Transportation Conformity in North Carolina. Transportation Planning Framework Required by NCGS §136 ‑ 66.2. In MPOs, includes 20 year fiscally constrained.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP Development Process Overview For the Great Smoky Mountain National Park Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe,
Advertisements

SIP Development Process Overview For Rocky Mount Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
SIP Development Process Overview For Metrolina Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
SIP Development Process Overview For Hickory Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
Overview of the Mountain Area Transportation Conformity Process.
Overview of the Transportation Conformity Process.
SIP Development Process Overview For Triad Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ Eddie.
Isolated Rural Areas US EPA Conformity Training Summer 2004 Eddie Dancausse FHWA NC Division x112
Transportation Conformity Basics. What is Transportation Conformity? Transportation conformity (conformity) is a way to ensure that Federal funding and.
Transportation Conformity Basics Eddie Dancausse FHWA NC Division x112
Clean Air Act (CAA) -Drafted in 1963 and amendments added in 1965, 1970, 1977, and Legislation on a national level -Regulated by the Federal Government.
Transportation Planning for Federal Land Management Agencies (FLMAs) SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006 SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006.
1 SAFETEA-LU Changes to the Transportation Conformity Rule February 21, 2008.
Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Overview and Considering Greenhouse Gas Emissions in MTC’s 2035 RTP Joan Sollenberger, Chief Lisa Klein Division of.
Tribal Transportation Improvement Program (TTIP) Tribal Transportation Planning U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration November,
Session 7: Other Conformity Rule Changes FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
Public Participation Advisory Committee February 25, 2015.
Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Transit Urban Roundtable September 30,
Transportation and Air Quality in the Treasure Valley.
State of Connecticut Department of Transportation TRANSPORTATION IN THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT The Transportation Planning Process June 2007.
Project Delivery and ODOT’s Air Program & Air Quality Updates Geo-Environmental Conference Presented by: Natalie Liljenwall, ODOT Air Quality April 22,
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Transportation & Air Quality Planning AMPO MPO Educational Series November 8,
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
UNLOCK THE MYSTERIES TO AIR QUALITY Bernadette Dupont, FHWA-KY June 2007.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
2015 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Transportation Conformity Wade Hobbs FHWA CADO January 15, 2014.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
© Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1 Programmatic New Source Review November 2, 2005 Malcolm C. Weiss Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1900 Avenue.
SIP Development and Implementation in New Mexico - and Why it Matters to Tribes Rita Bates Planning Section Chief Air Quality Bureau New Mexico Environment.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
Introduction to the Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process MPO 101 Michigan Transportation Planning Association 35 th Annual Conference July 14,
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 1 Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program.
Presentation for Air Quality Coalitions The 2015 Proposed Ozone Standard.
Early Action Compacts Presented by Karen Borel EPA Region 4 March 25, 2003.
Noise & Air Quality NEPA Class September 2015 Office of Environmental Services Noel Alcala, PE, Noise and Air Quality Coordinator Noise & Air Quality NEPA.
May 21, 2008 Bringing Transit Planning to the MPO Planning Table Bringing Transit Planning To The MPO Planning Table Daniel Rudge.
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
Consulting with Idaho Tribes in Planning Transportation Development 14 th Annual NW Tribal Transportation Symposium Patti Raino, ITD.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Conformity Determination Graciela Lubertino, PhD November 7, 2012.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.
U.S. Department of Transportation Planning Certification Review National Capital Region Transportation Management Area TPB Tech Committee Briefing March.
Planning for Clean Air: An Introduction to the “SIP Process” SIP 101.
Clean air act Drafted in 1963 Amended in 1963, 1965, 1970, 1977, 1990 It is national.
Clean Air Act The law that defines EPA's responsibilities for protecting and improving the nation's air quality and the stratospheric ozone layer. Draft.
Keeping Our Air Clean Local and Regional Strategies to Improve Air Quality in Chittenden County Presentation to: CCMPO – February 17, 2010.
Air Quality, Transportation Conformity, and the FSTIP FTIP/FSTIP Workshop February 9, 2016.
Session 3: When Do You Do Conformity? FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
War of the Forecasts: Model vs Project Dan Thomas, P.E. NCDOT - Transportation Planning Branch March 6, 2008 Tennessee Model Users Group.
HANDOUT 2017 FSTIP Development Workshop Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Requirements Wade Hobbs Federal Highway Administration California.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING PROCEDURES FOR REVISIONS STATEWIDE AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS (STIP & TIP) State of Alabama Department.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
The Air Pollution Control Act of 1955
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
The Clean Air Act By Jessi Walker Per 2.
Transportation Improvement Program and Air Quality Conformity Analysis
Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Transit
Uinta Basin General Conformity
Presentation transcript:

Transportation Conformity in North Carolina

Transportation Planning Framework Required by NCGS §136 ‑ In MPOs, includes 20 year fiscally constrained LRTP and any additional projects (illustrative or vision) required to address transportation deficiencies Developed by MPOs and submitted to FHWA, includes fiscal constraint. Transportation conformity is demonstrated on the LRTP Year Comprehensive Transportation Plan 20-Year MPO Long Range Transportation Plan 10-Year Program & Resource Plan (5 Year Plan & STIP) 4-YearSTIP/TIP Approved by Feds FHWA Approval of STIP (including MPO TIPs) and conformity determinations for non-attainment areas NCDOT Adoption, including all projects, programs and services (and full STIP)

The Clean Air Act (CAA) Sets the framework and goals for improving air quality to protect public health Sets provisions for the attainment and maintenance of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) In North Carolina, the pollutants of concern are Ozone (O 3 ), carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) Ensures that the State Implementation Plan (SIP) meets goals to protect human health, coordinates transportation and air quality planning processes and improves data and planning assumptions

Conformity Basics

What is Transportation Conformity? A process that ensures that Federal funding and approval goes to transportation projects that are consistent with air quality goals It applies in areas where transportation-related pollutants: Are currently violating the NAAQS Have violated the NAAQS in the past It’s a way to meet CAA requirements and ensure that transportation plans, programs and projects do not: Create new violations of the NAAQS Increase the frequency or severity of NAAQS violations Delay timely attainment of the NAAQS

Transportation Conformity… Connects air quality and transportation planning SIP Transportation Plan & TIP CONFORMITY

Transportation Conformity… Applies to Long Range Transportation Plans (LRTPs) Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs) Projects funded by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in nonattainment or maintenance areas

Conformity Determination Frequency For existing nonattainment or maintenance areas: Every four years Whenever an LRTP or TIP is updated For newly designated areas: Within one year after the effective date of designation

Who Makes a Conformity Determination? Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) In metropolitan areas North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Areas outside of MPOs called Donut Areas Federal Highway Administration – Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division Federal Lands such as the Great Smoky Mountains National Park

Who Else is Involved in the Conformity Process? Interagency consultation process involves many groups: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Federal Transit Administration (FTA) NC Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) Rural Planning Organizations (RPOs) NC Division of Air Quality (NCDAQ) Other Local Transportation or Air Quality Agencies

How is conformity determined? Regional emissions analysis Performed to show that the transportation plans/TIPs are consistent with the SIP motor vehicle emissions budgets Must include all regionally significant projects and Federally-funded projects

How is conformity determined? Regionally significant projects Transportation projects that serve regional transportation needs Major activity centers Major planned developments New retail malls Sports complexes Transportation terminals Principal arterials All fixed guide way transit facilities The MPO/RPO/NCDOT determines what projects are regionally significant The interagency consultation partners review the list and negotiate agreement on list of regionally significant projects

What if conformity determination cannot be made? The use of Federal aid funds is stopped Impacts design work, right-of-way acquisition, construction, permitting and approval of environmental documents

What initiates the need for a conformity determination? Designation of a new non-attainment area Must be made within one year after designation Adoption or amendment of a LRTP Adoption or amendment of a local TIP or Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Modification to the SIP End of the four-year required update clock

When Do The Requirements for Transportation Conformity End? After a nonattainment area is redesignated to a maintenance area AND maintenance area has successfully performed conformity for a minimum 20 year period

Maintenance Areas in NC 8-Hour Ozone Metrolina: Cabarrus, Gaston, Iredell(p), Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Rowan, Union Triangle: Chatham(p), Durham, Franklin, Granville, Johnston, Orange, Person, Wake Rocky Mount: Edgecombe and Nash Great Smoky Mountain National Park: National Park Boundary of Haywood and Swain

Maintenance Areas in NC CO Metrolina: Mecklenburg Triangle: Durham and Wake Triad: Forsyth PM 2.5 Triad: Guilford and Davidson Hickory: Catawba

Conformity Process

Long Range Transportation Plan  Developed by the MPO (2 to 4 year process) Transportation Advisory Committee endorsement of LRTP pending conformity determination Conformity work begins at year 3 of this process

Interagency Consultation Meeting Lead by MPO/NCDOT/FHWA MPO, RPO, Local AQ Agency, NCDOT, NCDAQ, FHWA, EPA, FTA Consensus Plan documents conformity parameters LRTP horizon years, conformity analysis years, Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets, mobile model, Travel Demand Model, non- modeled area analysis, etc. Conformity schedule

Transportation Modeling Model run by MPO and/or NCDOT 70 Days Travel Demand Model (TDM) Extract Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Speeds Used to develop emission factors

Emission Factor Development Mobile Model Run by NCDAQ 15 Days

Draft Conformity Determination Report (CDR) Report is drafted by MPO and NCDOT Report Generation takes approx. 10 Days

Review and Comment of Draft CDR NCDAQ Reviews the report 21 Days Mandated by State Law Document is also reviewed by EPA, FHWA, FTA, Local Air Quality Agency, RPO and NCDOT Major conformity issues addressed/resolved

Final Conformity Determination Report Interagency Consultation Meeting between FHWA, NCDOT, and MPO Discuss review comments and agency responses Issue resolution “Clean” review letter provided by NCDAQ Final CDR is written by MPO and NCDOT Adds about 5 Days to the schedule

Final CDR Public Review and Comment Period Hosted by MPO and RPO 30 Day Minimum Address comments and document responses Interagency Consultation Meeting (if necessary) (MPO/NCDOT/FHWA) MPO TAC makes conformity determination and adopts LRTP/TIP (MPO/NCDOT)

Federal Review of Final CDR and LRTP Reviewed by FHWA, EPA, and FTA 30 Days “Clean” Review Letter ( EPA ) USDOT Conformity Determination (FTA/FHWA) Process Complete 9 to 12 months