CRISTAL ITP European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation CRISTAL ITP ASAS-TN, Paris Johan Martensson CASCADE CRISTAL ITPJohan Martensson ASAS-TN 2, Paris CASCADE April 2008

AGENDA Background CASCADE scope ITP procedure Project Project partners Objectives Method Results Next steps and conclusions

CASCADE Scope Ground Surveillance Applications (ADS-B-out) ADS-B Receiver In a non-radar environment In a radar environment On the airport surface Airborne Derived Data Airborne Surveillance Applications (ADS-B-in - ATSAW) Situational awareness on the surface Airborne situational awareness Visual separation on approach In Trail Procedure

ATSA-ITP Standardization Operational Services and Environment Definitions (OSED) - defined by the Requirement Focus Group (RFG) 10 th of March 2008 – SPR-INTEROP ED-159/DO-NNN issued for FRAC 18 th April 2008 – FRAC comment dead line 24 th of April 2008 – Planned FRAC approval at SC-186 meeting in Washington DC

ATSA-ITP Objective ATSA-ITP: Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness - In Trail Procedure in procedural airspace Improved Flight Economy and Flight Safety/Comfort by increasing the opportunities for Flight Level changes through use of new longitudinal separation standard during climb/descend increased pilot awareness of climb/descend opportunities

ATSA-ITP Procedure FL360 FL340 FL350 Standard Separation ATSA-ITP aircraft ADS-B out (consistent with ITP) No specific ADS-B requirements Desired Altitude REFERENCE AIRCRAFT BLOCKING AIRCRAFT 1. Climb is desired 2. Standard climb ? 3. ITP ? Blocked Assessment, request, clearance and reassessment Standard Separation 4. Assessment ok !Approved

Partners With assistance from

Objectives Refine the ATSA-ITP procedure Validate the operational acceptability Demonstrate technical feasibility Ensure that North Atlantic specific constraints and opportunities are taken into account in the standardization and industrial development Develop a benefit model for ATSA-ITP in the North Atlantic environment Prepare a revenue flight trials phase and develop a plan towards operational implementation

Work packages Validation aims CRISTAL ITP Airbus Simulation Shanwick Simulation Reykjavik Simulation Flight TestBenefit Analysis AirborneTechnical Feasibility XXX Operational Acceptability XXX GroundOperational Acceptability XXX BenefitsEfficiency & Capacity X Economics X Safety X*

Plan Project Kick-offJuly 2007 Simulations Airbus stand aloneOctober 2007 Airbus – NATS (Shanwick) October 2007 Airbus – ISAVIA (Flight test rehearsal) December 2007 ISAVIA stand alone (Reykjavik) January 2008 Flight test Airbus – ISAVIAMarch 2008 Benefit Analysis NATSApril 2008

Airborne Validation tools HF/VHF/CPDLC A320 integration AIRBUS Side Pseudo pilot/ATC Conf 1 Conf 2 (ND/MCDU) Simulation Flight trial

Airborne Validation tools HF/VHF/CPDLC A320 integration AIRBUS Side Pseudo pilot/ATC Conf 1 Conf 2 (ND/MCDU) Simulation Flight trial

Ground Validation tools Shanwick ATC Reykjavik

Benefit analysis tools Simulation of real traffic sample Traffic growth Airborne capabilities Flight crew behavior Etc..

Simulations 1 (2) Shanwick + Reykjavik Real ATC HF/VHF/CPDLC A320 integration AIRBUS Side Synchronized Pseudo pilot/ATC Conf 1 Conf 2 (ND/MCDU)

Simulations 2 (2)

Flight Trial 1 (2) Flight path

Flight Trial 2 (2) Manouvers

Results 1 (2) Technical feasibility Prototypes and current technical equipment support the ITP procedure Detailed performance analysis is ongoing Operational acceptability Procedure appreciated, well understood and correctly applied Airborne prototype HMI found “easy to use” Current controller HMI is acceptable to support ITP Clarification of procedure usage (input to ATSA-ITP standard) Agreement on phraseology by controllers and flight crew Strong preference for using CPDLC (free text is acceptable and pre-formated msg preferred) Procedure design and usability allows for a small amount of controller and flight crew training

Results 2 (2) Efficiency, Capacity and Economics Benefit analysis result consolidation is ongoing Results expected shortly Safety Safety issues within the scope of procedure clarification have been considered throughout phase 1 of the project Identified areas for further attention Use of third party Aircraft Identification over voice is an issue ITP clearance over voice is time consuming Existing conflict probe function in relation to the new separation minima Investigations for ITP specific controller HMI functions

Next Steps 2008 Q2-Q3Results consolidation of phase Q Q2Phase 2 - preparation for revenue flight trials 2009 Q3Pioneer airline project for ITP Q4 Q Result consolidation Preparation for revenue flight trials Q2 Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q Q2 Q3Q4 Pioneer trials  Operations

Conclusions CRISTAL-ITP: Made the world’s first flight trial of the ATSA-ITP procedure Successfully achieved clarification of how the ITP procedure can be applied in the NAT airspace Provided important input to the ATSA-ITP standard Shown Technical Feasibility for airborne systems Created Operational Acceptance by controllers and flight crew Developed and improved the procedure phraseology CRISTAL ITP agreement on Voice and CPDLC phraseology Continues towards implementation