M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure The U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management Intergovernmental Meeting Snowbird, Utah EM Budget Overview Cynthia Rheaume EM Director of Budget October 17, 2007

M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure 2 DOE’s Waste Disposal Complex Hanford Pantex Plant Brookhaven Knolls Princeton Savannah River Oak Ridge Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute General Atomics Energy Technology Engineering Center Sandia Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Lawrence Berkeley Nat’l Lab Lawrence Livermore Nat’l Lab Ames Ashtabula Argonne Nat’l Lab Fermi Portsmouth Paducah Mound BCL Bettis Kansas City Nevada Test Site Idaho NationalLab CERCLA Disposal Facility Fernald Regional Low Level Waste Disposal Facility DOE Generator Site (no on-site disposal facility) Low Level Waste Operations Disposal Facility Mixed Low Level Waste Operations Disposal Facility Legend Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for Transuranic waste disposal Los Alamos Nat’l Lab Sandia WIPP West Valley Yucca Mountain repository for High Level Waste/Spent Nuclear Fuel disposal Sites are closed Rocky Flats

M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure 3 EM Funding History $ in billions

M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure 4 Major EM Accomplishments Site Completions 86 out of 108 sites Liquid Tank Waste Long-lead procurement and construction underway on Waste Treatment Plant, Sodium Bearing Waste Treatment Facility, and Salt Waste Processing Facility All empty unused tanks grouted at Idaho National Laboratory Over 2500 cans of vitrified high-level waste produced for disposal Other Waste TRU / WIPP – Disposed of over 50,000 cubic meters of contact-handled TRU waste – Initiated disposal of remote-handled TRU waste Low-Level and Mixed Low-Level – Approaching 1 million cubic meters disposed

M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure 5 Uranium/Plutonium Initiated consolidation of weapons-usable surplus Pu from Hanford, Los Alamos, and Livermore to Savannah River DUF 6 Conversion Facilities at 70% completion –all DUF6 cylinders now on-site Long-lead procurement and construction underway on Building 3019 U- 233 Conversion Project Other Remediation Decontaminated and decommissioned over 1700 nuclear, radioactive and industrial facilities Stabilized more than 100 contaminated groundwater plumes, and remediated over 6,500 release sites Major EM Accomplishments (cont’d)

M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure 6 EM Risk-Based Priorities Highest Risk-Based Priorities Minimum safety and essential services across EM cleanup sites Radioactive tank waste waste storage, treatment, and disposal (including technology development and deployment activities in support of high-level waste) Spent nuclear fuel storage, receipts and disposition Special nuclear material storage, processing, and disposition High priority groundwater remediation (selected Hanford, Paducah and Los Alamos plumes) Solid waste (transuranic and mixed/low-level waste) treatment, storage, and disposal Lower Risk-Based Priorities Soil and groundwater remediation Nuclear facility D&D Non-nuclear facility D&D

M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure 7 Near-Term Scheduled Site Closures Inhalation Toxicology Laboratory NM Pantex Plant TX Lawrence Livermore National CA Laboratory-Site 300 Miamisburg Environmental OH Management Project Sandia National Laboratories NM Argonne National Laboratory-East IL Stanford Linear Accelerator CA LLNL (Site 300) Stanford SNL Inhalation Lab Pantex ANL-E Miamisburg

M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure 8 FY 2008 Budget Composition Other is comprised of: Program Direction, Technology Development, Contribution to the D&D Fund, Uranium/Thorium Reimbursements, Headquarters, and Community and Regulatory Support

M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure 9 FY 2008 Budget Status

M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure 10 EM Out-Year Budget Targets

M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure 11 Maintain and demand highest safety performance Assure effective identification and management of risks –Performance –Dealing with increased scope and requirements –Independent reviews – technical, cost, and schedule Validate project costs, schedules, and assumptions Improve senior management focus on project execution Provide additional training for Federal managers and staff to enhance project management, and acquisition skills Implement more effective acquisition process –Contract type –Fee structure Ensure real-time feedback and application of lessons learned Ensure proper organizational alignment of functions, authorities, and people Management Initiatives

M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure 12 EM Program FY 2008 Budget Legend: Over $1 billion$300 million to $1 billion$50 million to $300 million Kentucky New York Washington South Carolina Idaho New Mexico Tennessee Ohio EM Budget $5.7 Billion Nevada

M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure 13 Corporate Performance Measures

M E Environmental Management safety  performance  cleanup  closure 14 Summary Budget based on prioritized risk reduction Ensure all EM activities are conducted safely, and in accordance with environmental laws and regulations Strive for operational excellence through technology, process improvement, innovation, effective project management, and high standards/accountability Maintain effective communications with stakeholders Accomplish our mission through partnering with industry and other stakeholders New and improved EM website at