To update and establish the intent of the chapter  Incorporates “college and career readiness” into the purpose of the chapter.  Redefines the Core.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Education Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility Request: Summary of Key Provisions.
Advertisements

CAC NOVEMBER 13, 2014 Common Core State Standards and Universal Design for Learning.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Iowa Assessment Update School Administrators of Iowa November 2013 Catherine Welch Iowa Testing Programs.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Career & Technical Education Standards Career and Technical Education WI Department of Public Instruction.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting California.
LCAPs in Orange County and the Role of the Orange County Department of Education Jeff Hittenberger, Ph.D. Chief Academic Officer.
1 Montana Common Core Transition June 2013 CCSSO Conference Showcase Judy Snow State Assessment Director.
New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC) Recommendations for Change June 1, 2011.
CCSS-M IN MICHIGAN. Michigan K-12 Standards CCSS-M with Michigan “Welcome”
Making preparations in Ohio: Common Core and Ohio’s Revised Academic Content Standards New System of Assessments.
Making preparations in Ohio: Common Core and Ohio’s Revised Academic Content Standards New System of Assessments.
Oregon Common Core State Standards Foundation of the Oregon Diploma.
21st Century Life and Career Skills - Standard 9 State Board Meeting August 6, 2014.
Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling
Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards Aligned to Common Core State Standards 1.
Educational Technology Plan Del Mar Union School District.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
January 19, :00 – 10:00 a.m. ET 1. Changes to Kentucky’s ESEA Waiver Request Required by USDOE Affecting 703 KAR 5:222, Categories for Recognition,
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Agenda 2017 Standards & Instruction –W–What and how should kids learn? Assessments and Data Systems –H–How do we know if they learned it? School and Educator.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
The Race to Future-Ready Dr. Rebecca Garland Accountability Conference February 19, 2009.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
Lodi Unified School District Program Improvement Update: Assessment, Research and Evaluation Department (AR&E) Board of Education April 15, 2008.
Wisconsin’s School Report Cards October Agenda 2017 Standards & Instruction –W–What and how should kids learn? Assessments and Data Systems –H–How.
Tangipahoa Parish’s Implementation of Common Core State Standards Implementation Update Presented by: LADOE and Tangipahoa Parish School System Fall 2011.
Oregon Common Core State Standards Foundation of the Oregon Diploma.
Kansas State Board of Education Brad Neuenswander & Tom Foster Kansas State Department of Education March, 2013.
South Dakota Department of Education Spring 2011.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
1 Up-date on Assessment in Connecticut Dr. Barbara Q. Beaudin, Associate Commissioner Division of Assessment and Accountability Chief, Bureau of Student.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OVERVIEW IU 5. CHAPTER 4 - STANDARDS Effective March 1, 2014 PA Core Standards English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Reading.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation ___________________ Dublin High School ___________________ March 9-11, 2009.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS FALL MEETING -- OCTOBER 26, 2014 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
Webinar 1: Overview. 1. Overview  Link to SLD Rule  Multi-tiered Systems of Support (MTSS)  Systems of Assessment 2. Introduction to Tiers  Tier 1:
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
Wisconsin Standards for CTE. Timeline New accountability system begins & AYP ends (ESEA waiver) New proficiency benchmarks for WKCE reading & mathematics.
Mid-Course Adjustments in Learning Results Implementation CAEA Summer Conference Patrick R. Phillips, Deputy Commissioner August 15, 2005.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Butte County Department of Education September 19, 2014 Digital.
Accountability Report Dedham Public Schools October 3,
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Amendments to N.J.A.C. 6A:8 Standards and Assessments Monday, January 11, 2016.
Strengthening Parental Involvement in Georgia Schools.
Implementing SBAC Pilot Items Rowland Unified School District Leadership Meeting November 6, 2013 Brian Huff.
ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Additional CAASPP Assessments Diane Hernandez, Director Assessment.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Language Arts Assessment Update
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEM By Purpose
Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting
Presentation transcript:

To update and establish the intent of the chapter  Incorporates “college and career readiness” into the purpose of the chapter.  Redefines the Core Curriculum Content Standards (CCCS) to include the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in ELA and mathematics.  Implements a statewide assessment system that will include achievement of the CCSS.

To reflect changes in law and code  Deletes definition and use of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and replaces it with Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) (ESEA waiver)  Replaces references to the Quality Assurance Annual Report (QAAR) with the Quality Single Accountability Continuum (QSAC)  Changes “vocational education” to “career and technical education” (Perkins Act)  Replaces references to the Special Review Assessment (SRA) with the Alternative High School Assessment (ASHA)

To reflect changes in definitions or terminology  Changes reference to the CCCS content area from “technological literacy” to “technology”  Redefines “structured learning experiences” to match 6A: 19  Adds the new definition of “Twenty-first century themes and skills” to clarify 6A:8-3(c)2  Updates the definition of career and technical education to reflect their alignment to the CCSS

To eliminate outdated or redundant references  Removes references to Professional Development Standards and local professional development plans addressed in 6A:9  Removes references to “additional evaluation” of district boards of education because it was associated with QAAR  Removes the Appendix, which contained AYP targets  Removes references and timelines associated with outdated standards.  Deletes references to high school competency assessments and adds the requirement to develop new high school assessments to measure the CCSS in ELA and mathematics

To enhance clarity  Adds “at-risk of failure” to clarify that modifications described in the subsection on instructional tools and resources applies to students at-risk of failure  Deletes the 2 year timeline for personalized student learning plans pilot and evaluation program to clarify that the regulation imposes no mandate  Establishes that the ASHA is submitted for review to the DOE in Trenton, not to the exec. county superintendent  Stipulates that the Department’s student achievement reporting requirement includes aggregated and disaggregated data for students with disabilities and ELLs

To provide more time and flexibility for districts to fulfill requirements  Adds “business” to the 10 days districts have to transmit any official records, including students transcripts  Replaces “cumulative progress indicators” with “indicators” to enable districts to use other measurements to assess progress (formative and summative assessments)  Changes the reporting requirement for chief school administrators to present assessment data from 30 to 60 days  Allows districts to select the delivery format to meet requirements of 6A:8-3(b)1-4 (opportunities to provide information about career interests and specialized programs that reflect the needs of students and the community)