Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation Web Site www.leeds.ac.uk/aaandrwww.leeds.ac.uk/aaandr Our core activities are the resolution and determination.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Refreshing institutional policies around academic integrity: a focus on student training Dr Neil Morris Faculty of Biological Sciences.
Advertisements

Regulation and Credit Framework for the Conferment of Awards Quality and Standards Office.
Warwick Business School. WBS Plagiarism: What we do Deter – Clear instruction to students what WBS and Warwick University considered poor and good academic.
WBS PLAGIARISM PROCEDURE
ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT PROCEDURE Lynn Jones Regulations, Assessment and Awards Manager.
Extenuating Circumstances Briefing for Chairs of Extenuating Circumstances Groups and Professional Support Staff.
© University of South Wales Regulations Briefings Overview of University of Wales, Newport regulations – still in place for ex-Newport students completing.
1 Discipline, Capability and Grievance resolution: for those with responsibility for others Jessie Monck, PPD, Human Resources Division.
Plagiarism Sarah Gregory Management Development Division Wednesday 2 nd March 2011.
Academic Affairs Presentation Examination Liaison Officers 16 February 2015 Catherine McCorry / Angela Douglas Academic Affairs.
Our Academic Framework Modular Regulations. Two semesters –September to January –February to June –(The summer period) BUT Three terms –September to Christmas.
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners February 2013
Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS Faculty / Quality Assurance Services.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services.
Assessment Boards External Examiner Training 13 May 2015.
Programme Leader’s event The framework and progression.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
External Examiners Induction
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation 1 Plagiarism.
University of Brighton Regulations workshop for partner colleges Tanya Izzard, Partnership Manager
Quality &Validation Department (Q &V) BUE 1 By: Nehal Osman.
Cheating, Plagiarism and Unfair Practice Franchise Delivery Quality Assurance Services.
Our Academic and Quality Frameworks Phil Brimson Quality Manager (Validation and Review)
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS FOR ACADEMIC STAFF Quality Assurance Services.
Summary of the Undergraduate and Postgraduate Standard Assessment Regulations Academic Year 2012/13.
Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2014/15 Stewart Smith-Langridge Annette Cooke Governance Services 5 November
Institutional Overview of Quality Frameworks, Quality Assurance and Enhancement Dr Anne Craven, Head of Quality and Academic Partnerships 25/04/2014.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
Cheating, Plagiarism Unfair Practiceaterials Quality Assurance Services Collaborations and Partnerships Group.
Summary of Standard Assessment Regulations Academic Year 2013/14.
FEATURE WRITING INTRODUCTION 2013 From Thursday October 3, 2013 this class will run from 9.30am until 12.30pm every week.
External Examiner Induction Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2015/16 Annette Cooke/Alison Jones Quality and Enhancement Office 4 November 2015.
Excellence - Education; Research; Knowledge Exchange Assessment Regulations Registry Academic Services Sara Welham 31 August 2010.
International Partnerships Conference 21 November 2013 CREATE THE DIFFERENCE1 Dr Noel Morrison Academic Registrar and Director of the Student Experience.
Department name (edit in View > Header and Footer...) Academic Integrity and Academic Misconduct Presenter’s name Presenter’s title.
Academic HONESTY IBO. Academic Honesty Set of values and skills that promote personal integrity and good practice in teaching, learning, and assessment.
External Examiners’ Seminar 2011/12 Academic Regulations Lynn Jones Regulations, Assessment and Awards Manager Academic Registry.
Undergraduate Examination Board Briefing Prof Chris LANGLEY Chair – RSC Dominic STONE Secretary – RSC 25 th April 2016 Slide 1.
The work of the Senate Student Disciplinary Committee Student Discipline.
FEATURE WRITING INTRODUCTION FEATURE WRITING Feature Writing is a core module of the BA (Hons) Journalism degree programme. It is a 20-credit module,
External Examiners’ Workshop The University’s key examination and assessment regulations Mr Paul Cecil Quality and Standards Manager (Academic Standards.
Prof Richard Barnes Student Director
External Examining Induction Event for new Examiners February 2017
ACADEMIC REGULATIONS INCLUDING UPDATES
External Examiner Workshop Subject / School Boards
Postgraduate Examination Board Briefing
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners
School of Mathematics Academic Integrity Officer
In Year Module Retrieval (IYMR)
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
MMU Regulations.
The New Academic Framework and progression
Examination Board Briefing
Taught Award Regulations
Late hand-in of assignments
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
External examining at Solent university
External Examiners Induction Academic Regulations
Important information about your assessment in 2017/18
Their role within Schools and Colleges
External Examiners Induction Academic Regulations
In Year Module Retrieval (IYMR)
Module 6: Academic Misconduct
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners March 2014
What happens if I don’t pass first time
Academic Misconduct Policy
Presentation transcript:

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation Web Site Our core activities are the resolution and determination of: academic appeals special cases of student progress that fall outside the regulations requests from Schools to curtail the opportunities for a student to progress allegations of cheating, plagiarism and the submission fraudulent or fabricated coursework and academic malpractice student disciplinary cases, both academic and non-academic The Office is responsible for the University Committees whose work it is to investigate and decide these cases. We offer advice and guidance to Schools and individual members of staff on these and related matters. We also give procedural advice to individual students whose case is under consideration. We provide interpretation of and advice on regulations for taught programmes of study, particularly in the context of complex cases or where special provisions are being requested. The overall objective of the Office is the fair resolution of cases within the framework of the processes and procedures of the University. 06/10/20101

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation Appeals against the results of University examinations and assessments Cheating, plagiarism and fraudulent or fabricated coursework Referred students procedure Unsatisfactory students procedure Module exclusion procedure General University disciplinary regulations Immediate temporary exclusion - ill health Code of practice on student health and conduct University residences disciplinary regulations University Computer Systems (UCS) Disciplinary Regulations Criminal offences Students with criminal records 06/10/20102

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation AAandR Handbook – Electronic only – Available only to staff – Cover all main areas – FAQs – Links to relevant rules, regulations and web sites – Flow Charts – Guidance – Forms and semi-standard letters – Improvements and changes during the year 06/10/20103

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation APPEALS – 2009/10 Summer Appeals now in progress Report on lessons to be learned available in the New Year – published in AAandR Handbook – 2009/10 Resit, Medicine and Masters Appeals Report on lessons to be learned available post Easter – published in AAandR Handbook 06/10/20104

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation PLAGIARISM, FRAUDULENT OR FABRICATED COURSEWORK AND ACADEMIC MALPRACTICE – Penalties Increased flexibility Less prescriptive Timescales throughout the investigation 06/10/20105

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation Range of Penalties – School Level The School Panel should begin with the most severe penalty that it can impose: zero for the module (irrespective of marks awarded for other components in the module) with the requirement to do a completely new piece of work, which must be of pass standard (40 - Undergraduate and 50 – Postgraduate) on a single occasion only. When determining the penalty the School Panel should consider the following points: – Level and experience of the student – Percentage of the assessment and the severity of the offence – The student’s explanation and response to the allegation – Any mitigation – See Notes on Penalties (14) - where plagiarism has occurred in the student’s final attempt 06/10/20106

Office of Academic Appeals and Regulation Written Warning The non-plagiarised work will be marked with the resultant mark being aggregated with the marks for the remaining components of the module. 06/10/20107

Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation REQUIRED to submit a new piece of work for the Element to pass standard on a single occasion only for a capped element mark For an ELEMENT MARK of ZERO, 20, 30, or the appropriate pass mark [40/50] – Subject to the student submitting a new piece of work for the element and the submission reaching pass standard, the capped element mark (zero, 20, 30, 40/50), as determined by the Panel, will be aggregated with the marks for the remaining components of the module. – Where all other module assessment requirements have been satisfied (see footnote*), the credits will be awarded. * Although the aggregate module mark may be below the pass mark, subject to all other module components having being completed to at least pass standard (after any resits if applicable) and the student having demonstrated the learning outcomes for the module, the credits will be awarded. 06/10/20108

Office of Academic Appeals and Regulation REQUIRED to submit a new piece of work for the Element to pass standard on a single occasion only for a capped module mark For a MODULE MARK of ZERO, 20, 30, or the appropriate pass mark[40/50] – Subject to the student submitting a new piece of work for the element and the submission reaching pass standard, irrespective of the marks awarded for other components of the module the capped module mark (zero, 20, 30, 40/50), as determined by the Panel, will be recorded for the module. – Where all other module assessment requirements have been satisfied (see footnote*), the credits will be awarded. * Although the aggregate module mark may be below the pass mark, subject to all other module components having being completed to at least pass standard (after any resits if applicable) and the student having demonstrated the learning outcomes for the module, the credits will be awarded. 06/10/20109

Office of Academic Appeals and Regulation Penalties – Committee on Applications REQUIRED to repeat the Semester or the Year in its entirety: take the tuition, submit new assessments to pass standard on a single occasion – For CAPPED MODULE MARKS of ZERO, 20, 30, 40/50 except that it must be expected that the module in question will always for zero PERMANENT EXCLUSION FROM THE UNIVERSITY WITH NO AWARD – Transcript, other than relating to the module in question, issued at the Committee’s discretion together with any comment The Committee can apply any penalty it deems appropriate. 06/10/201010