Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL)- 1 - GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 GBM Simulation and Instrument Response R. Marc Kippen Space and Atmospheric.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Review of the GLAST/LAT Project, Feb , 2001 IOC – S.Williams SAS - R.Dubois 1 Instrument Operations Center (IOC) and Science.
Advertisements

GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.1 Requirements 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Review of the GLAST/LAT Project, Aug. 14, 2001 Scott Williams 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Operations Center Scott.
GLAST LAT Project Engineering Meeting – ISOC Peer Review 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large Area Telescope ISOC Peer Review ISOC Detail.
GLAST LAT Project July 19, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/17 Science Verification Analysis and Calibration GLAST Large Area Telescope Eduardo do Couto e Silva.
GLAST LAT ProjectDC1 Closeout Workshop, Feb , Post-DC1 Work Seth Digel (HEPL/Stanford Univ.) Post-DC1 Work.
Section 15-1GLAST Ground System Design Review August 18&19, 2004 ISOC Organization ISOC Manager R Cameron Commanding, H&S Timeline Planning Command Generation.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 4.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
LLRV Timeline. June 1961Dryden Committee Formed June 1961Dryden Committee Formed Dec. 1961Bell contacted NASA HQ Dec. 1961Bell contacted NASA HQ Jan.
GLAST LAT Project ISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Section Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large Area Telescope ISOC Peer Review 7.2.
GLAST LAT ProjectJune Cost/Schedule Status Meeting 07/23/ Integration and Test 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I & T Input to June Cost/Schedule.
GLAST LAT Project 1S. Ritz Purposes of the Data Challenges “End-to-end” testing of analysis software. –define the ends –define the tests (what is success?)
GLAST Science Support Center June 29, 2005Data Challenge II Software Workshop GRB Analysis David Band GSFC/UMBC.
Data Processing and User Software Ken Ebisawa (Astro-E2 GOF) presentation and demonstration.
GRB Simulations in DC2 Valerie Connaughton with input from Nicola Omodei and David Band.
GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 9, 2004 Implementation of the Standard Analysis Environment (SAE) James Peachey (HEASARC/GLAST SSC—GSFC/L3)
LSST Scheduler status Francisco Delgado Sr. Software Engineer Telescope & Site.
GLAST LAT ProjectMonthly Status Review - ISOC, 1 September GLAST Large Area Telescope WBS 4.1.B Instrument Science Operations Center Monthly Status.
Mantychore Oct 2010 WP 7 Andrew Mackarel. Agenda 1. Scope of the WP 2. Mm distribution 3. The WP plan 4. Objectives 5. Deliverables 6. Deadlines 7. Partners.
CRESCENDO Full virtuality in design and product development within the extended enterprise Naples, 28 Nov
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Baseline-Preliminary Design Review, January 8, 2002 K.Young 1 LAT Data Processing Facility Automatically process Level 0 data.
Material Gamma Ray Astronomy at MPE For further information contact Helmut Steinle, MPE – NaIBGO component22 keV122 keV1.275 MeV4.4 MeV.
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Marseilles, 29June-3 July.
Status of Hall C 6 GeV Analysis Software Robust Fortran/CERNLIB code, “ENGINE”, for analysis of HMS/SOS coincidence and single arm experiments that has.
IRS Data Products: An Update SINGS Team Meeting November 2002 Baltimore, MD L. Armus SIRTF Science Center.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
Refined ECSS Software Process Model Elements SD-TN-AI-0570, Issue 5 APPENDIX D.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section XX 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT System Engineering WBS Dick Horn.
# - 1 E. Andrews LAT Software Schedule  Key FSW Milestone Dates –PAST: Jan ‘02 / Jul ‘02 – Preliminary Design Review / Delta PDR May ’03 – Critical Design.
Consortium Meeting La Palma October PV-Phase & Calibration Plans Sarah Leeks 1 SPIRE Consortium Meeting La Palma, Oct. 1 – PV Phase and.
Adam Zok Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internship Program August 14, 2008.
PDS Geosciences Node Page 1 Archiving Mars Mission Data Sets with the Planetary Data System Report to MEPAG Edward A. Guinness Dept. of Earth and Planetary.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR, October 2, 2001 E. do Couto e Silva1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
GLAST Science Support CenterNovember, 2005 GSSC User Committee Meeting Tools for Mission and Observation Planning Robin Corbet, GSSC
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF Motivation for Developing SPICE October 2007.
Swift HUG April Swift data archive Lorella Angelini HEASARC.
GLAST's GBM Burst Trigger D. Band (GSFC), M. Briggs (NSSTC), V. Connaughton (NSSTC), M. Kippen (LANL), R. Preece (NSSTC) The Mission The Gamma-ray Large.
GDB Meeting - 10 June 2003 ATLAS Offline Software David R. Quarrie Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,
GLAST Science Support Center June 21, 2007 Getting Involved with GLAST GLAST Guest Investigator Program David Band, GSSC CRESST/GSFC/UMBC.
Proposal: staged delivery of Scheduler and OpSim V1 (2016) meet most of the SRD requirements – Deliver a system that can be extended with an improved scheduler.
Contract Year 1 Review IMT Tilt Thompkins MOS - NCSA 15 May 2002.
GLAST LAT Project 1S. Ritz Data Challenge Planning Overview Purpose Boundary conditions Plan: –scope and progression of data challenges –schedule summary.
GLAST LAT ProjectSAS PDR, Aug. 17, 2001 R.Dubois1 Schedule Balloon Science Tools, Analysis Platforms Calibrations Performance Tuning, Tracking Data Production.
GLAST User’s Committee Meeting– 1 – June 6-7, 2005 GLAST Burst Monitor (GBM) Chip Meegan NASA/MSFC.
For further information, please contact: Purpose of Calibration: - provide performance verification of the GBM detectors. - provide benchmark.
SSC Support for Sim #3 Archived MOC Data Products, and distributed via web. –Level-0 telemetry files organized by year and month –SPICE orbit and attitude.
1 Getting Involved with GLAST Workshop, CFA, 06/21/ C. Shrader, NASA/GSFC GLAST Data & Software Release plans + Science Support Center Services C.
1 SUZAKU HUG 12-13April, 2006 Suzaku archive Lorella Angelini/HEASARC.
GLAST Large Area Telescope – ISOC Overview and StatusDOE Annual Review, 13 June GLAST Large Area Telescope Instrument Science Operations Center.
GLAST GLAST Burst Monitor Charles Meegan Principal Investigator NASA MSFC Steve Elrod Project Manager NASA MSFC
GLAST Science Support Center May 8, 2006 GUC Meeting AI#28. SAE Release Schedule David Band (GSSC/JCA-UMBC) Julie McEnery (GSFC)
Geant4 Simulation for KM3 Georgios Stavropoulos NESTOR Institute WP2 meeting, Paris December 2008.
Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor
26th Oct 2006CAA cross cal meeting, MSSL RAPID Calibration Status RAPID team.
Implementation Review Team Meeting
Managing the Project Lifecycle
I&T&C Organization Chart
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter CRaTER Critical Design Review
Proposal for LAT Year 1 Data Release Plan
David Band – Science Lead, GSSC
GRB Simulations in DC2 Valerie Connaughton with input from Nicola Omodei, David Band, Jay Norris and Felix Ryde. DC2 Workshop -- GSFC
GLAST Large Area Telescope
Integration & Test Instrument Operations Coordination
GLAST Large Area Telescope Instrument Science Operations Center
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Overview of Beam Test Benoit, Ronaldo and Eduardo Nov 8 , 2005 thanks to Steve and Bill for helping to consolidate all the information.
Presentation transcript:

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL)- 1 - GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 GBM Simulation and Instrument Response R. Marc Kippen Space and Atmospheric Sciences Group Los Alamos National Laboratory

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL)- 2 - GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 GBM Detector / Instrument Response GR B GRB Photon SpectrumInstrument ResponseInstrument Background Observed Data

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL)- 3 - GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 Simulation and Detector Response Software  Definition: Multi-purpose software suite that computes the physical and instrumental response of the GBM instrument system Primary purpose: generate detector response functions critical to the analysis of flight science data Other uses: instrument design; interpretation of calibrations; design of flight and ground analysis algorithms & s/w  Technique: Numerical simulation — Monte Carlo radiation transport Verified through, and incorporating results from experimental calibration Major Components  Mass model (geometry + composition)  Incident particle distributions  Radiation transport physics  Instrumental/calibration effects  DRM database  DRM synthesizer/generator

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL)- 4 - GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 Key Functional Specifications GBM SIM/DRM S/W Functional Specs GBM-SPEC-1025 (reviewed at GSW PDR) GBM IODA S/W Functional Specs GBM-SPEC-1031 (reviewed at GSW PDR)  Complete and accurate interaction physics (included in core simulation package — GEANT4)  Accurate mass models, environment models, and instrument models (but not overly complex)  Later stages of development require S/C models (including LAT model)  Verification through comparison with experimental data  Final DRMs must include contribution from atmospheric scattering (+direct detector and S/C scattered response)  GLAST S/C will have rapid slew capability — different DRMs are required whenever aspect changes by > 1°  DRM generation s/w is part of GBM IODA s/w and subject to the same requirements for standards, configuration control, etc.

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL)- 5 - GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 Development Organization GBM Principal Investigator (Meegan) GBM Project Manager (Elrod) Ground Software Lead (Preece) Ground Software Review Board GSW Config. Mgr. (Connaughton) Ground Software Development Team Ground Software Test Team (Diehl, lead) SIM & DRM System Lead (Kippen) Developers (Hoover) Ground System Manager (Paciesas)  SIM/DRM software designed and developed at LANL in collaboration with GBM PI and GSW lead  Development process falls under GSW Development Plan (GBM-PLAN-1023)  Final products (s/w and data) delivered to GBM PI at NSSTC (also available to MPE and other interested parties)

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL)- 6 - GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 Phased Software/Model Development  Software and models require cross-validation with calibration data  Three phases of SIM/DRM sw/model development Design  Simulate prototype detectors Calibration  Simulate three levels of calibration/test Detector level GBM system level On-spacecraft level Operation  In-flight configuration appropriate for analysis of science data  DRM generation Prototype Detectors Flight Detectors, Det. Level Config. Flight Detectors, Sys. Level Config Flight Detectors, SC Level Config. with Spacecraft/LAT in Test Configuration Flight Detectors, Flight Configuration with Spacecraft/LAT in Flight Configuration Prototype Environment Test Environment 1 Detector Level Env. Test Environment 2 System Level Env. Test Environment 3 Spacecraft Test Facility and Source Holder Flight Environment with Atmospheric Scattering Model Design Phase Calibration Phase Operations Phase Mass Models Environment Models Prototype Thresholds, Resolution Test Environment 1 Det. Cal. Results Test Environment 2 Sys. Cal. Results Test Environment 3 S/C Cal. Results Flight Performance with Periodic Updates from In-flight Calibration Database Instrumental Effects

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL)- 7 - GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 Implementation: G BM RE sponse S imulation S ystem  Integrated package that will encompass all GBM instrument response software and data needs  Configuration controlled as a single deliverable package with component software/data modules  All packages (and their dependencies) use GNU compilers — mainly g++  All data files have headers with detailed version & job tracking data  Final phase package will be a subset of the GBM IODA software, cf. GBM- SPEC-1036 (GSW Arch. Design) gbmsim GBM instrument physical simulator calsim Instrumental/calibration effects & data packager atmosim Atmospheric scattering simulator drmgen Application-specific DRM generator GRESS arpack Atmospheric scattering data packager

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL)- 8 - GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 Implementation: G BM RE sponse S imulation S ystem gbmsim calsim atmosim GRESS root files armdb drmdb Mass model Cal. Params. Cmds. Application Specific DRM Source Location Software (SSC & IOC) Data Analysis Software (IOC) IODA Spectrum or DRM Spectrum or ARM caldb drmgen Aux. data Note: a separate, reduced DRM/ARM database is used for BAP software (based on same simulation data) arpack root files GRESS/IODA Overlap Area

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL)- 9 - GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 How – Direct Instrument Response gbmsim — Raw “physical” data calsim — Packaged, instrument-like data

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL) GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 How – Atmospheric Scattered Response atmosim — Raw “physical” data arpack — Packaged data matrix collection surface NRLMSISE-2000 atmospheric model used to create concentric shell mass model

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL) GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 How — Putting it all Together armdb – Atmos. Resp. db drmdb — direct response db drmgen — burst-specific response generator Data Analysis – spectral fitting and localization

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL) GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 How — Response used for Spectral Analysis Model GRB Spectrum rmfit/xspec — spectral model “hypothesis testing”  Parameterized spectral models  Built-in models or “custom” models Total Det. ResponseBackground Model Observed/Predicted Counts iterate  From drmgen  Updated automatically when S/C pointing changes  Empirical, time- dependent model based on data before and after burst  Observed and predicted counts compared via test statistic  Chi-squared (Gaussian) or Poisson log Likelihood  Optimize test Stat. iteratively Process is extended to simultaneously include multiple GBM detectors (Incl. NaI and BGO) or other instruments (e.g., LAT, Swift, etc.)

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL) GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 How — Response used for Localization Internal response generator caldb Trial GRB Direction Trial Spectral Parameters Simultaneous spatial/spectral model “hypothesis testing” S/C attitude/ position Predicted detector counts Observed Det. counts Chi-square evaluation Spatial/spectral optimization Background model

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL) GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 Development Status  SIM/DRM development is affected by: Delivery of GBM detector design data/drawings (received June 2004, three months behind original schedule) Delivery of GLAST spacecraft design data/drawings (expected July 2004, three months behind original schedule, initial delivery August 2004) Schedule of GBM calibrations  Required to verify SIM/DRM s/w and models  Detector level (MPE), system level (NSSTC), spacecraft level (Spectrum) — all slipped due to launch slip.  Development status: Preliminary versions of GRESS software complete (several months ahead of schedule) Detector model development nearing completion (3 months behind) Spacecraft model development starting (3 months behind) Result: able to meet required delivery schedule

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL) GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 SIM/DRM Revised Delivery Schedule MilestoneDate † DriverDate SIM/DRM Delivery 1 (Det.-level s/w & models) Nov. 1, 2004 (  +4 mo) Verify s/w & models with GBM detector-level calibrations Feb – Mar SIM/DRM Delivery 2 (Syst.-level s/w & models) Jun. 15, 2005 (  +3 mo) Verify s/w & models with GBM system-level calibrations Jul – Sep SIM/DRM Delivery 2.1 (preliminary CALDB/DRM) Nov. 1, 2005 (new) Support IODA Release 2.2 & 2.3, and Data Challenge 3 Nov. 1, 2005; Dec. 1, 2005 SIM/DRM Delivery 3 (S/C-level s/w & models) Jan. 2, 2006 (  +3 mo) Verify s/w & models with GBM spacecraft-level source survey Feb SIM/DRM Delivery 4 (Ops. phase s/w & models) Apr. 14, 2006 (no change) Support IODA Release 3 (launch-ready software) Sept. 1, 2005 SIM/DRM Delivery 5 (Final DRM/CALDB database) Nov. 1, 2006 (no change) Support Phase E science/Ops.Post-launch * All deliveries from LANL to NSSTC † Schedule changes from ground s/w CDR reflect changes in the GBM calibration schedule (affected by launch slip) Stable since GBM System CDR June 2004

Simulations and Response / R. M. Kippen (LANL) GBM BWG Review, 31 August 2004 SIM/DRM Schedule