Geometric Factors Focal Spot Object Film Object b a h c Film B A H C

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technical Aspects: the machine the image
Advertisements

Advanced Biomedical Imaging Lecture 3
Image Reconstruction.
Chapter 11 Prime Factors.
Formation Characteristics
4 Producing Quality Radiographs.
Advanced Biomedical Imaging Lecture 4 Dr. Azza Helal A. Prof. of Medical Physics Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University.
Quality Control in Diagnostic Radiology
Chapter 18 Radiographic Exposure
Components of Radiographic Image Quality
Radiographic Quality Chapter 5.
Resident Physics Lectures
Chapter 7 Radiographic Image Formation and Exposure Factors.
Chapter 17 The Grid So far we have discussed how kVp, patient size and collimation impact scatter radiation. As the part size and kVp increase, scatter.
Resident Physics Lectures
The Grid Kyle Thornton DMI 50B.
Analyzing the Image Density. Density Overall blackening of the image.
Part II Image Quality 1  Image Quality  Photographic Quality  Geometric Quality 2.
Technical Factors or Prime Factors
Copyright © 2012, 2006, 2000, 1996 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 8 Dental X-Ray Image Characteristics.
8.1 PRODUCTION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF X-RAYS
X-Ray Production & Emission
 QC testing of screen speed should occur on acceptance and then yearly.  Evaluate first whether similar cassettes marked with the same relative speed.
Conventional and Computed Tomography
Radiographic Grids I By Professor Stelmark.
Seeram Chapter 11: Image Quality
INSTRUMENTATION. ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS AND EFFICIENCY  Effective voltage  High frequency inverter technology (over 10,000Hz)  Constant potential.
Control of Scatter Radiation
1 Components of Image Quality & Radiographic Artifacts Radiologic Technology A SPRING 2012.
Quality Control.
IMAGE QUALITY REVIEW RT
Dr Mohamed El Safwany, MD.
Components of Image Quality & Radiographic Artifacts Radiologic Technology A Spring 2010 Final Final.
Image Quality Radiographic Resolution.
Mammography Questions and Answers
Components of Image Quality & Radiographic Artifacts
Factors affecting CT image RAD
Fluoroscopy Q&A Robert L. Metzger, Ph.D..
Exposure Factors or Prime Factors
RAD 254 Chapter 16 Image Quality Film factors Geometric factors Subject factors.
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNIQUE AND EXPOSURE
Radiographic Quality Visibility and Sharpness
Image Quality Q&A. RAPHEX Diagnostic Question 2001 D9: The imaging system which is best for visualizing small high contrast objects is: A. Computed tomography.
Image Production and Evaluation NOTE: QA AND QC ARE USED INTERCHANGABLY IN APPLETON AND LANGE.
Grids George David Associate Professor Department of Radiology
Radiographic Grids I By Professor Stelmark.
Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Essentials of Dental Radiography for Dental Assistants and Hygienists, Ninth Edition Evelyn.
Stacy Kopso, M.Ed., R.T.(R)(M).  Xray photon loses energy and changes direction  Responsible for most of the scatter that fogs the image  Related to.
Summary of Rotational Panoramic Radiography. Theory of Rotational Panoramic Radiography Panoramic Radiography –Unique in that the focus of the horizontal.
Image Receptor Unsharpness By Professor Stelmark.
Image Quality and Patient Dose. X-ray tube design - basic principles Electrons generated by thermionic emission from a heated filament (cathode) Accelerating.
Tube Exposure Factors Math Technique Contrast and Density
Sergeo Guilbaud School of Radiologic Sciences
RADIOGRAPHIC QUALITY S. Guilbaud, Education Director School of Radiologic Sciences.
Basis of Mammography F. Milano Dept. Clinical Physiopathology University of Florence
Exposure Factors or Prime Factors
Chapters 21 & 22.
Resident Physics Lectures
Factors Effecting the Production
Quality Control Testing of Screen Speed
Resident Physics Lectures (Year 1)
Resident Physics Lectures
Resident Physics Lectures
Resident Physics Lectures (Year 1)
Image Production and Evaluation
Fluoroscopic Image Quality Considerations
Fluoroscopic Image Quality Considerations
Dept of Radiodiagnosis, BJMC, Pune
GRIDS PRESENTER-Dr.Vishwanath patil PG resident
Presentation transcript:

Geometric Factors Focal Spot Object Film Object b a h c Film B A H C a b c h ---- = --- = --- = --- A B C H

Magnification Defined Focal Spot size of image -------------------- size of object Object Film (image)

Using Similar Triangles size of image Magnification = -------------------- size of object Focal Spot h H Object Film (image) focus to film distance H Magnification = ---------------------------------- = --- focus to object distance h

Using Similar Triangles size of image Magnification = -------------------- size of object Focal Spot h focus to film distance H magnification = ---------------------------------- = --- focus to object distance h H Object Film (image) SO focus to film dist. size of image = size of object X --------------------------------- focus to object dist

Optimizing Image Quality * focus to film distance H magnification = ---------------------------------- = --- focus to object distance h Focal Spot h H Object Film (image) Minimize magnification Minimize object-film distance Maximize focal-film distance

Relative Position Distortion Distortion Types X-Ray Tube Film Image Shape Distortion X-Ray Tube Film Image Relative Position Distortion minimal distortion when object near central beam & close to film

Penumbra Latin for “almost shadow” region of partial illumination also called edge gradient region of partial illumination caused by finite size of focal spot smears edges on film zone of unsharpness called geometric unsharpness penumbra edge gradient Line source focal spot Film Image

True Magnification m = geometric mag M = true mag Function of ratio of focal spot to object size (f / d) true & geometric magnification equal only when object very large compared to focal spot f a d b M=m + (m-1) X (f / d)

Penumbra Calculation Minimizing Penumbra Minimize object-film distance (OID) Maximize source-object distance (SOD) Makes focal spot appear smaller Minimize focal spot size F Line source focal spot SOD Object SID OID P = F x ------- SOD OID P

Magnification m = geometric mag M = true mag M = m = (a+b) / a d m = (a+b) / a M=m + (m-1) X (f / d) Finite sized focal spot M = m = (a+b) / a Infinitely small focal spot Geom = True m = geometric mag M = true mag a b

For general radiography purposes the geometric unsharpeness dominates the other components Therefore the unsharpeness will increase with increasing magnification. To keep magnification small (close to m=1) requires the image receptor to be as close as possible to the patient and the focus patient distance to be large. Typical conditions are: a  1mm d1  1 m d2  10 cm

Motion Unsharpness Caused by motion during exposure of Effect patient tube film Effect similar to penumbra Minimize by immobilizing patient short exposure times

Absorption Unsharpness Cause gradual change in x-ray absorption across an object’s edge or boundary thickness of absorber presented to beam changes Effect produces poorly defined margin of solid objects X-Ray Tube X-Ray Tube X-Ray Tube

Inverse Square Law intensity of light falling on flat surface from point source is inversely proportional to square of distance from point source if distance 2X, intensity drops by 4X Assumptions point source no attenuation Cause increase in exposure area with distance Intensity a 1/d2 d

Trade-off Geometry vs. Intensity maximize SID to minimize geometric unsharpness but doubling SID increases mAs by X4 increased tube loading longer exposure time possible motion going from 36 to 40 inch SID requires 23% mAs increase F SOD SID OID P

Magnification Types Geometric Magnification True Magnification Focal Spot Object Film h H Geometric Magnification assumes point source calculated from similar triangles True Magnification takes into account finite size of focal spot focal spot is area (not point) source

Automatic Artifact Occurs whenever we image a 3D object in 2D Work-around Multiple views ? ?

Film Construction Radiographic Film has two basic parts. Base Emulsion Most film has two layers of emulsion so it is referred to as Double Emulsion Film

Emulsion The emulsion is the heart of the film. The x-rays or light from the intensifying screens interact with the emulsion and transfer information to the film The emulsion consists or a very homogeneous mixture of gelatin and silver halide crystals about 3 to 5 µm thick.

Silver Halide Crystals 98% Silver Bromide 2% Silver Iodide Tabular shape used most commonly for general radiography. About 1µm thick for screen film exposure.

Silver Halide Crystals The differences in speed, contrast and resolution depend upon the process by which the silver halide crystals are manufactured and by the mixture of these crystals into the gelatin. Size and concentration of crystals have a primary influence on speed.

Producing the Latent Image The resulting silver grain is formed. Silver halide that is not irradiated remain inactive. The irradiated and non-irradiated silver halide produces the latent image.

Types of X-ray Film Two main types: Screen film used with intensifying screens. Single emulsion- emulsion on one side of base. Double emulsion used with two screens. Direct exposure film or non-screen film. Special purpose: Duplication, Cine, Dental

Film Dosimeters OD Dose (log)

Optical density X-ray film is a negative recorder – increased light (or x-ray) exposure causes the developed film to become darker Degree of darkness is quantified by the OD, measured with a densitometer Transmittance and OD defined as:

OD examples T OD Comment 1.0000 Perfectly clear (does not exist) Perfectly clear (does not exist) 0.7760 0.11 Unexposed film (base + fog) 0.1000 1 Medium gray 0.0100 2 Dark 0.0010 3 Very dark; requires hot lamp 0.00025 3.6 Maximum OD used in medical radiography

Contrast Contrast of a radiographic film is related to the slope of the H&D curve: Regions of higher slope have higher contrast Regions of reduced slope (e.g., the toe and shoulder) have lower contrast A single number, which defines the overall contrast of a given type of radiographic film, is the average gradient

Average gradient OD1 = 0.25 + base + fog OD2 = 2.0 + base + fog Average gradients for radiographic film range from 2.5 to 3.5

Scattered radiation For virtually all radiographic procedures except mammography, most photon interactions in soft tissue produce scattered x-ray photons Detection of scattered photons causes film darkening but does not add information content to the image

Effect of collimation As the field of view is reduced, the scatter is reduced An easy way to reduce the amount of x-ray scatter is by collimating the x-ray field to include only the anatomy of interest and no more

Antiscatter grid An antiscatter grid is placed between the patient and the screen-film cassette The grid uses geometry to reduce the amount of scattered reaching the detector

Antiscatter grid (cont.) Antiscatter grid is composed of a series of small slits, aligned with the focal spot, that are separated by highly attenuating septa Primary x-rays have a higher chance of passing through the slits unattenuated by the adjacent septa Septa (grid bars) are usually made of lead; openings (interspaces) between the bars can be made of carbon fiber, aluminum, or even paper

Bar Phantom Setup                                                      Who is this?

The Rise & Fall of Joe Camel

Focal Spot Size Varies with Technique Electron beam focuses more poorly at high mA or low kV Blooming increase of focal spot size with increasing mA more of a problem at low kV’s more blooming perpendicular to cathode-anode axis kilovoltage effects size decreases slightly with increasing kVp size always measured & specified at particular technique

Off-Axis Variation focal spot measurements normally made on central ray apparent focal spot size changes in anode-cathode direction smaller toward anode side larger toward cathode side less effect in cross-axis direction

Focal Spot Size Trade-off Focal Spot Size most critical for heat vs. resolving power exposure time vs. resolving power Focal Spot Size most critical for magnification mammography

Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) How well information reproduced (fraction of contrast retained) at various input spatial frequencies

Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) Fraction of contrast reproduced as a function of frequency Freq. = line pairs / cm 1 MTF 50% Recorded Contrast (reduced by blur) Contrast provided to film frequency

MTF If MTF = 1 all contrast reproduced at this frequency Contrast provided to film Recorded Contrast

MTF If MTF = 0.5 half of contrast reproduced at this frequency Contrast provided to film Recorded Contrast

MTF If MTF = 0 no contrast reproduced at this frequency Contrast provided to film Recorded Contrast

Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) value between 0 and 1 MTF = 1 indicates all information reproduced at this frequency MTF = 0 indicates no information reproduced at this frequency

Component MTF Each component of imaging system has its own MTF each component retains a fraction of contrast as function of frequency System MTF is product of MTF’s for each component.

Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) Since MTF is between 0 and 1, composite MTF <= MTF of poorest component 1/2 * 1/3 * 1/4 * 1/5 = ? ? < 1/5

Film MTF Resolves 10-20 line pairs per mm MTF ~ 1 for clinical applications

Focal Spot MTF Function of magnification Deteriorates with increased magnification all clinical imaging involves some magnification The larger the focal spot, the more deterioration of MTF with increased magnification

Imaging Screen MTF improves with magnification Why? magnification of an object of given frequency reduces frequency seen by screen

Focal Spot & Screen MTF focal spot MTF degrades with magnification screen MTF improves with magnification film MTF unaffected with magnification best system resolution detail screens minimize magnification BUT detail screens decrease speed increase exposure time more potential for motion

Imaging Physics Wrap Up

Object Motion independent of magnification depends on exposure time velocity If motion < 0.1 mm usually doesn’t contribute to unsharpness If motion > 1 mm, it generally dominates

Quantum Mottle statistical fluctuation in # of x-ray photons used by imaging system to form image quantum mottle independent of geometric (radiographic) magnification for a given density the same # of photons must strike a given area of screen/film

Quantum Mottle quantum mottle directly affected by photographic (optical) magnification less photons per unit area of image

Quantum Mottle influences perception of low-contrast objects with poorly defined borders not well addressed by MTF measures sharp high contrast borders geometric (radiographic) magnification may improve visibility of low contrast objects quantum mottle noise does not increase

Skin Exposure & Magnification Patient closer to x-ray tube Increases exposure grids not used with magnification work because of air gap Decreases exposure No bucky factor loss (3-6) Grid Film

Skin Exposure & Magnification Increase is less than calculated by inverse square law for 2X mag skin not twice as close routine radiography also involves some magnification smaller volume of patient exposed high speed screen/film sometimes used for magnification Grid Film

Ilse, we’ll always have physics. You Must Remember This Ilse, we’ll always have physics. The End