP BackgroundApplicabilityResourcesUseParks etc.ProcessReference

Wisconsin Examples of Resources BackgroundApplicabilityResourcesUseParks etc.ProcessReference Photo Credits: Parks & Recreation Areas: Elver Park, Madison, WI

Wisconsin Examples of Resources BackgroundApplicabilityResourcesUseParks etc.ProcessReference Photo Credits: Publicly Owned Refuges: Horicon Marsh NWR, Mayville, WI

Wisconsin Examples of Resources BackgroundApplicabilityResourcesUseParks etc.ProcessReference Photo Credits: Historic Sites: Taliesin, Spring Green, WI

Types of 4(f) “Use” 1.Permanent incorporation of land into a transportation facility Most common kind of 4(f) use 2.Temporary Occupancy Use vs no use determination based on 5 conditions Property adversely affected, but not permanently incorporated If a temporary occupancy is determined to be a use, it must be documented using one of the 3 kinds of documentation 3.Constructive Use No land acquisition – proximity impacts only Must result in substantial impairment of activities, features, or attributes Requires coordination with FHWA HQ BackgroundApplicabilityResourcesUseParks etc.ProcessReference

Documenting Use 1.Full 4(f) Evaluation Can only be approved if no avoidance alternatives are feasible (engineering) and prudent (6 factors) Select alternative with least overall harm (7 factors) Incorporate all possible planning to minimize harm 2. De Minimis Finding Incorporates measures to minimize harm (avoid, minimize, mitigate, enhance) Does not require avoidance alternatives or feasible/prudent analysis 3.Programmatic Evaluation (5 types – see website) 5 types include: (1) bikeways/walkways, (2) historic bridges, (3) historic sites, (4) parks/rec areas/refuges, and (5) net benefit Require avoidance alternatives analysis and all possible planning to minimize harm BackgroundApplicabilityResourcesUseParks etc.ProcessReference

Parks, Recreation Areas, & Refuges Defining Factors: 1.Official Designation (Federal, State, Local) 2.Primary Purpose Demonstrated by a management plan or other documents 3.Significance Based primarily on the opinion of the official(s) with jurisdiction 4.Public Ownership Easements can constitute public ownership 5.Open to the Public Not necessary for refuge properties BackgroundApplicabilityResourcesUseParks etc.ProcessReference

Other Encumbrances Examples: 1.Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (Section 6(f)) 36CFR 59.3, National Park Service LWCF Assistance Manual 2.Wildlife Restoration Act (Pittman-Robertson Act) 50 CFR , FWS Fed Assistance Program Guidance 3.Sport Fish Restoration Act (Dingell-Johnson Act) 50 CFR , FWS Fed Assistance Program Guidance Rules: 4(f) may or may not apply to these lands depending on their park, recreation, or refuge purposes Compliance with 4(f) does not relieve FHWA and WisDOT of separate compliance with the other laws Documentation developed for 4(f) compliance may aid demonstration of compliance with other laws BackgroundApplicabilityResourcesUseParks etc.ProcessReference

4(f) Process: Agency Roles FHWA Makes final determinations on 4(f) eligibility and impacts Coordinates full 4(f) reviews with legal counsel and US Dept of Interior Provides final review and approval of 4(f) evaluations WisDOT Identifies potential 4(f) resources and project impacts on resources Coordinates with other stakeholders on potential resources and impacts Prepares 4(f) documentation for review and approval by FHWA WDNR Assists WisDOT and FHWA in the identification of potential 4(f) resources Provides information on resource purpose, activities, and management When DNR owns land, acts as the official with jurisdiction for significance, de minimis, and programmatic determinations BackgroundApplicabilityResourcesUseParks etc.ProcessReference

Project Development Process BackgroundApplicabilityResourcesUseParks etc.ProcessReference Planning Project Notification Investigation/ Determination Environmental Baseline studies NEPA Document/ Approval Initial DNR Project Concurrence Design Permitting Review and Comment on Design Elements Final DNR project concurrence Construction Project Implementation Site inspections Operations and Maintenance

NEPA, 4(f), and 6(f) Process BackgroundApplicabilityResourcesUseParks etc.ProcessReference Investigation/ Determination NEPA Process4(f) Milestones6(f) Milestones 1. Baseline StudiesIdentification of Resources and Impacts 2. Draft Environmental Document (CE, EA, DEIS) Draft 4(f) Document 3. Public and Agency ReviewPublic/ Agency Comments on 4(f) Public/ Agency Comments on 6(f) 4. Final Environmental Document/ Approval (CE, FONSI, FEIS/ROD) Final 4(f) Document & FHWA Approval 6(f) Acceptability (DNR) Design (5.) Final Design, Permitting, & Mitigation 6(f) Approval

Reference Resources FHWA 4(f) Website – BackgroundApplicabilityResourcesUseParks etc.ProcessReference

Review 1.What are the general applicability rules for 4(f)? (1) FHWA approval, (2) Transportation project, (3) Use of land from 4(f) resource, (4) Exceptions 2.What are the 3 types of property that 4(f) protects? (1) Parks, Rec Areas, (2) Refuges, (3) Historic Sites 3.What are the 3 kinds of use under 4(f)? (1) Permanent Incorporation, (2) Temporary Occupancy, (3) Constructive 4.What are the 3 ways to document a 4(f) use? (1) Full, (2) De Minimis, (3) Programmatic 5.What are the 4(f) roles of WisDOT, WDNR, and FHWA? Resource Identification, Coordination, Documentation, Official With Jurisdiction, Review and Approval