SPA, admissions issues and feedback

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCQF RPL Project Ruth Whittaker SCQF RPL Consultant Recognising Prior Informal Learning (RPL) within the Scottish Credit & Qualifications Framework (SCQF)
Advertisements

E-Apel: Electronic Accreditation of Prior Learning To what extent can the Accreditation of Prior Learning (APEL) process.
Supporting Professionalism in Admissions and Feedback UCET Management Forum - 26 June2008 Janet Graham, Director of SPA.
University admissions practices: What is right? What is wrong? How should they change? Steven Schwartz.
HEPI Conference – 7 October 2008 Developments in Higher Education Applications and Admissions: Implications for Universities, Schools and Colleges Anthony.
THE ADMISSIONS POLICY. WHY AN ADMISSIONS POLICY ? To ensure that the University is compliant with the QAA Code of practice: Admissions to Higher Education.
Good Practice in Interviews The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen – 22 April 2009 Leslie Currie, SPA Senior Project Officer.
The National Parent Forum of Scotland National Parents Conference Saturday 30 th October 2010 Engaging Parents in CfE Carol McDonald HMI.
Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision December 2008 Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.
Admissions Update for Partner Institutions. Programme Working with International Students James Richardson, Director of International Office Admissions.
Matching applicants to the best courses - UCAS Entry Profiles and feedback to students Geoff Ramshaw Policy Executive Policy and Communications Department.
Quality assurance considerations in work- based learning provision
Towards an Inclusive Culture: Engaging Students in Institutional Enhancement Dr Helen May Senior Adviser Higher Education Academy.
What do enquirers and applicants need to know? PSRB Forum on Public Information 16 December 2011 Leslie Currie, Senior Project Officer.
Outcomes from the SPA Fair Admissions Task and Finish Group What does it mean for your institution? SPA event 19 June 2012 Professor Mary Stuart, Vice-Chancellor,
HE Admissions from the FE Perspective Iain Wolloff Farnborough College of technology.
The International Postgraduate Student Experience – QAA perspective Dr Laura Bellingham Research, Development and Partnerships Group UKCGE workshop Thursday.
Current Issues in Admissions Policy and Practice: the view from SPA Professionalising Admissions HE in FE Conference 2 March 2010 Missenden Abbey Janet.
Admissions Policy and HE Strategy Professionalising Admission to Higher Education in Further Education Conference Tuesday 2 March 2010 Annie Doyle, Senior.
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
Specialist leaders of education Briefing session for potential applicants 2013.
B2 RAG analysis comparisons. Participants a three separate events completed RAG analyses of their concerns for evidencing B2 indicators: 1) 22 July 2014.
E-Portfolio Reference Model Dr Angela Smallwood Centre for International e-Portfolio Development, University of Nottingham Peter Rees Jones JISC-CETIS.
SPA’s Good Practice for Admissions Policies Admissions Policy and the QAA Quality Code – Are you ready? Peter Chetwynd, Admissions Support and Development.
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
ITIC PERSPECTIVE ON THE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FCTC PROTOCOL ELIZABETH ALLEN ITIC – JULY 2014.
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
UK higher education: quality assurance at home and abroad Carolyn Campbell The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
The new competitive environment: How can the use of contextual data aid fair admissions SPA event 19 June 2012 Janet Graham, Director of SPA.
Performance Review and Staff Development (PRSD) The Role of Governors Governor Reviewer Training.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Introduction to the Applicant Experience The Applicant Experience in Wales, 4 June 2014 Peter Chetwynd, Admissions Support and Development Manager.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Using data to improve the disabled student experience UK research project undertaken by Skill for ECU, looking at how HEIs encourage disabled student disclosure.
The UK Quality Code and Higher Education Reviews Admissions Policy and the QAA Quality Code – Are you ready? Catherine Kerfoot, Development Officer, QAA.
‘to safeguardthe public interest in sound standards of higher education qualifications and to inform and encourage continuous improvement in the management.
SPA Seminar Managing Numbers for 2010 Entry Welcome and context 2 June 2010 Janet Graham, Director of SPA.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
Fair access and widening participation – the view from SPA OCNLR Access to HE Conference Thursday 24 March 2011 Annie Doyle, Senior Project Officer, SPA.
The role of the applicant experience in improving retention SPA Seminar Northern Ireland - 12 April 2011 Annie Doyle, Senior Project Officer, SPA.
Qualifications Information Review CONSULTATION | 2012 QIR Consultation.
Rhona Sharpe, Head of OCSLD Liz Turner, Head of APQO 11 th April 2013 CHAIRING VALIDATION PANELS.
1 st April 2009 Stevenson College Access Centre DSSG workshops How to Complete the Annual Revalidation Form.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
1 DED Action Plan Review Taking on the Duty NADP Annual Conference 2007 Honey Lucas ECU Projects Officer.
Contextual data in admissions: is it right to use it; is it wrong not to? FACE Conference 2 July 2009 Dan Shaffer, Senior Project Officer.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement Shirley Jones.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Managing mistakes in admissions decision-making 2a. UCAS Admissions Conference, 21 March 2016 Jeni Clack, Admissions Support and Development Advisor.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
Managing the risk of unconscious bias in admissions 3b UCAS Admissions Conference, 21 March 2016 Dan Shaffer, Head of Professionalism in Admissions Lizzy.
SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS & DISABILITY CODE OF PRACTICE 2015 HOW THIS APPLIES TO FURTHER EDUCATION.
Partnerships between institutions: competition, collaboration and issues to consider for admissions 4b. UCAS Admissions Conference, 22 March 2016 Janet.
Current Issues in Admissions Policy and Practice: the view from SPA Admissions to HE Conference – 5 November 2009 Janet Graham, Director of SPA.
SEN, disability and the EYFS
Higher Education and Training Awards Council
Equality and Human Rights Exchange Network
Coaching and Mentoring Centre of Excellence (CoE) HR/OD SMT Proposal Presented by: Melanie Lloyd & Karen Gallagher 22 December 2015.
Joining up approaches between your recruitment and admissions 1b
External Verification Report 2014/15
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Implementing and reviewing additional admissions assessments
Good practice in entry requirements
B2 RAG analysis comparisons
The UK Quality Code and Chapter B9
Partnerships between institutions: competition, collaboration and issues to consider for admissions 4b. UCAS Admissions Conference, 22 March 2016 Janet.
Role of the Internal Verifier
Presentation transcript:

SPA, admissions issues and feedback Welcome to SPA The Robert Gordon University – 22 April 2009 Leslie Currie, SPA Senior Project Officer Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

SPA, admissions issues and feedback In this presentation The origins of SPA and the Schwartz Report principles What is SPA now? What we do to support HEIs SPA’s priorities from 2009 Feedback - Admissions Policies, clear criteria and options for feedback Conclusions Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

SPA, admissions issues and feedback 28/03/2017 The origins of SPA Set up in 2006 following the Schwartz Report Fair Admissions to Higher Education: Recommendations for Good Practice 2004: “ The Group recommends the creation of a central source of expertise and advice on admissions issues. Its purpose would be to act as a resource for institutions who wish to maintain and enhance excellence in admissions. Such a centre could lead the continuing development of fair admissions, evaluating and commissioning research, and spreading best practice.” Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

What is SPA? UK’s independent and objective voice on HE admissions Set up to develop an evidence base for good practice; to provide expertise and advice to the HE sector to enhance professionalism in admissions, student recruitment and widening access SPA leads on the development of fair admissions, and managed the review of the implementation of the Schwartz Report Fair Admissions (2004) principles, published December 2008 The SPA Steering Group, with representatives from all the UK HE funding bodies, oversees the Programme Six staff with a busy programme to July 2011 Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

The Schwartz Principles SPA, admissions issues and feedback 06/11/2008 The Schwartz Principles In 2004 Schwartz recommended 5 principles for fair admissions: be transparent enable institutions to select students who are able to complete the course as judged by their achievements and their potential strive to use assessment methods that are reliable and valid seek to minimise barriers to applicants be professional in every respect and underpinned by appropriate institutional structures and processes “Equal opportunity for all individuals, regardless of background, to gain admission to a course suited to their ability and aspirations.” Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

What is SPA doing to support HE providers? SPA, admissions issues and feedback 28/03/2017 What is SPA doing to support HE providers? Good Practice statements and briefings Admissions Policies, Feedback, Interviews, Criminal Convictions, Entry Profiles, Admissions Tests, Working with ECU on native languages issues, age and admissions etc Gathering and sharing good practice Visits to over 110 institutions across the UK – relatively informal information exchange; SPA conferences and SPA website are a useful resource for HE SPA inputs topics into UCAS Professional Development programme and encourages institutions to train all staff involved in admissions to enhance professionalism Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

What is SPA doing to support HE providers? 2 SPA, admissions issues and feedback 09/04/2009 What is SPA doing to support HE providers? 2 Encourage full adoption of the QAA code of practice on admissions Work with the Delivery Partnership, encouraging HE to develop more detailed Entry Profiles and enhance feedback to unsuccessful applicants Schwartz Report Review 2008 - to find out what’s changed and developed since 2004 on principles of fair admissions Advice, guidance and discussion with national organisations e.g. UUK, QAA, UCAS, HEA, NCEE, ECU, University and College mission groups, NUS, government departments, funding councils etc with regard to admissions, contextual data, qualifications, widening inclusion etc from an HE perspective Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

SPA and the future - priorities from 2009 SPA, admissions issues and feedback 28/03/2017 SPA and the future - priorities from 2009 Admissions Policies – finalise Good Practice Guidance The Applicant Experience - Pre-application – information and guidance; Application – offer making, feedback; Post-application; Transition and support Contextual data and holistic assessment Vocational qualifications and entry to Higher Education Part-time students – admissions issues, process and policy Higher Education in Further Education Equality and diversity – including Equality Impact Assessments Strategic change – work with senior managers in HEIs; and raise the standing of admissions within institutions Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

Confidence in the Application Process SPA, admissions issues and feedback Confidence in the Application Process Applicants (and their advisers) need to be confident that: Applications are properly considered by appropriately skilled or qualified staff There is clarity about how long decisions will take Interviews are conducted professionally, by trained staff and for a clear purpose Feedback is provided to unsuccessful applicants on request Offers are clear and easily understood Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

Admissions Policies – what’s the point? SPA, admissions issues and feedback Admissions Policies – what’s the point? Transparency in admissions policies - John Denham (DIUS, England), April 2008: “We have to look for … measures that will reassure the public… based on the fundamental principle that universities decide whom they should admit. The answer lies… in openness, transparency and accountability. It lies in each university having a published admissions policy; being able to show that it has measures in hand to equip all those involved in admissions to implement the policy accurately and fairly; and in each university being able to assure itself that this is being done.” English policy statement – but of interest across UK Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

Good Practice: Admissions Policies SPA, admissions issues and feedback 09/04/2009 Good Practice: Admissions Policies A high level statement demonstrating how the policies support the achievement of the institution’s mission and strategic plans, how they inform the operational aims and show commitment to applicants. Provide a source of good quality information and detail on all aspects of an institution’s admissions policies and procedures, transparent and helpful to a variety of audiences but mainly to the applicant and their advisors, as well as to the institution’s own staff. When reviewing admissions policies HE providers should note: the QAA Code of Practice, Section 10, on admissions to higher education (Sept 2006) to ensure policies comply with its precepts, the SPA Admissions Policies Guidance, available at http://www.spa.ac.uk/good-practice/admissions-policies.html - Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

Good Practice: Admissions Policies SPA, admissions issues and feedback 09/04/2009 Good Practice: Admissions Policies Background – Schwartz Report - Principle 1 stated: ‘A fair admissions system should be transparent’ Purpose of the admissions policy and connected legal and responsibility issues Admissions Policy: Structure and audience; Language; Transparency, accessibility and dissemination Admissions Policy - content, approval, responsibilities and monitoring Includes: high level statement, strategic framework, policy approval, issues in considering applications (at institution, course and at both levels) and information for applicants Support and training for admissions staff Qualifications – institution policies Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

Considering applications SPA, admissions issues and feedback Considering applications Establish clear criteria against which an application is considered Record decisions on individual applications in a structured way When asked you, or colleagues, can easily give a reason The applicant can reflect on your reasons and improve his/her subsequent applications Remember – the decision to admit is still yours Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

Feedback – and transparency 1 SPA, admissions issues and feedback 28/03/2017 Feedback – and transparency 1 Entry criteria. How are decisions reached e.g. are experience, qualifications, motivation, interview etc. factors in deciding who gets an offer? Contextual data. Are other factors taken into account e.g. a questionnaire after they apply, numeracy test for those without Standard level Maths, school performance? Holistic assessment. How important are these factors in relation to qualifications? Information. How do you inform potential applicants, applicants and/or their advisers about entry criteria and feedback? Transparency is the key to moving forward in this area Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

Feedback – and transparency 2 SPA, admissions issues and feedback 28/03/2017 Feedback – and transparency 2 More transparency will give applicants greater understanding of what is required It might, however, give them more opportunity to question decisions if they closely match the criteria. Applicants and advisors can see what contextual data has been used, and the relative importance of this information in making the decision BUT a good audit trail/ record keeping as to how the individual decision has been reached should help in giving feedback Timescales – is this information clear in the information given to applicants? Complaints and appeals – is this process transparent to applicants and staff? Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

SPA, admissions issues and feedback Who does what? In the interest of transparency and consistency everyone involved in the applicant process needs to be clear about each stage within their institution – For example, do you know.. Who should the first point of contact be for course enquiries? Who deals with applications services (eg UCAS) in your institution? What is the role of an admissions tutor? Does your institute have admissions tests or interviews? Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

Electronic Feedback to unsuccessful HE applicants SPA, admissions issues and feedback 28/03/2017 Electronic Feedback to unsuccessful HE applicants SPA had significant input into the UCAS development of an electronic feedback system through Track . Two options of electronic feedback are now available: Option 1: Coding linked with a reject decision – An institution devised code which would generate text of a standard sentence or paragraphs or possibly free text, which the applicant would view as a letter on Track. Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

Electronic Feedback continued… SPA, admissions issues and feedback Electronic Feedback continued… Option 2: ‘Amended reject’ decision’ - On request from the applicant, the HEI sends feedback via UCAS using a standard sentence/ paragraph, or free text as a new ‘amended reject’ decision. (Prior to applicant making response to offers) These codes are institution specific codes, devised by each HEI, and generate institution specific text for the applicant on UCAS Track. Text would need to be reviewed by the HEI on an annually basis Use of these via UCAS would be an optional tool for HEIs Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

Work on feedback issues SPA and UCAS SPA, admissions issues and feedback 28/03/2017 Work on feedback issues SPA and UCAS UCAS and SPA worked on JISC Scoping Study and now on EFIFA: Good practice in the provision of feedback to applicants, and in the use of technology to support this (March 2007). Importance of having good feedback statements - clear and helpful, while recognising the pressures on your time and resources SPA Good Practice Statement on Feedback http://www.spa.ac.uk/good-practice/applicant-feedback.html February 2008 Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

Conclusions and way forward SPA, admissions issues and feedback 28/03/2017 Conclusions and way forward Development of transparent policies and feedback are part of the evolving and increasingly complex area of decision making Clear policies and feedback are part of ‘customer care/service’ and good practice Good Entry Profiles and clear and concise admissions policies etc. will help to overcome any perceptions of unfairness Statement of good practice on feedback and admissions policies can be found on the SPA website www.spa.ac.uk Each HEI will need to review policies and procedures in an effort to adhere to good practice guidelines Robert Gordon, 22.04.09

SPA, admissions issues and feedback Conclusion Thank you – any questions or comments for SPA or to raise with colleagues here today? More information from: enquiries@spa.ac.uk or 01242 544891 www.spa.ac.uk Robert Gordon, 22.04.09