1 SpaceOps 2002 Autonomous Operations For The Swift Mission T3-47 John Ong/Swift Software Systems Manager NASA/GSFC Code 582/301-286-8435 Mike Rackley/Swift.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VOE, CalTech, 13Apr05 GCN (GRB Coordinates Network) GRB Event Reporting Scott Barthelmy NASA-GSFC.
Advertisements

Title: ICON L0 from MOC to SOC automation Author: MOC/SOC Resides: SOC Description: This is a script that copies the ICON L0 files from the MOC to the.
GLAST LAT ProjectManager’s Face to Face - ISOC, 17 March GLAST Large Area Telescope WBS 4.1.B Instrument Science Operations Center Manager’s Face.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 3.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
Mission Operations and Data Flow Overview Koji Mukai Astro-E2 Guest Observer Facility.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.1 Requirements 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large.
RFA 18 – Automation of Operations Software Specific Request –Specify plans and requirements for automation of operations software, and describe the software.
Lessons from HETE-2 Ops D. Q. Lamb (U. Chicago) with invaluable input from E. Fenimore, C. Graziani, and R. Vanderspek.
GLAST LAT Project ISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.3 Verification and Validation 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Section 15-1GLAST Ground System Design Review August 18&19, 2004 ISOC Organization ISOC Manager R Cameron Commanding, H&S Timeline Planning Command Generation.
GLAST LAT Project ISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 3 LOF Operations Concept 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 4.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
JPL Autonomous Space Mission Simulation Flight Team Bob Hoffman Josh Ruggiero Adam Nikolic Dusty Terrill.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 21 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
1 08 January 2015 Stephen Horan Cube Quest Kick-off: Communications Rules PI for Avionics Space Technology Mission Directorate.
Space Astronomy for Science Teachers - 28 June 2002 The Gamma Ray Burst Explorer What is Swift (Marg Chester, Swift Ops Lead Scientist) What are GRBs (Sally.
March 2004 At A Glance ITOS is a highly configurable low-cost control and monitoring system. Benefits Extreme low cost Database driven - ITOS software.
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Direct Readout Laboratory NPP/JPSS HRD/LRD Status Patrick Coronado NASA Goddard Space Flight Center directreadout.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/ipopp.
STEREO Science Center SWG – Dec 2004 William Thompson NASA Goddard SFC Code Greenbelt, MD
Open Source DTN for ISS Payloads Concept Proposal, 05-Jun Open-source DTN communication software for ISS Payloads Kevin K. Gifford BioServe Space.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Operations Concept Richard Saylor Jr. HTSI/Code 444 August 16-17, 2005.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE.
IXYZ Frank Marshall NASA/GSFC 25 April 2012 April 25, 20121Implementing Portals of the Universe.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
Data Management Subsystem Jeff Valenti (STScI). DMS Context PRDS - Project Reference Database PPS - Proposal and Planning OSS - Operations Scripts FOS.
Aquarius Project Status 7 th Aquarius/SAC-D Science Team Meeting 11 April 2012.
Swift HUG 14 Feb Swift archive Lorella Angelini/HEASARC.
An Overview of the Swift Observatory Liz Puchnarewicz Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
1 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) CRaTER Technical Interchange Meeting C&DH Flight Software April 14, 2005.
CAPACITY Operational Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring Missions CAPACITY Final Meeting - WP Ground Segment synthesis Final Meeting ESTEC02/06/05.
1 Description and Benefits of JWST Commanding Operations Concept TIPS/JIM Meeting 17 July 2003 Vicki Balzano.
Page No. 1 Kelvin Nichols Payload Operations and Integration Center EO50 Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN) Implementation on the International Space Station.
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
Final Version Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mission Operations Tim Rykowski Jeffrey Hosler May 13-17, 2002.
Supernova/Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Mission/Science Operations Irene Bibyk Tim Rykowski Bob Schweiss June 28, 2001.
We have developed a GUI-based user interface for Chandra data processing automation, data quality evaluation, and control of the system. This system, known.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
ONE Concept. ONE Work area & lab setup ONE Goals Provide single network interface regardless of physical link Provide reliable, isochronous message transport.
1 ROAD MAP OF THE CCSDS ARCHITECTURE WORKING GROUP (AWG) Draft, Issue March 2003 Takahiro Yamada, Chair, AWG.
The GLAST Science Support Center’s Role in Supporting the User Community [24.10] Thomas E. Stephens (GSFC/L-3GSI) for the GLAST Science Support Center.
DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August Model Mission: Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) Mission Goal “To study the microphysics of three.
Space Operations as a Guide for a Real-World Scheduling Competition Eduardo Romero Marcelo Oglietti
GLAST Science Support CenterNovember, 2005 GSSC User Committee Meeting Tools for Mission and Observation Planning Robin Corbet, GSSC
Swift HUG April Swift data archive Lorella Angelini HEASARC.
1 John Nousek (Penn State University) Gamma-Ray Burst Explorer: Afterglow Follow-up & Swift Constraints Swift & GRBs: Unveiling the Relativistic Universe,
Intelligent Distributed Spacecraft Infrastructure Earth Science Vision Session IGARSS 2002 Toronto, CA June 25, Needs for an Intelligent Distributed.
March 2004 At A Glance autoProducts is an automated flight dynamics product generation system. It provides a mission flight operations team with the capability.
STEREO Science Center Status Report William Thompson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center STEREO SWG March 27-28, 2007.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Ground System Requirements.
Communications Plan: Ji Young Kim, Chul Han Song, Saewung Kim, and Jim Crawford.
March /5/2016 At A Glance STARS is a real-time, distributed, multi-spacecraft simulation system for GN&C technology research and development. It.
Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,
Swift as a Rapid Wide Field Follow-up Instrument John Nousek & Jamie Kennea Penn State University Phil Evans University of Leicester International Workshop.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Ku - Band, DTN, and enhanced payload utilization.
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR Test Suites (Backup) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
1 John Nousek & David Burrows (Penn State University) Alberto Moretti (Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera) X-Ray Telescope (XRT): Performance after Five.
Tracing the JWST Proposal from User Interface to Commanding of an Instrument Margaret Meixner & WIT Balzano, Robinson & CMD.
March 2004 At A Glance ITPS is a flexible and complete trending and plotting solution which provides user access to an entire mission full-resolution spacecraft.
GLAST LAT ProjectIDT Face-to-Face Agenda S. Williams 1 Face to Face Meeting Session Topic: LAT Operating Modes Date: March 19 Time: 13:30 Convener: Scott.
Be in the know Visual Intercept Project from Elsinore Technologies David Hershman Regional Sales Manager
GLAST Science Support Center GLAT Users’ Committee Meeting Scheduling GLAST Observations Robin Corbet
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 IOC Subsystem 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
EIS Operation Planning H. Hara (NAOJ) 2007 Dec 10.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Radiation Environment Monitor Kevin Hargrave EO
LRO Mission Operations Concept
Jim Aloise System Programmer
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
Technology for a NASA Space-based Science Operations Grid Internet2 Members Meeting Advanced Applications Track Session April, 2003 Robert N. Bradford.
Presentation transcript:

1 SpaceOps 2002 Autonomous Operations For The Swift Mission T3-47 John Ong/Swift Software Systems Manager NASA/GSFC Code 582/ Mike Rackley/Swift Ground System Engineer NASA/GSFC Code 581/

2 SpaceOps 2002 Major Mission Goals Autonomously Detect & Observe Of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) Autonomously Slew To (I.e., “Chase”) GRBs (w/o Ground Intervention) Forward GRB Data (e.g., Position, Basic Characteristics) to Ground System Within 20 Seconds Perform Hard-X-Ray Survey (Through Pre-Scheduled, Time-Based Observation Plan) Perform Follow-On Observations (Through Continual Updating of Observation Plan) Quickly And Autonomously Distribute Newly Detected GRB Information To The Global Astronomy Science Community

3 SpaceOps 2002 Observatory Overview X Z Y BAT UVOT Sun Shade XRT Star Trackers XRT radiator BAT Power Box BAT IPE Boxes IRUs

4 SpaceOps 2002 Mission Characteristics Autonomous Slew Decision Capability Fast Slews: 50° in <75 seconds Low Earth Orbit, 22° Inclination Delta II , 3m Fairing Observatory Mass: ~1357 kg Average Power: ~983 W

5 SpaceOps 2002 Key Mission Ops Challenges Supporting 24x7 “Dynamic”, Autonomously Slewing S/C With An 8x5 Ops Staff –Observation of a Newly Detected GRB Causes Rescheduling of Observing Plan (Expected to Occur Daily) Generating Accurate As-Flown Schedule Given That The Pre-Planned Schedule Will Change Routinely –Utilizes Unique Observation Ids To Enable Mapping of As-Flown Schedule To Actual Observations Performing Data Processing With Minimal Staff –From Raw-Frame Files At Ground Station To Science Formatted Files At Data Center

6 SpaceOps 2002 Operations Concept Summary Autonomous GRB Detection & Repointing of S/C By Onboard Figure of Merit (FoM) Flight SW (FSW) –Occurs Approximately Once Per Day –Immediate Notification to Ground System So Others In Science Community Can Also Take Action to View Burst When Not Viewing a Newly Detected Burst, Spacecraft is Driven by Pre-Loaded Observation Plan –72-Hour Observation Plan Uplinked Daily For Newly Detected and Preplanned Bursts, All Observations Assigned a Unique Observation Number –Information on Actual Observations Reflected In FoM FSW Housekeeping (Observation Numbers, Times, Durations, etc.) –Ground System Develops As-Flown Schedule Using Observation Information Provided by FoM FSW

7 SpaceOps 2002 Operations Concept Summary Frequent, Dynamic Replanning Performed by Science and Flight Operations Teams –Must Account for Previous Preplanned Activities (Observation Plan), and How They Were Affected by the Autonomous Actions Taken by the Spacecraft (Newly Detected Bursts) Routine Spacecraft Communications With Ground Station –Approximately 6-10 Contacts Per Day (6 Minimum) –Contacts Used For Routine Operations (e.g., Data Dumps, Health and Safety Monitoring, Daily Commanding) Process for Getting Data from Malindi to the Science Users Quickly Fully Automated Science Team Able to Initiate Observations Quickly Via Target of Opportunity (ToO) Requests

8 SpaceOps 2002 System Architecture Diagram

9 SpaceOps 2002 System Architecture Highlights Burst Alert Messages Relayed to Ground in Real-Time Via the TDRSS Demand Access Service (DAS) –DAS Provides Near Continuous Coverage –Messages Relayed to GRB Coordinates Network (GCN) For Distribution to the Science Community in Near Real-Time –Link May Also Be Used to Provide Housekeeping Data to Operations Team in the Mission Operations Center (MOC) Malindi Ground Station Provides Ability to Dump Stored Housekeeping & Science Data to Ground and Conduct Day- to-Day Operations –Station Owned and Operated by Italian Space Agency (ASI) and Located in Kenya, Africa –Dump Data Automatically Transmitted to the MOC

10 SpaceOps 2002 System Architecture Highlights Science Team Can Add Target-Of-Opportunity (ToO) Requests To Observation Plan –Science Team Presents ToO Request To MOC –MOC Uplinks Via TDRSS - Uplink Must Be Scheduled, Not Always Available Like The DAS for Telemetry –Turnaround Within 60 Minutes Swift Data Center Provides Science Data Processing Functions –Receives Data Automatically From the MOC –Extracts Observations From Raw Packet Data –Converts Observations Into Science Formatted, Quick-Look Data Products and Makes Available to the User Community –Data Processing Pipeline Fully Automated

11 SpaceOps 2002 System Architecture Highlights Flight Operations Support in MOC Supported Via Standard Suite Of Automation Capabilities/Tools –Automatic Conduct Of Data Dumps From Spacecraft –Autonomous Monitoring Of Telemetry With Paging Of Offsite Personnel As Needed –Remote Data Access For Flight Operations Team –Automatic Ingest Of Orbit Information And Incorporation Into Planning Process –Automatic Generation of Analysis Products (e.g., Trend Plots And Statistics Reports)

12 SpaceOps 2002 Onboard Autonomy Via FoM FSW FoM FSW Schedules Actual Observations –Pre-Planned Targets (PPTs) Uplinked In Observation Plan Are Forwarded to FoM FSW ILO S/C ACS –Automated Targets (ATs) Consist Of Newly Detected GRBs & ToOs –Priority of Observations Based On Assigned Merit –Observing PPTs Given Priority When ATs Constrained FoM FSW Scheduling Requires Integrating Time-Based PPTs and Event-Based ATs –ATs Are To Be Observed ASAP for Pre-Defined Time –PPTs Can Be Pre-Empted By ATs BAT Assigns Observation Numbers for GRBs, Ground System Assigns For PPTs and ToOs

13 SpaceOps 2002 FoM FSW Target Observation Flow The unique capability which distinguishes Swift from all other astrophysics missions is the requirement to slew the spacecraft to acquire the newly discovered GRBs within the field of view of the Narrow-Field Instruments The scientific premium on rapid acquisition is so high as to preclude ground control of the slew request, so the Swift spacecraft must include an onboard decision process to enable an entirely automated response to unplanned slew requests (hence, the Figure of Merit)

14 SpaceOps 2002 FoM FSW Functional Interfaces S/C ATT STATUS PKT SLEW RESPONSE MSG VIEW CONSTRAINT MSG S/C SLEW REQUESTS Ground PPT REQUEST (via SCP) ToO REQUEST (via TDRSS) FoM MGMT CMDS Ground TDRSS MSGs FoM TLM PKTs Figure of Merit task HSKP PKT REQUEST MERIT UPDATE MSG Instr BAT NFIs NEXT OBSERVATION INFO MSG Inst BAT NFIs GRB POSITION MSG

15 SpaceOps 2002 Conclusions Swift Represents A New Class of Missions Requiring Autonomous S/C Repointing Without Ground Intervention –Not Possible For FOT To Be In Loop For Authorizing “Chasing” of GRBs –Onboard FoM FSW Will Manage Autonomous Slews - FOT Reassess and Replans Accordingly Vital That Ground Systems Work With Flight Data Systems Engineers Early-On To Ensure Capabilities Exists For Efficient & Cost-Effective Operations –Every PPT and AT Observation Assigned Unique Observation Number, Allowing for Correlation of Instrument Science Data –Actual Observation Information Downlinked In FoM Housekeeping Essential to Generation of As-Flown Schedule High Level of Automation of Data Processing Pipeline Required To Meet Funding Limits –Close Coordination Required Among Instrument, S/C, Malindi Ground Station, MOC, & SDC Personnel