Discussion & Status Report on Recycling & Waste Management Measures in Climate Change Scoping Plan Prepared Pursuant to AB 32 California Integrated Waste.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32) The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32) California Council on Science and.
Advertisements

California GHG policy and implications for the power sector APEX Sydney Conference October 13, 2008 Anjali Sheffrin, PhD.
State and Local Initiatives to Combat Global Warming AB A Framework for Change James N. Goldstene California Air Resources Board October 22, 2008.
1 AB 32 Scoping Plan Update California Counties A State of Progress Jeff Weir Air Resources Board December 3, 2008 Sacramento, CA.
Discussion of Climate Action Team Subgroup Activities California Integrated Waste Management Board Board Meeting December 11, 2007.
1 AB 32: The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 The Transportation Connection AB 32: The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 The.
1 AB 32 Scoping Plan Energy Action Plan Meeting Mike Scheible Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board California Public Utilities Commission.
“Use of Resources” Climate Change Workshop CIWMB Early Action Measures “Use of Resources” Climate Change Workshop CIWMB Early Action Measures Evan W.R.
2009 Used Oil/HHW Conference Solutions Through Shared Responsibility Howard Levenson CIWMB November 2, 2009.
CALIFORNIA’S CLIMATE ACTION: TRY EVERYTHING POSSIBLE ASHLEY CONRAD-SAYDAH DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR CLIMATE POLICY CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.
October  AB 32 (2006)  Target: Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions at 1990 levels by 2020 and maintain reductions  Authorized the Cap and Trade Program.
Oregon Climate Change Regulatory Activities and Policy Initiatives Bill Drumheller -- Oregon Department of Energy University of Oregon School of Law Climate.
Anaerobic Digestion and the Path Towards Zero Waste Paul Relis Senior Vice President CR&R Incorporated July 14,2009.
1 West Coast Climate Change Initiative. 2 West Coast Governors’ Global Warming Initiative Oregon, Washington, California Start: Governors’ Directive,
Organics Policy Roadmap  Sub-directive 6.1: 50% reduction of organics in waste stream by 2020  Need additional capacity to process 15 million tons per.
1 Washington Action on Climate Change Hedia Adelsman, Department of Ecology September 25, 2009.
1 Southern California Water Dialogue April 23, 2008 Jon Costantino Climate Change Planning Manager California Air Resources Board AB 32 California Global.
Climate Policy Development Tom Peterson The Center For Climate Strategies August 25, 2005.
Energy Action Plan “Report Card” and the AB32 “Umbrella” CFEE ROUNDTABLE CONFERENCE ON ENERGY Julie Fitch California Public Utilities Commission Director.
How the State of California Can Play A Greater Role in Addressing Global Warming Leonard Robinson – Chief Deputy Director California Department of Toxic.
New Mexico’s Climate Change Initiative Jim Norton New Mexico Environment Department.
Roadmap to a Sustainable Waste Management Future Waste Diversion Strategies in the Unincorporated Communities of Los Angeles County Throughout the Region.
Offsets and Climate Policy: EPA Perspectives Dina Kruger Director, Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May 30, 2008.
Climate change, land, materials and products: new reports from EPA and the Product Policy Institute GRRN Recycling and Zero Waste Conference October 19,
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Waste Sector: An Environmental Perspective Scott Smithline, Director of Legal and Regulatory Affairs Californians Against.
California Cap on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Market-Based Compliance Mechanisms Edie Chang California Air Resources Board September 2015 California.
New Mexico Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Programs April 2008.
CLIMATE LITERACY 101 State Actions for Mitigation Matt Correa Water Resources Engineer DSIWM – Climate Change Program.
Senate Select Committee on Climate Change and AB 32 Implementation December 3, 2013.
Implementing AB 32: California’s Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions National Association of Clean Air Agencies Spring Membership Meeting May.
Department of the Environment Reducing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A State’s Perspective Renee Fizer, Climate Change Division-MDE.
Washington State: Climate Initiative
AB 32 and SB Implementation Process and Issues Presentation to Ventura County Civic Alliance Southern California Association of Governments October.
Sustainable Port of San Diego Michelle White Green Port Program Manager.
Workshop Agenda  Presentations on background, technical information and perspectives.  Discussion of “Measures” that can help CIWMB meet GHG emission.
American Public Power Association Pre-Rally Workshop February 28, 2006 Washington, D.C. Climate Change: Making Community-Based Decisions in a Carbon Constrained.
CPUC Role in AB 32 Implementation LIOB – 2 nd June, 2010 San Diego, CA.
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
Climate Change Workshop: CIWMB GHG Reduction Measures Strategic Policy Development Committee May 8 th, 2007 Judith Friedman, CIWMB.
Overview of Recent Developments Gregory B. Greenwood Science Advisor Resources Agency.
California Public Utilities Commission CPUC Climate Change Activities Paul Clanon Executive Director August 28, 2007 Presentation to the Senate Energy,
Discussion and Status of the Solid Waste Management & Recycling Strategies included in the AB 32 Draft Scoping Plan to Reduce California Greenhouse Gases.
1 Public Meeting to Update the Board on Mandatory Commercial Waste Recycling October 21, 2011.
James Goldstene California Air Resources Board AB 32: The Global Warming Solutions Act of th LEA/CIWMB Partnership Conference October 16, 2007.
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
AB 32 Implementation Nuts and Bolts IEP Annual Meeting September 22, 2008 Kevin Kennedy Office of Climate Change California Air Resources Board.
0 National Inter-Ministerial Dialogue on Climate Change Cape Hotel Monrovia, Liberia June 25, 2009 Assessing and Developing Policy Options for Addressing.
Climate Change October Main concepts Climate change – lasting change of some or all characteristics, describing the average weather condition Greenhouse.
Proposed Amendments to the AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Regulation October 20, 2011.
California Energy Commission Global Climate Change: Trends and Policy Issues Susan J. Brown California Energy Commission March 3, 2005.
11 AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan Progress Report October 21, 2010 California Air Resources Board.
Smooth Sailing Ahead Partnering With Sustainability and Waste Compliance & Mitigation Fernando Berton, CIWMB.
Discussion of Priority Activities for Next Eighteen Months Action Plans.
1 Draft Landfill Methane Control Measure California Air Resources Board April 22, 2008.
Green Action Team Meeting February 19, 2009 Status of Major Deliverables Green Building Initiative (Exec Order S-20-04)
Climate Action Team CIWMB Update CIWMB Board Meeting November 15, 2005.
AB 32 Update December 6, Outline Cap and Trade Program 2013 Update to Scoping Plan Looking ahead to
11 Regional Renewable Energy Study Review of Findings and Forecasts Presented to: Climate, Energy and Environment and Policy Committee Metropolitan Washington.
Status of AB 32 Implementation and Consideration of Updated Environmental Analysis of Scoping Plan Alternatives California Air Resources Board August 24,
Greenhouse Gas Initiatives: progress and perspective Sandra Meier Environmental Energy Alliance of New York.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Consideration Of Allocation Proposals To Be Funded From The Integrated Waste Management Account And/Or To.
Discussion and Status of the Solid Waste Management & Recycling Strategies included in the Climate Change Proposed Scoping Plan California Integrated Waste.
1 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Management An introduction Tim Holmes, P.E. Kenwood Energy Energy Consulting Services Kenwood Energy P.O.Box 692 Kenwood, CA
John Davis Mojave Desert and Mountain Recycling Authority.
The Greenhouse Gas Connection to Sustainable Resource Management
Quarterly Meeting November 30, 2016
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
California’s Legislative Backdrop for Addressing Climate Change
Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project Doing More with Our Waste
Implementation Update: 2017 Scoping Plan
Presentation transcript:

Discussion & Status Report on Recycling & Waste Management Measures in Climate Change Scoping Plan Prepared Pursuant to AB 32 California Integrated Waste Management Board Strategic Policy Development Committee Meeting – May 12,

AB 32, Scoping Plan, & ARB Schedule  2020 GHG emissions target = 427 Million Metric Tons Carbon Dioxide Equivalents (MMTCO2e)  ARB adopted Scoping Plan on December 12, 2008  Specific measures to achieve 174 MMTCO2e reductions  Appendices & supplemental documents  Adopt mandatory reporting rules by January 1, 2009  Adopt regulations to implement plan by January 1, 2011  2050 GHG emissions target = 80% reduction below 1990 levels 2

Scoping Plan Recommendations Key elements: Energy efficiency programs Renewable energy California cap and trade program linked to Western Climate Initiative (WCI) Targets for transportation-related emissions Existing laws and policies (Pavley, Low-Carbon Fuel Standard, etc.) Targeted fees 3

Recycling & Waste Management Strategies in Scoping Plan Landfill Methane Control (Discrete Early Action) – 1 MMTCO2e Increasing Efficiency of Landfill Methane Capture – TBD* Commercial Recycling – up to 5 MMTCO2e* Increase Production & Markets for Compost – 2 MMTCO2e* Anaerobic Digestion – 2 MMTCO2e* Extended Producer Responsibility & Environmentally Preferable Purchasing – TBD* *Reductions from these measures are not currently counted towards the AB reduction goal of 174 MMTCO2e. 4

Other Recycling & Waste Management Strategies – Scoping Plan Appendix Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) from Landfill Gas (further research) Watershed-Friendly Landscape Guidelines (supporting regional land use strategies) 5

Landfill Methane Capture Lead Agency – ARB ARB Board to adopt regulation 34-page draft regulatory language posted on web site In effect – Fall 2009; Early Action Item - in place by 1/1/2010 Expect annual reduction of ~1 MMTCO2e Install new methane control systems at landfills currently without systems Establish statewide performance standards to maximize methane capture efficiencies 6

Mandatory Commercial Recycling Lead Agency – CIWMB Implementation Schedule – Informal workshops 2009, rulemaking by 12/31/2010 Expect annual reduction of ~5 MMTCO2e (lower bound) Will achieve increased recovery of recyclables with high potential for GHG reductions Need to resolve authority issue 7

Increase Organics Production & Markets Lead Agency – CIWMB Implementation Schedule – Ongoing Expect annual reduction of ~2 MMTCO2e (lower bound) Lifecycle Analysis (LCA) of organics management options Organics Roadmap – December 2008 Board Meeting Need to develop financial incentives ARB commitment to work with CIWMB, CDFA, Caltrans on direct financial incentives for use of compost Increase IWMA funds for organic grants Need to resolve cross-media issues on air & water quality 8

Anaerobic Digestion Lead Agency – CIWMB Implementation Schedule – 90 facilities by 2020 Expect annual reduction of ~2 MMTCO2e LCA of organics management options Additional benefit – Produces renewable energy from biomass & contributes to 33% RPS goal (1.2 million mWh) Additional benefit – Produces biofuels and helps meet Low-Carbon Fuel Standard Diverts high methane-producing waste types such as food waste, green waste, & other organics 9

Extended Producer Responsibility & Environmentally Preferable Purchasing EPR Lead Agency – CIWMB Implementation Schedule – Need statutory authority CIWMB adopted EPR Framework Sept 2007 (revised Jan 2008) AB 283 would establish statutory authority to implement EPR Framework Expect annual reduction of – TBD, based on product selection EPP Lead Agency - DGS Collaborate with DGS on Environmentally Preferable Product choices Leverage the State’s buying power 10

OSWER analyzed technical potential scenarios to estimate potential GHG mitigation co-benefits from land and materials management. Examples include : Materials Efficiency Reduce packaging use by 50% MMTCO2E per year Reduce use of non-packaging paper products by 50%20-70 MMTCO2E per year Extend the life of personal computers by 50%25 MMTCO2E per year Reuse/Recycling Recycle all construction and demolition debris150 MMTCO2E per year Increase national MSW recycling/composting rate from 32.5% to 50% MMTCO2E per year Combust 25% of MSW for energy recovery25-45 MMTCO2E OSWER Draft Analysis: Technical Potential Scenarios 11

Source: Global GHG Abatement Cost Curve v2.0 Negative GHG abatement cost for waste recycling-12€/ton CO2e Negative GHG abatement cost for electricity from landfill gas-12€/ton CO2e GHG abatement cost for solar photo-voltaic18 €/ton CO2e GHG abatement cost for gas plant CCS retrofit58 €/ton CO2e 12

Additional Strategies in Scoping Plan that Involve CIWMB Glass manufacturing High Global Warming Potential foams & insulation Green Building Water efficiency programs Tire inflation & fuel-efficient tire standards Local government programs – transportation, energy, waste/recycling, water use Climate change curriculum for K-12 as part of Education & Environment Initiative 13

Major Issues Under Evaluation by ARB Cap & Trade Allocation of Allowances, Role of Offsets Administrative Fee, Use of Revenue Economics & Co-Benefits 14

Key Issues For CIWMB Authority to implement measures Resources to implement measures Administrative fee to cover personnel and research Accounting for indirect emissions in GHG inventories Integration of R&WM measures with other industry sectors GHG Quantification Tools Especially organics, recycling for use by local govt & industry Protocol Development 15

Next Steps Work with ARB on authority, implementation, & resources Complete Lifecycle Assessment and Economic Analysis of Waste Management Options to Reduce GHG Emissions Complete Economics Study for Commercial Recycling Complete CA Climate Action Network project with Institute for Local Governments Complete Programmatic EIR for Anaerobic Digestion Complete Landfill Gas to Liquified Natural Gas Demonstration Project Complete Landfill Gas Efficiency Study with CEC Implement all proposed measures (with additional resources approved in FY 09/10 budget) 16

Next Steps – cont’d Participate in new Climate Action Team Interagency Working Groups Participate in Protocol Development Work with CA Climate Action Registry on protocols for Co-Digestion & Community Operations Pursue protocol development for composting & recycling Serve on Technical Advisory Group for Chicago Climate Exchange Work with USEPA on Climate Change activities Develop new Strategic Directive on Climate Change activities 17

Ideas for New Strategic Directive Core Value – efforts to maximize diversion also maximize greenhouse gas emission reductions Key Sub-directives Continue coordination with Climate Action Team, ARB, inter-agency working groups Implement all Recycling and Waste Management measures to achieve > 10 MMTCO2e Foster development of alternative energy and biofuels from post- recycled waste materials Encourage legislation clarifying that regulatory proposals for air and water quality consider impacts on AB 939 and greenhouse gas reductions Include climate change impacts as criterion in reviewing CIWMB regulations 18

Climate Change Key Staff WCMP – Scott Walker, Stephanie Young STAR – Brenda Smyth, Clark Williams, Teri Wion LAMD – Cara Morgan, Kaoru Cruz, Jennifer Caldwell 19

Questions? 20