Overview of Program Evaluation Program Evaluation Basics Webinar Series Mary E. Arnold, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Youth Development Specialist Oregon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Evaluation Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines
Advertisements

Cathy Jordan, PhD Associate Professor of Pediatrics Director, Children, Youth and Family Consortium University of Minnesota Member, Community Campus Partnerships.
Impact of the HEARTH Act on Metro Denver Homeless Planning John Parvensky President Colorado Coalition for the Homeless.
Chapter 1: An Overview of Program Evaluation Presenter: Stephanie Peterson.
IRB 101: Introduction to Human Subject Research
Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research Chapter 6.
Introduction to Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice
By Dean C. Ludwig, Ph.D. Chair and Professor of Business and Leadership Studies Lourdes College, Sylvania, OH 2011 IACBE Annual Conference, Las Vegas.
Making a Powerful IMPACT: How to write impact statements that count. Whitney Cherry, Calhoun County Yolanda Goode, Gadsden County.
Camping & Environmental Education Institute 2/25/15
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Approaches to Board Development Thomas P. Holland, Ph.D., Professor Institute for Nonprofit Organizations University of Georgia Athens, Ga
Research and AWC Faculty Seminar, February 19, 2009, Mary Schaal, M.Ed.
The issue of scholarship in VET institutions delivering higher education Denise Stevens.
Program Evaluation & Research In Service-Learning Service-Learning Mini-Institute Lynn E. Pelco, Ph.D. Division of Community Engagement.
Program Evaluation EDL 832 Jeffrey Oescher, Instructor 6 June 2013.
The Scholarship of Civic Engagement Adapted from a presentation by Robert G. Bringle Director, Center for Service and Learning Indiana University-Purdue.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Locating and Reviewing Related Literature Chapter 3 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright.
ScholarSHIP “Undergraduate Research at Shippensburg University”
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF ADDING THE RECLAIMING FUTURES APPROACH TO JUVENILE TREATMENT DRUG COURTS: RECLAIMING FUTURES/JUVENILE DRUG COURT EVALUATION Josephine.
Chapter 3 Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Locating and Reviewing Related Literature This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright.
The Human Subjects Institutional Review Board Workshop Part 1: An Introduction to Human Subjects Research Ethics and the IRB Process Presented by Alena.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? Merle Rosenzweig Michael Unsworth.
Protecting Human Participants in Your Research and Classroom Projects NAU Institutional Review Board
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
1 Ambulatory Pediatric Association Educational Guidelines for Pediatric Residency Tutorial 6 Source: Kittredge, D., Baldwin, C. D., Bar-on, M. E., Beach,
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
Dr. Lesley Farmer California State University Long Beach
 Lunch and Learn April 22, 2015 Office of Human Research.
Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches
Telling your story: the promotion dossier Cathy Jordan, Ph.D., LP Director - Children, Youth and Family Consortium Associate Professor of Pediatrics and.
Annual Report. Submission of UCEDD Annual Report DD Act: required each center to submit annual report to the Secretary (ADD) DD Act: required each center.
Planning and Focusing an Evaluation Program Evaluation Basics Webinar Series Mary E. Arnold, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Youth Development Specialist.
CA COUNTY PEER QUALITY CASE REVIEW (Insert Review Week Dates)
Our Community: THINGS ARE JUST NOT THE SAME!. UNIT SUMMARY: Children are often under the impression that the way things are in their world is the way.
Human Subjects Review: Policies and Procedures. Why A Human Subjects Review? It is the policy of this University that all researchers undertaking studies.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
Writing Describe a problem in education. What is the significance of this issue? What would you like to know about this problem? Who else is interested.
CSD 5100 Introduction to Research Methods in CSD Where To Begin?? Selecting the Research Problem Identification of a topic Framing a research problem Research.
Week 2 The lecture for this week is designed to provide students with a general overview of 1) quantitative/qualitative research strategies and 2) 21st.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
AAHRPP ACCREDITATION (Association for the Accreditation of Human Protection Programs)
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
PEER Module 4: Research & Evaluation Questions
When Do I Need Ethics Board Approval? George Schmid, M.D., M.Sc. World Health Organization/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
SCHOLARSHIP Teaching Faculty members are responsible for teaching effectively by employing useful methods and approaches that facilitate learning. Faculty.
Tutorial 1 Dr. Oscar Lin School of Computing and Information Systems Faculty of Science and Technology Athabasca University January 18, 2011.
IRB – Investigator/Research Coordinators Monthly Meeting Gerald D. Fischbach, M.D. Executive Vice President for Health and Biomedical Sciences and Dean.
A Novel Approach to Mandatory Resident Scholarly Activities Carly Eastin, MD, Travis Eastin, MD, MS, Lee Wilbur, MD, Rawle Seupaul, MD Department of Emergency.
Does My Project Require HRPP/IRB Review? Research Human Subject Engagement HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM (HRPP) OFFICE.
RESEARCH IN THE RESIDENCY. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education EFFECTIVE 7/1/2007 Common Program Requirements (FOR ALL RESIDENCIES)
Northwestern Family Medicine Residency & Erie Family Health Center
Human subjects protections and the IRb
Role of The Physical Therapist in Critical Inquiry
Introduction to IRB (Institutional Review Board)
MUHC Innovation Model.
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING-I ACCT 2003
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE
Ross O. Love Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service
Be an Effective Council Member
What are the Role & Purview of the IRB?
Does My Project Require HRPP/IRB Review?
Making a Powerful IMPACT:
Role of The Physical Therapist in Critical Inquiry
HLC Update: Progress and Preparation for the Visit
Human subjects protections and the IRb
Does My Project Require HRPP/IRB Review?
Research Compliance: Protections for Research Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Program Evaluation Program Evaluation Basics Webinar Series Mary E. Arnold, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Youth Development Specialist Oregon State University 4-H Professional Development Webinar October 11, 2012

Overview of Program Evaluation Let’s start at the very beginning- a very good place to start Goals for Today’s Webinar 1.Learn a basic history of youth program evaluation 2.Learn reasons for conducting evaluations 3.Learn the different levels of evaluation 4.Learn Bennett’s Hierarchy- an well known Extension evaluation model 5.Learn different evaluation purposes 6.Learn the steps of the evaluation process 7.Review expectations for evaluation for OSU Extension 8.Review expectations for compliance with OSU’s Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Arnold, M. E. & Cater, M. (2011). From then to now: Emerging directions for youth program evaluation. Journal of Youth Development, 6(3). On-line: Article NO:110603FA005. A Brief History of Youth Program Evaluation Publications related to youth program evaluation have flourished in the past 10 years; 20 years ago there was very little to be found The evaluation field as a whole is only now approaching 40 years 1960s saw rise to federally mandated (and funded) evaluations Evaluation results were poor, and had little effect on program expansions or reductions This gave rise to methodological critiques Focus on rigor- experimental design to measure outcomes The importance of qualitative methods to understand the “human” side of social programs And, add in the developmental influences at play in youth programs

*** Carnegie Council on Youth Development (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21 st century. Washington, DC: Author. Youth Development Program Evaluation Began in the late 1800s Focused on success stories – it was the right thing to do! 1980s dawn of the age of accountability Late 1980s youth development programs emerged as different from intervention programs, with different outcomes*** for youth: Intellectually reflective (we might call this critical thinking today) Enroute to a life of meaningful work Good citizens Caring and ethical Healthy Even so, first efforts were focused on “reach” and participant satisfaction Finally, emerged an emphasis on demonstrating impact Poll # 1: What has been the primary focus of evaluations you have done?

Why Do We Evaluate? Help others understand the program (stakeholders) Understand the need for a program Improve the program Improve teaching Understand the program’s impact Determine if the program is progressing as planned Determine if the program is worth the cost Meet grant reporting criteria Meet administrative requirements Poll # 2: Why do you evaluate your programs?

Tiers of Program Evaluation Adapted From:Weiss, H. B. & Jacobs, F. H. (1988). Evaluating Family Programs. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

“Bennett’s Hierarchy” Bennett, C. (1975). Up the hierarchy. Journal of Extension. PDF available at: 2-a1.pdfhttp:// 2-a1.pdf

Types of Evaluation Planning Evaluation (Needs Assessment) Process Evaluation Evaluability Evaluation Outcome Evaluation Efficiency Evaluation Garber, P.A., & Grinnell, R. M. (1994). Evaluation and Quality Improvement. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Poll # 3: What types of evaluations have you done?

The Steps of a Program Evaluation Forming an Evaluation Team Developing Evaluation Questions Gathering Data Conducting Data Analysis Interpreting Evaluation Results Sharing Results Taking Action

The Steps of a Program Evaluation Forming an Evaluation Team Developing Evaluation Questions Gathering Data Conducting Data Analysis Interpreting Evaluation Results Sharing Results Taking Action

The Steps of a Program Evaluation Forming an Evaluation Team Developing Evaluation Questions Gathering Data Conducting Data Analysis Interpreting Evaluation Results Sharing Results Taking Action

The Steps of a Program Evaluation Forming an Evaluation Team Developing Evaluation Questions Gathering Data Conducting Data Analysis Interpreting Evaluation Results Sharing Results Taking Action

The Steps of a Program Evaluation Forming an Evaluation Team Developing Evaluation Questions Gathering Data Conducting Data Analysis Interpreting Evaluation Results Sharing Results Taking Action

The Steps of a Program Evaluation Forming an Evaluation Team Developing Evaluation Questions Gathering Data Conducting Data Analysis Interpreting Evaluation Results Sharing Results Taking Action

The Steps of a Program Evaluation Forming an Evaluation Team Developing Evaluation Questions Gathering Data Conducting Data Analysis Interpreting Evaluation Results Sharing Results Taking Action

The Steps of a Program Evaluation Forming an Evaluation Team Developing Evaluation Questions Gathering Data Conducting Data Analysis Interpreting Evaluation Results Sharing Results Taking Action

Program Evaluation Expectations ALL Extension faculty members must: Document measurable program outcomes on at lest one priority educational effort annually through an impact statement in SOARS This expectation takes into account the faculty member’s length of service, rank and experience in current assignment For those who have scholarship in their position description, evaluation efforts often lead to scholarly production (conference presentations, journal articles, etc.) Poll # 4: What is the primary reason you have conducted program evaluations in the past 3 years?

Institutional Review Board (IRB) AKA… Do I have to do that? Research is determined by three qualities: 1.Systematic inquiry into a phenomena 2.That is designed to develop or contribute 3.Generalizable knowledge Human Subjects Are: Living individuals about whom an investigator conducting research obtains: 1.Data through an intervention or interaction with the individual, or 2.Identifiable private information

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Okay, I have to do it… now what? Go to the IRB Website at: 1.Complete the “Does Your Study Require IRB Review? Form 2.Complete online ethics training modules 3.Complete the steps listing under “Preparing and Initial Submission” at initial-submission

That’s all for now! Join in next month for: Program Planning for Effective Program Evaluation That’s all for now! Join in next month for: Program Planning for Effective Program Evaluation Don’t forget to complete an evaluation of today’s webinar at: