RISK AND NEED TRACKS SAMHSA 2013 Orleans Parish Drug Court Expansion Grant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alliance Clinic Mediation Assistant Tx Plus A New Program Design for Dual Diagnosis Patients Enhanced Treatment Program HONOR THE CHALLENGE - EMBRACE THE.
Advertisements

Integrating Risk/Needs Assessment Into Drug Court
Best Practices Standards Vol. I: An Overview. OBJECTIVES  Define Best Practices Standards  Identify the need for Best Practices Standards  Briefly.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
REHAB Milestones Clinical Services Options IOP REHAB Milestones Clinical Services Options IOP Treatment Programs.
Practical Application of the ORAS The Corrections Institute Center for Criminal Justice Research University of Cincinnati.
Working with Young Adults years old
A MERICAN P SYCHOLOGICAL A SSOCIATION 11. Forensic Issues II.
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change Nov. 10, 2010 Lecture James M. Byrne, Professor.
TREATMENT CENTRE.  Principles of treatment  treatment goals - abstinence and harm reduction  Types of treatment  medical treatment  psychological.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Austin American Statesman August 21, 2007 Texas leads nation in number of drunken driving deaths WASHINGTON BUREAU Tuesday, August 21, 2007 WASHINGTON.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change James M. Byrne, Professor March 26,2015.
THE COALITION OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROVIDERS OF NEW JERSEY The Role of Community Resource Centers in Offender Re-entry.
Elmore County Drug and DUI Court
The 10 Key Components of Veteran’s Treatment Court Presented by: The Honorable Robert Russell.
Amethyst, Inc. Amethyst exists to nurture and sustain healthy women and families. We have been providing gender specific and trauma informed alcohol, tobacco.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
For more information contact Alemi at
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Treatment 101 Substance Abuse Basics West Coast Consulting Wanda King
Louisiana Access to Recovery LA-ATR Understanding Addiction & Supporting Recovery Webinar Pastor Pythian Noah June 25, 2009.
‘The courts and prisons’. The Courts: 1.Court Integrated Services Programs (C.I.S.P) 2.Court Referral & Evaluation for Drug Intervention & Treatment Program.
NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES.
Presented by: Cary Heck, Ph.D. University of Wyoming
Risk/Needs Assessment Within the Criminal Justice System.
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Classification and Supervision in Probation and Parole
Evidence-Based Screening Instruments for Co-Occurring Disorders in the Justice System Criminal Justice, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Technical Assistance.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Recovery Support Services and Client Outcomes: What do the Data Tell Us? Recovery Community Services Program Grantee Meeting December 14, 2007.
Assessment of Alcohol-Involved Offenders Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals Treatment Research Institute.
Vermont Treatment Court Dockets Compassion & Accountability ~~~~~ Innovative Practices Conference Vermont Law School November 15, 2013.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
What Makes Drug Courts Effective? Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Recovery Support Services and Client Outcomes: Results of Two Interim Evaluations in Texas College on Problems of Drug College on Problems of Drug Dependence.
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Programs for Drug Offenders.
Treatment for Substance Abusers in the Therapeutic Community.
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania Evidence-Based Dispositions for Drug Offenders.
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Targeting Dispositions by Risks &
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Targeting Dispositions by Risks &
Chapter 14 Prevention and Corrections in the Community 1.
Behavioral Health Integration of Services for Justice Involved Clients Veronica Kelley, LCSW Assistant Director San Bernardino County.
Section 5: Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment 1.
ACCELERATED COMMUNITY ENTRY United States District Court Western District of Michigan Robert Holmes Bell Chief Judge.
Targeting Participants for Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals.
Cleveland Municipal Drug Court: SAMHSA CSAT Adult Treatment Drug Court Grant Dr. Margaret Baughman Madison Wheeler, BS Paul Tuschman, BA Begun.
Foundations of Addictions Counseling, 3/E David Capuzzi & Mark D. Stauffer Copyright © 2016, 2012, 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
Performance Evaluation of Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction.
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Department of Juvenile Justice
A MULTI-TRACK DUI COURT SYSTEM FOR REPEAT OFFENDERS
Why You Need a DUI Court and How to Get Started
Mental Health Services
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D., FCPP
Treatment Court Dockets
Evidence-Based Criminal Justice Reform
Mental Health Services
Addressing dual diagnosis within a residential treatment programme serving women with complex needs Anita Harris.
Marie Crosson, Executive Director
Preliminary Outcomes of the Texas Access to Recovery Project
Annals of Research and Knowledge (ARK)
Coconino County Recovery Court
Presentation transcript:

RISK AND NEED TRACKS SAMHSA 2013 Orleans Parish Drug Court Expansion Grant

ORLEANS PARISH OUTCOMES COULD CHANGE DRUG COURT STATUTE TO INCLUDE INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT Goals and Benefits

Increase and Improve Access Availability eligibility screening assessment treatment types group types, intervention types modalities programming for men and women individualized treatment provide lower recidivism rates higher retention rates promote public safety individual trauma counseling transportation services childcare vocational training GOALS:

Benefits of Drug Court Track System Increased retention and graduation rates Reduced recidivism Self-efficacy Empowerment Sustainable employment Employment skills Increase in physical and mental health Access to health care Enhanced parenting skills Family relationships Trauma symptom reduction No More One Size Fits All Treatment

Current Process vs Process after Grant Implementation Current Process Intake Screening Form DAST Intake/Accepted into Drug Court Addiction Severity Index Gender Specific Treatment Groups After Grant Implementation Intake Screenin g Form TCUD S-II Nursing Assessmen t RANT Specialized Risk/Need Treatment Tracks Four Question PTSD Screener PCL-C SLES Q Helping Women Recover and Helping Men Recover Curriculum MHSF -III Psychiatric Evaluation Intake/ Accepted into Drug Court Addiction Severity Index Gender Specific Tretment Groups

2 DESIGNATED SCREENING AND INTAKE COUNSELORS ADDED ASSESSMENTS TO CREATE INDIVIDUALIZED CASE MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT PLANS Screening and Assessment

Screening Court calls for screening prior to sentencing Intake counselor screens for eligibility Risk and Needs Assessment Triage (RANT) Screening completed in the DCCM Outcome: Individualized Case Management Plan: GED Housing Medicaid

Assessment Intake completed in DCCM and GPRA Mental Health Screening Trauma Screening TCU-Drug Abuse Screening Addiction Severity Index (ASI) Outcome: Individualized Treatment Plan: Psych Evaluation (onsite Psychiatrist) Nursing Assessment (onsite nurse) Individual Counseling (onsite trauma therapists) Personalized Treatment Track (Risk and Need) Grief Counseling Anger Management Parenting Groups (NOLA DADS)

HIGH RISK/HIGH NEED HIGH RISK/LOW NEED LOW RISK/HIGH NEED LOW RISK/LOW NEED Risk and Need Tracks

RISK Need Prognostic Risk Re-Offending Career Criminal Revolving Door Criminogenic Need Substance Dependence Rehabilitation Sobriety Risk and Need

Risk and Need Quadrants Standard Drug Court Track (10 Key Components)  Status Calendar  Intensive Treatment  Compliance is proximal  Restrictive Consequences  Focus consequences on treatment and supervision Specialized Track (Treatment emphasis)  Noncompliance calendar  Intensive treatment  Treatment is proximal  Focus consequences on treatment Specialized Track (Accountability emphasis)  Status Calendar  Pro-social rehabilitation  Prevention Services  Abstinence & compliance are proximal Specialized Track (Diversion emphasis)  Noncompliance calendar  Prevention services  Focus consequences on abstinence HighLow High Low

High Risk/ High Need (Standard Drug Court Track) Scheduled Status Hearing with the Judge Intensive Outpatient Treatment with FSGNO Consequences for treatment and supervision Compliance is a proximal goal Graduation Sanction/restrictive consequences Prescribed Medication allowed Generally Substance Dependent Possess antisocial personality features Prior failures in treatment Early onset of Substance Use Unable to be a good parent, hold a job, or attend school Will need vocational skills training’ Treatment and Supervision attendance are proximal goals (short term) Sanctions should be immediate for missing treatment or supervision Before sanctioning for new drug use they need time to be in treatment Response to positive drug tests should be treatment oriented

High Risk/Low Need (Emphasis on Accountability) Scheduled Status Hearing with the Judge Pro-Social Rehabilitation (People, Places & Things) Prevention Services Abstinence and Compliance are proximal Need Social Skills Training and Accountability with close monitoring Scheduled Status Hearings-Judge to monitor and sanction due to high risk of noncompliance with monitoring May not meet dependence criteria and Intensive treatment option may put them at more risk for exposure to drug use Psycho educational groups to provide education of negative effects of drugs and alcohol Education to help re-enter society without drug and alcohol Abstinence and Compliance are short term and attainable goals-sanctions needed for missing treatment and supervision.

Low Risk/High Need (Emphasis on Treatment) Status Hearings only for noncompliance Intensive Outpatient Treatment with FSGNO Consequences focused on treatment Treatment is a proximal goal Prescribed medication allowed Substance Dependant Mental Illness Poor Coping Skills Need Intensive Treatment and Supportive Intervention Regular status hearings are not necessary because they may expose them to high risk behaviors Quick and immediate sanctions are a must Monthly Status Hearings are acceptable Must be in separate groups from High Risk offenders Need vocational and educational services Poor attendance should get a immediate judicial sanction Relapse is a distal goal (long term)-should get a treatment sanction

Low Risk/Low Need Status Hearing for noncompliance Prevention Services Consequences are focused on abstinence Usually productive in life (work, school, parenting) Combining them with HRHN (Drug Court) would expose them to antisocial behavior No scheduled status hearings are necessary-only noncompliance May not require Intensive Outpatient Groups May need psycho educational groups or less intensive treatment Abstinence is a proximal (short term) goal-immediate sanction Treatment plan should include prevention

DRUG COURT VERSUS INTENSIVE PROBATION Who is Eligible???

Drug Court AND Intensive Probation Current Drug Court clients Substance Dependant Active Probation Minimum 3 years probation Current IP clients May be substance dependant May be recreational user Dealers Active/Inactive Probation Eligibility

INTENSIVE PROBATION BECOMES DRUG COURT Program Outline

Currently Options Defendants sentenced to Drug Court receive ALL of the afore mentioned services inclusive of individualized treatment. Defendants sentenced to Intensive Probation receive case management and are NOT ELIGIBLE for any of the afore mentioned services available through the SAMHSA Grant. Defendants that need case management would be sentenced to Court Intervention Services and screened for a treatment track. Cases that would fall into the traditional Drug Court track (High Risk/High Need) will be re-alloted to a felony Drug Court Section and the High Risk/Low Need track would be transferred to Section C for supervision. All others will remain in their sentencing section to be monitored by the Case manager assigned to that track. Drug Court Umbrella