Eligible for Execution: The Daryl Atkins Story Sources and References An extensive listing of the sources that were used to write Eligible for Execution as well as related bibliographic information. Press Accounts of the Atkins case Legal Commentary on Atkins v. Virginia Atkins Case Documents Supreme Court, Judicial Process, and Criminal Justice System Bibliography Death Penalty Bibliography Atkins Case Update - Click Here The latest activities in the ongoing Atkins litigation. Atkins Case Exhibits - Click Here Copies of actual documents relevant to the Atkins case, such as indictments, autopsy reports, verdict forms, plea bargain agreements, etc. Allow students to see what some of the documents discussed in the book actually look like. Atkins Appellate Decisions - Click Here The full text of five appellate court rulings in the Atkins case. Supreme Court Oral Arguments - Click Here A transcript of the oral arguments presented to the U.S. Supreme Court in Atkins v. Virginia. Death Penalty Information - Click Here Descriptive and statistical information on the death penalty, covering things like murder rates, state-by-state capital punishment laws, means of execution, execution rates, etc. Supreme Court Cruel and Unusual Punishment Case Excerpts - Click Here http://walker.cqpress.com/

Atkins Case Exhibits The links below allow access to copies of selected judicial orders, court documents, and evidence relevant to the charges against Daryl Atkins for the murder of Eric Nesbitt. 圖右:http://www.breitbart.com/image.php?id=iafpCNG.5bf957340db9bda738613b1b06a0531c.a01p0&show_article=1 圖中: http://forensicpsychologist.blogspot.com/2008/01/daryl-atkins-lindsey-lohan-and-cuckoos.html

Discovery Order - Upon request the prosecution must provide relevant information to the defense. Here is the initial judicial order providing the attorneys for Daryl Atkins access to prosecution materials and evidence. Several other discovery orders were issued as the case progressed. Atkins’s Account to the Robbery of Pizza Delivery Man Kevin Phillips - Daryl Atkins was convicted of multiple crimes committed in the months leading up to the murder of Eric Nesbitt. In one of those crimes Atkins participated with others in the robbery of Kevin Phillips, a pizza delivery man. This document includes Atkins’s handwritten description of his role in the crime along with his answers to questions posed by the interrogating police detective. Because the handwritten confession is difficult to read, an unofficial transcript of it appears at the end of the document. Atkins’s Confession to the Maiming of Amanda Hamlin - In his most serious offense prior to the Nesbitt murder Daryl Atkins attempted to rob Amanda Hamlin as she finished mowing her lawn. In the course of the unsuccessful robbery, Atkins shot and maimed Hamlin. This document includes Atkins’s handwritten confession to the crime as well as his answers to questions posed by the interrogating police detective. Because the handwritten confession is difficult to read, an unofficial transcript of it appears at the end of the document.

Autopsy Report - Following her examination of Eric Nesbitt’s body, Dr Leah Bush issued an autopsy report that included this drawing of the wounds Nesbitt suffered. Indictment - On November 19, 1996 the grand jury issued indictments against Daryl Atkins for several offenses committed against Eric Nesbitt, including this indictment for premeditated murder during the commission of a robbery. Appointment of Counsel - UIndigent criminal defendants are entitled to the services of an attorney at government expense. On November 11, 1996, Judge Prentis Smiley officially appointed George M. Rogers III as lead attorney for Daryl Atkins. William Jones Plea Agreement - Plea bargaining is a common method of disposing of criminal cases. The plea agreement reached between William Jones and the prosecution was critical in obtaining testimony that led to the conviction of Daryl Atkins on capital murder charges.

Guilt Phase Verdict Forms - Following the guilt phase of the 1998 trial, the jury concluded that Daryl Atkins was guilty of capital murder and the use of a firearm in the commission of a murder. The foreman of the jury, Melvin Underwood, signed the verdict forms indicating the jury’s unanimous decision. Defective Sentencing Verdict Form - In January of 1999 the Supreme Court of Virginia overturned the jury’s 1998 death sentence against Daryl Atkins because of this defective verdict form. The jury concluded that the prosecution had successfully proven the existence of both aggravating factors recognized under Virginia law: that Daryl Atkins posed continuing threat to society and that his crime was outrageously or wantonly vile. But note that the verdict form, while presenting the jury with six possible alternatives, failed to provide an option for finding the absence of both aggravating factors. The Virginia high court concluded that a death sentence cannot be imposed where the verdict form does not give the jury the full range of choices to consider. The justices ordered that the sentencing issue be retried. Second Sentencing Verdict Form - The question of an appropriate sentence for Daryl Atkins was retried before a second jury in August 1999. This jury, like the first, concluded that both aggravating circumstances were present and recommended that Atkins be sentenced to death. Note that this verdict form includes all seven possible outcomes. The Virginia Supreme Court upheld the sentence in September 2000.

Appointment of Dr. Evan S. Nelson - Judge Prentis Smiley appoints Dr Appointment of Dr. Evan S. Nelson - Judge Prentis Smiley appoints Dr. Evan Nelson as a mental health expert for the defense for the 2005 retardation hearing. Dr. Nelson previously had worked with the defense during the sentencing phases of the process. Appointment of Dr. Stanton Samenow - The prosecution was also entitled to the appointment of mental heath experts to evaluate Daryl Atkins’s intellectual ability. In this judicial order Judge Smiley authorizes Dr. Samenow to work with the Commonwealth’s Attorney for the 2005 retardation hearing. Substitution of Counsel Order - Prior to the 2005 retardation trial, Attorney Robert Lee of the Virginia Capital Representation Resource Center, who had represented Atkins in his appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, asked Judge Smiley to replace George M. Rogers III and Bryan L. Saunders as Atkins’s legal counsel because of possible conflict of interest issues. Here Judge Smiley agrees to that request by replacing Rogers and Saunders with Capital Defender Joseph A. Migliozzi, Jr. Atkins’s Academic Record - A key factor in establishing Daryl Atkins’s intellectual ability was his performance in school. This document summarizes the grades Atkins earned in high school. Juror’s Request to be Excused - During the 2005 retardation trial, one juror passed this note to the court indicating great emotional discomfort in dealing with the capital punishment issue and requesting to be excused. Judge Smiley excused the juror.

Retardation Verdict - In August 2005 the jury found that Daryl Atkins had failed to prove by a preponderance of evidence that he was retarded. The unanimous decision of the jury is verified by this verdict form signed by foreman Stephen T. Jackson. Atkins’s Execution Date - Following the 2005 retardation trial, Judge Smiley accepted the jury’s verdict that Atkins was not retarded, re-imposed the death sentence, and set the execution date for December 2, 2005. Judge Smiley Reduces Daryl Atkins’s Sentence to Life in Prison without Parole - In January 2008 Judge Smiley agreed with the argument of the defense that the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s office had improperly withheld from the defense relevant evidence prior to Atkins’s initial trial. As a consequence Judge Smiley vacated Atkins’s death sentence and imposed a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Press Accounts of the Atkins Case There was significant press coverage of the Daryl Atkins case, starting with the commission of the crime and continuing throughout the many phases of the judicial process. In the beginning primary news coverage appeared in local newspapers such as the Hampton Roads Daily Press, but as the case gained importance the national media began following the litigation. These reports helped inform the writing of Eligible for Execution. Listed below are many of the relevant articles that appeared in print or electronic format in the nation’s newspapers, magazines, broadcast media, and wire service reports. The articles are organized by topic and arranged generally in the order in which they appeared in the book. In most cases the full text of article is available in the outlet’s electronic archives.

KEY FIGURES-Daryl Atkins Plunkett, A. J. "Two Men Accused in More Holdups, Suspects Charged in Airman’s Slaying," The Daily Press, September 11, 1996. Rosenberg, Patti. "Suspect: Killing ‘Just Happened.’ Night of Drinking Led to Airman’s Death, The Daily Press, August 28, 1996. Spencer, Jim. "Armed Robbery Ignored Until It Was Too Late," The Daily Press, September 8, 1996. St. George, Donna. "A Question of Culpability, Mental Capacity of Convicted Virginia Man is a Murky Legal Issue," Washington Post, July 23, 2005. Williams, Beverly N. "Crime Spree Leads to Convictions, Accused Killer Faces Multiple Jail Terms, The Daily Press, March 8, 1997. Williams, Beverly N. "Murder Suspect Will Face 24 Charges, 10 Victims of Spree Describe Crimes," The Daily Press, October 26, 1996. Williams, Beverly N. "Robberies Net Life, 106 Years," The Daily Press, May 2, 1997.

Atkins Case Update The Virginia Supreme Court's decision effectively ended the Atkins case. No longer would Daryl Atkins face the prospects of an execution. After spending a decade on death row, Atkins would now be released into the general prison population where he will spend the rest of his life for the murder of Eric Nesbitt.