  Institutional Support Expenditures divided by Total Operating Expense - Auxiliary Exp.   According to the Legislative Budget Board: “provides an.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UT San Antonio PeopleSoft Project September 2010.
Advertisements

The University of Texas System FY 2007 Operating Budget Presented to the Board of Regents August 2006.
Texas State University-San Marcos FY 2009 Budget Allocations New Funds Available $ 15,027,767 (Sources: Enrollment increase and tuition increase)
Operating Budget Overview Presented to the Tuition and Fee Committee November 13, 2009 Presented to the Tuition and Fee Committee November 13, 2009.
Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Cost Recovery Report April 22, 2009 Carol Hollingsworth, Director, Grants & Contracts Financial Services & Janet Parker,
1 General Budget Information Training for Fiscally Fit Program.
Financial Affairs ….and such! Jan 2014 TWU’s Account Structure General Ledger Account xxxx Segment  10  100  30  1580  xxxx.
ACBO Fall Conference October 22, 2012 Presented by: Warren Kinsler – Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud and Romo Fred Williams – North Orange County CCD Ann-Marie.
1 Tuition Policy Advisory Committee September 16, 2004.
FINANCIAL LIAISON MEETING February 16, Property Management John Asmuth Property Services.
Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget Presented by: Mary Simon Sr. Director Budget and Planning Development.
The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National Reputation By Successfully Serving its Region The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National.
1 Overview of NACUBO Cost of College Model January 7, 2004 Presented by: Nancy D. Suttenfield Vice Chancellor for Finance and Administration.
Title Page Rozzie Gerstman May 15, Overview of Presentation.
1 State Budget and its Impacts on Mines Faculty Conference August 23, 2010 Kirsten M. Volpi, CPA Senior Vice President for Finance and Administration.
Budget Training The University of Montana 2010/2011 Session I The Budget Environment.
An Educational Computer Based Training Program CBTCBT.
Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Cost Recovery March 5, 2009.
Overview of Rate Calculation TWO COST GROUPS: DIRECT COSTS INDIRECT COSTS FACILITIES ADMINISTRATION.
University of Texas at San Antonio Chart of Accounts Fund Groups Presentation.
Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget
2   Institutional Support Expenditures divided by Total Operating Expense   According to the Legislative Budget Board: “provides an indicator of the.
9/25/2013. AGENDA  Introduction & General Overview  F&A Definition and Category Application  Application of F&A Cost Rates  The Distribution Basis.
Tuition-Designated Fees University of Texas at San Antonio.
A Primer on The University of Texas at Austin Budget Fiscal Year
2008 Budget Forum 2008 BUDGET FORUM Larry A. Nielsen Provost Executive Vice Chancellor Charles D. Leffler Vice Chancellor Finance & Business Terri Lomax.
Kuali Financial Systems – Financial Administrator Development Series - October, 2006 Fund Accounting.
What Every Departmental Administrator Needs to Know about F&A Proposals Diane Winter, University of Michigan Julie Jarvis, University of Illinois.
New Sub-Account 69  Effective 6/1/10 use Sub-Account 69 Operation and Maintenance (O & M) of Plant for work order requests.  Why: To properly account.
Learn from the past, prepare for the future, live in the present Thomas S. Monson Re-focus, Re-invest and Re-invent.
The board of each community college district shall within or before the first quarter of each fiscal year, adopt an annual budget which it deems necessary.
PRESENTATION TO FACILITIES INFORMATION SYSTEM USERS OCTOBER 2013 CORPORATE CONTROLLER’S OFFICE JODY MURAWSKI COST ANALYSIS BEVERLY LIPSKI, BILL RIDGWAY.
Clemson University- Budgeting. Why Bother to Budget? Plan that helps identify known and anticipated financial problems Needs generally always greater.
 The Facilities and Administrative Rate (F&A Rate) is the mechanism used to reimburse the University for the infrastructure support costs associated.
Current Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Distribution Faculty Senate January 19, 2011 Jim Rankin.
Function Codes in the General Ledger University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
UT San Antonio PeopleSoft Project September 2010.
1 The University of Texas at San Antonio Presented by Accounting Services Training Class - Understanding the Statement of Account and Reconciliation (AM506)
Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi The TAMUCC Budget Where does the $ come from and how do we spend it?
Datatel Accounts Consist of 15 numbers, the first 10 are the cost center, the last 5 are the type of revenue or expense.
University of Washington Tacoma Budget Presentation May, 2014.
SAN JACINTO COLLEGE DISTRICT BUDGET HEARING AUGUST 3, 2009 PROPOSED BUDGET
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
A Primer on The University of Texas at Austin Budget Fiscal Year
Budget Forum February Where the State Dollar Comes From (general funds) – FY16 $13.1 Billion.
1 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA Operating Budget Presentation.
Accounting At Indiana University Kathleen T. McNeely Associate Vice President Financial Management Services.
F UNCTION /NACUBO C ODES – W HAT ARE T HEY AND W HY ARE T HEY I MPORTANT ? May 25, 2016 Sheri Hardison, Asst. VP for Financial Affairs & Controller May.
The University of Texas Pan American Designated Tuition Increase Proposal Fiscal Year 2006 Starting September 1, 2005.
University Budget Process Stability of revenue sources compared to most businesses Role of financial statement- financial accounting at one point Operational.
Chart of Accounts The Function Chartfield
HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE AND BUDGETING May 2017
Update: UMKC Spending, Staffing and Benefits /16
Developing a Housing Operational Budget Kay Sisco, Budget Director, University of Tennessee- Knoxville Stina Schoneck, Assoc. Dir. Of Finance,
Business Managers Meeting November 3, 2016
Agenda Faculty Fringe Summer Reallocation Salary Encumbrances
Enhancing Budget Literacy & Building the Proposed FY18 Budget
A Primer on The University Budget Fiscal Year
PROGs at Oregon State University
University Budget and Marginal Cost Components
Function Codes in the General Ledger
Fiscal Management.
San Jacinto College District Budget Hearing August 3, 2009
Program Code Update for FY2019
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
Chart of Accounts The Function Chartfield
Michael McKee | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Budgeting and Financial Management
SPACE II Presentation to Facilities Information System Users Fall 2005
Budget Background and FY 2020 Budget Proposal
Presentation transcript:

  Institutional Support Expenditures divided by Total Operating Expense - Auxiliary Exp.   According to the Legislative Budget Board: “provides an indicator of the proportion of operating budget being spent on administrative costs.”   Institutional Support Expenditures divided by Total Operating Expense - Auxiliary Exp.   According to the Legislative Budget Board: “provides an indicator of the proportion of operating budget being spent on administrative costs.” 2

  Institutional Support is a functional expense classification defined by NACUBO (National Association College & University Business Officers) used to allocate costs between higher education activities. As reported on the AFR, it tells the reader “why” an expense was incurred as opposed to “what” was purchased. 3

Institutional Support includes:   Executive Management – President, VPs & their staff including operations related to planning & legal   Fiscal Operations – Accounting, Bursar and bad debt expense from loans but not from receivables   General Administration– HR, Purchasing, etc.   Administrative Information Technology   Public Relations/Development Institutional Support includes:   Executive Management – President, VPs & their staff including operations related to planning & legal   Fiscal Operations – Accounting, Bursar and bad debt expense from loans but not from receivables   General Administration– HR, Purchasing, etc.   Administrative Information Technology   Public Relations/Development 4

 Instruction – costs  Instruction – costs directly related to instructional mission (includes department chairs).  Academic Support  Academic Support – includes dean’s offices & library, museums, academic computing & advising.  Research  Research– includes expenses for activities specifically organized to produce research whether internal (separately budgeted) or externally funded. Includes institutes and research centers.  Public Service  Public Service – non instructional activities to external groups. Includes conferences, institutes, consulting & general advisory services.  Instruction – costs  Instruction – costs directly related to instructional mission (includes department chairs).  Academic Support  Academic Support – includes dean’s offices & library, museums, academic computing & advising.  Research  Research– includes expenses for activities specifically organized to produce research whether internal (separately budgeted) or externally funded. Includes institutes and research centers.  Public Service  Public Service – non instructional activities to external groups. Includes conferences, institutes, consulting & general advisory services. 5

 Student Services –  Student Services – costs that have the primary purpose of contributing to students’ emotional and physical well being and intellectual, cultural & social development (outside the context of the formal instructional program.) Includes admissions & records, student IT, student health, counseling & career guidance, student activities, financial aid administration. Does not include intercollegiate athletics programs as those must be identified as an Auxiliary Enterprise by Texas law.  Student Services –  Student Services – costs that have the primary purpose of contributing to students’ emotional and physical well being and intellectual, cultural & social development (outside the context of the formal instructional program.) Includes admissions & records, student IT, student health, counseling & career guidance, student activities, financial aid administration. Does not include intercollegiate athletics programs as those must be identified as an Auxiliary Enterprise by Texas law. 6

 Operation & Maintenance of Plant – includes  Operation & Maintenance of Plant – includes administrative costs, building maintenance, custodial, utilities, landscape / grounds, repair & renovation, security & safety (police, disaster preparedness, environmental health & safety, etc.), logistical services (central receiving, stores) and facilities related IT.  Scholarships & Fellowships  Auxiliary Enterprises– self supporting entities  Auxiliary Enterprises– self supporting entities to furnish goods or services to students, faculty, staff or incidentally to the general public; includes food services, athletics, residence halls and all related administrative expenses.  Operation & Maintenance of Plant – includes  Operation & Maintenance of Plant – includes administrative costs, building maintenance, custodial, utilities, landscape / grounds, repair & renovation, security & safety (police, disaster preparedness, environmental health & safety, etc.), logistical services (central receiving, stores) and facilities related IT.  Scholarships & Fellowships  Auxiliary Enterprises– self supporting entities  Auxiliary Enterprises– self supporting entities to furnish goods or services to students, faculty, staff or incidentally to the general public; includes food services, athletics, residence halls and all related administrative expenses. 7

UTSA 5 Year Administrative Cost Trend AFR 2008AFR 2009AFR 2010AFR 2011AFR ,505,000 40,816,000 42,556,783 45,217,799 37,597, ,230,000363,087,000396,938,707418,830,437420,454, % 10.7% 10.8% 8.9% FY03 (11.2%) FY04 (11.7%) FY05 (11.3%) FY06 (11.9%) FY07 (10.3%) 8

Institutional Support Expenditures Total Operating Expense – Auxiliary Exp. We have lowered the rate by 1.86% Source: FY12 Annual Financial Report $ 37,597,797 ____________ = 8.94% $420,454,872 9

  Evaluated opportunities to ‘spread’ costs coded to Institutional Support as allowed by NACUBO   $4.4M in IT expenditures allocated to Academic Support   Corrected coding, $3.0M   Capitalized PeopleSoft project team salaries, $965K- moved the expense to O&M of Plant   Administrative Overhead, $895K - moved the expense to Auxiliaries   Evaluated opportunities to ‘spread’ costs coded to Institutional Support as allowed by NACUBO   $4.4M in IT expenditures allocated to Academic Support   Corrected coding, $3.0M   Capitalized PeopleSoft project team salaries, $965K- moved the expense to O&M of Plant   Administrative Overhead, $895K - moved the expense to Auxiliaries 10

11 AFR 2008 AFR 2009 AFR 2010 AFR 2011 AFR 2012 UT Tyler12.7%11.6%11.8%12.0%12.6% UT Permian Basin UT Dallas UT San Antonio UT Pan Am UT Brownsville UT El Paso UT Arlington UT Austin

  UT System & Legislative pressures   Measures administrative efficiency   Stakeholder accountability   Affordability of higher education  Chancellor’s Framework 2. B. 1. Utilize Incentive Based Compensation Strategies:   Presidential Performance Reviews   UT System & Legislative pressures   Measures administrative efficiency   Stakeholder accountability   Affordability of higher education  Chancellor’s Framework 2. B. 1. Utilize Incentive Based Compensation Strategies:   Presidential Performance Reviews 12

  Overall expenditures need to increase at a rate higher than Institutional Support costs increase   Fill vacant faculty positions   Add new faculty positions   Increase restricted funding expenditures – sponsored programs & gifts   Reduce Institutional Support Costs   Overall expenditures need to increase at a rate higher than Institutional Support costs increase   Fill vacant faculty positions   Add new faculty positions   Increase restricted funding expenditures – sponsored programs & gifts   Reduce Institutional Support Costs 13