NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 1 Dryden Flight Research Center Presentation to NASA Technical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Advertisements

NASA Commercial Crew Program COMSTAC May 2011 Page 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration COMMERCIAL CREW PROGRAM COMSTAC May 2011 E. Mango Commercial.
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO SRR Project Management.
USING NASA QUALITY STANDARDS NASA Academy of Aerospace (AAQ) Quality Mini-Workshop Ken Crane Quality Engineering Technical Discipline Team Lead NASA SAFETY.
BRC Storage & Distribution Safety and Quality Management System Training Guide
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew Initiative Overview and Status to the COMSTAC Philip McAlister NASA Exploration Systems Mission.
FAA Regulatory Policy for Composite Material Control Presented at 8/8/02 FAA/NASA Workshop (Chicago, IL) Introduction – Importance of stabilizing composite.
Purpose of the Standards
NASA Johnson Space Center Contracting Officer and Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative.
Series 2: Project Management Advanced Project Management for Behavioral Health Electronic Health Records (EHRs) 9/2013 From the CIHS Video Series “Ten.
@ Industrial Engineering by Bopaya Bidanda David I. Cleland.
PMSS Final SOW May 22 nd, Statement of Work 2 GLENN RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PMSS) The Contractor shall provide expert.
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
Staff Structure Support HCCA Special Interest Group New Regulations: A Strategy for Implementation Sharon Schmid Vice President, Compliance and.
The Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable Ralph Covington David Wang.
FY2010 PEMP Notable Outcomes October 15, FRA, LLC Board of Directors 10/15-16/2009 Office of Quality and Best Practices Performance Evaluation Management.
OMB Status 06/30/05 Monday, August 8, 2005 OMB Progress 06/30/05 Vicki Novak Tom Luedtke Gwen SykesPat DunningtonGwen Sykes Best in Government! Steps to.
Engaging Contractors in the Environmental Management System (EMS) Department of Energy EMS Workshop: Implementation, Lessons Learned, and Best Practices.
Expendable Launch Vehicle Payload Safety Program Cal Staubus.
Program Goals And Authority
Unit 8:COOP Plan and Procedures  Explain purpose of a COOP plan  Propose an outline for a COOP plan  Identify procedures that can effectively support.
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
NASA Technical Standards Working Group Presentation to White Sands Test Facility Dr. George Alcorn Goddard Space Flight Center GSFC.
NASA PREFERRED TECHNICAL STANDARDS PUBLISHED
Important acronyms AO = authorizing official ISO = information system owner CA = certification agent.
IT PMB: Executive Oversight and Decision Authority for Application and Infrastructure Projects at NASA Larry Sweet Chair, IT PMB JSC CIO August 2010.
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
Mandatory Technical Standards Engineering Management Board Goddard Space Flight Center July 10, 2003 Updated October 7, 2003 HQ/Code AE R. Weinstein.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Commitment Process Presented by Edward B. Luers October 2008 Interplanetary Network Directorate Deep Space Network.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration John F. Kennedy Space Center SPACEPORT ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 1 NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS WORKING GROUP.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Item 5d Texas RE 2011 Budget Assumptions April 19, Texas RE Preliminary Budget Assumptions Board of Directors and Advisory Committee April 19,
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
Protecting the Public, Astronauts and Pilots, the NASA Workforce, and High-Value Equipment and Property Mission Success Starts With Safety The NASA Safety.
NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM http://standards.nasa.gov 1 NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM BACKGROUND, DEVELOPMENT.
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 1 Diploma of Project Management.
NASA Update NDIA PMSC Quarterly Meeting February 4, 2010 Ken Poole NASA/MSFC/CS40 (Project Planning & Analysis Team)
NASA Technical Standards In Work WSTF Summary Quad Charts June, 2007 (Sponsored by NASA Chief Engineer)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration John F. Kennedy Space Center SPACEPORT ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 1 NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS WORKING GROUP.
NCSX Systems Engineering Management Plan Peer Review Bob Simmons May 15, 2003.
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
Constellation Space Transportation Planning Office July 30, 2009.
Technical Standards NPR Presented to Technical Standards Working Group June 11, 2007.
24b - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Safety Dave Bogart Code 302 August 16-17, 2005.
Decision Making Process Program Planning and Control Deana Hackfeld Management Systems Office November 17, 2006.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
At Lewis Field Glenn Research Center Industry Briefing Solicitation No. NNC04Z70010R Construction Services Contract June 15, 2004.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Report Performance Monitor & Control Risk Administer Procurement MONITORING & CONTROLLING PROCESS.
Safety & Health Considerations in Accommodating Commercial Activties David Loyd, JSC Safety & Test Operations 2013 NASA Safety Directors & Occupational.
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
OMB Status 03/31/05 Monday, June 6, 2005 OMB Progress 03/31/05 Vicki Novak Tom Luedtke Gwen SykesPat DunningtonGwen Sykes Best in Government! Steps to.
Important acronyms AO = authorizing official ISO = information system owner CA = certification agent.
2.1 ACQUISITION STRATEGYSlide 1 Space System Segments.
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Responsibilities & Tasks Week 2
Enterprise Content Management Owners Representative Contract Approval
Advances in Aligning Performance Data and Budget Information:
Planetary Protection at ESA
By Jeff Burklo, Director
An Assessment of Space Shuttle Flight Software Development Processes
Jeff Dutton/NASA COR August 26, 2019
Presentation transcript:

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 1 Dryden Flight Research Center Presentation to NASA Technical Standards Working Group Oct 5-6, 2004 Raymond Kacmar

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 2 DFRC Standards Activities: DFRC CLOSED ACTION ITEMS: Action No , NASA-STD-5017 (Draft 1), "Design And Development Criteria For Critical Mechanical Systems" Action No , Review of DIS Space Solar Cells - Electron and Proton Irradiation Test Methods Action No , Review of Draft ISO Space systems — Ground support equipment for use at launch, landing, or retrieval sites - General requirements Action No , Review of Draft ISO/CD Space systems — Mass properties control Action No , EMB Approval of NASA-HDBK-5010, "Fracture Control Implementation Handbook for Payloads, Experiments, and Similar Hardware Action No , AIAA Hydrogen Safety Guide Available for Public Review

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 3 DFRC Standards Activities: DFRC CLOSED ACTION ITEMS: Action No , Review of Draft ISO/WD "Probabilistic Risk Assessment" Action No , Review of Draft ISO FDIS Through -13 "Space systems - Fluid characteristics, sampling and test methods" Action No : Review of Revised Template for NASA Technical Standards Action No , Review of DRAFT ISO 21350, Off-the-shelf item utilization Action No : Agencywide Review of NASA-STD-5001A, Structural Design and Test Factors of Safety for Spaceflight Hardware

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 4 DFRC Standards Activities (Cont’d): DFRC Proposal Review: GRC , Determination of the Fracture Toughness of Advanced Ceramics at Elevated Temperature JPL , Standards on Getters for High Vacuum Hermetic Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS) Packaging JSC , Structural Design and Verification Requirements for Glass, Ceramics and Windows in Human Space Flight Applications MSFC , Standard Manned Spacecraft Requirements for Materials and Processes MSFC , Design Guide for Composite Oxygen Tanks MSFC , NASA Tailoring Standard for IPC-2221, Generic Standard on Printed Board Design MSFC , Compilation and Evaluation of Existing Data on the Compatibility of Materials with High-Test Hydrogen Peroxide

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 5 DFRC Standards Activities (Cont’d): DFRC Proposal Review (Cont’d): MSFC , The Effects of High-Test Hydrogen Peroxide (HTP) on Structural Materials as Determined by Isothermal Microcalorimetry MSFC , Standard for Evaluating the Contamination Transfer Potential from Process Support Materials MSFC , NASA Sustaining Engineering Standard MSFC , NASA Foreign Object Debris Elimination Standard or Handbook WSTF , Update of Safe Use of Oxygen and Oxygen Systems ASTM MNL 36 WSTF , Hydrogen Hazard Analysis Protocol WSTF , Detailed Revision of ISO/FDIS Parts 1 through 13

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 6 DFRC Standards Activities (Cont’d): OTHER ITEMS: Open Items: Action No , EMB Approval of NASA-STD-5012, " Strength and Life Assessment Requirements for Space Propulsion System Engines“ Review of KSC , Technical Standards for Trend Analysis No comments submitted from DFRC Action No , Review of Draft ISO/CD Space Systems-Stress Corrosion Cracking -Part 2-Selection of metallic materials Action No , Review of Draft ISO/CD Space Systems-Stress Corrosion Cracking -Part 1-Test methods for determining susceptibility of metals

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 7 Other Program Status FY 04 FULL COST FUNDING FOR FY2004 Civil Service Full Time Equivalents (FTE) FY 04 allocation 0 FTE FY 04 requirement – not recorded Civil Service Travel FY 04 allocation $0 K. FY 04 requirement $3 K. FY 04 Funding (Procurement Funds Only) FY 04 Funding - $40 K FY 04 Funding Commit - $40 K FY 04 Funding Obs - $40 K FY 04 Cost $28 K

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 8 Other Program Status FY 05 FULL COST FUNDING FOR FY 05 ($371K) Task Develop Technical Standards and Supporting Information Integrating lessons learned into the NASA preferred standards Support for disciplinary working groups Task Standards support/assessment Civil Service Full Time Equivalents (FTE) (full cost) Civil Service Travel - $3 K Procurement Funding (Labor and Material) - $40 K Center G&A and Service Pool - $328K Mandatory Standards Support (?)

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 9 DFRC ITA Technical Standards Discussion Raymond Kacmar DFRC ITA

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 10 The DFRC implementation of the ITA is a high-level Center staff function that provides senior technical and management oversight of select engineering activities, Mission and Ground Operations, and S&MA efforts in support of the programs. Key Characteristics of the ITA –We will not “reinvent the wheel”. We recognize that much of what is called for within CAIB R7.5  1 is already done at DFRC, and we will incorporate that within the context of our operations (by independent funding and providing dedicated resources as necessary). For example: –Flight Readiness Reviews/Airworthiness and Flight Safety Review Board activities –Flight Assurance activities –Many of the ongoing independent assessment activities

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 11 Key Characteristics (Continued) –We will improve those areas where DFRC is currently performing but have resource issues, for example: Lessons Learned support Systems Management Office - use ITA staffing to expand their presence –There are also some areas that are not done at DFRC and we will build the capability to accomplish them. Centerwide Tracking and Trending Facilities independent assessment Implementation of Waiver Issues

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 12 ITA Structure and Function Managed collaboratively by the ITA Board, consisting of the DFRC Chief Engineer and S&MA Director, and the DFRC NESC Chief Engineer (non-voting) The ITA Board reports to the Center Director –The ITA Board has signature authority (waivers, etc.) An ITA Director will run day-to-day ITA operations The ITA will consist of a core team, rotational assignees (1 - 2 year), matrixed experts and contractor support – 13 FTE, 2 WYE (FY05) Some realignment of responsibility may be required, but no functionality will be duplicated We recognize that success will be measured by becoming an asset, not a burden to the center. Again, a lot of the effort will not be new work but work already being done at the center. The ITA will encourage projects and line engineering to provide feedback on ITA activities.

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 13 Major ITA Functions Manage technical standards (including the waiver-granting authority of these standards). Approve safety and reliability assessment plans and products for all mission programs. Conduct periodic independent assessments using safety, reliability, quality, trend and risk analysis techniques as a check against similar program and project analyses. Supplement program and project problem reporting systems with independent inputs. Provide formal verification to appropriate decision authorities of mission and acquisition milestone readiness.

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 14 Independent Authority There are two principal elements in executing engineering work: The first, is execution of line engineering work (work that produces a mission-related product) that is done for programs by a matrixed organization. The second, is that to ensure that the line engineering process is able to perform its work relatively dispassionately, there is an additional group that acts as an arbiter for technical issues. This group maintains the authority for applying and modifying technical standards, identifying issues and resolving technical disputes between line engineering and program line management. Note that people within the line engineering organization may conduct some aspects of ITA work (and vice versa) through appropriately controlled processes.

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 15 Headquarters ITA Functions For the NASA engineering community, Headquarters (through the Office of the Chief Engineer), provides overall policy, coordination, standardization, oversight, and when necessary direction of field activity engineering work. In the context of the ITA, this principally consists of: –approving Agency-wide standardized engineering practices, including collaborative processes; –providing policy and direction for the establishment, implementation, and modification of technical standards, including delegation of authority to Centers as appropriate;

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 16 Field ITA Functions Field activities (through the Center Director) provide independent controls and oversight of the line engineering work through ITA functions. In the context of the ITA, this principally consists of approving and overseeing standardized and project- specific engineering practices at each Center; approving and overseeing the implementation and modification of program-specific standards for each Center as delegated by Headquarters; providing oversight of line engineering work conducted in support of projects; establishing and executing ITA processes at Centers; acting as the primary technical authority for engineering- related disputes and issues within projects and programs, as delegated by Headquarters.

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 17 Technical standards vs. Project requirements Technical standards include Agency, Center, program, project, industry, and international standard processes and requirements for generically performing technical work or producing manufactured equipment, and are covered within NPD , “Technical Standards. Project functional requirements include performance requirements specific to that project, and are covered within NPD , “Program/Project Management.” For example, technical standards might provide analytic techniques and part requirements for a vehicle, project functional requirements might provide the velocity, volume, and mass requirements for that vehicle.

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 18 Technical standards vs. Project requirements Cont’d Technical standards: are developed or adopted by the engineering community, approved by the ITA and are applied and executed by line engineering personnel, and this application and execution is in turn overseen by both line engineering management and the ITA. By contrast, project functional requirements are established by project management, executed by line engineering using technical standards as the means for execution, and this execution is overseen by cognizant enterprise and Center programmatic management; Independent Agency oversight of this process is provided by associated Program Management Councils, the Independent Program Assessment Office, and Center Systems Management Offices.

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 19 During authorization and formulation of each project, the list of applicable technical standards (including Center and program/project standards) will: be proposed by line engineering, concurred with by the program/project manager, and approved by the ITA manager for that Center as delegated by the NASA Chief Engineer. In addition, this list of standards will identify any exceptional cases in which standards are not intended to be incorporated in relevant project contracts.

NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM NASA TECHNICAL STANDARDS PROGRAM 20 Resolution of Technical Issues Most technical issues will be resolved among project management and the line engineering directorate based on a reasoned resolution of competing technical, schedule, and cost considerations. In such cases, appropriate technical, cost, and schedule strategies can often be developed that satisfy all requirements, or which lead to an appropriately developed and reviewed revision to those requirements. This process is overseen continually by the Center element of the ITA, and ITA actions are required for those cases in which technical standard requirements are proposed to be modified. In the event there are issues that are not satisfactorily resolved within the Center, or which require a solution for which the Center does not have authority or resources, the issue will be identified to the cognizant Mission Office Associate Administrator and the NASA Chief Engineer for concurrent resolution, including appropriately justified recommendations from program management, line engineering, and the Center element of the ITA on alternate courses of action. In the very unlikely event this process does not reach concurrent resolution, the issue will be identified to the NASA Administrator for final resolution.