GOMATH! Day 2 Network 609 Core Curriculum Planning June 2013 Presenter: Karen Cardinali.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principal Professional Development Mathematics KCAS June 13 and June 16, 2011 Analytical and Applied Sciences June/July
Advertisements

LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Taking a Look at Rigor.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Arizona Department of Education School Improvement and Intervention.
The “Highly Effective” Early Childhood Classroom Environment
Robyn Seifert February 6,  smarterbalanced.org  K-12 EDUCATION  Administrators 2.
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Student Assessment CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Analysis Grade 5—Module 3.
MATH INTERVENTION MATERIAL REVIEW: Number Worlds Grades Pre-K – 8 and Algebra Readiness SRA In December Laura Clarke shared that Campbell Ridge is using.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Lesson Design: An Overview of Key Tools for Flexible Math Instruction Think about Ms. Christiansen—the teacher in the video. What helps a teacher plan.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module 3 Content.
Materials video clip 6 copies of LOI selected elements HO: plus/delta 6 copies: Balanced Math Framework Curriculum map 1.NBT.2a Chart paper for elements.
Presented by Karen Cardinali CFN 609
1. Addresses the Common Core Standards 2. Differentiation 3. Supports RtI 4. Technology/On-line Resources 5. Results Top Benefits of.
IGP Reflection: Evaluate Please update your tracking charts based on the implementation of the paragraph planning from last week. IGP Reflection Questions:
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
MONTGOMERY MATH K-4 WHY MATH IN FOCUS? May 28, 2013 Board of Education Meeting Amy Wish K-4 Supervisor of Mathematics and Science.
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
Teaching Through Problem Solving Part 2 – Bermuda Framework for Teaching Mathematics Gilbert Institute Ongoing PD commencing the week of March 3, 2014.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
UNWRAPPING THE MATH BUNDLES DIANE FOLEY, NETWORK LEADER CFN 204 Paul Perskin
Day 6. Agenda Just how is this thing supposed to go? Math! Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability.
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
You Are A First Grade Parent… A Preview of What to Expect.
Mathematics How will Instructional Shifts demanded of the Common Core learning standards support our children when taking state exams? CFN609.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader Adjusting Math Instruction for NYS Math Assessments Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach CFN204 1.
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
CCSS Assessments Presenter: Dr. Cindy Thomas. Session Objectives: Who developed the new CCSS assessment? What types of questions are on the math assessment?
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
MFAS Mathematics Formative Assessment System We shall be using tasks from MFAS.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
What is it we expect students to learn? Curriculum learning tasks need to be clearly stated 1.What policies and practices, regarding curriculum development,
Middle School Planning Session CMP3: DAY 2 Presented by Karen Cardinali June 12, 2013.
Tier 1 Sheltered Instruction & Academic Language Collaboration Module 2: Standards.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader Math Professional Development September 27, 2013 Presented by: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
1.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2014 SESSION 8 25 JUNE 2014 CONDITIONAL PROBABILITIES AND EVALUATING INDEPENDENCE.
Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
1 What will the work look like per quarter to help reach the goal? School wide goal: In order to increase student achievement Brown School will use a balanced.
Using SVMI & SDCOE Resources to Support Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics.
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
K-5 Math Adoption Day 2. Problems of the Day! Math Perception Impacts Performance Where do you think besides TV, that kids get negative messages about.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
The Teacher- Child Interaction Linking Developmentally Appropriate Practices to the Characteristics of Effective Instruction.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Learning AP ILD November 8, 2012 Planning and Monitoring for Learning.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
Supporting Instruction and Student Progress in the GoMath Classroom Presented by Cynthia Tanzey Senior Education Services Consultant.
Understanding by Design Stage 2: Determining Acceptable Evidence Summer UBD Workshop, Day 2 August 13, 2014.
3 rd, 4 th and 5 th Grade. Agenda Preparation looks like… General Information for Exams Overview of ELA Exam Overview of Math Exam Ways to Help At Home.
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Dealing with the Common Core K-12
A Guaranteed, Viable, and Engaging Curriculum
How do grade levels currently plan at your school?
Elementary Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

GOMATH! Day 2 Network 609 Core Curriculum Planning June 2013 Presenter: Karen Cardinali

Agenda Share experiences since last session Differentiated group work: Performance Tasks Lesson/Unit Planning Scope and Sequence Whole group share Reflections/Next steps

Since last session…

Instructional Materials Review on Assessment

GoMath! Embedded Performance Assessment: Performance assessments help reveal the thinking strategies students use to work through a problem. Performance assessments are provided in many places in GoMath: Diagnostic Interview Assessments in the Assessment Guide provide one- to-one interview assessments for each chapter. A Performance task for each chapter is provided in the chapter review/Test in the student edition. Constructed response items are provided in the Chapter Review/Test in the Student Edition and in the Chapter tests in the Assessment Guide. Extended constructed response items are provided in the Chapter tests in the Assessment Guide Performance Assessments with Multiple tasks for each critical Area are provided in the Assessment Guide

Performance Assessments Each GoMath Assessment has 4 tasks that target specific math concepts, skills, and strategies. These tasks can help assess students’ ability to see what they have learned to solve everyday problems. Each assessment focuses on a theme. Teachers can plan for students to complete one task at a time or use an extended amount of time to complete the entire assessment.

Critical Areas The Common Core specifies Critical Areas at each Grade level. These are listed below:

Scoring Rubrics GoMath! provides a 3 and 4 point scoring rubric to help teachers evaluate the quality of a student’s work and level of understanding to be used with the performance task in the chapter review and the extended response item in the chapter test in the assessment guide. In scoring a student’s task, the teacher should ask two questions: How well did the student use math conventions to arrive at a solution? And How well did the student communicate the solution? Poor sentence structure, word choice, usage, grammar, and spelling should not affect the scoring unless communication of ideas is impossible to determine.

Performance 3 point Rubric

Performance 4 point Rubric

Working closely with the NYC DOE Houghton Mifflin Harcourt will include the following enhancements to the GO Math! program: A booklet of Chapter and Critical Area performance tasks at each grade level that includes: – High cognitive level problem-solving performance tasks addressing the Common Core Standards and assessed with a 4 point scoring rubric aligned with NYC expectations and requirements. – Two-pages of teacher support material for each Critical Area and Chapter performance task with teacher content and information for incorporation and development of the problem-solving performance tasks. – Examples of student work for each rubric scoring level for each Critical Area and Chapter performance task.

Performance task Guiding Tasks/Questions: Reflect on and Compare the different rubrics and/or tasks available to our students. Compare the Cognitive Demand of the varied tasks: (Constructed response, Performance task, Parcc task…) Work the task. How well does the task align to the Common Core? How and when should the task be administered? How might your school use these performance tasks?

Performance Tasks: What can we share?

Unit Planning Unit Overview Unit Topic and Length CCLS: Content and Mathematical Practices Big Ideas and Essential Questions Balance of the Instructional Shift: Rigor Content/skills Assessments: Initial, Formative, On-Going Checks, Performance Tasks, Summative. ( Student Evidence) Learning Plan and Activities designed to be accessible and responsive to all students. Additional Resources for students and Teachers School Specific additions What aspects of GOMATH! are helpful and important to access when Unit planning?

Unit Planning: What can we share?

Lesson Panning What is the math you want students to walk away with? What standards are being worked on? Workshop model: How will the math be presented? What will students be doing to experience the mathematics, What will be shared at the end of the lesson to push student understanding? What strategies will be used? What misconceptions might students have? How will students be grouped and receive access to the mathematics? What questions will be asked throughout the lesson to move students closer to the instructional outcomes desired? How will you assess student understanding? Homework? What aspects of GOMATH! are helpful and important to address when lesson planning?

Lesson Planning: What can we share?

Scope and Sequence/Pacing An updated curriculum map has been updated and is available on ENGAGE NY at: curriculum-map

Next steps/Questions/Concerns

Thank you for your participation. Have a great summer!

Curriculum Review Results School communities should consider whether the built-in RTI support is a fit for their teaching staff and ensure that teacher teams have ample time to review the materials before teaching them so that they can understand the arc of the year, units, and each individual lesson before enactment and pace lessons effectively to balance problem solving and procedural skill and fluency