Athletics Certification Orientation. Orientation Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits Committee Philosophy Second Cycle Issues Technology Athletics Certification.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Principle 12 Institutional Self-Study Guide. January, 2009 Each Division II institution shall conduct a comprehensive self-study and evaluation of its.
Introduction to the NCAA Amateurism Clearinghouse.
Limited Resource Institutions APP and Academic Certification Best Practices NCAA Regional Rules Seminar 2014 Eric Brey Quintin Wright Katy Yurk.
Rejected! Rebounding From and Moving Forward Following a Monitoring Report Requirement.
Developing a Gender Equity Action Plan Judith M. Sweet Former Senior Vice President for Championships and Education Services and Senior Woman Administrator.
 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.
Principle 2 Chancellor/President Oversight. January, 2009 A model Division II member institution’s Chancellor/ President sets forth a vision for the institution’s.
DEBRA G. KLINMAN, PH.D. ELLIE A. FOGARTY, ED.D. VICE PRESIDENTS, MSCHE Tips, Strategies, and Best Practices for Team Chairs.
AB 86 Adult Education Regional Planning. What is AB86 ? $25 Million Statewide for Planning AB 86, Section 76, Article 3 The purpose is develop regional.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
NCAA Division I Institutional Performance Program
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
The Division II Model Athletics Department Tool Kit January, 2009.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Norco College Student Success and Support Program Plan Marissa Iliscupidez March 14, 2015.
Compliance and its Cast of Characters ~ Introductory Compliance Concepts for those with Auxiliary Roles Kimberli E. Bowman NCAA Membership Services.
Educational Session: NCAA Division I Hot Topics Thursday, January 16, :30 to 11:00 A.M.
NCAA CERTIFICATION Self-Study Update Dr. Robin Forman Dean of Undergraduate Students Leslie Claybrook Associate Athletic Director/Senior Woman Administrator.
NCAA Division I Institutional Performance Program 2015 NCAA Regional Rules Seminar Supplement.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
DIVISION II LEGISLATIVE AND INTERPRETIVE PROCESSES Amanda Conklin Jennifer Fraser.
URBAN SCHOOL LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE PARTNERSHIPS, PARENTS AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT October 27, 2011 Presented By Ramona Reyes, Vice President, Columbus.
Local Approval of Stand-Alone Credit Courses Training Session provided by the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office and System Advisory Committee.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
NCAA Division III Compliance Concepts NCAA Division III Compliance Concepts2014.
NCAA DIVISION I ATHLETICS CERTIFICATION PROGRAM. The Purpose of Athletics Certification Athletics certification is meant to ensure the NCAA's fundamental.
Athletics Certification Orientation Presentation.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
SACS-COC Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Plus Q & A CCPRO Conference, Greensboro, NC September 2011 Kimberly B. Lawing, Vice President of Institutional.
Principle 6 Coach’s Role. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits. Athletics Certification Process. Operating Principles. Measurable Standards.
Principle 4 FAR Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II Member institution shall include the active involvement of the faculty athletics representative.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation 7/28/09 Academic Affairs Retreat Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
NCAA A.P.P.L.E. Conference CREATING & IMPLEMENTING EFFECTIVE POLICIES Craig Littlepage Director of Athletics University of Virginia January 2012.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Saundra Yancy McGuire, Ph.D., Chair Kurt Keppler, Ph.D., Vice-Chair The LSU Retention Committee: Procedures, Findings and Recommendations LSU Faculty Senate.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
Steve Chen & William Salazar. Morehead State University 2009 AAHPERD Convention Tampa, Florida NCAA 101: Institutional Control and Academic Integrity for.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Purpose and Benefits.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Athletics Certification Orientation
Moving forward to Fall 2018 visit
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
2010 Regional Rules Seminar
President Yong Vice President Aytch Lynette Apen, IEC Co-Chair
Department of Intercollegiate Athletics Board of Trustees Academic Affairs Committee Mr. Earl Hilton, Director February 17, 2012.
Dr. W. Robert Ashurst Faculty Research Committee Chair
Integrated Budget & Planning Cycle
Evergreen Valley College Accreditation Update October 20, 2014
February 2007 Note: Source:.
Fort Valley State University
Presentation transcript:

Athletics Certification Orientation

Orientation Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits Committee Philosophy Second Cycle Issues Technology Athletics Certification Process Measurable Standards Institutional Plans Available Resources Questions

Origin of Athletics Certification Approved at the 1993 Convention. –Five-year cycle. Second cycle began in –10-year cycle.

Purpose Open up affairs of athletics to university community and public. Set standards, called operating principles, for operation of Division I athletics programs. Establish tough sanctions for failure to conduct a comprehensive self-study or correct problems.

Benefits Self-awareness Affirmation Opportunities to improve

Second Cycle Issues Implementation of required actions and plans from first cycle will be evaluated. Program area checklists will be used to evaluate gender issues, minority issues and student-athlete well-being areas. All institutional plans must include all required elements.

Second Cycle Issues Commitment to Equity area has been expanded to be Equity and Student-Athlete Well-Being. Additions have been made to Academic Integrity operating principle. Technology initiatives

Technology Athletics Certification Web-based System –Benefits: Increases efficiency. Reduces costs. Adds greater consistency ID and password-protected.

Athletics Certification Process Step No. 2 Institution develops self- study report. Step No. 1 Orientation videoconference and institution begins self-study process (Sept-Nov). Report developed September - April Step No. 3 Self-study report submitted via ACS May 1, Step No. 4 NCAA staff liaison reviews report for preliminary issues. May 1 – June 30 Step No. 5 Full committee (CAC) reviews self-study report and approves issues. July 15 – August 15 Step No. 6 Institution has option to respond to CAC analysis.

Athletics Certification Process Step No. 7 Peer-review team conducts campus visit (Sept 15 – Dec) and writes report on Web- based system September 15 - December Step No. 8 Peer-review team report styled at NCAA office. October - January Step No. 10 CAC deliberates and issues a final decision for all institutions. Step No. 9 PRT report sent to the president or chancellor for response on Web-based system February 2008

“Players” in Certification Committee on Athletics Certification

15 members –College presidents –Athletics administrators –Faculty athletics representatives –Conference administrators

Committee Philosophy Assist institutions in identifying mechanisms to ensure intercollegiate athletics programs are operating to their fullest potential.

“Players” in Certification Committee on Athletics Certification Peer-Review Team

Typical team: –Maximum of four members. –Chaired by a president or chancellor whenever possible. –Random selection approved by committee. –Will not include peer-reviewers with potential conflicts of interest.

Peer-Review Team –Verifying ccuracy of the self-study. –Verifying road-based participation. –Evaluating onformity with the operating principles. A B Responsible for: C

“Players” in Certification Committee on Athletics Certification Peer-Review Team Steering Committee Self-Study Subcommittees Campus Liaison Chief Report Writer NCAA staff

The Certification Decision Materials Reviewed During Deliberations –Self-study report. –Initial issues identified by CAC. –Institution’s response to CAC analysis. –Peer-review team’s report. –Institution’s response to peer-review team’s report.

Certification Categories Certified Certified with Conditions Not Certified

Measurable Standards Clarifies expectations for each operating principle. Brings more consistency to the process. Used by institutions, NCAA staff, peer- review teams and the committee.

Plans for Improvement Stand-alone and in writing Broad-based campus participation Issues/problems Measurable goals Steps to achieve the goals Specific timetable(s) Individuals/offices responsible for carrying out the specific actions Institutional approval

Available Resources NCAA staff liaison (athletics certification link) Handbook (PDF) Self-study instrument (PDF) Orientation materials Self-study checklist Measurable standards Peer-reviewer candidate information

Athletics Certification Questions?