1 CONSENSUS STANDARDS OIVD WORKSHOP April 22-23, 2003 Rockville MD Ginette Y. Michaud, M.D. OIVD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The National Standards and Quality System Jean-Louis Racine The World Bank Cambridge, England April 19, 2007 Knowledge Economy Forum VI Technology Acquisition.
Advertisements

U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDAs website for reference purposes only. It.
Regulatory Pathway for Platform Technologies
Entering the US Market: Medical Devices
"Determining the Regulatory Pathway to Market" Classification Heather S. Rosecrans Director, 510(k) Staff Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices.
Development of ISO standards for AD syringes SIGN Meeting Cambodia, October 2002 Injection technologies G Gerald Verollet.
Development of Guidance Documents Jennifer Scharpf, M. P. H
510k Submission Overview Myraqa, Inc. August 22, 2012.
Options for Regulation and the Impact of Regulation on the Marketplace 29 November 2005 Alan Kent
What’s New in the FDA’s Pharmaceutical Inspectorate and Risk Based Systems Inspection Rick Perlman Chair Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Division ASQ.
Medical Devices Approval Process
Entering the North American Market
1 Overview of Standards for External Defibrillators: Role of FDA Charles Ho, Ph.D. FDA/CDRH/ODE
CDRH Software Regulation
Harmonization of Standards for Assistive Technology (AT) Rory A. Cooper, Ph.D. Departments of Rehabilitation Science & Technology, and Bioengineering University.
The FDA Landscape AdvaMed September 2008 Judith K. Meritz
+ Medical Devices Approval Process. + Objectives Define a medical device Be familiar with the classification system for medical devices Understand the.
Overview of NSF Standards Process and Joint Committee Formation Sustainable Water Contact Products Stakeholder Meeting October 30, 2012.
Classification of HLA Devices FDA Introduction & Background Sheryl A. Kochman CBER/OBRR/DBA.
1 Presented by Name Date. 2 Mission To enhance the global competitiveness of U.S. business and the American quality of life by promoting and facilitating.
Radiological Devices Advisory Committee Meeting November 18, 2009 John A. DeLucia iCAD, Inc.
Regulatory Update Ellen Leinfuss SVP, Life Sciences.
CA 101 Certification and Registration ANSI Annual Conference 2002 by: Gordon Gillerman Manager Governmental Services Underwriters Laboratories
FDA Regulatory review in Minutes: What Product Development Executives Need-to-Know. Specifically, frequent causes of recalls and related areas that investigators.
Prof. Moustafa M. Mohamed Vice dean Faculty of Allied Medical Science Pharos University in Alexandria Development and Regulation of Medical Products (MEDR-101)
Industry Perspective on Challenges for Product Developers - Drugs Christine Allison, M.S., RAC Associate Regulatory Consultant, Global Regulatory Affairs.
Feldman 20 February Pilot Plant through Scale-Up Manufacturing Martha A. Feldman, RAC Drug & Device Development Co., Inc. P.O. Box 3515 Redmond,
Slide 1 of 20 Rob Packard, President FRM-023 A D1 – Management Review Template Management Review Management.
Medical Devices IRB Determination IRB Member Continuing Education.
OIVD Workshop Premarket Notification (510(k)) April 22, 2003 Parklawn Building Rockville, MD Presented by Marjorie Shulman Premarket Notification Staff.
FDA Focus On Consumer Protection
STANDARDS OVERVIEW Wednesday, April 30, 2015 KAREN RECZEK, STANDARDS COORDINATION OFFICE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
The concept for a network of national Reference Laboratories for high risk IVDs – Results of the working group meeting 1.
Humanitarian Use Devices September 23, 2011 Theodore Stevens, MS, RAC Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
Slide 1 ANSI Annual Conference 2002 Breaking Down Border: Business, Standards and Trade CA 101: Everything You Need to Know But Didn’t Know to Ask: The.
Utah Life Science Summit Nov Phil Triolo, PhD RAC President, Phil Triolo and Associates LC.
ENV 5613 Instructor: Dr. Berrin Tansel Presented by: Puneet Gill & Waseem Haider.
Regulatory Decision Making D. Kathleen Wright, Reviewer Division of Microbiology Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation & Safety ( OIVD ) Food.
UPCOMING CHANGES TO IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTICS (IVDs) AND LABORATORY DEVELOPED TESTS (LDTs) REGULATIONS Moj Eram, PhD November 5, 2015.
1 BIORESEARCH MONITORING AND IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS SYBIL WELLSTOOD, PH.D. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE DIVISION OF BIORESEARCH MONITORING.
Research in the Office of Vaccines Research and Review: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
1 May 30, 2007 U.S. – China Symposium on Active Industry Participation in Standardization Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC.
Welcome New IRB Member! This brief presentation covers: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
Human Specimen Repositories Requirements of 21 CFR Parts 50 & 56 PRIM & R May 5, 2004 Sally A. Hojvat, Ph.D. Director of Microbiology Devices Office of.
Special Meeting on Procedures for Information Exchange November 7, 2007 Geneva Session 1 Anne Meininger United States USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point.
Dr. Trevor Smith Chair ISO/TC 176 Quality Management & Quality Assurance Worldwide Quality Director Global Manufacturing & Logistics Eastman Kodak Company.
The CDRH Software Message (October 19, 2002) John F Murray Jr.. Center for Devices & Radiological Health US Food and Drug Administration
Workshop on “EU Enlargement: Regulatory Convergence in Non-acceding Countries” Athens 7 – 8 November 2003 Regulatory Convergence and Technical Standards.
Establishment of Medical Device GMP Requirements Hsiau-Wen Huang, Ph. D. Senior Researcher Bureau of Pharmaceutical Affairs Department of Health.
European Diagnostic Manufacturers Association EQA contribution and industry expectations Dr. Claude GIROUD – Chairman Standardization, Quality & Risk Management.
High Level Symposium to Enhance Regulator Expertise on Good Regulatory Practices and the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade.
Device regulations USA Dr Phil Warner. USA Regulations MEDICAL DEVICES Food, Drug & Cosmetics Act Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (and other things)
Workshop on conformity assessment procedures and certification of medical devices INT MARKT Kyiv, November 2011 Conformity assessment of medical.
Director, Regulatory Affairs
FDA's Two New Draft Guidance on Software and Device
Dental Standards & Testing Methods
CA 101 Certification and Registration
Regulation of Medical Devices: Importance of a Globally Harmonized Approach Nicole Taylor Smith, JD September 2017.
Premarket Notification 510(k) process
Irena Prat and Josée Hansen World Health Organization
CDRH Voluntary Consensus Standards Program
Reasonable Assurance of Safety and Effectiveness: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
The Current PMA Requirements
CDRH 2010 Strategic Priorities
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Linda M. Chatwin, Esq. RAC Business Manager, UL LLC
Medical Device Design and Development
Larry Kessler, Sc.D. Director
Dr Manisha Shridhar Regional Advisor WHO-SEARO
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
Presentation transcript:

1 CONSENSUS STANDARDS OIVD WORKSHOP April 22-23, 2003 Rockville MD Ginette Y. Michaud, M.D. OIVD

2 INTRODUCTION  CDRH recognizes many consensus standards relevant to IVDs  IVD SPECIFIC STANDARDS  GENERIC DEVICE STANDARDS

3 INTRODUCTION IVD SPECIFIC STANDARDS – NCCLS  automation and informatics  clinical chemistry and toxicology  evaluation protocols  general laboratory practices  hematology  immunology and ligand assay  microbiology  molecular methods

4 INTRODUCTION “GENERIC” DEVICE STANDARDS- AAMI, ANSI, CEN, IEC, IEEE, ISO, UL  software  medical device risk management  human factors  electrical safety  electromagnetic compatibility

5 INTRODUCTION CONSENSUS STANDARDS I. Role of consensus standards in IVD premarket review II. FDA’s role in development of STNDs III. Process for FDA recognition of STNDs *Focus on consensus documents

6 I. Role of consensus standards in IVD premarket review  FDA Modernization Act of 1997 –Creates Section 514(c) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act  FDA recognition of national and international standards (Federal Register)  voluntary conformance by manufacturers to recognized standards  submission of declaration of conformity

7 I. Role of consensus standards in IVD premarket review  Conformity with recognized standards may affect:  safety and effectiveness determinations  IDE, HDE, PMA, PDP  substantial equivalence determinations  510(k)/abbreviated  amount of test data submitted/reviewed  Manufacturer obligated to:  maintain records  submit data upon request

8 I. Role of consensus standards in IVD premarket review  Conformance to STNDs is voluntary  Alternate approaches allowed Refer to:  "Recognition and Use of Consensus Standards; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA". h/cfdocs/cfggp/search.cfm.

9 I. Role of consensus standards in IVD premarket review  Other guidance:  "The New 510(k) Paradigm. Alternate Approaches to Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications, Final Guidance." and  "Frequently Asked Questions on the New 510(k) Paradigm".

10 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards  Significant OIVD participation in standards development organizations (SDOs)  official membership by individuals  informal document reviews

11 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards  FDA SDO participation governed by 21CFR10.95 Participation in outside standard-setting activities. –FDA encourages participation if in the public interest –CDRH supports participation through the CDRH Standards Program –Individual participation by invitation

12 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards  Organization must meet minimum standards as an SDO: –activity based on sound scientific and technological information; –revisions on the basis of new information; –goal to protect the public against unsafe, ineffective, or deceptive products or practices; –activity not for economic benefit of any group; –activity not involving specific approval of individual products; –existence of commenting procedure.

13 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards  FDA official participation restricted to organizations that meet requirements  Standards are considered for FDA recognition only if developed in conformance with requirements

14 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards OIVD participation in standards development: OIVD participation in standards development:  NCCLS  ISO  GHTF

15 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards NCCLS:  international, voluntary, consensus SDO  Goal: to “enhance the value of medical testing...through the development and dissemination of standards, guidelines, and best practices”

16 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards NCCLS Participation:  proposal of new standards projects  committee writing assignments  commenting on documents  voting on proposed standards

17 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards International Organization for Standardization/ISO: International Organization for Standardization/ISO:  Voluntary, consensus SDO; non- governmental federation of national SDOs, covering all technical fields except electrical  Mission: to promote international standardization to reduce technical barriers to trade

18 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards ISO: ISO:  ~200 technical committees each for different technical areas  OIVD participates in ISO TC 212 Clinical laboratory testing and in vitro diagnostic test systems

19 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards ISO TC 212: ISO TC 212:  Goal: standardization in laboratory medicine and IVD test systems  3 working groups: –WG 1Quality management in the clinical laboratory –WG 2 Reference systems –WG 3 In vitro diagnostic products

20 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards ISO TC 212: ISO TC 212:  4 completed standards: –medical laboratory quality and competence –reference measurement procedures –reference materials –labeling of staining reagents

21 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards ISO TC 212: ISO TC 212:  Standards under development:  laboratory safety  requirements for reference measurement laboratories  metrological traceability

22 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards ISO TC 212: ISO TC 212:  Documents under development (continued):  requirements for blood glucose self- testing systems  specifications for self-testing Prothrombin Time instruments  quality management of point of care testing

23 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF): Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF):  voluntary multi-national organization  representatives: medical device regulatory authorities and industry associations  Goal: harmonization and convergence of medical device regulatory practices

24 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards GHTF:  publishes harmonized documents on regulatory practices & definitions  for use by emerging economies and developed nations  4 Study Groups focused on all phases of product life cycle

25 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards GHTF:  Harmonization projects:  premarket regulatory practices,  standardized premarket submission format,  labeling requirements  data collection  post-market surveillance reporting systems  quality system requirements  medical device auditing processes

26 II. FDA’s role in the development of consensus standards  CDRH active in all Study Groups (SG); OIVD active in SG 1  SG1: operational aspects of medical device regulation including IVD products Current IVD harmonization projects:  classification  labeling  IVD premarket conformity with principles for safety and performance

27 III. Process for FDA Recognition of Consensus Standards  62 IVD Standards recognized by CDRH (NCCLS)  numerous non-IVD standards recognized

28 III. Process for FDA Recognition of Consensus Standards  Mechanisms for proposing CDRH recognition of consensus standards: 1. Proposals by CDRH Specialty Task Groups (STG) 2. Proposals submitted by outside persons and considered by STG  Publication in Federal Register

29 III. Process for FDA Recognition of Consensus Standards  Specialty Task Groups:  Review previously recognized Standards for relevance  Prepare list of priorities for new projects  Propose the revision of existing consensus documents

30 CONCLUSION  OIVD acknowledges the importance of consensus standards:  impact on safety & effectiveness  greater premarket requirement transparency  review of submissions facilitated  Active OIVD participation in development & recognition of STNDs