Scientific Record Keeping Alan L. Goldin, M.D./Ph.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NIH Public Access Policy What It Means for Authors and for Universities.
Advertisements

Office of University Partnerships Office of Policy Development and Research U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of University Partnerships.
NSF Data Management Plan
Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) Grantees may access a list of progress reports that are due using the Status page in eRA Commons, and selecting.
RAP October 3,  What does “Best Practices of Grants Management” mean? ◦ It is the daily oversight of the grant/contract/agreement in accordance.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Audit Requirements for Nonprofits.
Christina Hansen, Assistant Vice Chancellor Bob Johnson, Research Librarian for Nursing & Allied Health May 2008 NIH Public Access Policy UCI Libraries.
Office of University Partnerships Madlyn Wohlman-Rodriguez Hispanic-Serving Institutions Assisting Communities (HSIAC) 2006 Grant Terms and Conditions.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
Compliance Supplement  What is the Compliance Supplement  Important sections of the CS  For what should or should not be used  New Information for.
NIH Changes …grants.gov. NOT-OD files/NOT-OD htmlhttp://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice- files/NOT-OD html.
Preparing and Submitting Reports Della Brown White, Ph.D. Program Officer, Office of Health Equity Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health.
PA/FOIA INTERFACE OSD/JS Privacy Office (703)
Public and Private Interests in Animal Research LAT Chapter 1.
JO807: Advanced Journalism Research JO807: Week 13 “Freedom of Information Act” and the WWW.
SPS Open Forum: The new OMB circular and grant/contract close-out.
Laboratory Notebook FITT (Fostering Interregional Exchange in ICT Technology Transfer)
1 Project Close-out SPS Round Table January 17, 2006.
NSF Data Management Plan Requirements Alex Kanous
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
Subrecipient Monitoring. A formal binding legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity A portion of your sponsored project's.
NIH Public Access Policy What it means to OHSU Researchers Presented by: Andrew Hamilton Date: 3/18/2007.
Data management A cornerstone for responsible conduct of research
Data Management. 2 Data Management Practices RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN RESEARCH.
Promoting Objectivity in Research by Managing, Reducing, or Eliminating Conflicts of Interest UT HOP UT HOP The University of Texas at Austin.
Arizona State Library, Archives and Public Records
THE NIH REVIEW PROCESS David Armstrong, Ph.D.
Building Open Science Luis Ibáñez Kitware, Inc. The Insight Journal.
MANAGING THE SUBMISSION AND AWARD PROCESS Office of Sponsored Projects Main Campus and Branches.
ITCS Workshop May 23, 2000 Maxims for Grant and Contract Seeking Presented by Alan A. Schreier, Office of Sponsored Programs.
Monitor and Closeout Awards Lamar Revis NMFS Team Leader Paulette S. Moss OAR, NWS, NESDIS Team Leader.
Joan L. Lucas – General Counsel
Policy on Data Stewardship, Access, and Retention Establishes University policy to assure that research data are appropriately maintained, archived for.
1 Module 4: Post-Award Administration of Sponsored Projects (Part 1) Office of Research and Sponsored Programs The University of Mississippi 100 Barr Hall.
Synapse and Catapult– New NIH OTT Technology Transfer Tools Ajoy K. Prabhu, M.S., M.B.A. Group Leader, Marketing Office of Technology Transfer National.
Notebooks and Protocols
Nikki Dillard Allison Lowry Tiffany Thomas.  “The maintenance of a history of one’s activities, as financial dealings, by entering data into ledgers.
Complying with the NIH Public Access Policy: Depositing manuscripts in PubMed Central Julie Speer, Lori Critz, Michelle Powell Office of Organizational.
Required Materials / Spring 2009 By Wilmer Arellano.
10/19/2011F. B. Bramwell1.  Thanks to conversations with: ◦ HU Office of General Counsel  John Gloster  Dan McCabe ◦ University of Kentucky Intellectual.
Using FOIA for investigations IRE Better Watchdog Workshop St. Louis Jennifer LaFleur, ProPublica.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
Grant Award Management Bryan S. Clark, M.B.A. Chief Grants Management Officer Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
1 Sex/Gender and Minority Inclusion in NIH Clinical Research What Investigators Need to Know! Presenter: Miriam F. Kelty, PhD, National Institute on Aging,
ACCESS for VALIDITY ACCESS for INNOVATION. Starting January 2011 for NEW proposals Not voluntary – “integral part” of proposal and FastLane Required for.
DOCUMENTATION Research Data Management. Research Data Management Lab Books Why keep a Lab Book? Records are important for development and writing up of.
YOUR RELIABLE PARTNER. “Taxation of intellectual property, research & development in Russian Federation”
Research Misconduct Adapted with permission from Virginia Tech University Office of the Vice-President for Research.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
Frameworks for the Access and Use of Administrative Data, With the Example of Current Practice in the UK Steven Vale Office for National Statistics UK.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
December 1, 2009 Topic: Post Award Function. Enhance and facilitate University research and external funding by providing services, in a timely and professional.
RECORD RETENTION Arizona State Library, Archives and Public Records.
J.P. Hornak, , 2004 Research Practices http://
How Not to Be the Only One Who Knows About Your Research Sharing and Archiving for Posterity Melanie Radik and Raphael Fennimore Library & Technology Services.
I have a Grant, Now What??! John Hulvey Office of Sponsored Programs Administration and Accounting.
DOE Data Management Plan Requirements
Overview of Proposal and Award Process at UCLA A short “ How-to-Do ”
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
1 The Basics - Grant Management 101  Basics of Financial Reporting Requirements  Administrative Requirements (record keeping)  On Site Monitoring.
For Official Use Only (FOUO) and Similar Designations NPS Security Office
Grant Writing for Success
Pitching & Investigating
Guidelines for Use of Government Owned Equipment
Records Management Compliance Training
DGCA Breakfast Briefing
Arizona State Library, Archives and Public Records
Guidelines for Use of Government Owned Equipment
Post Award Update Quarterly dga meeting
Presentation transcript:

Scientific Record Keeping Alan L. Goldin, M.D./Ph.D.

Laboratory Notebooks Bound, serially numbered pages All entries should be dated Permanent ink Table of contents Include the actual data, such as photographs, negatives, autoradiograms and printouts

Data in Laboratory Notebooks Original data should be included Photographs, negatives and similar can be glued or taped Other materials can be inserted in plastic sleeves (including CD or DVD) Oversize material and magnetic media should be stored, with the location and coding scheme included in the lab book

Laboratory Notebook Requirements Can be More Detailed Data book paper should be acid-free Bindings should be sewn or glued  Plastic comb, wire spiral, or ring binders are considered unacceptable Data books may be inventoried  Master data book log  This policy applies in industry

Policies in Industry Only bound laboratory notebooks are acceptable Entries must be countersigned weekly or more often The rules are stricter because the notebooks may be used as evidence to gain patent protection

Electronic Record Keeping ELN – Electronic Laboratory Notebook  Database software  Generic electronic notebooks  Scientific electronic notebooks CENSA – Collaborative Electronic Notebook Systems Association

How long to keep notebooks? NIH policy mandates 3 years after the end of the project (grant funding period) FDA policy mandates 10 years after use Patent policy mandates 23 years after issue of the patent

How long to keep notebooks? The organization with the longest policy has priority State law usually overrides federal laws  Virginia mandates that data by state agencies must be retained for 5 years  Investigators in Virginia at state-supported universities must follow that policy

Who owns the notebooks & data? When NIH awards a research grant to a university, any and all data collected as part of that funded project are owned by the grantee institution Data books of all investigators (PI, postdocs, grad students, technicians) are the property of the institution

Who owns the notebooks and data? The principal investigator is the steward If the PI resigns or moves to another institution:  Equipment and all data belong to the initial institution  Permission can be obtained to transfer the award, equipment and data

Public Access to Data The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) revised the regulations regarding public access to experimental data in 1999  Circular A-110 included the revisions  The public can obtain access to experimental data through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)

Applicability Data produced with Federal support that are cited publicly and officially Data collected by institutions of higher education, hospitals, and non-profit institutions  Does not apply to commercial organizations  Does not apply to state and local governments Applies to new and competing awards made after the effective date of the amendment (11/8/1999)

Research Data Recorded, factual material commonly accepted in the scientific community as necessary to validate research findings Published  Peer-reviewed scientific or technical journal  Cited by a Federal agency publicly and officially

Research Data Do Not Include: Preliminary analyses Drafts of papers Plans for future research Peer reviews Physical objects (samples, tapes) Trade secrets or commercial information

FOIA Request Must Include: Specific regulation or order citing the data Publication cited Grant number Description of the data being sought A statement that the data are being requested under the amendment to Circular A-110

What happens if the PI has moved? Research grants are award to institutions, not individuals The FOIA office will send the request to the institution Both the FOIA office and the institution will try to locate the PI and fulfill the request for data

What happens if the PI refuses to comply with the request? This would be viewed as a material failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the award NIH would initiate appropriate enforcement action  This could include withholding future support to the institution

What if the data are in an abstract cited in a Federal regulation? If the abstract is based on preliminary analyses, then the data would be excluded If the abstract is not based on preliminary analyses and is cited by a Federal agency in a regulation, then the data may be accessible

Additional Sources of Information Responsible Conduct of Research Education Consortium (RCREC) Web Site Responsible Conduct of Research Education Consortium (RCREC) Web Site Office of Management & Budget Circular A-100 (section 36) Office of Management & Budget Circular A-100 NIH Working Group Report on Research Tools NIH Working Group Report on Research Tools