Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Basin Scale Precipitation Data Merging Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Uncertainty in rainfall-runoff simulations An introduction and review of different techniques M. Shafii, Dept. Of Hydrology, Feb
Advertisements

Calibration of GOES-R ABI cloud products and TRMM/GPM observations to ground-based radar rainfall estimates for the MRMS system – Status and future plans.
“OLYMPEX” Physical validation Precipitation estimation Hydrological applications Field Experiment Proposed for November-December th International.
International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development Kathmandu, Nepal Mandira Singh Shrestha Satellite rainfall application in the Narayani basin CORDEX.
ReferencesAcknowledgements Funding for this work was provided by NASA grant #NNX10AQ77G S01 We would like to thank personnel at the NWS/NCRFC, and in particular.
Application and Evaluation of a Snowmelt Runoff Model in the Tamor River Basin, Eastern Himalaya using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo Data Assimilation Approach.
G.S. Karlovits, J.C. Adam, Washington State University 2010 AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
Precipitation in the Olympic Peninsula of Washington State Robert Houze and Socorro Medina Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington.
Arctic Land Surface Hydrology: Moving Towards a Synthesis Global Datasets.
June 23, 2011 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center 1 NOAA / CBRFC Water forecasts and data in support of western water management.
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Water Supply Forecasting Method Michelle Stokes Hydrologist in Charge Colorado Basin River Forecast Center April 28,
Temperature and Precipitation Data CBRFC Stakeholder Forum July 31, 2012.
CARPE DIEM Centre for Water Resources Research NUID-UCD Contribution to Area-3 Dusseldorf meeting 26th to 28th May 2003.
EARS Satellite data for Climate Water and Food Meteosat Flow Forecasting and Drought Monitoring Mark de Weerd, MSc. EARS Earth Environment Monitoring BV.
National Weather Service River Forecast System Model Calibration Fritz Fiedler Hydromet 00-3 Tuesday, 23 May East Prospect Road, Suite 1 Fort.
Integration of Multiple Precipitation Estimates for Flash Flood Forecasting Reggina Cabrera NOAA/National Weather Service.
Assessment of Hydrology of Bhutan What would be the impacts of changes in agriculture (including irrigation) and forestry practices on local and regional.
FLASH FLOOD PREDICTION James McDonald 4/29/08. Introduction - Relevance  90% of all national disasters are weather and flood related  Central Texas.
Streamflow Predictability Tom Hopson. Conduct Idealized Predictability Experiments Document relative importance of uncertainties in basin initial conditions.
Forecasting Streamflow with the UW Hydrometeorological Forecast System Ed Maurer Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington Pacific Northwest.
Preliminary Applications of the HL-RDHM within the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Ed Clark, Hydrologist Presented July 26 th, 2007 as part of the.
National Weather Service - Southeast River Forecast Center Southeast River Forecast Center North Florida Visit July 17-20, 2006 Southeast River Forecast.
COMET HYDROMET Enhancements to PPS Build 10 (Nov. 1998) –Terrain Following Hybrid Scan –Graphical Hybrid Scan –Adaptable parameters appended to.
Assessing the impacts of climate change on Atbara flows using bias-corrected GCM scenarios SIGMED and MEDFRIEND International Scientific Workshop Relations.
Applications of the NWS Research Distributed Hydrologic Model in Operational Hydrology The Colorado Basin River Forecast Center (CBRFC), an office of NOAA’s.
Multi-Sensor Precipitation Estimation Presented by D.-J. Seo 1 Hydrologic Science and Modeling Branch Hydrology Laboratory National Weather Service Presented.
Robert Hartman Acting Director NWS Office of Hydrologic Development GPM in the NOAA Integrated Water Forecasting Program.
Overview of the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Lisa Holts.
Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks (PERSIANN) Kuolin Hsu, Yang Hong, Dan Braithwaite, Xiaogang.
Global Flood and Drought Prediction GEWEX 2005 Meeting, June Role of Modeling in Predictability and Prediction Studies Nathalie Voisin, Dennis P.
Eric Jones Senior Hydrologist Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center 89 th AMS Meeting.
Understanding hydrologic changes: application of the VIC model Vimal Mishra Assistant Professor Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Gandhinagar
The NOAA Hydrology Program and its requirements for GOES-R Pedro J. Restrepo Senior Scientist Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA’s National Weather.
Pg. 1 Using the NASA Land Information System for Improved Water Management and an Enhanced Famine Early Warning System Christa Peters-Lidard Chief, Hydrological.
Thomas R. Karl Director, National Climatic Data Center, NOAA Editor, Journal of Climate, Climatic Change & IPCC Climate Monitoring Panel Paul D. Try, Moderator.
Hydrological evaluation of satellite precipitation products in La Plata basin 1 Fengge Su, 2 Yang Hong, 3 William L. Crosson, and 4 Dennis P. Lettenmaier.
Potential for medium range global flood prediction Nathalie Voisin 1, Andrew W. Wood 1, Dennis P. Lettenmaier 1 1 Department of Civil and Environmental.
Preliminary Applications of the HL-RDHM within the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Ed Clark, Hydrologist Presented July 26 th, 2007 as part of the.
1 Understanding Sources of Error and Uncertainty NOAA’S COLORADO BASIN RIVER FORECAST CENTER.
WSR-88D PRECIPITATION ESTIMATION FOR HYDROLOGIC APPLICATIONS DENNIS A. MILLER.
Nathalie Voisin 1, Florian Pappenberger 2, Dennis Lettenmaier 1, Roberto Buizza 2, and John Schaake 3 1 University of Washington 2 ECMWF 3 National Weather.
National Weather Service Hydrologic Forecasting Course Agenda 14 October – 7 November 2003.
Fritz Fiedler Calibration 2290 East Prospect Road, Suite 1 Fort Collins, Colorado National Weather Service River Forecast System Cooperative Program.
An Overview of Satellite Rainfall Estimation for Flash Flood Monitoring Timothy Love NOAA Climate Prediction Center with USAID- FEWS-NET, MFEWS, AFN Presented.
Regional Flood Awareness Workshop December 3, 2009 Jeff Graschel Service Coordination Hydrologist Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center.
DOWNSCALING GLOBAL MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood, Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of Washington,
VERIFICATION OF A DOWNSCALING SEQUENCE APPLIED TO MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR GLOBAL FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and.
Pearl River Coordination Meeting October 7, 2009 Dave Reed Hydrologist in Charge Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center.
EVALUATION OF A GLOBAL PREDICTION SYSTEM: THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN AS A TEST CASE Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier Civil and.
Overview of CBRFC Flood Operations Arizona WFOs – May 19, 2011 Kevin Werner, SCH.
 It is not representative of the whole water flow  High costs of installation and maintenance  It is not uniformly distributed in the world  Inaccessibility.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Weather Service Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Salt Lake City, Utah 11 The Hydrologic.
Evaluation of TRMM satellite precipitation product in hydrologic simulations of La Plata Basin Fengge Su 1, Yang Hong 2, and Dennis P. Lettenmaier 1 1.
Latin American and Caribbean Flood and Drought Monitor – What it does and does not do Figure showing current system Coarse resolution 25km, daily Satellite.
Estimation of precipitation over the OLYMPEX domain during winter
JPL Technical Activities
Multi-Site and Multi-Objective Evaluation of CMORPH and TRMM-3B42 High-Resolution Satellite-Rainfall Products October 11-15, 2010 Hamburg, Germany Emad.
EF5: A hydrologic model for prediction, reanalysis and capacity building Zachary Flamig Postdoctoral Scholar.
Hydrologic Considerations in Global Precipitation Mission Planning
Multi-Sensor Precipitation Estimation
(I) Copula Derived Observation Operators for Assimilating Remotely Sensed Soil Moisture into Land Surface Models Huilin Gao Surface Hydrology Group University.
NEWS linkages: (pull, push, collaborate, external)
Rainfall-Runoff Modeling
Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier
TOWARDS HIGH-RESOLUTION GLOBAL SATELLITE PRECIPITATION ESTIMATION
Other data: ARM, CEOP, USGS and Global Runoff Data
N. Voisin, J.C. Schaake and D.P. Lettenmaier
University of California, Irvine PI: S. Sorooshian
Evaluation of the TRMM Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) and its utility in hydrologic prediction in La Plata Basin Dennis P. Lettenmaier and.
An Inter-comparison of 5 HRPPs with 3-Hourly Gauge Estimates
Presentation transcript:

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Basin Scale Precipitation Data Merging Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method K. Hsu, F. Boushaki, S. Sorooshian, and X. Gao Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing University of California Irvine The 3rd Workshop of the International Precipitation Working Group, October, 2006

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine  PERSIANN Rainfall  Precipitation Data Merging  Grid-Based Precipitation Data Merging  Basin Scale Precipitation Data Merging  Case Study  Summary Outline

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine PERSIANN System “Estimation” Global IR MW-RR (TRMM, NOAA, DMSP Satellites) Merged Products - Hourly rainfall - 6 hourly rainfall - Daily rainfall - Monthly rainfall ANN Error Detection Quality Control Merging Satellite Data Ground Observations Products High Temporal-Spatial Res. Cloud Infrared Images Feedback Hourly Rain Estimate Sampling MW-PR Hourly Rain Rates Hourly Global Precipitation Estimates Gauges Coverage GPCC & CPC Gauge Analysis Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks (PERSIANN) Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine

PERSIANN-CCS (Cloud Classification System)

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Global PERSIANN: US PERSIANN-CCS: o x0.25 o Hourly 0.04 o x0.04 o Hourly PERSIANN Precipitation Products

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine A SHORT MOVIE OF PERSIANN PRODUCTS (PERSIANN: Precipitation estimation from Remote Sensing Information using Artificial Neural Network) PERSIANN (0.25°  0.25°) 07/25-27/2006 PERSIANN CCS (0.04°  0.04°) 07/24-27/2006 High resolution precipitation data are needed for hydrologic applications in SW. Severe storms propagate from mountains to low-elevated areas. Acknowledgement. This research is partially funded by NSF/SAHRA and NASA/GPM programs

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine RESEARCH TO SUPPORT MODELING EFFORTS Flash Flood Monitoring (7/27-28/2006) Poor radar coverage over mountainous southwest can result in missing flood warning for the areas radar network does not cover (Maddox et al., 2003). The demo shows our on-going study to check how the missing portions of a severe storm can be retrieved by the concurrent PERSIANN storm images and also reduce false warning. Strong convections start over mountains where radar coverage is poor. PERSIANN monitors the lifetimes of storm systems and provides information for early warning. Radar beams (3-km above ground level) are blocked by mountains in southwest United States. Differences between PERSIANN and radar images exist. Red: PERSIANN Rain vs. Radar No Rain Blue: PERSIANN No Rain vs. Radar Rain

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine 6-Hour Accumulated Rainfall: Hurricane Ivan hydis8.eng.uci.edu/CCS

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Precipitation Measurement is one of the KEY hydrologic Challenges

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Hydrologic Models QBQB QRQR t q R IAIA  i t API Model Sacramento Model Mike SHE Model, DHI VIC Model

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Streamflow Simulation vs. Precipitation Uncertainty:

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Streamflow Simulation vs. Precipitation Uncertainty:

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Streamflow Simulation vs. Precipitation Uncertainty:

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Radar Gauge Surface Temperature Soil Moisture Vegetation LABZ Multiple Sources for Rainfall Estimation Geosynchronous Satellites VIS, IR, Sounding Low Orbiting Satellites VIS, IR, MV, and Radar

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Bias Correction and Downscaling of Daily Rainfall to Hourly Rainfall Time Step: Day CPC Daily Analysis PERSIANN Rainfall (non-adjusted) PERSIANN Rainfall (bias adjusted) PERSIANN Rainfall Daily Rainfall: Summer 2005 Downscaled to Hourly Rainfall Grid size: 0.25 o x0.25 o Grid size: 0.04 o x0.04 o CPC Daily Gauge Analysis Grid-Based Data Merging

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Basin Scale Precipitation Data Merging

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Gages used by NWS Hydrologic Model Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model (NWS) (RFC parameters) Input time step : 6 hours Output time step : 24 hours Leaf River Near Collins Mississippi USGS # Basin Area : 753 mi 2 PERSIANN Rainfall Estimates in Hydrologic Simulation Observed Radar/Gage Merged OBSERVED vs. SIMULATED DISCHARGE (RADAR/GAGE MERGED RAINFALL ESTIMATES) Radar/Gauge 6-hour Rainfall Observed Radar/Gage Merged TRMM/Multi Satellite OBSERVED vs. SIMULATED DISCHARGE (TRMM-MULTI SATELLITE RAINFALL ESTIMATES) PERSIANN 6-hour Rainfall

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Basin Scale Precipitation Data Merging  i : Hydro. Model parameters Q : Output P : Input  : Errors  I : Weighting parameters  I : Bias parameters  output Hydrologic Model (  i) Optimization Q t obs t comp Q t comp  ()  (  I, Model ) (  g,  g ) (  s,  s ) PiPi Ps Pg Hydrologic Model (SAC-SMA Model)

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Probability distribution to be maximized = observations = simulated flows * Hours Flow Parameter Calibration

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Uncertainty of Parameters Hours Uncertainty associated with parameters Total Uncertainty including structural errors Probability distribution to be maximized 95%

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Bayesian Model Analysis Learn model parameters from data: p(ө): Priori distribution of parameters p(D|ө): Likelihood function p(ө|D): Posterior distribution of parameters

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Sampling Probability distribution to be maximized w.r.t Current guess

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Always accept New guess > 1 Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Sampling 100% acceptance of new points having higher probability than the old point

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Accept if  R ~ Uniform (0,1) MCMC –Acceptance of New Points Having Lower Probability than the Old Point is Probabilistic If the  ratio is small, then the probability of acceptance is small < 1 Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Sampling α% acceptance of new points having lower probability than the old point

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Rainfall Runoff Time Series Gages used by NWS Leaf River Near Collins Mississippi USGS # Basin Area : 753 mi 2 Streamflow (CMSD) Precipitation (mm/day) Gauge PERSIANN Time: Day

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Runoff Forecasting from Gauge, PERSIANN, and Merged Rainfall Gauge Rainfall Satellite: PERSIANN Rainfall Merged Rainfall Rainfall (mm/day) Streamflow (m 3 /day) Gauge PERSIANN Merged RMSE CMSD Corr Bias CMSD Time (Day)

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Parameter Distribution Distribution of Merging Parameters(5000 samples) Weighting factor (α g ) Weighting factor (α s ) Bias parameter (β g ) Bias parameter (β s )

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Interaction Between Parameters Parameter: α g Parameter: α s Parameter: β g Parameter: α s Parameter: β g Parameter: β s

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Confidence Interval of Merged Rainfall (95%) 95% confidence interval

Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Rainfall (mm/day) Streamflow (m 3 /day) Precipitation 95% Uncertainty Bound 99% Uncertainty Bound 95% Uncertainty Bound Observed Streamflow