IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

District Accreditation
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
1 Responding to Extreme Changes between Self-Study and the Evaluation Visit Dr. Andrew Thompson, Provost Dr. Richard Resch, Provost (Retired) The American.
Presented by Dr. Tanmay Pramanik Overview of On-Site Team Evaluation.
Joint ATS-WASC Accreditation Reviews Jerry McCarthy, ATS Teri Cannon, WASC.
1 Establishing Performance Indicators in Support of The Illinois Commitment Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education December 11, 2001.
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
Developing and Using Institutional Plans.
Educational Approval Board Approved Schools Conference The EAB: Past, Present and Future David C. Dies, EAB Executive Secretary November 13, 2008.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Student Outcomes – Lessons Learned on Employed and Satisfied EAB Approved Schools Conference November 9, 2006 Patrick J. Sweeney, School Administration.
WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.
Subchapter M-Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act Program Part 273-Education Contracts under Johnson-OMalley Act.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Principles of Standards and Measures
1 Educator and Provider Support Grant Policy and Research Committee EEC Board October 6, 2014.
World’s Largest Educational Community
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Commission for Academic Accreditation 1 Accreditation and Academic Quality King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Faculty Workshop Accreditation,
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
PCTIA Accreditation WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE APPLYING FOR ACCREDITATION.
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
About Administration Requirements/ Processes Particulars Master of Engineering Degree Designed for Distance Learning A collaborative program designed by.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Legal & Administrative Oversight of NGOs Establishing and Monitoring Performance Standards.
PCTIA Accreditation WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE APPLYING FOR ACCREDITATION.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
The Program Review Process What is Instructional Program Review?
Preparing for the On-site Evaluation: Strategies for Success November 5, 2009.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Recommendations Overview Student Success Task Force.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Banner County Schools Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Amy Trauernicht Stacy McDaniel Troy Lurz Maribeth Moore Kaci Kearns Dan Spatzierath.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Accreditation Overview.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Perkins End of Year Evaluation Southwestern Community College May 18, 2016.
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee October 19, 2015.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Session D: The Accreditation Process.
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
Maine is IT! at SMCC Grant Playbook for
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.
Measuring Course Quality: Development of a Micro-Analysis Tool
Fort Valley State University
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007

IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Employment Verification School Visit Institutional Planning

SETTING THE CONTEXT Redesign Questions Modernization Principals EABs Purpose in AB 281

Redesign Questions: How will EAB's oversight process help schools advance over time and lead to better student satisfaction and learning results? Can there ever be a sustained and rational school advancement process without a defined strategic/institutional plan, which sets goals, creates action steps, measures results and evaluates progress? How do the EAB school approval, annual renewal, and school visit processes need to be redesigned to focus on results and to encourage and support school advancement? What result data would schools and the EAB need to collect and analyze so schools are accountable for student outcomes?

Modernization Principles: The EAB believes the best way to protect students is to enhance the schools and their programs by holding schools accountable for outcomes data. The EAB believes there needs to be a cooperative working relationship with schools for institutional effectiveness to be successful. The EAB believes schools must develop an internal capacity for making decisions based on data, for satisfying students, and for continuous improvement.

EABs Purpose in AB 281: Evaluate and approve schools. Collect and disseminate student outcome and satisfaction information. Perform annual reviews of schools. Conduct on-site school visits. Hold school accountable for improving their performance and effectiveness. Support options for innovative and quality programs offered by schools.

EMPLOYMENT VERIFICATION IN 2009 SCHOOL RENEWAL (September 1, 2008) EAB schools focus on employment/careers for adults not on a liberal arts education Employment/career advancement most significant/meaningful result for dreamers attending EAB schools EAB schools primary customers are employers who hire graduates EAB has a responsibility to give consumers good information and accurate results data EAB schools success is defined by success of graduates

EABs Process for Verification of Employment: September 1, 2008, schools submit the Verification of Employment form for students completing a program after January 1, 2008 During 2009 school visits, EAB calls employers EAB picks random samples of schools not being visited in 2009 and calls employers

SCHOOL VISIT DESIGN PROCESS Compliance plus Institutional Effectiveness Researched other states and accreditation agencies Convened a Focus Group of School Administrators Field-tested school visits Developed materials and forms to guide process

Four types of School Visits: Comprehensive – three-year cycle / mid-accreditation New Schools – within first six months Annual – pulse check on goals Other – complaint, growth, data

Sample of Agenda for School Visit: EAB School Visit 9:00 - 9:15Facility Tour 9:15 - 9:30Overview of the Process 9: :00 Registrar/Admissions: Overview of Student Records (files for new students, refunds, graduates) 10: :30 Owner/Director/Administrator 10: :00Instructors 11: :30Students (close to graduation) 11: :00Advisory Committee/Employers (teleconference or in-person) 12: :30Graduates (teleconference or in-person) 12:30 - 1:00EAB Staff Completes Assessment Form 1:00 Exit Conference with Owner / Director to share assessment results School officials should use this sample agenda as a guide when preparing for an EAB school visit. All groups listed on the sample agenda will be interviewed. The EAB staff will work with you to finalize an agenda for the school visit.

School Visit Form Categories: Student Records / Compliance Institutional Plan Mission-driven School Admissions Curriculum Faculty / Instructors Student Services

Financial Soundness / Stability Facilities Advisory Committee / Employers School and Program Evaluations Strengths Areas Needing Improvement Actions Required School Visit Form Categories (continued):

Institutional Planning Fiscal Analysis & Planning Advertising / Recruitment Interview / Enrollment Curriculum Development, Delivery & Evaluation Staff & Instructor Selection Professional Development & Evaluation Student Services Facilities Planning Program Evaluation Graduates and Employers Mission Values Goals SYSTEMS ELEMENTS OF EFFECTIVE INSTITUTIONS

School Visit Conclusion: Share school visit form with school Conduct an exit interview Send a summary letter of findings / actions required

INSTITUTIONAL PLANNING Those that fail to plan, plan to fail.

INSTITUTIONAL PLAN Require all schools to submit an Institutional Plan September 1, 2009 Accommodate scope and size of the school Accommodate accreditation planning All institutional elements addressed Three – five year plan with annual goals, objectives, and measurable results Help next year with training

Institutional assessment and improvement activities should be appropriate to the size and scale of the schools operations and support the management and administration of the school as well as the quality of education provided. The accreditation expectations for a small, diploma/certificate granting institution are different that a large, degree granting institution. The accreditation expectations for a small, diploma/certificate granting institution are different that a large, degree granting institution. Institutional Enhancement and Assessment Accreditation Expectations

Institutional assessment should validate and document the schools educational and administrative practices to improve student learning and achievement. Improvement activities are expected to be significant and on- going experiences in the school. Not simply once every renewal cycle as part of the accreditation / licensure process. Institutional Enhancement and Assessment Accreditation Expectations

Accreditation Expectations The institutional assessment and improvement activities must include a written and comprehensive plan that examines school operations and sets forth specific short- and long-range (i.e., minimally three years) goals for improvement with measurable benchmarks and timelines for implementation. The institutional assessment and improvement plan must address the entire school in such areas as management; fiscal condition and budget; administrative policies and practices; student support services; faculty and staff development; educational program curricula; learning resources system, equipment, and supporting materials; facilities; and student achievement outcomes.

Institutional assessment and improvement activities should support and enhance the quality of the education provided using information obtained internally (e.g., staff and faculty development and planning, and student input and feedback) and externally (e.g., Program Advisory Committees, employers, community involvement, school graduates, etc.) These activities should strive to validate the schools educational and administrative practices and to document and improve student learning and achievement. Institutional assessment and improvement activities are expected to be significant and ongoing experiences in the school.

IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Attempt to work with whole school system Provide a context for schools to improve over time Hold schools accountable for results Provide good information to the public