Regional Haze Rule Best Available Retrofit Technology Government to Government Consultation Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RH Requirement for BART  §308 (e) contains BART requirements for regional haze visibility impairment…. The State must submit an implementation plan containing.
Advertisements

Regional Haze Update & Current Results Michele Notarianni Brenda Johnson EPA Region 4.
Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Environmental Management Commission.
An Update on the Activities of the Western Regional Air Partnership ‘WRAP v2.0’ Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
Air Protection Branch 1. 2 Air Quality Activities Support the Mission of the Air Protection Branch Monitor and Report Air Quality Data Analysis and Planning.
Texas Lignite Industry. Texas Lignite  Because >95% of lignite mining operations in Texas are in support of electric generation…..whatever impacts the.
CHEAPER AND CLEANER: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants, Delivering Health, Environmental and Economic.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Indiana Energy Association Environmental Issues Impacting Coal Fired Power Plants September 12, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department.
ACC Open Meeting – November 18, 2010 Four Corners Power Plant 1.
Colorado: An Air Quality History WESTAR SPRING BUSINESS MEETING MAR CH 29 – 30, 2010.
Regional Air Quality Analysis: Four Corners
Update on EPA Oil and Gas Activities Greg Green, Outreach and Information Division, OAQPS.
The Impact of Greenhouse Gas Regulation on Energy Production: Legal Framework for Greenhouse Gases Standards for Fossil-Fuel Fired Electric Generating.
WELCOME TO NEW MEXICO WESTAR Fall Business Meeting 2009.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
1 Navajo Nation Operating Permit Program Anoop Sukumaran, Navajo Nation EPA Tribal Program Development.
1 EPA’s Proposed Interstate Air Quality Rule Consideration of Issues Associated with Possible Expansion of IAQR to the West Patrick Cummins, WGA Background.
The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) WRAP formed in 1997 as the successor organization to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) –
Final Amendments to the Regional Haze Rule: BART Rule Making June 16, 2005.
Air Quality Management China City Mobilization Workshop Joseph Paisie USEPA Beijing, China.
Ozone and Nitrogen Concerns in NM WRAP Ozone and NOx in the West November 11, 2009.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q PM 2.5 Final NSR Implementation Rule Nat’l Tribal Air Assoc. July 16, 2008.
BART Control Analysis WESTAR August 31, 2005 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Todd Hawes
Next Steps in Regional Haze Planning in the Western U.S. Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31,
Assessment of Mercury Rules for Electric Generators in North Carolina September 9, 2015 Presented to the Environmental Management Commission – Air Quality.
Ozone and NOx in the West WRAP November 11, 2009 Santa Fe, New Mexico Don Arkell Regional Haze Implementation.
BART Guideline Overview WESTAR August 31, 2005 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Todd Hawes
REGIONAL HAZE BART – Key Issues For Consideration Eric Massey, Arizona DEQ Lee Alter, WGA SSJF Meeting June 3, 2004 Denver, Colorado.
NACAA Fall Meeting October 2012 Innovative and Replicable Initiatives - The Colorado Clean Air/Clean Jobs Act Will Allison, Director CDPHE Air Pollution.
1 Colorado BART APCD. 2 Class 1 Areas National Parks and Wilderness Areas 12 in Colorado 4 National Parks 8 Wilderness Areas.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
Best Available Retrofit Technology Rule - Colorado David R. Ouimette Colorado Air Pollution Control Division.
Proposed Reasonable Progress Rule Workshop Brief Background and Procedure Public Workshop June 14, 2007.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Santa Fe December 2006 Update on Regional Haze 308 SIP Template.
WESTAR 2003 Fall Technical Conference on PSD Increment Tracking & Cumulative Effects Modeling Seattle, Washington Conducting Class I Area Increment Analyses.
1 Conducting Reasonable Progress Determinations under the Regional Haze Rule Kathy Kaufman EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards January 11,
Navajo Nation Interest’s In EPA Rulemakings Affecting EGU’s National Tribal Forum May 22-24, 2012 Tulsa, Oklahoma Anoop Sukumaran, Navajo Nation Environmental.
WRAP Update Patrick Cummins WESTAR Meeting September 23, 2005.
BART SIP Development: Example from Colorado Rocky Mountain National Park WRAP IWG Meeting, Denver, CO August 29, 2007 Presented by: Ray Mohr and Curt Taipale.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q 1 Regional Haze Update WESTAR September 17-19, 2007 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards.
EPA – Regional Haze Issues IWG Meeting April 17 th Keith Rose and Laurel Dygowski.
Reproposal of the Regional Haze Rule and BART Guidelines.
Navajo Nation Air Quality Control Program Operating Permit Program Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency Route 112 North/Bldg Fort Defiance,
Summary of June 15, 2005 Revisions to RH BART and BART Guidelines.
VISIBILITY SIPS The Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Fire The Role of the RPOs Opportunities for Participation US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Dennis Haddow.
The West is different August 14, 2013 OAQPS. Aerosols causing Worst Visibility Days – East vs. West 2.
Emission Trends and SIP Scenarios for SO2 and NOx Patrick Cummins WRAP Meeting December 14, 2005.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
Impacts of Environmental Regulations in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT January 26, 2016.
How Tribes Use Models Part 1 Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
WRAP WORK PLAN UPDATE NOVEMBER 2001 Submitted to WRAP Board for Approval Andy Ginsburg ODEQ, Co-Chair IOC Forum Mike George ADEQ, Co-Chair TOC Forum.
Pulp & Paper Sector Strategy & New Source Performance Standards Strategy Peter Tsirigotis, Director Sector Policies & Programs Division National Association.
Working with State and Federal Regulatory and Land Management Agencies Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
EPA Air Policy Priorities
WRAP Update Patrick Cummins WESTAR Meeting September 23, 2005
BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association
Department of Environmental Quality
Four Corners Air Quality Task Force
Status of Regional Haze Rule
Western Regional Haze Planning and
Air Update, Georgia EPD Karen Hays Chief, Air Protection Branch
Summary of RH-LTS Requirements (d)(3)
EPA’s Roadmap for the Second Planning Period
Presentation transcript:

Regional Haze Rule Best Available Retrofit Technology Government to Government Consultation Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency

NGS BART (PENDING) NOx Mercury (Final) Coal Ash Rule Climate Change FCPP BART (FINAL) NOx, PM Mercury (Final) Coal Ash Rule Climate Change SJGS BART (STAYED) NOx Mercury (Final) Coal Ash Rule Climate Change Coal Fired EGU’s Surrounding Navajo Nation EPA R9

Navajo Nation Comment Team Navajo Nation President NNEPA Executive Director Air & Toxic Department Manager Air Quality Attorney Operating Permit Program Navajo Division of Natural Resources Natural Resource Attorney NN Attorney General Water Rights Unit Attorney Navajo Nation Vice President

Regional Haze Rule (RHR) 40 CFR Subpart § The Clean Air Act requires (Best Available Retrofit Technology) BART review when any source that “emits any air pollutant which may reasonably be anticipated to cause or contribute to any impairment of visibility” in any 156 Federal Class I area There are sixteen (16) and eleven (11) Class I area within 300 km (186 mi) radius of the Four Corners Power Plant and Navajo Generating Station Predicted visibility impact with baseline emissions exceeds 0.5 delta- deciview

Regional Haze Visibility Impact Best 24-hr avg visibility Worst 24-hr avg visibility

Timeline For Proposed Activities “Goal is to achieve natural background levels by 2064 (i.e., no manmade visibility impairment)” 53 Years Every 10 years beginning in 2018 the previous SIP/FIP must be updated to account for current visibility and progress made toward the 2064 goal 6

Federal Class 1 Areas Within NGS & FCPP

BART Five Factor Analysis 40 CFR § 51 Appendix Y Cost of Compliance Energy and non-air quality environmental impacts of compliance Existing pollution control technology at the source Remaining useful life of the source Degree of visibility improvement which may be anticipated from the use of BART

Unit 4 &5 750MW per unit Unit 3 280MW Unit 1 &2 185MW per unit Four Corners Power Plant Pre- BART Operation APS = 100% unit 1,2,3, Unit 4,5 : SCE 48 %, APS 15%, PNM 13%, SRP 10%, EPE 7%, TEP 7%

Unit 4 &5 750MW per unit Unit 3 280MW Unit 1 &2 185MW per unit Four Corners Power Plant Better Than BART Proposal APS = 100% unit 1,2,3, Unit 4,5 : SCE 48 %, APS 48+15=63%, PNM 13%, SRP 10%, EPE 7%, TEP 7% SCRSCR

Navajo Generating Station (NGS) BART Decision Pending !!!! Unit 1, 2 and 3 = 750 MW each U.S.BOR =24.3%, SRP = 21.7%, LADWP = 21.2%, APS = 14%, NPC = 11.3%, TEP = 7.5%

NGS Studies

San Juan Generating Station BART-Nation Position EPA R6 BART FIP NMED Failed to Submit RH SIP SCR on all Four Units BART FIP will have No Tribal Implications No Economic Impacts Analyzed Compliance timeline increased from 3 to 5 years NMED RH SIP SNCR on all Four Units Meet Presumptive BART Limits Visibility Improvement aligns with SIP Economic Impact to NM ratepayers analyzed SCR cost too high compared to SNCR Navajo Nation Position EPA Consider NM RH SIP EPA failed to conduct full five factor analysis EPA analysis of no Tribal implications is not supported Economic Impacts, Regional Cumulative Benefits

Degree of Visibility Improvement BART guidelines recommend use of the CALPUFF IMPROVE monitoring network Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) 1 ppb IWAQM default value for ammonia background HCL and HF Emission Factors USEPA approval modeling protocol

Gina McCarthy, Assistant Administrator for EPA Office of Air and Radiation visited NGS and met with Navajo Nation President Ben Shelly on January 29, 2012

Navajo Nation G2G EPA HQ G2G EPA R 9 EPA R 6 G2G DOI USBR, NPS, BIA Lease Power Plants& Coal Mines Mercury, Greenhouse Gases Coal Ash Rule, Ozone NAAQS BART FCPP, NGS, SJGS BART, CAP, EIS, Leases

EPA Policy