Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

An Overview of Satellite Rainfall Estimation for Flash Flood Monitoring Timothy Love NOAA Climate Prediction Center with USAID- FEWS-NET, MFEWS, AFN Presented.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "An Overview of Satellite Rainfall Estimation for Flash Flood Monitoring Timothy Love NOAA Climate Prediction Center with USAID- FEWS-NET, MFEWS, AFN Presented."— Presentation transcript:

1 An Overview of Satellite Rainfall Estimation for Flash Flood Monitoring Timothy Love NOAA Climate Prediction Center with USAID- FEWS-NET, MFEWS, AFN Presented at the International Workshop on Flash Flood Forecasting March 2006- San Jose, Costa Rica

2 Why Use Satellite-Based Techniques? Failure to Capture Significant Rainfall

3 Why Use Satellite-Based Techniques?

4 Geostationary Infrared Satellite Technology GOES 10 -- 135°WGOES 12 -- 75°W

5 Geostationary Infrared Satellite Technology Detects upwelling of Infrared radiation from nearest surface This radiation is converted to a Temperature; Colder temperatures are generally associated with a higher altitude An approximation can be made that a cloud higher in the atmosphere produces more precipitation than a ‘lower’ cloud  Cloud Top Temperature vs Rain rate Therefore, generally:

6 Negative IR Rainfall Aspects  Rainfall estimation method is not physical  Errors sensing high level, non precipitating clouds such as cirrus  Failures to capture some warm cloud processes such as coastal rainfall and processes such as coastal rainfall and orographics orographics

7 Positive Aspects of GOES IR Temporal and spatial resolution! Temporal and spatial resolution! ¼ to ½ hour frequency & 2-4 Km pixel resolution¼ to ½ hour frequency & 2-4 Km pixel resolution Geostationary imaging Geostationary imaging Rapid data availability Rapid data availability Easily accessible Easily accessible

8 Microwave Satellite Sources AMSU-B SSM/I TMI

9 Microwave Satellite Technology Passive MW rainfall retrieval methods are more physical then IR sensors Passive MW rainfall retrieval methods are more physical then IR sensors MW instrument measures scattered radiation from ice & water particles over land MW instrument measures scattered radiation from ice & water particles over land Sensors measure ice & water particle distribution Sensors measure ice & water particle distribution The contribution due to ice is correlated to The contribution due to ice is correlated to previously determined radar – rain rate previously determined radar – rain rate relationships relationships

10 Negative MW Rainfall Aspects CCCCoarse spatial and temporal resolution 11116-25 Km pixel & ~2 hour sampling HHHHIGH LATENCY TTTThough predictable, satellite tracks are not consistent between observations PPPProblematic when attempting to sense H2O over snow/ice covered regions

11 Positive Aspects of MW Method MW rain rate estimation is a physical method MW rain rate estimation is a physical method Convective systems yield higher accurate rain rate estimates Convective systems yield higher accurate rain rate estimates

12 TRMM Sensors VIRS (Visible and InfRared Scanner) VIRS (Visible and InfRared Scanner) –Swath width: 720 km –Resolution: 2.1+ km TMI (TRMM Microwave Imager) TMI (TRMM Microwave Imager) –Swath width: 760 km –Resolution: 5-45 km

13 TRMM Sensors, Cont. PR (Precipitation Radar) PR (Precipitation Radar) –Swath width: 220 km –Resolution: 4.3 km

14 Thank You!


Download ppt "An Overview of Satellite Rainfall Estimation for Flash Flood Monitoring Timothy Love NOAA Climate Prediction Center with USAID- FEWS-NET, MFEWS, AFN Presented."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google