1 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Current Framework and Fundamental Concepts  For those unfamiliar with the HITSP Harmonization Framework.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HDF: HL7 Methodology Ioana Singureanu M&M co-chair, HDF Editor Eversolve, LLC.
Advertisements

Catherine Hoang Ioana Singureanu Greg Staudenmaier Detailed Clinical Models for Medical Device Domain Analysis Model 1.
0 Chicago, IL March 6 th, 2007 Use Case Requirements, Design and Standards Selection HITSP Use Case Requirements, Design and Standards Selection Date:
Object-Oriented Application Development Using VB.NET 1 Chapter 5 Object-Oriented Analysis and Design.
Health Information Technology Standards Panel Ed Mikoski 19MAR09 TIA Healthcare ICT Section Teleconference.
ISO/IEC MFI-4 Extended Registry Masaharu Obayashi SC32/WG
The HITCH project: Cooperation between EuroRec and IHE Pascal Coorevits EuroRec 2010 Annual Conference June 18 th 2010.
IMS1805 Systems Analysis Topic 3: Doing Analysis (continued from previous weeks)
Web Service Architecture Part I- Overview and Models (based on W3C Working Group Note Frank.
Cross Domain Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
1 Joyce Sensmeier MS, RN, FHIMSS, HIMSS Glen Marshall, Siemens Healthcare Charles Parisot, GE Healthcare IHE's contribution to standards harmonization.
Organizing IHE Integration Profiles related to the Electronic Health Record Input to the IHE ITI Tech Committee November 2002 Charles Parisot, GE Medical.
Cross Domain Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
0 enabling healthcare interoperability 2009 Webinar Series Sponsored by the HITSP Education, Communications and Outreach Committee Presenters:Co-Chair.
Initial slides for Layered Service Architecture
Sept 13-15, 2004IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Overview of IHE IT Infrastructure Patient Synchronized Applications.
July 20, 2007 Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel Principles for Proper Use of HITSP Interoperability Specifications And Proposal for Proper.
STORING ORGANIZATIONAL INFORMATION— DATABASES CIS 429—Chapter 7.
HITSP’s Scope  The Panel’s mission is to assist in the development of a Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN) by addressing the standards-related.
IHE Profile – SOA Analysis: In Progress Update Brian McIndoe December 6, 2010.
Nationwide Health Information Network: Conditions for Trusted Exchange Request For Information (RFI) Steven Posnack, MHS, MS, CISSP Director, Federal Policy.
Odyssey A Reuse Environment based on Domain Models Prepared By: Mahmud Gabareen Eliad Cohen.
RIDE ConsortiumRIDE Workshop, December 8, 2006, Brussels 1 The RIDE Roadmap Methodology and the Current Progress Prof. Dr. Asuman Dogac, Turkey Dr. Jos.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 6b EHR Functional Model Standards.
EHR-S Functional Requirements IG: Lab Results Interface Laboratory Initiative.
Clinical Document Architecture. Outline History Introduction Levels Level One Structures.
Chapter(1) Introduction and conceptual modeling. Basic definitions Data : know facts that can be recorded and have an implicit. Database: a collection.
0 Connectathon 2009 Registration Bob Yencha Webinar | August 28, 2008 enabling healthcare interoperability.
Requirements as Usecases Capturing the REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION TEST.
0 enabling healthcare interoperability Webinar Series Sponsored by the HITSP Education, Communications and Outreach Committee Building Blocks for Healthcare.
Actors and Use Case Diagrams Month Day, Year. Agenda Training Plan Overview Review Detailing Requirements with Requisite Pro Concepts Setting Up XDE Integration.
Gpi gordon point informatics Information Decomposition at NCI Jean Duteau HL7 UK RIMBAA Conference, November 4, 2010.
UML Use Case Diagramming Guidelines. What is UML? The Unified Modeling Language (UML) is a standard language for specifying, visualizing, constructing,
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 5b Health Data Interchange Standards.
IHE Profile – SOA Analysis: In Progress Update Brian McIndoe January 18, 2011.
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 3b National and International Standards Developing.
S&I Integration with NIEM (DRAFT) Standards Development Support June 8, 2011.
CIS 112 Exam Review. Exam Content 100 questions valued at 1 point each 100 questions valued at 1 point each 100 points total 100 points total 10 each.
Health eDecisions Use Case 2: CDS Guidance Service Strawman of Core Concepts Use Case 2 1.
1 Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel Care Delivery - IS01 Electronic Health Record (EHR) Laboratory Results Reporting July 6, 2007.
HIT Standards Committee Identifying Implementation Specifications & Gaps LeRoy Jones – Program Manager Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel.
CIS/SUSL1 Fundamentals of DBMS S.V. Priyan Head/Department of Computing & Information Systems.
Relationships Relationships between objects and between classes.
Promoting excellence in social security Building on sector wide commonalities to enhance the benefits of Information.
WSDL in a Healthcare Enterprise Architecture Lorraine Constable, Constable Consulting John Koisch, Guidewire Architecture Jean Henri Duteau, GPI.
Sept 13-15, 2004IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Patient Identifier Cross-referencing Charles PARISOT GE Healthcare.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 6a EHR Functional Model Standards.
Healthcare Information Standards Panel 2007,2008, and Beyond John D. Halamka MD Chair, HITSP.
1 DRAFT October 22, 2008 Ed Larsen Framework Review Working Group Plan.
July 27, 2007 HITSP Project Medications Management Use Case Presentation to CCHIT Steve Wagner and Scott Robertson.
OOD OO Design. OOD-2 OO Development Requirements Use case analysis OO Analysis –Models from the domain and application OO Design –Mapping of model.
Electronic Health Record (EHR) and Vital Record (VR) Systems Information Exchange National Center for Health Statistics Classifications and Public Health.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Patient Index and Demographic Implementation Strategies IHE Vendors Workshop 2006 IHE IT Infrastructure Education Rick.
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise The IHE Process: Developing Standards-based Solutions Kevin O’Donnell Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Committee.
Models of the OASIS SOA Reference Architecture Foundation Ken Laskey Chair, SOA Reference Model Technical Committee 20 March 2013.
Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel General Introduction June 15, 2007.
Introduction: Databases and Database Systems Lecture # 1 June 19,2012 National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences.
Case Study: HL7 Conformance in VA Imaging Mike Henderson Principal Consultant Eastern Informatics, Inc.
NAACCR Data Standards Activities to Achieve Interoperability Ken Gerlach, Chair NAACCR Interoperability Ad Hoc Committee June 12, NAACCR Annual.
August 11, 2006 Washington DC HITSP Project Interoperability Specification Inspection Test Contract HHSP EC.
0 Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel January 24, 2008 HITSP – NHIN Liaison Update.
1 The information contained in this presentation is based on proposed and working documents. Health Information Exchange Interoperability Minnesota Department.
Portable Data for Imaging Testing and Demonstration Process WELCOME Chris Carr Radiological Society of North America Director of Informatics - Staff Liaison.
eHealth Standards and Profiles in Action for Europe and Beyond
Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel
Current Framework and Fundamental Concepts
Distribution and components
Health Information Exchange Interoperability
, editor October 8, 2011 DRAFT-D
Presentation transcript:

1 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Current Framework and Fundamental Concepts  For those unfamiliar with the HITSP Harmonization Framework and Fundamental Concepts, these are attached as references. –HITSP Harmonization Framework –HITSP Fundamental Concepts

2 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel HITSP Framework September 15, 2007

3 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability HITSP Approach  Use Harmonization process to define a set of artifacts called constructs that –Specifies how to integrate and constrain selected standards to meet the business needs of a Use Case –Defines Roadmap to use emerging standards and to harmonize overlapping standards when resolved  The HITSP Framework describes –Types of constructs that could be used to specify how to meet the needs of a Use Case. –Defines specific rules for each construct type, including: What a construct type can used for. How construct types can be nested.

4 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability HITSP Harmonization Framework  HITSP construct types, in decreasing breadth of scope, include: –Interoperability Specification – integrates all constructs used to meet business needs of a Use Case –Transaction packages – Logical group of transactions –Transaction - logical group of actions that use components and/or composite standards to realize the actions –Components - groups of base standards that work together, such as message and terminology  Each construct: –May contain construct types that are less inclusive in scope –May constrain any construct or standard it contains. –May be constrained by any construct that contains it –Is a candidate for reuse and repurposing, if a new set of requirements and context can be fulfilled by the construct without impacting existing uses of the construct –Is uniquely identified and version controlled

5 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability HITSP Terminology  HITSP documents are referred to as constructs  There is a hierarchical framework for constructs to facilitate re-use  An Interoperability Specification is a set or collection of constructs of various document types: –ISx: “root” document, sets the context of use for all the constructs in the collection –TPx: a transaction package invoked by the IS, may have additional constraints stated in the IS –Tx: a transaction invoked by the IS, may have additional constraints stated in the IS or TP –Cx: a component invoked by the IS, may have additional constraints stated in the IS, TP, or T  Technical Notes (TNx) provide additional informative content, but are not required for implementation

6 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability HITSP Framework Use Case/Modification Request Interoperability Specification (1..m transaction packages, transactions, or components) Transaction Package (1..m transactions or composite standards) Transaction (1..n components or composite standards) Component (1..c base or composite standards) Base Standard #1 Base Standard #4 Base Standard #2 Base Standard #3 Component (Composite) Standard Transaction (Composite) Standard Transaction Package (Composite) Standard Defines and Narrows Context Base Standard #5 Base Standard #6 Base Standard #7 Standard s Organiza tion Potential for Reuse in Other Contexts

7 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability LevelDefinitionExampleRules Use Case or Harmonization Request  Defines business and functional requirements Interoperability Specification – to meet use case  Models business, functional, interoperability requirements to meet Use Case  Identifies technical system requirements to meet Use Case  Set context for constructs used  HITSP EHR Interoperability Specification  Identifies technical actors and actions  May include any other HITSP construct - components, transactions or transaction packages  Expresses constraints on HITSP constructs used Definitions and Rules

8 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Definitions and Rules (continued) LevelDefinitionExampleRules Transaction Package  Defines how HITSP constructs are used to support a stand- alone information interchange within a defined context between two or more systems  Record Locator Service  Entity Identificatio n Service  Manage Sharing of Documents  Thin context and interoperability requirements that are testable  Addresses like technical actors, context, and content  May use and constrain two or more transactions and/or one or more composite standards  In special circumstances, may use and constrain infrastructure or security component constructs Transaction  Logical grouping of actions, including necessary content and context, that must all succeed or fail as a group.  Query lab result  Send lab result  Fulfills actions between systems needed to meet one or more interoperability requirements  Testable  May use components or composite standards  Express constraints on composite standards or components used

9 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Definitions and Rules (continued) LevelDefinitionExampleRules Component  An atomic construct used to support an information interchange or to meet an infrastructure requirement (e.g., security, logging/audit)  Lab result message  Lab result context  Typically will use one “primary” standard and may have other “secondary” standards  Expresses constraints on base or composite standards used Technical Note  Used to give additional guidance and direction to HITSP analysis process, as well as background information for implementers  TN900 – Security and Privacy  Does not state any constraints

10 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Composite and Base Standards LevelDefinitionExampleRules Base Standard  A standard capable of fulfilling a discrete function within a single category produced and maintained by a single standards organization.  Messaging standard  Security standard  Code set. HITSP definition of “standard” includes: –Specifications –Implementation Guides –Code Sets –Terminologies –Integration Profiles Composite Standard  Grouping of base standards, often from multiple standards organizations, maintained by single organization. In HITSP, it can fulfill functional requirements for a component, transaction or transaction package.  IHE Integration Profiles  HL7 Implementation Guides  Health transaction services Per Definition above

11 HITSP Fundamental Concepts Internal Review Team (IRT) Report 22 Oct 08 | IRT Meeting TC Members Charles Parisot (co-chair) Steve Hufnagel (co-chair) David Tao Durwin Day IRT Report to TC Leadership Staff Members Bob Yencha Ed Larsen Gene Ginther Jack Corley

12 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Topics Under Review  Definitions of fundamental concepts and their relationships (Done)  Definition and numbering harmonization across documents(In Progress) –Stakeholders, Business Actors, Technical Actors –Information Exchange and Data Requirements (IERs, DRs)  Making HITSP documents easier to use (in Progress) –RDSS a living document; focus on Section 2: Requirements Analysis –IS emphasis on Section 3: Design

13 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Fundamental Concepts  Stakeholder - person, organization or “personified system” that performs actions in a use-case.  Business Actor – an abstraction that is instantiated as an IT system application that a Stakeholder uses in the exchange of data needed to complete use case action(s); a Business Actor is not a Stakeholder.  Technical Actor - the abstraction that is instantiated as an IT system interface that interacts with other Technical Actors. A Technical Actor supports the data exchanges for a Business Actor. The exchanges are defined by HITSP Transaction, Transaction Package, and Component constructs.  Information Exchange Requirement (IER) - describes a requirement for information exchange between HITSP Business Actors. Data contents of such an exchange is defined by associated Data Requirements.  Data Requirement (DR) – defines requirements for part or all of the content for a data exchange for one or more IERs as a set of information attributes with specific details for each attribute.

14 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Fundamental Relationships

15 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Fundamental Relationships Stakeholder IERs & Associated DRs B. Actor T. Actor Transactions & Associated Content Requirements Analysis Specification of Interoperability n Construct IS Supports  Transaction - a logical grouping of data exchanges and data exchange methods that must all succeed or fail as a group. A transaction is specified in a Transaction Construct.  Content – data exchanged among HITSP Technical Actors. When specified separately, content is specified in Component Constructs. Events, Actions & Exchanges B. Actor