American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Embedding Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes in Regularly Scheduled Assignments Dr. Larry H. Kelley Auburn, Alabama
Advertisements

Provincial Report Cards Mathematics Grades 1 to 12.
Changes to Assessing and Reporting Shawn Whyte Assessment Coach.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
 Dynamics – Atwood Machines / SBA urses/honors/dynamics/Atwood.html.
Mathematics in the MYP.
Connections to the TPGES Framework for Teaching Domains Student Growth Peer Observation Professional Growth Planning Reflection.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
Middle Years Programme
NMT Gen Ed Learning Objectives An ability to communicate well An ability to reason well An ability to evaluate and apply information Development of analytical.
DEVELOPING DEPARTMENTAL OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLANS Jerry Rackoff Lois Huffines Kathy Martin.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Principles of High Quality Assessment
University of Delaware Introduction to Assessment Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Courtesy of Sue Groh.
Writing Instructional Objectives
How to Write Goals and Objectives
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
University of Delaware Introduction to Assessment Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Contributions by Sue Groh and Hal White.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
KPIs: Definition and Real Examples
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Principles of Assessment
Academy for Student-Centered Learning – Workshop Two Melia Fritch, Shawna Jordan, & Shannon Washburn October 28, 2013 CREATING STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Changes to Assessing and Reporting Shawn Whyte Assessment Coach.
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION. Copyright Keith Morrison, 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT... Concerns direct reality rather than disconnected.
CriteriaExemplary (4 - 5) Good (2 – 3) Needs Improvement (0 – 1) Identifying Problem and Main Objective Initial QuestionsQuestions are probing and help.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) “101”
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Updating Curriculum to Support Learning Davidson County Community College May
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
Threshold Concepts & Assessment Ahmed Alwan, American University of Sharjah Threshold Concepts For Information Literacy: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.
WELCOME TO CE100 Preparing for a Career in Early Childhood Development Unit 3 Class will start at the top of the hour! Please turn the volume up on your.
They must have both  Criteria that will be evaluated  Topic sentence  Developing sentences  Closing sentence  Levels to which the criteria are met.
University Physics: Mechanics
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
Performance-Based Assessment HPHE 3150 Dr. Ayers.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Developing a Useful Instrument to Assess Student Problem Solving Jennifer L. Docktor Ken Heller Physics Education Research & Development Group
Impulse, momentum, and collisions
University Physics: Mechanics
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Creative Intervention Planning through Universal Design for Learning MariBeth Plankers, M.S. CCC-SLP Page 127.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Monitor and Revise Teaching. ObjectivesObjectives Describe how to monitor teaching List ways to contribute to broader evaluations Explain how to review.
Learning Goals Development & Assessment The Basics of Goals-Based Course Design.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Quantitative Reasoning Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
University Physics: Mechanics
University Physics: Mechanics
Introduction to Assessment in PBL
Mathematics Assessment (Math 321 & Math 334)
Writing Rubrics and exemplars
Introduction to Assessment in PBL
Presentation transcript:

American Association of Physics Teachers Alabama Section April 5, 2014 University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama Are they Learning What we Teach? (Closing the loop on student learning) Ali Yazdi, Jefferson State Community College

SACS 2.5 (Part of Core Requirements) The institution engages in ongoing, integrated and institution- wide researched based planning and evaluation processes that: (3) Demonstrate the institution is effectively accomplishing its mission.

 Institutional Effectiveness is the extent to which an institution achieves its mission and goals. Definition of Institutional Effectiveness

 The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of the results in each of the following areas:  Educational programs to include student learning outcomes. SACS 3.3 Institutional Effectiveness

 The focus of Institutional effectiveness has changed from Instructor-focused teaching To Student-focused Learning

 What is student learning outcome?

The knowledge, skills and abilities a student has attained at the end (or as a result) of his or her engagement in a particular set of higher education experiences. Learning Outcomes defined

Outcomes are expressed in terms of knowledge, skills, attitudes or values.

Specific Measurable Attainable Realistic and Results-Oriented Timely SMART SLOs

1.Learner-centered 2.Key to the course/program mission 3.Meaningful (to students and faculty) 4.Measurable 5.All of the above Good learning outcomes are:

Turns colleges from being teacher-centered to be student- and learning centered Assessment

1. Create written statements of measurable SLOs. 2. Choose the evaluation tool. 3. Set standards for levels of performance on each objective (Rubrics) 4. Identify observable factors that provide the basis for assessing which level of performance has been achieved. 5. Evaluate student performance, assemble data, and report results. 6. Use results to improve student learning. Process for measuring SLOs

Heidi Andrade Rubrics have become popular with teachers as a means of communicating expectations for an assignment, providing focused feedback on works in progress, and grading final products. Although educators tend to define the word “rubric” in slightly different ways, Heidi Andrade’s commonly accepted definition is a document that articulates the expectations for an assignment by listing the criteria, or what counts, and describing levels of quality from excellent to poor. Rubrics are often used to grade student work but they can serve another, more important, role as well: Rubrics can teach as well as evaluate. When used as part of a formative, student-centered approach to assessment, rubrics have the potential to help students develop understanding and skill, as well as make dependable judgments about the quality of their own work. Students should be able to use rubrics in many of the same ways that teachers use them—to clarify the standards for a quality performance, and to guide ongoing feedback about progress toward those standards. What is a Rubric?

Rubrics consist of a collection of steps that initiated by the student to take her/him from a Real World problem to a sensible, correct solution. (It is sort of an ALGORITHM) PHYSICS Problem Solving (Example of Rubrics)

Oral and written communication skills Critical thinking skills Mathematical problem-solving Information literacy Technological literacy Social and interpersonal skills Cultural/global/diversity studies General Education outcomes

If it is not documented then it did not happen. Documentation Rule

Learning Outcomes Assessment Implement Rubrics Examining the results Making Adjustment Closing the loop

PHY 213S Assessment Rubric Description of Assessed Objective 3210 Physics approach The physics approach is appropriate and complete The physics approach contains minor omissions or errors Some concepts and principles of the physics approach are missing/or inappropriate Most physics approach is missing and/or inappropriate Specific Applicatio n of physics The specific application of physics is appropriate and complete The specific application of physics contains minor omissions or errors Parts of the specific application of physics are missing and/or contain errors Most of the specific application of physics is missing and/or contains errors Mathematic al procedure The mathematic al procedures are appropriate and complete Appropriate mathematic al procedures are used with minor omissions or errors Parts of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contains errors Most of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contain errors Logical progress The entire solution is clear, focused and logically connected The solution is clear and focused with minor inconsistenci es Parts of the solution are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent Most of the solution parts are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent Totals Instructor analysis: Sample Rubric For Cal-Based PHYSICS I

y Learning Outcome Number 1 Solving Projectile Motion Problems 1.Projectile Motion Question 53 A ball is projected from the origin with initial velocity v o, as shown at the right. The initial speed of the ball is 50 m/s. Assume that. g =10 m/s 2. (a) Determine the x component of the initial velocity? (b) Determine the y component of the initial velocity? (c) Determine the acceleration in the x direction. Ignore air resistance. (d) Determine the acceleration in the y, direction. Ignore air resistance. (e) Complete the table below indicating the position components and the velocity components at one-second time intervals beginning at time zero when the ball leaves the ground. time (s)x velocity (m/s)x position (m)y velocity (m/s)y position (m) (f)Determine the ball's velocity (magnitude and direction) at position A. (g)Determine the ball's velocity (magnitude and direction) at position B just before it hits the ground. A B

Student learning Outcome #1 Solve projectile motion problems Physics approach The physics approach is appropriate and complete The physics approach contains minor omissions or errors Some concepts and principles of the physics approach are missing/or inappropriate Most physics approach is missing and/or inappropriate Specific Application of physics The specific application of physics is appropriate and complete The specific application of physics contains minor omissions or errors Parts of the specific application of physics are missing and/or contain errors Most of the specific application of physics is missing and/or contains errors Mathematical procedure The mathematical procedures are appropriate and complete Appropriate mathematical procedures are used with minor omissions or errors Parts of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contains errors Most of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contain errors Logical progress The entire solution is clear, focused and logically connected The solution is clear and focused with minor inconsistencies Parts of the solution are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent Most of the solution parts are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent Number of students at each level by responses to the questions Question # Instructor analysis: Even if 73% of responses are at levels 3 & 2, more examples of Projectile Motion should be worked out.

2. If α=30 and β=70, and M=5kg, determine the tension in string 2.  αβ M 1.A 5-kg hanging object is connected by a light, inextensible cord over a light, frictionless pulley to a 2.00-kg block that is sliding on a flat table. Taking the coefficient of kinetic friction as 0.3, find the tension in the string. learning Outcome Number 2 State and apply Newton’s 2 nd Law

Student learning Outcome #2 State and apply Newton's second law Physics approach The physics approach is appropriate and complete The physics approach contains minor omissions or errors Some concepts and principles of the physics approach are missing/or inappropriate Most physics approach is missing and/or inappropriate Specific Application of physics The specific application of physics is appropriate and complete The specific application of physics contains minor omissions or errors Parts of the specific application of physics are missing and/or contain errors Most of the specific application of physics is missing and/or contains errors Mathematical procedure The mathematical procedures are appropriate and complete Appropriate mathematical procedures are used with minor omissions or errors Parts of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contains errors Most of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contain errors Logical progressThe entire solution is clear, focused and logically connected The solution is clear and focused with minor inconsistencies Parts of the solution are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent Most of the solution parts are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent Number of students at each level by responses to the questions Question # Question # Instructor analysis: Solving problems of higher degree of difficulty should be more emphasized.

 1. A one-dimensional force is given as follows:  Find the Potential Energy Function for this force.   2. A one-dimensional Potential Energy Function is given as:   Find the magnitude of the force related to this Potential at x=2.  Learning OUTCOME 3 Calculate Potential Energy and Force

Student learning Outcome #3 Calculate potential energy and force Physics approach The physics approach is appropriate and complete The physics approach contains minor omissions or errors Some concepts and principles of the physics approach are missing/or inappropriate Most physics approach is missing and/or inappropriate Specific Application of physics The specific application of physics is appropriate and complete The specific application of physics contains minor omissions or errors Parts of the specific application of physics are missing and/or contain errors Most of the specific application of physics is missing and/or contains errors Mathematical procedure The mathematical procedures are appropriate and complete Appropriate mathematical procedures are used with minor omissions or errors Parts of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contains errors Most of the mathematical procedures are missing and/or contain errors Logical progress The entire solution is clear, focused and logically connected The solution is clear and focused with minor inconsistencies Parts of the solution are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent Most of the solution parts are unclear, unfocused, and/or inconsistent Number of students at each level by responses to the questions Question # Question # Instructor analysis: Relationship between Potential Energy Function and Force is well understood.