Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Accreditation – Progress Report Recommendations 3, 5.1, 7.1, 8.1

Advertisements

State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.

The ACCJC Rubric and Beyond Julie Bruno, Sierra College Susan Clifford, ACCJC Fred Hochstaedter Monterey Peninsula College.

Developing an Institutional Assessment Plan: Product and Process Bruce P. Szelest Winter Workshop - January 20-21, 2005 Saratoga Springs, NY Association.

Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.

Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.

ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.

Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,

Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.

2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 1. LAHC 2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 All Accreditation Commission recommendations successfully.

Presentation for Flex Day June 7, 2011 LATTC Accreditation

FLEX Day Presentation August 13, Planning and Budgeting Integration Model (PBIM)

ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.

PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.

All College Day August 23, 2013 The Homestretch to Reaffirmation! REAFFIRMED.

1 BC Draft Assessment Plan Academic Senate Assessment Committee.

KATIE TOWNSEND-MERINO, PALOMAR COLLEGE KEVIN BONTENBAL, CUESTA COLLEGE JOHN NIXON, ACCJC ASCCC ACCREDITATION INSTITUTE, 2012 Implementing Improvement Plans.

Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.

A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor 1.

SBVC and CHC Follow–Up Report Joint Presentation to the SBCCD Board of Trustees October 8, 2015 Haragewen Kinde, SBVC ALO Celia Huston, Co-Chair, ASLO.

NEASC FIVE YEAR REPORT FITCHBURG STATE COLLEGE JANUARY 2007.

What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.

Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.

+ using Integrated Planning & Budget In a Participatory Governance Context Realizing our Foothill Vision 20/20.

Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.

SBVC and CHC Follow–Up Report Joint Presentation to the SBCCD Board of Trustees October 8, 2015 Haragewen Kinde, SBVC ALO Celia Huston, Co-Chair, ASLO.

Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,

Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”

Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.

STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.

Master Plan Process FY Proposed Draft. October - February Cluster Groups and Units Identify Initiatives These are general goals or outcomes that.

SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.

SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.

Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.

Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.

Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.

Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.

Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.

Reedley College Accreditation Follow-Up Report August 9, 2012.

Accreditation Update Self-Study Progress and Review MPC Flex Days Spring 2015.

Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.

EDUCATIONAL MASTER PLAN TIMELINE Mr. Rick Miranda Acting Vice President, Academic Affairs/Asst. Superintendent Dr. Kristi Blackburn Dean of Institutional.

1 District Office Administrative Services Unit Review (ASUR) and Annual Operational Planning November 7, 2013 Presented by Dr. George Railey Vice Chancellor.

Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.

SPRING ASSESSMENT OF COLLEGE PROCESSES.

Accreditation - Fall Standard IB - Institutional Effectiveness The College will develop and implement a comprehensive communication plan. The College.

1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.

Institutional Effectiveness Plan

Conceptual Model of Integrated Planning

ACCJC 18-Month Follow-up Report

University Resource Alignment: Goals and Process

Marcy Alancraig, Cabrillo Shelley Blackman, Evergreen Valley

Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update

Integrated Budget Process as Evidence of Institutional Effectiveness

COLLEGE OF ALAMEDA: INTEGRATED PLANNING & BUDGET MODEL

Presented To: College Planning Council

College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process

Chairs and Managers Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219

Program Review and Accreditation

Yuba Community College District Board of Trustees Meeting

DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW

Berkeley City College Accreditation Follow-up Report Update

Presented To: College Planning Council

Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)

Foothill College Governance Redesign Update

Completing your Program Review

Presented To: College Planning Council

Accreditation follow-up report

Presented To: College Planning Council

COLLEGE OF ALAMEDA: INTEGRATED PLANNING & BUDGET MODEL

Presentation transcript:

Accreditation follow-up report

The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so that they are more clearly based on an analysis of quality, effectiveness, and student learning. Furthermore, the college must develop a systematic means to evaluate those processes and assess whether its plans actually lead to improvements in programs and services (I.B.3, I.B.6, I.B.7).

The institution assesses progress toward achieving its stated goals and makes decisions regarding the improvement of institutional effectiveness in an ongoing and systematic cycle of evaluation, integrated planning, resource allocation, implementation, and re- evaluation. Evaluation is based on analyses of both quantitative and qualitative data.

The institution assures the effectiveness of its ongoing planning and resource allocation processes by systematically reviewing and modifying, as appropriate, all parts of the cycle, including institutional and other research efforts.

MERRITT COLLEGE MISSION, VISION & VALUES COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (CEMPC) Conduct a situational analysis Recommend 3-5 Strategic Directions every 5 years Monitor SLO Assessment Reviews each manager’s annual priorities Identifies institutional budget priorities based on each manager’s annual summary Recommend Annual Institutional Priorities Recommend College funding priorities, based on the above. Review evaluation and make recommendations to change process INPUTS Program Review: Each program/unit engages in program review every 3 years Annual Unit Plans: Each program/unit engages in annual planning cycle Feedback from: Senates, ASMC, Administrators Annual Campus Summit District Mission District Strategic Goals MERRITT COLLEGE INTEGRATED PLANNING & BUDGETING PROCESS REVIEW, ANALYZE & VALIDATE Fiscal Analysis by the Business Manager CDCPD CIC Facilities Committee Technology Committee Budget Committee Funding Priority Recommendations sent to College Council Funding Priority Recommendations sent to College President Approved Resources & Implementation Evaluation of Integrated Planning & Budgeting Process Strategic Institutional Directions Each manager collaboratively develops annual priorities for their area

The institution assesses its evaluation mechanisms through a systematic review of their effectiveness in improving instructional programs, student support services, and library and other learning support services. Standard I.B.7

Evaluators Questions to AskTimeline CEMPC (Institutional Effectiveness Committee) SLOAC 1.How does program review help to improve teaching and learning? 2.What are the positive outcomes of the program review process? and 3.How can we improve the program review process? Fall 2010 Spring 2011 Programs undergoing review1.How easy or difficult was the program review process? (one could compare it to the last cycle) 2.How easy was it to access data? 3.Was the process useful? How? 4.How widespread was participation within the program? 5.Have you made changes to your program as a result of program review? Disseminated in Fall to programs that completed Program Review in spring Programs undergoing Program Review during spring 2011 will complete these questions at time of Program Review.

A NNUAL U NIT P LAN U PDATE Evaluators 1.How clear are the instructions on the Annual Unit Plan? 2. How useful are the data provided in the Annual Unit Plan? 3. Is the Annual Unit Plan template easy to use? 4. How accurate are the data provided in the Annual Unit Plan?

MERRITT COLLEGE ASSESSMENT PLAN ActionTimelineCurrent StatusNext Steps Design Evaluation Tool (electronic surveys) for Program Review. Assess Program Review process. Fall 2010 Questions drafted. Pilot evaluation surveys through Accreditation Committee by October 15 Receive feedback. Revise the Evaluation Tool (electronic surveys), incorporating feedback. Administer the surveys. Fall 2010 Questions revised. Administer the survey Results submitted by mid- November. Compile results for submission to CEMPC and College Council by December Design Evaluation Tool for planning & resource allocation processes. Present tool to CEMPC and College Council for approval and recommendation to President. Fall 2010 Evaluation Tool reviewed by Accreditation Committee. Will be presented to CEMPC October 27 and to College Council in November. After approvals, electronic surveys will be created for use spring 2011 to assess planning and resource allocation processes. Design assessment for Evaluation Tools. Fall 2010 In process. Accreditation Committee will draft assessment and present to CEMPC in November and to College Council in December. After approvals, assessment process for Program Review Evaluation Tool will be conducted spring Disseminate results of Program Review Evaluation via website Spring 2011 Merritt College website is currently undergoing a complete redesign and reorganization in order to more effectively communicate internally and externally. Post results on website. Assess Program Review Evaluation Tool. Spring 2011Assessment mechanism will be drafted Fall Assess Evaluation Tool for planning & resource allocation processes. End of Spring 2011 Assessment mechanism will be drafted Fall 2010.