Helium Spill Test in LHC tunnel to define length of restricted working areas  Actual situation  Evolution  How to continue  Set-up of the spilling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improved anchoring of SSS with vacuum barrier to avoid displacement Ofelia Capatina (speaker), Katy Foraz (coordinates all the activities), Antonio Foreste,
Advertisements

Handling Liquid Cryogens Safely Tony Kent School of Physics and Astronomy.
Cryogenic discussion and update 30 October 2014Neutrino platform.
Mike Fitton Engineering Analysis Group Design and Computational Fluid Dynamic analysis of the T2K Target Neutrino Beams and Instrumentation 6th September.
ICHS 2007, San Sebastian, Spain 1 SAFETY OF LABORATORIES FOR NEW HYDROGEN TECHNIQUES Heitsch, M., Baraldi, D., Moretto, P., Wilkening, H. Institute for.
A. Perin, CERN, TE-CRG, 26 May Review of the cryogenic by-pass for the LHC DS collimators 26 May 2011 Modifications to the DFBs, DSLC and cryogenic.
FSTS “water hammer” Running mode Pressure profile of the “water hammer” pulse – Joukowsky Equation FSTS Running worst case scenario : – instant closing.
Interface issues on Super-FRS magnets test at CERN CrYogenic Department in Common System (CSCY) GSI, Darmstadt Yu Xiang Meeting for Super-FRS magnets test.
Liquid Nitrogen (LN2) Fire Extinction - Phase II
Irradiation Sample Transfer Line Snubbing Section Behavior Greg Padilla and Keane Nishimoto.
Mucool cryo-design Christine Darve Fermilab/Beams Division/ Cryogenic Department 8/12/02.
SAFETY FOLLOW-UP HL-LHC PROJECT WP17 – Infrastructures meeting S. La Mendola, Jose Gascon DGS/SEE 09 July 2015.
Interface issues on Super-FRS magnets test at CERN
Laurent Tavian Thanks to contribution and helpful discussions with M. Jimenez, V. Parma, F. Bertinelli, J.Ph. Tock, R. van weelderen, S. Claudet, A. Perin,
LHC Experimental Areas Forum - 03/07/ ATLAS Helium Cryogenics Nicolas Delruelle on behalf of the AT / ECR group.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
23 Jan 2007 LASA Cryogenics Global Group 1 ILC Cryomodule piping L. Tavian for the cryogenics global group.
Pro-Science 4 th International Conference of Hydrogen Safety, September 12-14, 2011, SAN FRANCISCO, USA EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF IGNITED UNSTEADY HYDROGEN.
ESS Cryogenic Distribution System for the Elliptical Linac MBL/HBL - CDS requirements Preliminary Design Review Meeting, 20 May 2015, ESS, Lund, Sweden.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
The cryogenic systems of the ATLAS and CMS detectors Johan Bremer on behalf of TE/CRG 06/06/2013AFF.
128 May 2013 CENF Near Far Integration For the Safety Folder + Environmental impact Study Simple process: Identify Safety issues >> description >> risk.
Accelerators for ADS March 2014 CERN Approach for a reliable cryogenic system T. Junquera (ACS) *Work supported by the EU, FP7 MAX contract number.
A. Siemko and N. Catalan Lasheras Insulation vacuum and beam vacuum overpressure release – V. Parma Bus bar joints stability and protection – A. Verweij.
Conceptual Design Review of the NPDGamma Experiment in Beam Line 13 Seppo Penttila NPDGamma project manager September 25, 2007 at SNS.
Safety Requirements and Regulations 10/3/20121Safety Requirements & Regulations James Sears.
Wu. Y., International Conference on Hydrogen Safety, September Initial Assessment of the Impact of Jet Flame Hazard From Hydrogen Cars In.
Preliminary Design for the Coupling Coil Cryostat in MICE
05 Novembre 2003Chamonix XIV Workshop, January How to deal with leaks in the QRL and magnet insulation vacuum Paul Cruikshank for AT/VAC Germana.
7/23/ J.Coupard. 1) Cryogenic risks 2) Cryogenic phases from RT/floating to nominal and additional safety rules A. Sectors warmed-up to RT or considered.
Task Force on Safety of Personnel in LHC underground areas following the sector 34 accident of 19-Sep-2008 Status report LPC 07/05/2009 B. Delille, S.
For more info:
EHN1 Cryogenic Integration Requirements David Montanari / Johan Bremer Jun 18, 2015 Rev. 1.
L. Serio COPING WITH TRANSIENTS L. SERIO CERN, Geneva (Switzerland)
Johan Bremer, 22th-26th September 2008 Cryogenics Operations 2008, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 1 CRYOGENICS OPERATIONS 2008 Organized by CERN Safety aspects.
Overview of the main events related to TS equipment during 2007 Definition Number and category of the events Events and measures taken for each machine.
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
1 Sector Test – Preparation Layout in LSS7 Jan Uythoven (AB/BT) Thanks to Mike Lamont and the other ‘sector testers’
Eric Prebys/LARP 2/17/2016.  CERN has taken unprecedented steps to control information about this event, including altering the electronic LHC log to.
The cryogenic system of the HIE-ISOLDE project and its related hazards for persons N. Delruelle on behalf of the TE/CRG group HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
AT-ACR B. VULLIERMECSOC Meeting 29 September Cryogenics for LHC Test Benches Safety Aspects Overview of the Test Station Overview of the Operation.
MAGNET#1MAGNET#2MAGNET#3 SATELLITE VB#1 SATELLITE VB#2 SATELLITE VB#3 PRECOOLER#1PRECOOLER#2 DISTRIBUTION VALVE BOX DVB CP#1CP#3CP#2 BUFFER DEWAR LHe 5m.
Cryogenic scheme, pipes and valves dimensions U.Wagner CERN TE-CRG.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR FUTURE LHC SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS POINT SUR LA STATION D’ESSAIS préparé par Jean-Marc Gheller Steering committee –September.
Duy Phan, EN-STI-RBS. Description of the hazards  An Oxygen Deficiency Hazard (ODH) exists when the concentration of O2 ≤ 19.5 % (by volume)  Cold burns.
GTK GAS COOLING SYSTEM Marco Statera, Vittore Carassiti, Ferruccio Petrucci, Luca Landi, Stefano Chiozzi, Manuel Bolognesi NA62 - GTK working group meeting.
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel and HGRP Tom Peterson 4 December 2014 Design Review.
Vacuum tank relief for Super-FRS long multiplet cryostat CrYogenic Department in Common System (CSCY) GSI, Darmstadt Yu Xiang.
LHC Machine Advisory Committee Meeting no.19 QRL status 16 June 2006 G. Riddone, AT-ACR On behalf of the QRL team.
A. Perin TE-CRG, 06 April LMC 08 April 2009 Consolidations related to pressure protection on DFBs and DSLs A. Perin, TE-CRG.
The Large Hadron Collider The 19 th Sep 2008 incident [R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In Charge of LHC] NIKHEF Seminar ( )
Movable beam pipe and NNC Study & prototype development Manchester 14/12/20091D. FP meeting.
ILC : Type IV Cryomodule Design Meeting Main cryogenic issues, L. Tavian, AT-ACR C ryostat issues, V.Parma, AT-CRI CERN, January 2006.
First Outcome of the Task Force on Safety of Personnel in LHC underground areas following the sector 34 accident of 19-Sep-2008 R. Trant on behalf of the.
2 K Coldbox Safety and ESH
He Plant, LN2 Systems and Commissioing
Design of the thermosiphon Test Facilities 2nd Thermosiphon Workshop
Rosario Turrisi INFN Padova
Neutrino Platform Overall Protodune Risk Mitigation Plan O
Helium spill in LHC tunnel
CRYOGENICS OPERATIONS 2008 Organized by CERN
Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC
J.M. Jimenez On behalf of TE-VSC group
Block 4 and Cluster D - Safety
Cryostat design Mechanical design: Thermal screens: Specifications:
On behalf of TE-VSC group
MERIT Review Meeting Cryogenics BNL, NY Dec. 12, 2005 Friedrich Haug
Helium collector CFD analysis
Cryogenic behavior of the magnet
Presentation transcript:

Helium Spill Test in LHC tunnel to define length of restricted working areas  Actual situation  Evolution  How to continue  Set-up of the spilling test  How  Where  When  Risks  On-going work  Conclusions 01/11/2013Johan Bremer

Helium Spill Test in LHC tunnel Actual situation 01/11/2013Johan Bremer LHC Project Report 684*: header C average flow 1 kg/s length helium jam 6 m After discussion (HSE and DSO): make restricted work area of 3 m, centred around release point. *SUMMARY OF THE EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF COLD HELIUM PROPAGATION ALONG A SCALE MODEL OF THE LHC TUNNEL (2003)

Helium Spill Test in LHC tunnel Evolution 01/11/2013Johan Bremer New proposal based on scale model New proposal based on simulations ~100 m Restricted working-area m (45 % of tunnel) Vacuum barrier Pressure relief device (w/o spring) Ventilation Jumper Restricted working-area m (9 % of tunnel)

Helium Spill Test in LHC tunnel How to continue 01/11/2013Johan Bremer Large difference between proposal based on scale model and proposal based on simulation work Make a representative spilling test in the tunnel to check the validity of the different models and calculations and base new access rules on these validated calculations: Liquid helium spill of 1 kg/s Total spill per test 125 kg (= 1000 liquid liters) Ventilation flow in access mode: m 3 /h, about 0.7 m/s in tunnel

Helium Spill Test in LHC tunnel Set-up of the spilling test: how 01/11/2013Johan Bremer Pressurize dewars with warm helium gas taken from cylinder. The liquid mass flow will be measured by balances on which the dewars will be placed 1450 mm DN 200 Dewar:Design pressure 2 bar Safety valve 0.5 bar Pressure drop system 0.1 bar

Helium Spill Test in LHC tunnel Set-up of the spilling test: how 01/11/2013Johan Bremer  Equip the tunnel with measurement system  25 Temperature sensors (Pt100)  25 ODH (special development of fast reacting measurement head)  6 cameras  4 air velocity sensors  2 mass balances (used for calculation of mass flow)  Equipment will be placed on 15 stands, 8 downstream (over 200 meter) and 7 upstream (over 100 meter) of ventilation direction, at places referenced to the simulation model  Most sensors will be placed at 1.75 m height, in passage area  Total of two to three tests will be made

Helium Spill Test in LHC tunnel Set-up of the spilling test: where / when 01/11/2013Johan Bremer  Test should be made at a point where the ventilation flow is out-going (un- even point)  Test should be made at the end of continuous cryostat section, to minimize effect on the chosen sector  Test should be made where there is least interference with on-going work  The ODH sensors have to be developed (fast reacting sensors not available on the market)  Discussion with SMACC, VSC and coordination: Test foreseen for end of January 2014 in sector 4-5, left of 5, 300 meter into arc

Helium Spill Test in LHC tunnel Set-up of the spilling test: risk 01/11/2013Johan Bremer Risk assessment based on LHC sector 3-4 experience and modelisation:  Sector 3-4  Estimate of situation during helium release*:  first 40 sec helium flow: 15 to 26 kg/s(spill: 1 kg/s)  helium mass released first 120 sec : 2000 kg (spill: 125 kg)  No explicit damage to tunnel structure, cable trays, electrical cabinets, cryogenic piping / valves etc, directly related to helium flow  Modelisation helium spill in XFEL tunnel**:  Modeled helium flow in the range of spill test;  Maximum temperature drop of mechanical equipment in the tunnel is not going over 40 degrees (if jet not directed onto equipment) Conclusion: very confident that collateral damage is excluded, but….. * CERN-ATS : Task Force Report: Safety of Personnel in LHC underground areas following the accident of 19 th September 2008 **Simulation study of helium release in the XFEL tunnel, WUT-ref:#630333/I22-01

Helium Spill Test in LHC tunnel Set-up of the spilling test: risk 01/11/2013Johan Bremer  Helium spill tests will only be performed outside of normal working hours (no access in sector 4-5)  Interconnects will be closed in area in which the spill test will find place  All equipment owners in the area where the spill test will find place, are asked to protect their sensitive material (electronic cards, connectors etc.) against condensation of water during and directly after the spilling test * Simulation study of helium release in the XFEL tunnel, WUT-ref:#630333/I22-01

Helium Spill Test in LHC tunnel on-going work 01/11/2013Johan Bremer  Prototype of ODH system under test  Instrumentation for test has been ordered, DAQ-chain being programmed  Full instrumentation test by end of November  Testing of emptying by pressurization at this moment with LN2  Discussion with LHC coordination  First discussion on how to implement future test results on “restricted working areas” will start shortly

Helium Spill Test in LHC tunnel Conclusions 01/11/2013Johan Bremer  No consistent data to support length of “restricted working areas” in LHC tunnel  Existing models have to be verified with “real life” spilling test  Necessary equipment and instrumentation has been identified  Possibility of collateral damage has been classified as minimal  Equipment owners have to be aware of eventual water condensation on their equipment  Cost of test: about 110 kCHF, without helium (6000 CHF / test) Tests will take place during last week of January in sector 4-5 left of 5, first 300 meter into the continuous cryostat