ADEPT www.scteachers.org 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Advertisements

1 Orientation to SAFE-T. 2 ADEPT A Assisting, D Developing, and E Evaluating P Professional T Teaching.
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
What is Monitoring? Information for panellists. Quality assurance of Authority subjects Monitoring poses the question: “How well is the school implementing.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Teacher Evaluation Model
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
[Insert Exercise Name] Evaluator Briefing and Guidance.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys ™ Module 8: Georgia Teacher Duties and Responsibilities Spring 2010 Teacher and.
ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Differentiated Supervision
1 ADEPT Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty Winthrop University.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
for School Library Media Specialists
ADEPT Framework
1 EPT Adding the A and D back into AD.
ADEPT A D E P T Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.
1 ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors. 2 ADEPT Web Site
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Dr. Robert Marzano Causal Teacher Evaluation Model
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
SAFE-T NET Introduction
Framework In Action: Theory into Practice
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
ADEPT Updated November SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 Your SAFE-T Guide Who is becoming your your new best friend?
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades Note to Presenter:
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Chapter 5 Evidence and Documentation McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
DPI PDP Verification Refresher Growing the Profession: Educator PDP Verification The Top Ten Things to Remember When Reviewing Educators’ PDPs for.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Using the CAP Rubric Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
Andy Wilson – Team Manager HR Education (School Teacher Appraisal) (England) Regulations 2012 A briefing for Heads and Governors.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview CAP Practicum Workshop for AIC Teacher Candidates Practicum Workshop Pt.2.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston, MA Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
Performance-Based Accreditation
The Individual Education Plan (IEP)
Writing the BOE Report.
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Teacher Evaluation Process
Alternative Assessment (Portfolio)
School Self-Evaluation 
Teacher Evaluation Process
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
Evaluation Information
SAFE-T Steps to Consensus
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
SAFE-T Steps to Consensus
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments

SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage III: Deliberation  Stage IV: Judgments

SAFE-T 3 What is the role of SAFE-T evaluators?  SAFE-T evaluators are both collectors of evidence and judges.  As collectors of evidence, they are responsible for gathering evidence that is as objective as possible.  As judges, they are responsible for making informed professional judgments.

SAFE-T 4 What is an “informed professional judgment?”  “Informed” means that the judgment is based on evidence.  “Professional” means that the judgment (1) is consistent with ethical guidelines, (2) is made on a case-by-case basis, and (3) eliminates to the extent possible external motives and personal feelings.

SAFE-T 5 Where is the evidence located?  The evidence is contained in the templates in the teacher’s dossier.  The chair of the evaluation team maintains the dossier.

SAFE-T 6 What’s in the dossier? At this point, the dossier should contain the following completed documents:  TT1: teacher’s LRP and reflections  TT2: teacher’s UWS and reflections  ET1s: evaluators’ observation records  TT3s: teacher’s reflection on each observed lesson  ET2: professional review completed by the principal  TT4: teacher’s self-assessment

SAFE-T 7 What connects the evidence to the judgments?  The evaluation criteria serve as the primary connection between the evidence and the judgments.

SAFE-T 8 What connects the evidence to the judgments?  The evaluation criteria are described in ET3.  To reduce subjectivity, all evaluators must use ET3 to review all evidence.

SAFE-T 9 How many judgments are made? Judgments are made at three levels. 1.The first judgment concerns whether or not the teacher met the requirements defined by each of the 34 key elements associated with the ADEPT Performance Standards.

SAFE-T 10 How many judgments are made? Judgments are made at three levels. 2.The second judgment concerns whether or not the teacher passed each of the four ADEPT domains for classroom-based teachers: planning, instruction, environment, and professionalism.

SAFE-T 11 How many judgments are made? Judgments are made at three levels. 3.The third and final judgment concerns whether or not the teacher received an overall passing score on SAFE-T.

SAFE-T 12 How are the judgments made?  The team chair must ensure that each member of the evaluation team has access to the entire contents of the dossier.

SAFE-T 13 How are the judgments made?  Each team member must independently review the evidence in terms of the written description of each of the key elements.  Based on this review, each team member independently determines whether each key element was “met” or “not met.”

SAFE-T 14 What happens next?  The next stage is deliberation. Here, the team members meet 1.to discuss their independent reviews, 2.to arrive at consensus regarding the judgment for each key element; and 3.to complete a consensus-based ET3 (SAFE-T Evaluation Summary).

SAFE-T 15 What else needs to happen at the consensus (deliberation) meeting?  The team must agree on the rationale for the consensus-based decision (“met” or “not met”) for each key element.

SAFE-T 16 What else needs to happen at the consensus (deliberation) meeting?  The rationales must be provided in the appropriate sections of ET3.  The rationale statements are especially important when the decision is “not met.”

SAFE-T 17 How many key elements are needed to pass each domain? Domain # Key Elements Needed to Pass Planning 10 or 11 Instruction 11 or 12 Environment 5 or 6 Professionalism 4 or 5

SAFE-T 18 How many key elements are needed to pass each domain? A teacher can miss one key element and still “pass” a domain. If a teacher misses two or more key elements in a particular domain, he or she “fails” the domain.

SAFE-T 19 What is the overall passing criteria for SAFE-T?  To pass SAFE-T, a teacher must pass all four domains at the time of the final evaluation.  Key elements that are “not met” automatically become areas for improvement.

SAFE-T 20 Is a written report required?  Yes. The consensus-based ET3 serves as the written evaluation report.  A consensus-based ET3 must be completed after each evaluation period.

SAFE-T 21 Is a teacher conference required?  Yes, at least one evaluation team member must meet with the teacher following each consensus meeting but prior to the end of each evaluation cycle.  The purpose of the conference is to provide the teacher with an explanation and a copy of the consensus-based ET3.

SAFE-T 22 Is a teacher conference required?  The teacher must sign and date the consensus-based ET3 at the conclusion of the meeting. The signature simply indicates that the teacher has reviewed the information contained on the consensus- based ET3.  The teacher must receive a copy of the consensus-based ET3

SAFE-T 23 In summary, what are the steps involved in making the necessary judgments? 1.Each evaluation team member conducts an independent review of the dossier and completes ET3.

SAFE-T 24 In summary, what are the steps involved in making the necessary judgments? 2.All evaluation team members meet to discuss their independent ratings and to achieve consensus.

SAFE-T 25 In summary, what are the steps involved in making the necessary judgments? 3.The evaluation team members prepare and sign the consensus-based ET3.

SAFE-T 26 In summary, what are the steps involved in making the necessary judgments? 4.One or more members of the evaluation team conference with the teacher to provide an oral and written explanation of the evaluation results.

SAFE-T 27 Are there any remaining important points?  School districts must seek to continuously improve the formal evaluation process by  obtaining and analyzing feedback on an annual basis regarding the ADEPT formal evaluation process,

SAFE-T 28 Are there any remaining important points?  School districts must seek to continuously improve the formal evaluation process by  analyzing their ADEPT data system (ADS) reports and evaluation summaries, and

SAFE-T 29 Are there any remaining important points?  School districts must seek to continuously improve the formal evaluation process by  using the results of these analyses to continuously improve the design and/or implementation of the ADEPT formal evaluation process.