Page 1© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik SRNWP – Revised Verification Proposal Clive Wilson Presented by Terry Davies at SRNWP Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Crown Copyright Source: Met Office Dale Barker, Tomas Landelius, Eric Bazile, Francesco Isotta, Phil Jones 17 April 2013 EURO4M – WP2: Regional.
Advertisements

© Crown copyright Met Office EURO4M Work Package 2 (chiefly WP2.1) Richard Renshaw EURO4M GA1, De Bilt, April 14 th 2010.
Slide 1ECMWF forecast User Meeting -- Reading, June 2006 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Seasonal forecasts Laura Ferranti and the Seasonal Forecast Section User meeting June 2005.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Damian Wilson Malcolm Brooks Evaluation statistics of cloud fraction and water content.
Page 1 NAE 4DVAR Oct 2006 © Crown copyright 2006 Mark Naylor Data Assimilation, NWP NAE 4D-Var – Testing and Issues EWGLAM/SRNWP meeting Zurich 9 th -12.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 9° General MeetingAthens September Working package/Task on “standardization” The “core” Continuous parameters: T2m,
Page 1© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Draft Interoperability Proposal Terry Davies SRNWP Meeting October 8-11, 2007.
© Crown copyright Met Office SRNWP Interoperability Workshop, ECMWF January 2008 SRNWP Interoperability Alan Dickinson Met Office.
Iwan Holleman, Program Manager OPERA c/o The Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) EUMETNET - OPERA WMO-TECO:
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Quantitative precipitation forecasts in the Alps – first.
EWGLAM/SRNWP Annual Meetings 2005 SRNWP Business Meeting 5 October 2005 Ljubljana (Slovenia) Short-Range Numerical Weather Prediction Programme.
Exploring the Use of Object- Oriented Verification at the Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Faye E. Barthold 1,2, Keith F. Brill 1, and David R. Novak.
© Crown copyright Met Office SRNWP Interoperability Workshop, ECMWF, January 2008 SRNWP Interoperability Terry Davies Met Office.
Univ of AZ WRF Model Verification. Method NCEP Stage IV data used for precipitation verification – Stage IV is composite of rain fall observations and.
Performance of the MOGREPS Regional Ensemble
CARPE DIEM Centre for Water Resources Research NUID-UCD Contribution to Area-3 Dusseldorf meeting 26th to 28th May 2003.
00/XXXX1 EUMETNET Tim Oakley Met Office, Exeter, UK CIMO ET on Upgrading the Global Radiosonde Network – Geneva 3-7 November 2003.
Short-Range NWP Programme 13th SRNWP Meeting 11 October 2006 Zurich (Switzerland)
Expert Team on System Aspects and Interoperability Programme Glenn Greed, UKMO, Project Manager Interoperability Ulrich Schättler, DWD, Chairman of the.
SRNWP data pool Jean-Marie Bettems / MeteoSwiss Claudia Heret / DWD COSMO GM Roma, September 5 th, 2011.
Interoperability between the European NWP modelling systems Ulrich Schättler, François Bouttier, Xiaohua Yang, Radmila Brozkova, Alan Radford A Report.
GIE/EIG EUMETNET, Registered Number RPM Bruxelles Status of the EUMETNET C-SRNWP project Gergely Bölöni C-SRNWP: Coordination on Short Range.
NWP Activities at INM Bartolomé Orfila Estrada Area de Modelización - INM 28th EWGLAM & 13th SRNWP Meetings Zürich, October 2005.
“Initiate the reorganisation and strengthening of the SRNWP Programme” EMN/C27/Doc12 C27 took place the 4-6 April 2006 in Toulouse 13th SRNWP Meeting 12th.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 SRNWP – Revised Verification Proposal Clive Wilson, COSMO Annual Meeting September 18-21, 2007.
COSMO Annual Meeting September 2005 Zurich (Switzerland) Short-Range Numerical Weather Prediction Programme.
Verification methods - towards a user oriented verification WG5.
SRNWP meeting, Dubrovnik OMSZ PROPOSAL October, OMSZ proposal for becoming responsible member of the C-SRNWP programme ANDRÁS HORÁNYI
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 Quality Management of a European Wind Profiler Network (CWINDE) Tim Oakley TECO-05 Bucharest, 4 th -7 th May.
© Crown copyright Met Office Preliminary results using the Fractions Skill Score: SP2005 and fake cases Marion Mittermaier and Nigel Roberts.
LAPS __________________________________________ Analysis and nowcasting system for Finland/Scandinavia Finnish Meteorological Institute Erik Gregow.
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Priority project « Advanced interpretation and verification.
© Crown copyright Met Office Probabilistic turbulence forecasts from ensemble models and verification Philip Gill and Piers Buchanan NCAR Aviation Turbulence.
9th COSMO General Meeting September 2007 Athens (Greece) Programme Short-Range NWP Report of the Programme Manager.
Short-Range Ensemble Prediction System at INM José A. García-Moya SMNT – INM 27th EWGLAM & 12th SRNWP Meetings Ljubljana, October 2005.
Interoperability at INM Experience with the SREPS system J. A. García-Moya NWP – Spanish Met Service INM SRNWP Interoperability Workshop ECMWF –
Nudging Radial Velocity, OPERA, LHN for COSMO-EU COSMO GM, Sibiu, 2 September Recent developments at DWD
Page 1© Crown copyright Scale selective verification of precipitation forecasts Nigel Roberts and Humphrey Lean.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG4 activities Pierre Eckert, MeteoSwiss, Geneva.
Funded by the European Commission WHAT MAKES A GOOD PROPOSAL?
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Quantitative precipitation forecast in the Alps Verification.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG 4 activities.
EurEPS The Realization of an Operational LAM-EPS in Europe A SRNWP Project under EUMETNET Proposed to the EUMETNET Council at its 30 th meeting by Norwegian.
EMS 2013 (Reading UK) Verification techniques for high resolution NWP precipitation forecasts Emiel van der Plas Kees Kok Maurice.
NWP Activities at INM José A. García-Moya SMNT – INM 27th EWGLAM & 12th SRNWP Meetings Ljubljana, October 2005.
U. Damrath, COSMO GM, Athens 2007 Verification of numerical QPF in DWD using radar data - and some traditional verification results for surface weather.
Overview of WG5 future activities Adriano Raspanti Zurich, September 2005.
FE 1 Ensemble Predictions Based on the Convection-Resolving Model COSMO-DE Susanne Theis Christoph Gebhardt Tanja Winterrath Volker Renner Deutscher Wetterdienst.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 Met Office Verification -status Clive Wilson, Presented by Mike Bush at EWGLAM Meeting October 8- 11, 2007.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 EuroRISK PREVIEW Windstorms Workpackage Ken Mylne, Met Office.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Variable resolution or lateral boundary conditions Terry Davies Dynamics Research Yongming.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 2 Outlook Some focus on Temperature with common plots and Conditional Verification Some Fuzzy verification Long trends.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Numerical Weather Prediction at MeteoSwiss 8th of October.
LAM activities in Austria in 2003 Yong WANG ZAMG, AUSTRIA 25th EWGLAM and 10th SRNWP meetings, Lisbon,
C-SRNWP (SHORT RANGE NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION NETWORK) AND THE FORECASTING CAPABILITY AREA OF EUMETNET Responsible member: Hungarian Meteorological.
© Crown copyright Met Office Review topic – Impact of High-Resolution Data Assimilation Bruce Macpherson, Christoph Schraff, Claude Fischer EWGLAM, 2009.
© Crown copyright Met Office EUMETNET- SRNWP verification programme -Met Office Responsible member Clive Wilson – Project manager 31st EWGLAM/16th SRNWP.
Responsible member: Hungarian Meteorological Service Period:
Fuzzy verification using the Fractions Skill Score
Spatial Verification Intercomparison Meeting, 20 February 2007, NCAR
Convective Scale Modelling Humphrey Lean et. al
Status of SREPS - Sept Full two runs a day from April 2006.
Workshop Results WG5 COSMO General Meeting
Quantitative verification of cloud fraction forecasts
Christoph Gebhardt, Zied Ben Bouallègue, Michael Buchhold
42h forecast HIRLAM 50km 24h accumulated precipitation.
SRNWP-PEPS COSMO General Meeting September 2005
Some Verification Highlights and Issues in Precipitation Verification
Presentation transcript:

Page 1© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik SRNWP – Revised Verification Proposal Clive Wilson Presented by Terry Davies at SRNWP Meeting October 8-11, 2007

Page 2© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Original Draft Proposal (not submitted to EUMETNET)  2 aims  Development of a common verification package  Realization of an operational model intercomparison  Further aims  Provide new methods (fuzzy etc)  Allow non-GTS observation data  Radar composites (esp. OPERA)  Responsible Member would:  Write & maintain code of package  Compute intercomparison scores, website & archive  Find NMS(or ECMWF) to host non-GTS data hub  Motivate NMSs to contribute non-GTS data to hub

Page 3© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Not submitted because:  Not fully agreed  Too ambitious- underestimate time/effort needed to develop new code & package  No one indicated wish to be responsible member  Major centres and consortia already had most of proposed functionality in own packages  EUMETNET reluctant to agree proposed cost  (1FTE scientist + travel +25% programme manager)

Page 4© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik New (draft) proposal – staged aims 1.Initiate a “realistic” intercomparison based on  Exchange of forecasts from main models at 3-4 centres (format – GRIB then interoperability to define)  Met Office NAE - 12km  Hirlam reference - 15km  Aladin France - 10km  COSMO-EU - 7km  Use existing packages  Accept different station selection, QC (difficult to mandate/change at op. centres)  Verify common scores for same parameters over common areas  Compare, contrast & pool results to reach “consensus”  Extension of existing precip. verification done by Met Office

Page 5© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Current Intercomparison of precipitation forecasts

Page 6© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik External Met Office website- European Precipitation comparison  al/precipitation/emip.html  Password protected  Models:  Hirlam reference  COSMO-EU (DWD lokall)  Aladin (MeteoFrance)  UM – North Atlantic European  COSMO-7 (MeteoSwiss)  Verified against British Isles Nimrod radar composite

Page 7© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik

Page 8© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik External Met Office website- European Precipitation comparison  24h accumulations thresholds :  0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 12.0, 16.0, 20.0, 24.0, 32.0 and 48.0 mm  Scores  frequency bias  Equitable Threat Score (ETS)  log-odds ratio  Extreme Dependency Score  00 UTC run of each model  since the beginning of January 2004  Means, time series & ascii contingency tables

Page 9© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Some Example results

Page 10© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Latest results

Page 11© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik New (draft) proposal – later staged aims 2.Add more models/configurations 3.Add higher resolution forecasts to intercomparison 4.Methods/code for high resolution forecasts  Collaborate on investigation of new methods  Intercomparison studies for set of forecasts from single model (cf NCAR project with WRF)  Provide code for new methods  Enable access to radar composites (OPERA) 5.Non-GTS data & hub  Much greater financial and staff resources

Page 12© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Why new draft may be acceptable  Practical & pragmatic  Stage 1 does not involve large cost or require extensive code changes  Stage 1 addresses primary concern (of EUMETNET directors) for meaningful verification of operational models  Stage 2 – allows more centres to judge their models against others over common domains  Stage 3 addresses new challenge of high resolution – still active research topic  Stage 4&5 will be necessary to evaluate and assess future operational high resolution models

Page 13© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik Questions