The Sanitation 21 Framework Simple Approaches to a Complex Problem.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Florida Center for Research in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.
Advertisements

Armand Racine Consultant Chemicals Branch
THE GLOBAL FRAMEWORK FOR CLIMATE SERVICES: NEXT STEPS Geoff Love Director, Responsible for the Taskforce Secretariat World Meteorological Organization.
What is an M and E Plan?. Organizing the Work of M and E An M and E System -- the 12 components as a whole – Sets out broad vision at national level An.
East Asia Ministerial Conference on Sanitation and Hygiene - Sustainable Urban Sanitation Planning Japan, November 30, 2007 Dr. Darren Saywell Development.
ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE LocalAssessmentGuidance.
Using training packages to meet client needs Facilitator: Gerard Kell.
PISA FOR DEVELOPMENT Technical Workshops Components and input for ToR of the International Contractor(s) 9 th April 2014 OECD Secretariat 1.
Basic Principles of Successful Grant Writing
Seed Policy Reform Processes in ‘Group A’ Countries.
ECIMF relationship to ebXML, RosettaNet & OAGIS Andrzej Bialecki Chief System Architect CEN/ISSS/WS-EC Plenary Meeting, Oslo, 12 June.
Implications of Heavy Metals in Sewage Sludge Where Do We Stand on Regulations?
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
Chapter 6 The Process of Interaction Design Presented by: Kinnis Gosha, Michael McGill, Jamey White, and Chiao Huang.
University of Sunderland CSEM04 ROSCO Unit 13 Unit 13: Risk Methods CSEM04: Risk and Opportunities of Systems Change in Organisations Dr Lynne Humphries.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Student Learning Standard 5.1:Universal Required Competencies.
4-1 Chapter Four THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL. 4-2 Purpose of the Research Proposal To present the question to be researched and its importance To discuss the.
Recent developments in the UNFCCC process in relation to global observations 4 th GTOS Steering Committee Paris, 1-2 December 2009 Rocio Lichte Programme.
STREET TRADING MANAGEMENT A PILOT MODEL WITHIN A CITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT C PREPARED BY: URBAN GENESIS MANAGEMENT.
How do you simplify? Simple Complicated.
Paul Mundy Concept notes A brief summary of your project idea.
Overview of Early Warning system and the role of National Meteorological and Hydrological services Please use this template to guide the development of.
The Business Skills Handbook
LECTURE ESSENCE AND STRUCTURE OF BUSINESS PLAN. 1.The concept of business – plan 2.Contents (parts) of business plan.
Synthesis of Ideas from MERGA Conference 2007 Participants in VP Development Session on National Curriculum Gaye Williams VP (Development) thanks all MERGA.
Standardisation in the European Statistical System Barteld Braaksma, Cecilia Colasanti, Piero Demetrio Falorsi, Wim Kloek, Miguel Angel Martínez Vidal,
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to NCHRP Project Panel presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with PB Consult Inc. Texas Transportation.
Module 1 Session 1.1 Visual 1 Managing the Implementation of Development Projects Course Overview and Introduction.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Page 1 ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 7/WG 7 N Summary of the Alignment of System and Software Life Cycle Process Standards The material in this briefing.
Assessments. Assessment in the Project Cycle DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING EVALUATION ASSESSMENT.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
Diagnosing Organizations. Diagnosis Defined Diagnosis is a collaborative process between organizational members and the OD consultant to collect pertinent.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Overview of the R-Package Kenn Rapp, Facility Management Team Asia-Pacific Indigenous Peoples Dialogue of the FCPF Chiang.
Week 12: Performance Management and Performance Budgeting Discuss Eureka exercise Review mid-term Conceptual Origins of Performance Management Government.
The PHEA Educational Technology Initiative. Project Partners PHEA Foundations – Ford, Carnegie, Kresge, MacArthur South African Institute for Distance.
Who is Desire2Learn? Ian Smissen Yvonne Monterroso Scenarios for the use of ePortfolios in Education.
Workshop: RIA for Prime Ministry Experts 13 October 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR Session 3 RIA Consultation for Public Sector and Government.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Design Reuse Earlier we have covered the re-usable Architectural Styles as design patterns for High-Level Design. At mid-level and low-level, design patterns.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
Investment decision making
Purpose of Learning Workbook  To build skills of how to write grants  To provide methods and models to support idea creation  To learn how to communicate.
IB Business & Management Topic 6 – Strategy HL ONLY.
© 2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Making Evaluation Work for Effective Policy Reform and Revision Chris Nelson, Director, Quality and Performance Systems Branch Sophie Davies, Manager Evaluations.
Community Planning: Monitoring & Evaluation Geddes Institute Research The Geddes Institute Emma Coles.
Castlebridge associates | | Castlebridge changing how people think about information How to Implement the.
Annual Planning Task Force (APTF) Recommendations NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
Proposed/agreed actions/commitments to partner/contribute towards the proposed EvalYear 2015 SOUTH-SOUTH SOLUTIONS SUPPLY - DEMAND MATCHING.
Software Evaluation Chapter 54 Introduction This is carried out when new software is need by a business. It helps the decision, of what kind of software.
Patricia Alafaireet Patricia E. Alafaireet, PhD Director of Applied Health Informatics University of Missouri-School of Medicine Department of Health.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
ELIXIR SAB Feedback December 2014.
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of Adaptation Supporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action Country Support Needs to Mainstream.
1 Introduction to safety case and safety assessment: purpose and content of safety case Ian Crossland Crossland Consulting
Communication WG Summary Purpose To achieve Increased collaboration and cooperation between AD Groups/WPs/IK partners A common understanding and commitment.
1 The XMSF Profile Overlay to the FEDEP Dr. Katherine L. Morse, SAIC Mr. Robert Lutz, JHU APL
ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIBILITY
IATI – Planned evaluation of IATI
System Planning To Programming
Monitoring the Process
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Fiscal Mapping Community of Practice
Exchanging Reference Metadata using SDMX
OECD Chief Statistician and Director, Statistics Directorate
Measuring Data Quality and Compilation of Metadata
OECD good practices for setting up an RIA system Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on Regulatory Impact Assessment Istanbul, Turkey 20 November 2007.
Date and venue: 23 September, MSFD PCG, DG Environment, Brussels
Presentation transcript:

The Sanitation 21 Framework Simple Approaches to a Complex Problem

2 Why another framework? Conventional approaches to planning seem to fail because: objectives are distorted by special interests (lack of balance across the domains of the city) plans lack flexibility plans are based on unrealistic assessments of management capacities ‘…a mismatch between technical proposals and institutional realities…’

3 You wanted this….

4 …but what you got was this.

5 What’s in the Sanitation 21 Framework? Nothing new – it’s not rocket-science, but it does suggest a change of mindset A simple conception of what is a complex process: Understanding the context (institutional realities across all domains of the city) Understanding how a sanitation system relates to the context across all domains of the city Checking whether the system meets objectives and can work across all domains of the city.

6 Structure of the Framework Part One: The context Decision making domains Objectives External factors Capacity Part Two: Technical Options Elements of the system Management requirements Part Three: Fit for Purpose? Meeting Objectives Matching management requirements Assessing: will it/ does it work?

7 Part One: The Context Key elements of the context Decision making domains Objectives External factors Capacity Understanding the context allows technical proposals to be assessed against institutional realities

8 Context (1): domains

9 Context (2): Objectives, external interests, capacities Objectives: what do stakeholders in each domain want from the sanitation system? External influencing factors: ‘outside’ factors which influence decision making Capacities: Actors, mandates, manpower, budgets

10 Context (3): Objectives, external factors, capacities

11 Context (4): Objectives, external factors, capacities

12 Part Two: Technical Options Components mapped across domains: A toilet Collection mechanism Transportation mechanism Treatment process Disposal/ re-use mechanism/ process Management Requirements The system as a whole Management requirements across all domains

13 Part 3: Fit for Purpose? Ask the following crucial questions across all domains of the city Does it meet the objectives? Do the management requirements match in every domain? Does it/ will it work?

14

15

16

17 In summary The framework is a simplified representation of a complex planning process It is meant to guide planners/ designers and help to build bridges between institutional analysis and technical planning It is not new – but clearly new mindsets are needed !

18 Next steps The Task Force would welcome feedback and comments on the draft document The work of the Task Force will end with a series of publications and dissemination events The Task Force recommends expansion of the Sanitation 21 process through IWA’s membership base

Thankyou