Alexander J. Smith, Barry P. Baldigo, Mike R. McHale New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volunteer Monitoring Within New Jerseys Watershed Management Area #4 Dr. Richard Pardi & Dr. Michael Sebetich William Paterson University Wayne, New Jersey.
Advertisements

Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Chemical Analysis of Water
CEDA DREDGING DAYS 2008 ECOSYSTEM APPROACH AND DREDGING Frederik Mink Interel Cabinet Stewart.
Biological Response of Two North Central PA Streams After Flood of September 2011 Fred Rogers CWI, Supervisor Dr. Mel Zimmerman Introduction: Within Pennsylvania,
What’s Mud Got to Do With It? Stephen J. Klaine, Ph.D. Department of Biological Sciences Clemson University
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Upper Providence Township Stormwater Management MS4 Program.
A Comparative Study of Water Quality and Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Diversity in the Rio Grande and its Ditches By Lian Liu Mentor: Ayesha Burdett.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Kristy Morris PhD, Senior Scientist Council for Watershed Health Regional Watershed Monitoring Programs Examples of Community Involvement.
SESSION: RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE Stronger and More Resilient Infrastructure to Accommodate the Effects of Sea Level Rise Michael V. Tumulty, P.E., Vice.
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
Biomonitoring and Bioassessment Chapter 11. Biomonitoring Biomonitoring – use of a biological systems for the evaluation of the current status of an ecosystem.
Water were does it come from and why do we need it!
The Brunner Island Power Plant: The Seasonal Effects of a Generated Thermal Plume on the Phytoplankton, Periphyton, and Macroinvertebrate Populations of.
Probabilistic Monitoring of Streams Below Small Impoundments in Tennessee Debbie Arnwine Water Pollution Control
Reintroduction of Native Fish Species to Coal Creek.
Baseline Water Quality Data From Streams Along The Rocky Mountain Front, Montana and The Implications for Native Trout. Photo By: Taylor Johnson Triston.
Materials Transport & NSCD Material Classes Velocity to Transport Relationships York NSCD Restoration PSY CCREP.
Effects of Human Activity on Water Quality Studies on the Upper Paint Creek Watershed By Emily Daniels Mary Estock and Ashley Hooper.
ARROW: system for the evaluation of the status of waters in the Czech Republic Jiří Jarkovský 1) Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University,
Development and validation of models to assess the threat to freshwater fishes from environmental change and invasive species PIs: Craig Paukert Joanna.
NC Division of Water Quality Water Quality Assessments and Local Watershed Plans.
Tahera Environmental Monitoring Commitments Summary Use TK in monitoring; cooperate with communities Collect reliable information that will: Allow detection.
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
 Comparing Vegetation in a Riparian Zone to an Upland Area in a Colorado Montane Forest By: Abby Branson Vegetation Ecology, Summer 2013 Mountain Research.
- Aquatics - Presented by: Rick Pattenden Mainstream Aquatics Ltd.
Fish Assemblages of the Wabash River Mark Pyron. Wabash River Fishes 1.Large river 2.High diversity 3.History of human impact 4.Fish assemblages respond.
Effects of Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) on Nesting Tree Swallows.
Relationships between River Environment & Aquatic Life Don Sada Walker Basin Stakeholder Meeting December 12, 2007 Dr. Sudeep Chandra (UNR), Fish Dr. Christian.
Assessments 2: What the biota can tell us about watershed condition K.E. Limburg lecture notes 26 March, 2002.
Gary R. Wall and Timothy F. Hoffman U.S. Geological Survey
Summary Overview Primary Headwater Habitat Assessment.
STREAM QUALITY in SOUGAHATCHEE CREEK. LEECH CRANE FLY MIDGE STONEFLY CADDISFLY MAYFLY GOOD WATER QUALITY (EPT~10-23) POOR WATER QUALITY (EPT~0-5)
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Volunteer-collected data can provide important baseline information to assist with decision making and improve watershed management. In this study, data.
Comparison of Phosphorus Retention Capacity between Floodplain Sediments and Streambed Sediments in an Agricultural Drainage Ditch L. M. Ahiablame and.
An Overview of our Community’s Stormwater Management Program
Watershed Alliance Approach to Stream Monitoring
Year Three Review of Water Quality Monitoring on the Upper Strawberry River Project T.R. Brueggen 1 and J.L. Bouldin 1,2 1 Environmental Sciences.
Comparison of Aquatic Invertebrates in Pool and Riffle Habitats of Blackburn Fork Comparison of Aquatic Invertebrates in Pool and Riffle Habitats of Blackburn.
Biodiversity Health Index Main Streams for Life John MacKinnon UNDP consultant June 2012.
Stream Health: biotic integrity variation in Owasco Lake watershed Susan F. Cushman Hobart and William Smith Colleges 2007 Finger Lakes Research Conference.
Water Quality of Mullins Creek/ Determined by Aquatic Diversity Josh Thomasson Biology-Environmental Concentration Tennessee Techological University Cookeville,
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
A Tool to Evaluate the Health of Streams and Rivers within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman 1, Claire Buchanan 2, Adam Griggs 2, Andrea Nagel.
Ecological Principles of Diversity 1. Principle of Limiting Similarity - There is a limit to the similarity of coexisting competitors; they cannot occupy.
Community Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Towards Water Resources Within the Upper Stroubles Creek Watershed Charlotte Brown 1 and Jerod Myers 2 NSF-REU.
1 Collaboration on EMAP Stream Condition Assessments in EPA Region 8 Thomas R. Johnson and Karl A. Hermann EPA Region 8.
Eric Ferguson King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks November 4, 2015 Existing Conditions Assessment.
Carbaryl Monitoring in Glassy-Winged Sharpshooter Treatment Areas, Chico Johanna Walters and Kean S. Goh Department of Pesticide Regulation GWSS Public.
Using Regional Models to Assess the Relative Effects of Stressors Lester L. Yuan National Center for Environmental Assessment U.S. Environmental Protection.
3 STUDENT ASSESSMENT DEPARTMENT
C.4: Conservation of biodiversity
STEM Certification for THE Paulding County High School Magnet School.
Michael Sorge Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources.
Ecological Principles of Diversity 1. Principle of Limiting Similarity - There is a limit to the similarity of coexisting competitors; they cannot occupy.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
COMPARING BIOINDICATORS TO MEASURE THE EFFICACY OF RESTORATION IN MIDDLE FORK JOHN DAY RIVER, OR Robin M. Henderson & James R. Pratt.
THE USE OF BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE TRAITS TO ASSESS CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSES AND VULNERABILITIES Anna Hamilton (Tetra Tech), Britta Bierwagen (US EPA),
Changes in Ecological Structure and Function along the Rural-Urban Gradient Urban Ecology Lecture 2.
J. M. C. K Jayawardhana1, W. D. T. M Gunawardhana 1, E. P
a Biological Study of Macroinvertebrates in the Leibert Creek
Butternut Creek Biomonitoring
The Index of Biotic Integrity (the BI or IBI)
IBI’s: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Alexander J. Smith, Barry P. Baldigo, Mike R. McHale New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Outline Project Background “Quantitative Assessment of Water Quality in the Upper Esopus Creek: fish, macroinvertebrates, periphyton, turbidity and nutrients” Response to Hurricane Irene Current Results Next steps New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Upper Esopus Creek Project Objectives Assess water quality and identify sources of: Turbidity Nutrients Quantify the impacts of: Shandaken Portal Village of Phoenicia (septic systems) Turbidity and Nutrients Methods 20 sites in August 2009, 2010, and 2011 Biological communities Water chemistries and discharge New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Precipitation August 29 August 28 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Hurricane Irene Flooding Flood recurrence interval was years Irene ~ 80,000 cfs Ave. ~ 300 cfs One of the worst in recorded history for the Esopus Creek drainage Irene Lee

Pre-IrenePost-Irene

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Condition Assessment - BAP Multimetric Spp. Richness EPT Richness Biotic Index Model Affinity

Sample Processing Effort

Community Structure

Conclusions Although significant impacts to diversity, the Upper Esopus is a resilient system Water quality assessment not necessarily the best indicator of recovery Multivariate ordination of community data shows a more complete picture Monitoring is complete, full analysis and work up by spring/summer 2013