Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project www.sccwrp.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PREDICTION AND ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS – SURFACE WATER ENVIRONMENT (SWE)
Advertisements

Hydrology Rainfall - Runoff Modeling (I)
Contaminant Fate WG 5 Year Plan RMP CFWG Meeting January 15, 2008.
PCBs Total Maximum Daily Loads San Francisco Bay Fred Hetzel SFB-RWQCB May 13, 2003.
Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
Modelling the rainfall-runoff process
IMPROVING ESTIMATES OF SUSPENDED SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION AND FLUX IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Brant Whiting, Jeffery S. Horsburgh and Amber S. Jones Utah Water.
A Model for Evaluating the Impacts of Spatial and Temporal Land Use Changes on Water Quality at Watershed Scale Jae-Pil Cho and Saied Mostaghimi 07/29/2003.
Irene Seco Manuel Gómez Alma Schellart Simon Tait Erosion resistance and behaviour of highly organic in-sewer sediment 7th International Conference on.
Part III Solid Waste Engineering
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview of the Hempfield Township’s New Storm Water Management Program.
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview: The Lower Providence Township Storm Water Management Program.
By: Carrie Turner Prepared for: New Jersey Association of Environmental Authorities Annual Conference March 12, 2013 Watershed Management Planning Provides.
The Wisconsin River TMDL: Linking Monitoring and Modeling Ann Hirekatur, Pat Oldenburg, & Adam Freihoefer March 7, 2013 Wisconsin River TMDL Project Team.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Some of my current research: Modeling sediment delivery on a daily basis for meso-scale catchments: a new tool: LAPSUS-D By: Saskia Keesstra and Arnaud.
Water Policy in the US and the EU K H Reckhow and C Pahl-Wostl Part I: US Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
UC Marine Council Santa Barbara Coastal LTER - NSF Nutrient Export Coefficient Modeling in Mediterranean Coastal Streams Timothy H. Robinson, Al Leydecker,
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Overview of Watershed Systems
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
WATERSHED MODELING IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Great Valley Water Resources Science Forum
Run-Off Characteristics of Streams
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
Castro Valley Creek Stormwater Quality Monitoring Brake Pad Partnership Meeting June 22, 2005.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
1 Small Tributaries Loading Study #2: Zone 4 Line A, Cabot Blvd. Hayward Year 1 – Draft FINAL report Lester McKee and Alicia Gilbreath Sources Pathways.
Watershed Assessment and Diagnosis of Condition for August 20, 2007 Joe Magner and Greg Johnson MPCA.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
BACKRIVER TMDL PROJECT Technical Outreach Prepared by MDE/TARSA Prepared for the Baltimore Harbor Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Model Upgrade Projects Blue Plains Regional Committee Briefing November 30, 2004 Presented by: Steve Bieber Metropolitan Washington.
Development of a Watershed-to- Very-Near-Shore Model for Pathogen Fate and Transport Sheridan K. Haack Atiq U. Syed Joseph W. Duris USGS, Lansing, MI.
Modeling to Understand Stormwater Management Efforts Portland Harbor Superfund Site Dawn Sanders City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services September.
Modeling Copper Runoff in San Francisco Bay Area Watersheds Jim Carleton US EPA.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Ric Lawson Watershed Planner Huron River Watershed Council MiCorps Staff.
CE 424 HYDROLOGY 1 Instructor: Dr. Saleh A. AlHassoun.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Watersheds Chapter 9. Watershed All land enclosed by a continuous hydrologic drainage divide and lying upslope from a specified point on a stream All.
Watersheds Human activities and structures, as depicted
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Clifton Bell, P.E., P.G. Chesapeake Bay Modeling Perspectives for the Regulated Community.
Kentucky Growth Readiness for Water Quality Does your water quality matter?
Dominguez Channel Watershed Pollutant Transport and Total Maximum Daily Loads: Modeling, Analysis, and Outreach Principal Investigators: Norman L. Miller.
Surface Water Surface runoff - Precipitation or snowmelt which moves across the land surface ultimately channelizing into streams or rivers or discharging.
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Copper Source Loading Estimates (Process Profiles) Physical & Chemical Characterization of Wear Debris (Clemson University) Water Quality Monitoring (ACCWP)
INTRODUCTION TO ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING. EIA Scientific Tools and Techniques2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be able to: 
Copper Source Loading Estimates (Process Profiles) Physical & Chemical Characterization of Wear Debris (Clemson University) Water Quality Monitoring (ACCWP)
Water Management Options Analysis Sonoma Valley Model Results Sonoma Valley Technical Work Group October 8, /08/2007.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
Prepared By: Amaliyar Kamleshkumar ( ) Rathod Nikunj ( ) Parmar mukesh ( ) Patel Raj ( ) Ode Kiran ( )
Runoff.
Water Pollution: Pollutant Transport Mechanisms
Exposure Modelling Day 1.
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
Water Pollution.
Water Pollution.
Elizabeth River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
James River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
COSA Committee Meeting
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Water Pollution.
Modeling Water Treatment Using the Contaminant Transport Module
Presentation transcript:

Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project

Prelude to Today’s Agenda Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) always benefit from more information Today’s presentation is mostly conceptual - many of the details have not been finalized Local stakeholders have extensive knowledge/experience - SCCWRP has been instrumental in bringing unbiased technical information to TMDL development One goal of today’s meeting is to identify potential partnerships and collaborations

Agenda For Today Background Goals of the project General approach - important considerations Next steps

Background Sediments at the mouth of several urban creeks draining to SD Bay are listed as impaired - chemistry, toxicity, benthic community Additional studies have focused the magnitude and extent of these impairments - Chollas, Paleta, and Switzer Creeks TMDL development for the contaminated sediments at these creek mouths would benefit from additional data -source analysis -linkage analysis

Constituents of Potential Concern Trace metals - copper, lead, zinc Trace organics - chlordanes, PAHs, DDTs/PCBs Associated constituents - organic carbon, suspended solids, hardness

Study Objectives What are the concentrations and loads of contaminants of potential concern? - can we differentiate among different sources? What is the fate of the contaminants of potential concern?

General Approach Utilize empirical data to estimate sources and loads of CoPC to affected areas at the mouth of Chollas, Paleta, and Switzer Creeks Employ watershed models to supplement information on sources and loads of CoPC Link to estuary models to help ascertain fates of CoPC inputs

Use of Empirical Data Want to examine multiple potential sources - urban watersheds and atmospheric deposition have been prioritized Watershed inputs -Focus on wet weather Use existing data wherever possible -MS4, Industrial, special studies Collect new data as needed - chlorinated hydrocarbons

Generalized Approach for Atmospheric Deposition The possibility of inputs from atm dep is high - urban air quality, localized sources There are two methods for estimating deposition -surrogate surfaces -atmospheric concentrations and estimated deposition velocities Focus will be direct deposition onto the water surface of affected areas - deposition onto the watershed would be an interesting component

The Use of Watershed Models Watershed models can be useful TMDL tools Predict concentrations and loads from unmonitored storms or areas -critical conditions -margin of safety Use to define source area contributions - subwatersheds, land uses, municipal boundaries, etc. Predict the effectiveness of future management actions - cost efficiency of potential implementation plans

Overland Flow Interception Storage Infiltration Interflow Upper Zone Storage Interception Storage Lower Zone Storage Groundwater Storage Deep Groundwater Evapotranspiration Active Groundwater Flow

Approach to Building a Watershed Model Physical data is needed for the model domain - watershed delineation, stream properties, land use, etc. Calibrate flow and water quality at small homogeneous land uses Validate flow and water quality at the end of the watershed cumulative of all land uses

Special Considerations for Watershed Modeling There are a number of different models available - static, dynamic We will use a dynamic model with short time steps - one minute to one hour intervals Shorter time steps enable predictions of within- storm management scenarios - first flush, peak flows, flow duration

Data Collection Strategy for Wet Weather Use previously collected data for land use information - requires certain assumptions Collect validation data at the end of each watershed - requires local data for validation Dynamic models necessitates dynamic water quality information - requires multiple samples across the hydrograph

Land use sites < 0.5"0.5" - 1.0"> 1.0"Total No. Agriculture3115 Commercial415 High density residential4217 Industrial5117 Low density residential213 Open space22 Recreational112 Transportation112 Natural loadings land use site events 30 natural site events Through 4/30/05 Sample Size For Land Use-Based Pollutographs Rainfall Quantity

Land Use Calibrations

Linking Watershed and Estuary Models Estuary models can make predictions about hydrodynamic and particle transport How much of the watershed inputs deposit in the estuary? Ultimately, at a specific location in the estuary, where did the sediment contamination come from?

Special Considerations for Estuary Models Two-way (tidal) flow Hydrodynamic stratification Particle dynamics -flocculation, settling, dispersal, mixing Chemical partitioning -dissolution, precipitation Sediment dynamics -flux, resuspension

Approach To Building An Estuary Model Start easy and work towards the more complex -Dry weather, then wet weather Calibration cruises -Hydrodynamic, particle, water quality, sediment quality data Special studies for rate constants -Fluorescent dyes, sediment flux, particle size distributions Validation cruises -Try to predict measured conditions based on calibration exercise

Summarizing What are the sources and loads of contaminants of potential concern? -empirical measurements -watershed modeling What is the fate of the contaminants of potential concern? - estuary modeling

Immediate Next Steps Need to prepare for wet weather sampling -Site and storm selection -Equipment prep and encroachment permits Compilation of existing watershed data -physical, flow, and water quality data Local partners? -Leverage existing monitoring -SCCWRP adapt to existing/planned studies -Incorporate tools or services developed by others

Longer Term Planning Determine success of watershed modeling -Requires more data? -Model application runs Begin preparations for estuary modeling -Hydrodynamic and water quality? -Primary special studies needed? Ability to interface with other agencies

Approach To Building An Estuary Model Physical data -geometry, bathymetry, substrate Hydrodynamic data -Tidal and creek forcing, thermal and density stratification, velocity Particle dynamics -Grain size, settling velocity, sediment resuspension Water quality dynamics -Dissolved/particulate phases, -