Charleston Pre-Conference Nov. 3, 2004 David Goodman Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University How to survive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cancer Research UK Library The e-journals experience April 28 th 2010.
Advertisements

Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
1 HOW LIBRARIES WILL USE COUNTER David Goodman Palmer School of Library & Information Science Long Island University and Princeton.
Paving the way for complete OA Joanne Yeomans & Jens Vigen CERN Scientific Information Group.
Enlighten: Glasgows Universitys online institutional repository Morag Greig University Library.
1 FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR COUNTER AND USE STATISTICS David Goodman Palmer School of Library & Information Science Long Island University.
1 Aggregating with GeoscienceWorld (GSW) Whats in it for us?
Electronic Publishing and Open Access
Throwing Open the Doors: Strategies and Implications for Open Access Heather Joseph Executive Director, SPARC October 23, 2009 Educause Live 1.
1 Institutional Repositories and Open Access – a threat to society publishers or an opportunity? Nick Evans Chief Operating Officer, ALPSP
Scholarly publishing distribution models In traditional model, libraries/others serve as mediators between information and researchers by buying books.
Society for Endocrinology Society for Endocrinology BES March 2007 Steve Byford Society for Endocrinology
Trade-Offs by Harold Winter
Gaining Momentum for Open Access Bas Savenije, Director General KB Tartu, Open Access Week 2011, 28 October 2011.
Access to Literature and the Progress of Science Rosalind Reid Editor, American Scientist Symposium Scientific Publishing: What Does the Future Hold? Lehigh.
Survival in Uncertain Times Library Materials Costs Exploding Lois Schultz April 22, 2003.
Creating Congruence Between consortial goals & emerging initiatives in scholarly publishing Margaret Landesman, University of Utah Johann van Reenen, University.
JISC Collections 19 May 2015 | ILI 2007 | Slide 1.
The Impact of Consortial Purchasing on Library Acquisitions: the Turkish Experience Tuba Akbaytürk 24 th Annual IATUL Conference Ankara, Turkey.
CREATING CHANGE IN EUROPE : SPARC EUROPE AND SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING Frederick J. Friend SPARC Senior Consultant
Scholarly Publishing: Why service is poor, prices are high, and what can be done by Aaron.
Rensselaer Research Libraries: Trends Migration from Print to Electronic –Research databases, e-journals and e-books –Enhanced scope, size, searchability.
1 William Y. Arms Cornell University April 4, 2003 Free Access to Information Today Who Benefits? What are the Risks? Who Pays?
Open Access: a Biomedical Science Perspective Gerald M. Kidder, Ph.D. Associate Vice-President (Research) and Professor of Physiology Schulich School of.
What is open access (OA) publishing? Why is it important? What are the pros and cons of OA? How does it relate to library and information science?
OPEN ACCESS: THE BASICS Making your research available.
Open Access Publishing The Future of Academic Publishing Dr. ZHOU,Huaibei Scientific Research Publishing November 19 th 2014.
The Digital Journal Collection in Libraries -what Libraries Are doing -Impact on Scientists Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Capitalism and Free Enterprise
CREATING CHANGE IN EUROPE : SPARC EUROPE AND SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING Frederick J. Friend SPARC Senior Consultant
IDENTIFYING OPEN ACCESS ARTICLES: VALID AND INVALID METHODS David Goodman Palmer School of Library and Information Science, Long Island University Kristin.
Open Access: An Introduction Edward Shreeves Director, Collections and Content Development University of Iowa Libraries
Electronic Journal Deals concerns and issues (or Beware the “Big Deal”) Linda Norbury Aston University USTLG Meeting 12 June 2001, Aston University.
© 2010 Koninklijke Bibliotheek – National Library of the Netherlands Open Access: Present Pitfalls and Future Scenarios Bas Savenije, Director General.
What does Elsevier count? Use Measures for Electronic Resources: Theory & Practice ALCTS Program, ALA, Chicago Daviess Menefee Director, Library Relations,
Electronic Publishing and the Economics of Information Part II Implications for Libraries Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee, Knoxville
A Skeptic’s View of Open Access Michael Held The Rockefeller University Press UKSG Conference March 30, 2004.
Alma Swan Key Perspectives Ltd Truro, UK SCONUL Annual Conference, Leeds, UK, June 2010.
Implementing an Institutional Repository at IUPUI: A Good IDeA Kevin Petsche Acting Digital Libraries Team Leader Emily Dill Public Services Librarian,
What is happening 'Free Access' 3. The Position of SPARC Raf Dekeyser.
The tension of Open Access: how not-for-profit publishers are reacting Sally Morris Chief Executive, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers.
Discovering Resources at Friedsam Memorial Library.
1. Self-interest: The desire of bettering our condition comes with us from the womb and never leaves till we go into the grave (Adam Smith). No one spends.
The access to information divide: Breaking down barriers Bas Savenije Director General KB, National Library of the Netherlands Stellenbosch Symposium /
23 Nov 2004Tom Graham University of Newcastle Scientific Publications: free for all? The Academic Library Viewpoint.
Beware Publishers Bearing Gifts Why the ‘Big Deal’ is a Bad Deal for Universities DAVID BALL Bournemouth University (Chair, Procurement for Libraries)
Pricing and Paying for Scientific Information during a Period of Transition Madeleine McPherson
Tilburg University Libraries, Publishers and Licensing Practical experiences and Fundamental issues Hans Geleijnse Librarian Tilburg University The Netherlands.
WILL INTERLENDING AND DOCUMENT SUPPLY SOON BE OBSOLETE? Frederick J. Friend JISC Scholarly Communication Consultant Honorary Director Scholarly Communication.
BioOne – Supporting Society Publishers Through Collaboration Heather Joseph President, BioOne 21 Dupont Circle, Ste 800 Washington, DC 20036
Scholarly Communication in a Knowledge-Based Economy John Houghton Centre for Strategic Economic Studies Victoria University, Melbourne
NEW MODELS FOR SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION Frederick J. Friend OSI Open Access Advocate JISC Consultant Honorary Director Scholarly Communication UCL.
Are academic journals becoming obsolete? Ted Bergstrom University of California, Santa Barbara.
| 1 Commercial Scholarly publishing In the world of open access Derk Haank Edinburgh CEO Springer 11 April 2005 Science+ business media.
1 Business-Level Strategy. 2 Business-level strategy: an integrated and coordinated set of commitments and actions the firm uses to gain a competitive.
The Peculiar Economics of Scientific Information Ted Bergstrom University of California, Santa Barbara.
1 Electronic Storage and Document Delivery Services: A publishers’ viewpoint Nick Evans Member Services Manager Association of Learned and Professional.
Open Access Defined An Introduction by Patti McCall.
The Government & The Economy. Learning Objectives To understand the Economic Objectives of Governments.
Using Content Presented by Karen Andrews Physical Sciences & Engineering Librarian, U.C. Davis Tuesday, September 13, :30-9:30 ASIDIC Fall 2005 Meeting.
Chapter 5 The Free Enterprise System. Traits of Private Enterprise Section 5.1.
THE BLAME GAME: OPEN ACCESS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLISHERS, LIBRARIANS AND ACADEMICS Fiesole on the Yarra 29 April 2005.
Open Access (OA) : a summary for 2006 Joanne Yeomans CERN Scientific Information Group (Presentation for the CESSID students 12 th May 2006)
CREATING CHANGE IN EUROPE : SPARC EUROPE AND SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING Frederick J. Friend Director Scholarly Communication University College London
Issues in Scholarly Communication: Do they affect you? Andrea Imre, Julie Arendt, Howard Carter, Joseph Ripp Morris Library.
Resolution Concerning Scholarly Publishing Alternatives and Authors’ Rights Passed by the UW Faculty Senate, April WHEREAS, the primary mission of.
Opening access to quality research materials
Are academic journals becoming obsolete?
Large drug distributor Wanted to implement ERP
Presentation transcript:

Charleston Pre-Conference Nov. 3, 2004 David Goodman Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University How to survive during the transition

How to survive during the transition for publishers and librarians Charleston Pre-Conference Nov. 3, 2004 David Goodman Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University

3 Probable: US & UK Plans enacted in their current form: self-archiving, with quality control by existing journals "Green OA" (journal + repository) and expanding to all subjects and adopted in all countries

4 Less Probable: US & UK Plans not enacted Delayed and gradual start of OA, but otherwise exactly the same consequences

5 Alternative 1: "Green" OA succeeds; journals continue

6 Alternative 2: "Green" OA fails; journals cease

7 Green OA S uccess The factor determining success is journal cancellations The factors determining cancellations are price increases access alternatives and whether authors insist on fully edited articles for their work.

8 The Base Rate of Cancellations 1. The base rate of cancellations is determined by price increases. 2. Since journal prices increase faster than library budgets, libraries must cancel some journals each year 3. If journal prices did not increase, libraries would rarely cancel 4. Libraries are fiduciaries to use their funds most efficiently for their users' benefit 5. Therefore, libraries will cancel the least needed titles, as judged by cost / benefit

9 1. The cost / benefit judgment affects: a. lowest quality journals even in core areas b. even good journals in peripheral areas. Thus, even high quality titles receive some cancellations 2. Benefit includes use (however measured) demand alternatives 3. OA is expected to increase use Thus OA by itself will not trigger cancellations Use

10 1. a. OA increases access possibilities b. Therefore OA will increase the rate of subscription loss 2. a. At the very beginning, required OA will provide little additional access b. Therefore, at the beginning of required OA, there will be little additional subscription loss Access

11 1. The loss will increase later 2. The extent depends upon whether academic authors insist upon fully edited articles for their work a. In some fields authors already do not b. in most fields it is unknown c. neither publishers nor libraries can influence this 3. However, there will be time to adapt before loss becomes too great Acceptibility

12 Basic Strategies Fail-safe policies, which can be carried out simultaneously, and without interference: A) Publishers: convert to OA Journals B) Libraries: decrease long-term commitments

13 Publisher OA Journal Strategy 1. The one form of OA that does not harm publishers is OA Journals 2. To convert to OA Journals takes time and capital 3. The phased onset of OA will give a few years time 4. Many publishers, especially large ones, have capital 5. Therefore, they should completely convert to OA Journals while still healthy

14 Publisher OA Journal Strategy by Type 1. Large nonprofit publishers with low costs will do well 2. Small non-profit publishers should if possible amalgamate or seek subsidy 3. Very small nonprofit publishers and their societies should switch to Article Databases 4. Large for-profit publishers should cut costs by leanness, better technology, and lower profit expectations 5. Small for-profit publishers should seek niches

15 Publisher OA Journal Strategy: Costs 12. A publisher of OA Journals must have competitive costs 12a. The present standard is APS 13. Publishers can increase efficiency for OA Journals and avoid most present cancellations, if they avoid price increases 14. For OA Journals, meeting price competition will be as important as quality competition.

16 Poor Publisher Strategies a. Relying on long-term contracts will come to an end when the contracts do b. Relying on National consortia that will be replaced by OA. c. Not providing statistics will encourage cancellation d. Many A & I services have become obsolete, because much simpler services perform as well. Therefore, vertical integration risks very low-cost competition e. Relying on high-priced sales to industry may mean abandoning the academic market f. Trying to resist OA

17 Why Cooperation is Possible Libraries must spend all their money; what they save on journals, they'll spend on books.

18 Library Strategy 1. Libraries cannot count on consistent funding increases 2. Therefore, they should not sign or renew multiyear contracts 3. Since this costs more at first, they must buy less 4. If they only buy what is needed, they can afford premium document delivery services. 5. Libraries should avoid canceling titles with no price increase, and titles from publishers converting to OA Journals.

19 Library Electronic Resource Strategy 1. Libraries should avoid relying on publishers' services for distribution. They cannot easily get free of them 2. For electronic publications, libraries must get a physical electronic copy and thenceforth use consortial file serving 3. Libraries can enforce publisher cooperation by willingness to cancel subscriptions 4. Archiving is a library function

20 Library OA Strategy 1. Libraries should cooperate with publishers only when it aids both them and all other libraries 2. Libraries can help efficient low-cost publishers and all forms of OA 3. Libraries must ultimately release some library funds to pay OA Journals' author fees 4. Libraries should assist Institutional Repository "self- archiving" to advance to true Article Databases with quality control (just in case)

21 Poor Library Strategies a. Avoiding mistakes by buying everything b. Avoiding thought by renewing everything c. Being archival in all subjects d. Letting users adapt to slow ILL e. Signing contracts that favor only one's own library f. Not actively assisting Institutional Repositories and other forms of OA g. Waiting untill faculty take the lead

22 If we cannot get the system to work, the scientists will run it themselves

23