Turtle ray interactions with the EMC Tim West University of Manchester.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
June 28, 2004 BBBTF Steven H. Robertson McGill University, Institute of Particle Physics 1 Beam Background Simulation with B A B AR with B A B AR June.
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
1 IR Vacuum M. Sullivan MAC Review Jan , 2006 M. Sullivan for the Machine Advisory Committee Review January 18-20, 2006 IR Vacuum.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
Status of EMC background data Tim West University of Manchester.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.
CC ANALYSIS STUDIES Andy Blake Cambridge University Fermilab, September 2006.
Diffractive Results from Workshop on low x physics, Antwerp 2002 Brian Cox   E Diffractive W and Z Observation of double diffractive dijets Run 1 highlights.
Evaluation of G4 Releases in CMS (Sub-detector Studies) Software used Electrons in Tracker Photons in the Electromagnetic Calorimeter Pions in the Calorimeter.
G EANT 4 energy loss of protons, electrons and magnetic monopole M. Vladymyrov.
The Design of a Detector for the Electron Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Anders Ingo Kirleis 1, William Foreman 1, Elke-Caroline Aschenauer 2, and Matthew.
BEACH Conference 2006 Leah Welty Indiana University BEACH /7/06.
NEEP 541 Radiation Interactions Fall 2003 Jake Blanchard.
Approved Plots from CMS First Beam Runs 2-October-2008.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
Anders Kirleis Stony Brook University The Design Of A Detector For The Electron Ion Collider.
Beam-Beam Background and the Forward Region at a CLIC Detector André Sailer (CERN PH-LCD) LC Physics School, Ambleside 22st August, 2009.
GEANT4-BASED SIMULATION STUDY OF PEP-II BEAM BACKGROUNDS IN THE BABAR DETECTOR AT THE SLAC B-FACTORY W. S. Lockman, SCIPP, University of California, Santa.
1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
HIGH GRANULARITY CALORIMETER ANALYSIS SARAH MARIE BRUNO CMS - CALTECH GROUP SUPERVISORS: ADOLF BORNHEIM, LINDSEY GRAY, MARIA SPIROPULU.
Ted Liu, July 5,00, idea on Ztrigger L1 Trigger Strategy L1 Trigger Requirements and Trigger Lines L1 Trigger performance Background Study Improving Performance:
Detector alignment Stefania and Bepo Martellotti 20/12/10.
Dec 2004 Low Energy backgrounds in the TESLA IR Impact on feedback BPMs FONT collaboration  QMUL: P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, G White, S Molloy.
BESIII EMC Simulation & Reconstruction He Miao
1 M. Sullivan IR update IR Update M. Sullivan for the 3 rd SuperB workshop SLAC June14-16, 2006.
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
07/24/07 Francisco Carrion OPTIMIZING THE TRACK DETECTOR Francisco Javier Carrión Ruiz Mentor: Hans Wenzel 07/08/09 SID CONCEPT FOR THE INTERNATIONAL LINEAR.
1 Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump Siva Darbha Supervisors: Lewis Keller and Takashi Maruyama.
ST Occupancies (revisited) M. Needham EPFL. Introduction Occupancies matter Date rates/sizes In particular was data size on links from Tell1 to farm estimated.
Feb 7, 2006S. Kahn -- Muon Collider Detector Backgrounds 1 Detector Backgrounds in a Muon Collider Steve Kahn Muons Inc. LEMC Workshop.
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with the PHENIX experiment at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - Master of Arts – Thesis Defense Stony Brook University.
Inclusive cross section and single transverse-spin asymmetry of very forward neutron production at PHENIX Spin2012 in Dubna September 17 th, 2012 Yuji.
William Lockman UC Santa Cruz May 6, 2005MDI meeting G4 simulation: status and validation strategy Goals Contributors Status Needed plots Future tasks.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
Preliminary Design of Trigger System for BES III Zhen’an LIU Inst of High Energy Physics,Beijing Oct
Beam Background Simulation at Belle/KEKB Motivation SR background Particle background Feedback to the detector design SR alarm Summary O. Tajima (Tohoku.
Initial Study of Synchrotron Radiation Issues for the CEPC Interaction Region M. Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory for the CEPC14 Workshop.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
on behalf of ATLAS LAr Endcap Group
Update of the SR studies for the FCCee Interaction Region
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
The Interaction Region
Beam-Gas Inelastic scattering in CEPC partial double ring
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
STAR Geometry and Detectors
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
High Granularity Calorimeter Upgrade Studies
Calorimeter Backgrounds
Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
EMC Simulation Studies SuperB Collaboration Workshop LNF 1/12/2009
SR Update for JLEIC June 8, 2017
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

Turtle ray interactions with the EMC Tim West University of Manchester

Outline What are turtle rays? What are turtle rays? About the simulated data About the simulated data Low energy ring results Low energy ring results High energy ring results High energy ring results Future plans Future plans

What are turtle rays? Coulomb and Bremsstrahlung related processes cause e − and e + in the beam to move off axis. Coulomb and Bremsstrahlung related processes cause e − and e + in the beam to move off axis. These ‘turtle rays’ then interact with material around the detector; the support structure, magnets and beam pipe itself. These ‘turtle rays’ then interact with material around the detector; the support structure, magnets and beam pipe itself. This interaction can produce an EM shower which is then picked up in the Calorimeter. This interaction can produce an EM shower which is then picked up in the Calorimeter. This shower can then add energy to digis produced by collisions. This shower can then add energy to digis produced by collisions.

About the simulated data Results presented here were produced from Monte Carlo data simulated in January of this year. Results presented here were produced from Monte Carlo data simulated in January of this year. The number of entries in plots may include events which produce no hits in the EMC. The number of entries in plots may include events which produce no hits in the EMC. LER results are for 2000 events per ntuple; HER results tend to for slightly less due to batch jobs timing out. LER results are for 2000 events per ntuple; HER results tend to for slightly less due to batch jobs timing out. Concentrate on the turtle rays produced in Coulomb scatters as these cause the most background. Concentrate on the turtle rays produced in Coulomb scatters as these cause the most background.

LER results Of 2000 events, only 278 produce the 2049 digi hits. Of 2000 events, only 278 produce the 2049 digi hits. Small number of hits in the endcap are concentrated in the inner rings. Small number of hits in the endcap are concentrated in the inner rings. Forward region of barrel has more hits that backward region. Forward region of barrel has more hits that backward region. No large variation over phi. No large variation over phi. Primary PEP hits are concentrated around the skew quad and quadrupole-2 magnets at front and rear ends. Primary PEP hits are concentrated around the skew quad and quadrupole-2 magnets at front and rear ends. Large peak at 556cm – has a 0.5mm spread. Large peak at 556cm – has a 0.5mm spread.

HER results

HER results (continued) Of the 1279 events, 676 produce 7016 digis in the EMC. Of the 1279 events, 676 produce 7016 digis in the EMC. A further 201 digis come from 80 events which have no pep hit; there are another 131 events with no pep hit or emc digis. A further 201 digis come from 80 events which have no pep hit; there are another 131 events with no pep hit or emc digis. Large excess of digi hits in the eastern quadrant of the detector. Large excess of digi hits in the eastern quadrant of the detector. Slight excess of digis in the top quadrant for pep hits further from the IP. Slight excess of digis in the top quadrant for pep hits further from the IP. Peak in hits in endcap – pep hits further from the IP produce very few hits in the barrel. Peak in hits in endcap – pep hits further from the IP produce very few hits in the barrel.

HER results (continued) Moving the pep hit closer to the IP increases proportion of hits in the barrel (excess in rear portion). Moving the pep hit closer to the IP increases proportion of hits in the barrel (excess in rear portion). Digi multiplicity increases rapidly as the pep hit moves towards the IP, peaking in the region of the septum. Digi multiplicity increases rapidly as the pep hit moves towards the IP, peaking in the region of the septum. PEP region (cm) N EMC N PEP N EMC /N PEP z< <z< <z Septum

HER results – the septum Classify septum pep hits as those between 240cm and 285cm upstream of IP. Classify septum pep hits as those between 240cm and 285cm upstream of IP. Fairly small number of hits on the septum – very high digi multiplicity though. Fairly small number of hits on the septum – very high digi multiplicity though. Very few hits in the endcap – large excess towards the rear portion of the barrel. Very few hits in the endcap – large excess towards the rear portion of the barrel. Septum hits produce around 30% of the digis in the rear portion of the barrel. Septum hits produce around 30% of the digis in the rear portion of the barrel.

HER results (continued) These results are for zone 2 scattering events (26-42m upstream of IP). These results are for zone 2 scattering events (26-42m upstream of IP). Zones 3 (42-66m) and 4 (66m upwards) do not appear to show any hits in the region of the septum. We also see: Zones 3 (42-66m) and 4 (66m upwards) do not appear to show any hits in the region of the septum. We also see: o Much lower digi multiplicity (average ~1.5 for both). o Large excess in the endcap. o Slight excess in the rearmost part of the barrel. Have only had a preliminary look at zone 3 and 4; not looked at zone 1 (4-26m upstream) at all – these are on my to-do list. Have only had a preliminary look at zone 3 and 4; not looked at zone 1 (4-26m upstream) at all – these are on my to-do list.

HER results (continued) None of these events cause a trigger to fire. None of these events cause a trigger to fire. Average cluster energy is 37/41/44MeV for zone 2/3/4; number of clusters decreases as zone number increases. Average cluster energy is 37/41/44MeV for zone 2/3/4; number of clusters decreases as zone number increases. Very few clusters over 100MeV (16/486 over all zones). Very few clusters over 100MeV (16/486 over all zones). Around a third of the digis are on the default digi list. Around a third of the digis are on the default digi list. Average default digi energy is under 10MeV. Average default digi energy is under 10MeV.

Future plans o Look at HER zone 0, 1, 3 and 4 turtle rays more closely. o Look at LER zones 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 turtle rays - results here are for zone 5 ( m upstream). o Look for similarities with single beam data.

Zone 1 HER coulomb Pep hit z/cm N EMC N PEP N EMC /N PEP z< (517) 20 (256) 2.8 (2.5) -470<z< (1410) 35 (217) 7.2 (7.1) -350<z (5089) 693 (191) 28.1 (26.6) Septum 1752 (1428) 48 (35) 36.5 (40.8) No triggers No triggers Similar digi/cluster energy distribution. Similar digi/cluster energy distribution.

Zone 1 HER coulomb

Zone 2 HER coulomb

Zone 3 HER coulomb

Zone 4 HER coulomb

Zone 1 Zone 2