Early Childhood Education for ALL Young Children: A Look at the IDEA Six-Year State Performance Plan Susan Crowther IDEA, Part B, Section 619 Coordinator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preschool Special Education A Review of State Performance Indicators and The Child Outreach Network.
Advertisements

Educational Environments Data Collection for Children Ages 3 through 5 RI Department of Education August 22, 2006.
Delaware Building BLOCKS EARLY CHILDHOOD MONITORING – INSTRUCTION – ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM FOR YOUNG CHILDREN Delaware Special Education Meeting September.
Erik McCormick Former OSEP Part B Data Manager September 29, 2006 Special Education Data – The Old, the New and the Huh?
Six Year Plan Meeting the state targets Region Meeting August 16, 2007.
Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Transition (Indicators C-8 and B-12)
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
INDICATOR 6-PRESCHOOL ENVIRONMENT CODES. Indicator 6-Preschool Environment Codes  Percentage of children ages 3 through 5 with IEPs attending a:  A.
OF ECSE COMPLIANCE PRESENTATION FOR THE 2014 MO-CASE CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 23, 2014.
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
State Prekindergarten Standards, Children with and without Disabilities: We’re ALL on the Same Page 2005 OSEP Early Childhood Conference December 2005.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.
IDEA What Does it Mean for Inclusion? Natural Environments/ LRE for ALL Children and the State Performance Plan (SPP) December 18, 2008 Pamela Ptacek.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
Bibb County School District Program for Exceptional Children Paired Zone Meeting November 7 and 9, 2011.
Sandy Rybaltowski Special Education Policy April 2008 REPORT ON PRESCHOOL EDUCATION.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
Understanding Transition from Early Intervention to Preschool An Overview for Families New Jersey Department of Education New Jersey Department of Health.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
Noel Cole, Coordinator Michigan Department of Education, Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
Creating Supports for Transition Ann Hains, UW-Milwaukee Sarah Hadden, UW-Eau Claire Jill Haglund, DPI Donna Miller, DHFS.
UNDERSTANDING THE THREE CHILD OUTCOMES 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
JANUARY 6, 2014 VERNA THOMPSON Delaware 619 Meeting.
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
1 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
School for Early Development and Achievement Kim Johnsen SPE 644.
Indicator 7: Measuring Preschool Outcomes Sarah Geldart – MA ESE – Additional Contact:
KETTLE MORAINE (KM) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Ryan Meyer.
Spring 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 SPP/APR Update.
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
Annual Desk Audit (ADA) March 31, 2015 Webinar. Agenda  Purpose/Introduction of the ADA  Indicator Reviews  With Five-year trends  Navigating the.
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
October REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR PRESCHOOL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS.
State Performance Plan ESC-2 Presentation For Superintendents September 19, 2007.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Early Childhood Outcomes Trying to Get The Word Out Maria Synodi, 619 Coordinator Connecticut State Department of Education NECTAC National TA Meeting.
Special Education School District Profile Slinger School District Lynda McTrusty.
ARC Chairperson Training
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Appleton Area School District
Milwaukee School District
Hartford Jt. 1 School District
For Starters: It’s IDEIA !
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
ARC Chairperson Training
Why Collect Outcome Data?
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Presentation transcript:

Early Childhood Education for ALL Young Children: A Look at the IDEA Six-Year State Performance Plan Susan Crowther IDEA, Part B, Section 619 Coordinator Anita Ashford Title I Prekindergarten Programs

State Performance Plan  Six-Year Plan  Annual Performance Report with data- driven results  Written across Divisions at the Department  Submitted December 2005  Approved without revision, Jan 2006

20 Indicators  Indicator 1 – High School Diploma Rate  Indicator 2 – Dropout Rate  Indicator 3 – Statewide Assessment  Indicator 4 – Suspension/Expulsion  Indicator 5 – Placement of Students 6-21  Indicator 6 – Placement of Students 3-5  Indicator 7 – Outcomes Students 3-5  Indicator 8 – Family Involvement  Indicator 9 – Disproportionality - Overall Identification

Indicators (continued)  Indicator 10 – Disproportionality - Identification by Classification  Indicator 11 – Timely Evaluations  Indicator 12 – Transition from Part C to Part B  Indicator 13 – Transition, Ages 16+  Indicator 14 – Transition, Postsecondary Survey  Indicator 15 – General Supervision  Indicator – Dispute Resolution  Indicator 20 – Accurate Data

Early Childhood Indicators  Indicator 6 - FAPE in the LRE  Children served in setting with typically developing peers  Indicator 7 - FAPE in the LRE  Outcomes  Indicator 12 – Transition from Part C to Part B  IEP by the third birthday

Indicator 6 – FAPE in the LRE  Percent of preschool children with IEPs who received special education and related services in settings with typically developing peers (e.g., early childhood settings, home, and part-time early childhood and part-time early childhood special education settings). (20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(A))

Educational Environments  Early Childhood Setting (ECE)  Early Childhood Special Education Setting (ECSE)  Home  Part-Time ECE/Part-Time ECSE  Residential Facility  Separate School  Itinerant Service (Outside the Home)  Reverse Mainstream Setting

Educational Environments  Early Childhood Program at least 80% of day  Early Childhood Program from 40% to 79% of day  Early Childhood Program Less than 40% of day  Early Childhood Special Education Program, Separate Class  Early Childhood Special Education Program, Separate School  Early Childhood Special Education Program, Residential Facility  Service Provider Location  Home

State Improvement Goal ECE, Part-time/part-time, home (Itinerant, RM) FFYMeasurable and Rigorous Targets % % % % % %

Indicator 7 – FAPE in the LRE  Percent of preschool children with IEPs who demonstrate improved:  Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships);  Acquisition of and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy); and  Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs. (20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(A))

Choosing an instrument  State Task Force  – reviewed instruments  May 2005 – Recommended Assessment, Evaluation and Programming System (AEPS)  December 2005 – Train the Trainers  Spring 2006 – Students assessed using AEPS

Indicator 12 – Transition C to B  Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age three, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.  Data of current IEP by third birthday not accurate due to lack of reporting between Part C and Part B

Publications  Early Childhood Transition Process  Brochure – April 2006  Family Booklet – Summer 2006  Collaboration between Part C System and Part B, Section 619 on these and other planned publications

Reports  Monthly report to school districts of children served in Part C who are 2 years 2months  Provided by Part C to the state, then dispersed to school districts

Transition Meeting  Scheduled between child’s age of 2 years 3 months and 2 years 9 months  Scheduled by the child’s Family Service Coordinator (FSC)  Held by child’s age of 2 years 9 months  Attended by parents and school district and Part C stakeholders

Evaluation and IEP  Evaluation must be completed in timely manner in order to complete IEP by third birthday.  IEP completed, signed and implemented by third birthday.  No interim IEP allowed  No timeline extensions allowed that would prevent the IEP by third birthday.

For more information  State Performance Plan  Publications  Type in “State Performance Plan”  State Department     Regional Service Center   School Directory, Education staff, DOE by office/division  Regions, Early Childhood Coordinator