Randal Lawson Executive Vice President, Santa Monica College Ricardo Navarrette Vice President, Student Services Santa Rosa Junior College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Randal Lawson Executive Vice President, Santa Monica College Past President, CCCCIO.
Campus Improvement Plans
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Strategic Budgeting Initiative Provost Open Forum November 19, 2013.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Academic Advising Implementation Team PROGRESS REPORT April 29, 2009.
SEM Planning Model.
President’s Cabinet April 12,  Process review  The “why” for the plan  The draft plan  Q & A  Implementation.
Setting Course Enrollment Maximums: Process, Roles, and Principles Adopted Spring 2012 The Academic Senate of the California Community Colleges.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
Design and Development Awards Spring 2015 TLOS Networked Learning Design and Strategies (NLDS)
TBA Compliance Training Long Beach City College Developed & Presented by Bob Rapoza LBCCD Internal Audit Manager TBA Compliance Training Long Beach City.
Emerging Latino Communities Initiative Webinar Series 2011 June 22, 2011 Presenter: Janet Hernandez, Capacity-Building Coordinator.
South Seattle Community College BUDGET HEARING Fiscal Year June 7, 2005.
Randal Lawson Executive Vice President, Santa Monica College Past President, California Community Colleges Chief Instructional Officers.
Randal Lawson Executive Vice President, Santa Monica College Past President, CCCCIO.
How many balls can you juggle at one time?. Identify 7 balls extension middle managers juggle every day in leading the extension program Identify strategies.
FTES and Attendance Accounting Putting the Pieces Together.
Santiago Canyon College SCC Academic Scheduling Institute Funding Accounting Methods 101.
FTES and Attendance Accounting. FTES calculations are defined in the California Code of Regulations Title 5 and the California Community College Student.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Addressing Unofficial Withdrawals and Federal Financial Aid Compliance Addressing Unofficial Withdrawals and Federal Financial Aid Compliance February.
Randal Lawson Executive Vice President, Santa Monica College Past President, California Community Colleges Chief Instructional Officers.
Randal Lawson Executive Vice President, Santa Monica College Past President, CCCCIO.
1 TBA Issues and FTES Review Material February, 2012 Cathy Iyemura Attendance Accounting, District Office.
South Seattle College ALL COLLEGE MEETING MARCH 11, 2015 OLYMPIC HALL 1.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
ACCJC SPECIAL REPORT DUE TO FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTACT: DR. VICTOR JAIME, ED.D DUE: APRIL 15, 2014.
Successfully Aligning Resources With Planning League of Innovation Conference March 10, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services Tammeil.
Accelerated Instructional Program Review Handbook Spring 2007.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
Coalition 101. RESPECT AND VALUE “The group respects my opinion and provides positive ways for me to contribute.” EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS “The roles.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Randal Lawson Executive Vice President, Santa Monica College Immediate Past President, CCCCIO.
Randal Lawson Executive Vice President, Santa Monica College Past President, CCCCIO.
CCIA Conference May 6, 2010 Kathy Blackwood, SMCCCD.
Enrollment Management: Scheduling Component September 29, Department Head Meeting.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
Building the Board Your Organization Needs Presented by Indiana Youth Institute Community Foundation of Howard County 3/8/2007.
Central Kitsap School District SHARED DECISION MAKING Central Kitsap High School March 2, 2006.
Randal Lawson Executive Vice President, Santa Monica College Past President, CCCCIO.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Academic Senate Study Session: Part-Time Instructional Budget October 22, 2015 Presented by: Michelle Marquez Vice President, Administrative Services.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Academic Senate Study Session 11/12/15. Outcomes of Today’s Session  See a broad overview of enrollment management  Revisit the steps in enrollment.
California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Quality Distance Education Webinar Attendance Accounting And Reporting for Distance Education Courses.
Pam Deegan Miramar College November 1, Agenda  Definitions  Productivity  Faculty Load, Contractual Obligations Contractual Obligations  Scheduling.
Building the Parent Voice
Linda Retterath Mission College January 29, 2010 Thank you to Jim Wilczak, Jim Burrell and Clement Lam for their material from previous presentations.
Winter Symposium January 20, Why are we here today? To discuss ways that we can take control of our future and make the outcomes we desire more.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Conversion to Semesters? An Examination of Issues.
2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 Curriculum, Budgets, and Enrollment Management Kevin Bontenbal, Cuesta College Ian.
The Essentials of Strategic Enrollment Planning James Mager Associate Vice President.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
Randal Lawson Executive Vice President, Santa Monica College Immediate Past President, CCCCIO.
FTES? FTEF? MARCH 1, FTES o FTES = Full-Time Equivalent Students o Funding formula to determine how much money VC receives from the state o Each.
Calculating and Understanding FTES New A&R Directors Training
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
New Prospect Elementary School
Guided Pathways: The New
Enrollment Management
/ Budget Update Town Hall Meeting June 10, 2009
Enrollment Management
Lights! Camera! Action! MR.
The Art of Scheduling Pam Deegan April , 2016.
Carlos Lopez, Moreno Valley College, CIO
Presentation transcript:

Randal Lawson Executive Vice President, Santa Monica College Ricardo Navarrette Vice President, Student Services Santa Rosa Junior College

O VERVIEW  What is enrollment management and who should be involved?  The Schedule of Classes—Planning and Mechanics  Marketing and Enrollment Services  Student Retention/Persistence  Reporting and Compliance

W HAT IS ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT ? It is not…  Just a quick fix to your current enrollment problems  Just an enhanced admission or marketing operation  Just an explanation for enrollment-related decisions (class cancellations, etc.)  Just a planning document that “sits on a shelf”

W HAT IS ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT ? It is…  An institutional commitment and an integral part of strategic planning  A clear articulation of institutional enrollment goals (well beyond sheer numbers)  A plan that aligns services and resources under the umbrella of a larger vision  A data-driven strategy  A living plan that is constantly changing as institutional needs change

W HO SHOULD BE INVOLVED ? At the institutional planning and implementation levels—EVERYONE:  Must be a shared vision with acceptance of clearly articulated goals  Acceptance of well defined responsibilities for all members of the college community  Integral part of participatory governance planning processes, but…  Need to “avoid the trap” of allowing individual operational/implementation decisions to become subject to “management by committee”

W HO SHOULD BE INVOLVED ? At the operational planning level—Key Administrators and their Management Teams:  Chief Instructional Officer  Chief Student Services Officer  Chief Business Officer  Chief Information Services Officer  Institutional Researcher  Marketing/Public Information Administrators

W HAT INFORMATION IS NEEDED ?  Reliable historical enrollment, course offering, and budget data  Useful “what if” projection tools based upon these historical data  Ability to actively monitor progress so that timely adjustments can be made  Identification of key performance indicators  Identification of benchmarks

S CHEDULE OF C LASSES  Focus of Academic and Fiscal Planning  Central to community college mission  Primary source of both institutional revenue and expenditures  Must balance consideration of academic needs and fiscal realities

S CHEDULE P LANNING —F ISCAL C ONSIDERATIONS  Size of the schedule:  To grow or not to grow…  Is growth funded?  How much growth can you afford?  Costs of additional faculty and staff  Impact of other projected expenditures  What is the capacity for growth?  Facilities/Budget for Distance Education Support  Adequate numbers of faculty in targeted areas  Adequate student support services

S CHEDULE P LANNING —F ISCAL C ONSIDERATIONS  Size of the schedule:  Is a reduction necessary?  Is there a choice? Can better efficiency/productivity address the problem?  Can have unintended long-term impact  Example—Significant community college system enrollment decline following budget constraints  Sometimes, there is just no choice…  Need to carefully consider contractual obligations

S CHEDULE P LANNING —F ISCAL C ONSIDERATIONS  Balance between Academic/Fiscal Perspectives  CIO and CBO must learn to understand and respect each other’s “worlds.”  Disturbing this balance can have unintended long-term consequences.

S CHEDULE P LANNING —M EETING S TUDENT N EEDS  Establish culture of basing recommendations and decisions on information rather than institutional “myths”  Importance of good historical information regarding student demand patterns, such as:  History of course offering size and distribution  History of individual course offering experience/trends:  Courses with Largest Enrollments  High Enrollment/Demand Courses  Low Enrollment/Demand Courses  Course cancellations/additions during previous registration periods

S CHEDULE P LANNING —M EETING S TUDENT N EEDS  Provide effective “friendly” formatting of such information to all involved in the scheduling process  Allocate specific numbers of course sections to division/departments  Establish and enforce specific class time patterns  Maintain appropriate balance among time patterns and days of offering

S CHEDULE P LANNING —M EETING S TUDENT N EEDS  Allocate classrooms to divisions/departments  Class size/room capacity match  Avoid culture of departmental “control” (priority rather than entitlement; establish point in time where classrooms revert to general use)  Monitor facilities use data and adjust the offering accordingly  Consider online vs. “on ground” distribution of course sections

S CHEDULE P LANNING —M EETING S TUDENT N EEDS  Faculty Assignment and Load—Legal and Contractual issues  Full-Time Faculty:  Contract Load  Overload  Assignment Preference Provisions  Banking of Contract Load

S CHEDULE P LANNING —M EETING S TUDENT N EEDS  Faculty Assignment and Load—Legal and Contractual issues  Part-Time Faculty:  60% Law (67% Law, Effective January 2009)  Contractual Re-employment Provisions  Class Size—Minimum and Maximum  Often some conflict between effective scheduling and contractual obligations  Need for district instructional “voice” in collective bargaining

S CHEDULE P LANNING —M EETING S TUDENT N EEDS  Constantly monitor throughout the schedule building process relationship between recommendations and the planned allocation  Maintain constant communication with participants about recommendation/plan relationship  Without strong intervention—schedules tend to “roll over” from semester to semester

S CHEDULE P LANNING —M EETING S TUDENT N EEDS  Daily active monitoring of the schedule during registration periods  Evaluate match between actual student enrollment and the course offerings  Make necessary scheduling adjustments in a timely manner  Constant communication/interaction among Instruction, Counseling, and Enrollment Services  Evaluate effectiveness of each schedule, learn from your successes and mistakes, and use for next schedule

S CHEDULING M ECHANICS  Definitions…  Daily Contact Hours (DCH): Meeting time per day  Daily Student Contact Hours (DSCH): Daily Contact Hours × Number of Students  Weekly Contact Hours (WCH): Daily Contact Hours × Class Meeting Days  Weekly Student Contact Hours (WSCH): Weekly Contact Hours × Number of Students

S CHEDULING M ECHANICS  The 50-Minute Hour  CCC “Alternative Math” for calculating contact hours  Basic Concept—That each clock hour consists of 50 minutes of instruction and 10 minutes of passing time (between classes) or break time (within multi-hour classes)

S CHEDULING M ECHANICS  The 50-Minute Hour  Multi-Hour Class Example (7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.)  150 minutes of instruction; 30 minutes of break/passing time  When classes extend beyond the hour by a fractional amount  Beginning with 0.3 hours— representing 5 minutes beyond the hour—contact hours increased by 0.1 for each 5-minute increment  Crucial calculation for compressed calendar meeting times and intersession/short-term class meeting time

S CHEDULING M ECHANICS —50-M INUTE H OUR

S CHEDULING M ECHANICS  More Definitions…  Census—a reporting “snapshot in time” at approximately the 20% point of a course  Weekly Census—attendance reporting type for course sections that are regularly scheduled for the full semester  Daily Census—Attendance reporting type for course sections that meet on a regular basis for at least five days, but meet for less than the full semester  Most intersession course sections  Short-Term course offerings within a regular semester

S CHEDULING M ECHANICS  And Still More Definitions…  Positive Attendance—Attendance reporting type based upon actual student attendance for the course section  All Noncredit Courses  Irregularly Scheduled and Open Entry/Open Exit Courses  Independent Study/Work Experience—Attendance reporting type based upon units rather than contact hours  Non-Classroom Based Instruction  Also includes most online instruction  Alternative Attendance Accounting Method—Online Labs

S CHEDULING M ECHANICS  Term Length Multiplier (TLM)—Number of weeks of instruction in regular fall/spring semesters  Inclusive of all days of instruction, final exam days, and approved flexible calendar days  Standard Term Length Multiplier—17.5  Compressed Calendars—range from 16.0 to 17.0  Quarter System Calendars—11.67  Full-Time Equivalent Student (FTES)—the equivalent of one student enrolled 15 hours per week for two 17.5-week semesters  Both enrollment measure and funding “currency”  Calculation understanding essential for enrollment management  15 Hours × 35 Weeks = “Magic Number” of 525

FTES—C ENSUS W EEKLY F ORMULA Full Term—Calculated at Census (20% of Term Length)

FTES—C ENSUS W EEKLY E XAMPLE Class of 30 students meeting 75 minutes per day twice a week (equals 3.0 WCH) for 17.5 weeks (Standard Term Length Multiplier):

FTES—C ENSUS D AILY F ORMULA Less Than Full Term—Calculated at Census (20% of Class Meetings)

FTES—C ENSUS D AILY E XAMPLE Class of 30 students meeting 90 minutes per day (1.8 DCH) with 29 class meetings (6 weeks, 5 days per week, 1 holiday):

FTES—P OSITIVE A TTENDANCE F ORMULA

FTES—P OSITIVE A TTENDANCE E XAMPLE Class of 30 students meeting a total of 3 hours per week (3.0 WCH) for 17.5 weeks), with reported attendance hours at 90% of “Perfect Attendance:”

FTES—I NDEPENDENT S TUDY F ORMULA

FTES—I NDEPENDENT S TUDY E XAMPLE 3-Unit Class with 30 Students Meeting for 17.5 weeks (Standard Term Length Multiplier):

FTES—Alternative Attendance Accounting Method Formula Full Term—Calculated at Census (20% of Term Length)

FTES—Alternative Attendance Accounting Method Example Class of 30 online lab students meeting 3 hours per week (equals 3.0 WCH) for 17.5 weeks (Standard Term Length Multiplier):

E FFICIENCY /P RODUCTIVITY M EASURES  WSCH per FTEF (Weekly Student Contact Hours per Full-Time Equivalent Faculty)  Different FTEF Calculations according to what is being measured  Include only “in classroom” time—measure of class size efficiency  Include all compensated time (include release/reassigned time) of teaching faculty—measure of instructional budget efficiency  Generally, WSCH per FTEF considered “acceptable”  Most useful as internal measure over time

E FFICIENCY /P RODUCTIVITY M EASURES  FTES per FTEF (Full-Time Equivalent Students per Full-Time Equivalent Faculty)  Comparative Annual Faculty Assigned Hour Use by Department/Discipline  Comparison of Faculty Assigned Hours and FTES  Fill rates; Percentage of available “seats”  Classroom Utilization Studies  Know your “break even” point in terms of FTES revenue vs. direct instructional costs

M ARKETING AND P ROMOTION  Determining your basic message  If all advertising and recruiting were to disappear, what would create positive “word-of-mouth” for your college?  What negative “word-of-mouth” do you need to overcome?  Establishing image and “brand” just as important as specific targeted enrollment campaigns  Communicate a consistent message—contributes to “Look and Feel”  Be sure that performance lives up to claims

M ARKETING AND P ROMOTION  Create a positive “word-of-mouth”  Focus on the student experience  How convenient are the services you offer?  Wait time in lines  Availability of services when and where they are needed  Consistency of service delivery—Do staff have a service attitude?  Website Navigation  Leverage the use of technology  Acknowledge institutional challenges and demonstrate that you are doing everything you can to help

M ARKETING AND P ROMOTION  Create a positive “word-of-mouth”  Focus on the student experience  Get students involved in “connecting with other students”  Tour Guides  Informational Ambassadors  Involve student clubs in welcoming new students  Be sure students have a voice in planning and then “championing the cause”  Student Surveys  Focus Groups  Student representation on planning committees  Anecdotal Data (Student “Stories”)

M ARKETING AND P ROMOTION  Marketing is communication  Both external and internal  Not just expensive media buys  Direct mail   Communicating with current students and those who left, not just with prospective new students  Effective use of college website  Schedule of Classes (both printed and online)  Personalized communication  Promotional Items/Services  Effective use of community events

M ARKETING AND P ROMOTION  Determining your basic message  If all advertising and recruiting were to disappear, what would create positive “word-of-mouth” for your college?  What negative “word-of-mouth” do you need to overcome?  Establishing image and “brand” just as important as specific targeted enrollment campaigns  Communicate a consistent message—contributes to “Look and Feel”  Be sure that performance lives up to claims

M ARKETING AND P ROMOTION  Create a positive “word-of-mouth”  Focus on the student experience  How convenient are the services you offer?  Wait time in lines  Availability of services when and where they are needed  Consistency of service delivery—Do staff have a service attitude?  Website Navigation  Leverage the use of technology  Acknowledge institutional challenges and demonstrate that you are doing everything you can to help

M ARKETING AND P ROMOTION  Create a positive “word-of-mouth”  Focus on the student experience  Get students involved in “connecting with other students”  Tour Guides  Informational Ambassadors  Involve student clubs in welcoming new students  Be sure students have a voice in planning and then “championing the cause”  Student Surveys  Focus Groups  Student representation on planning committees  Anecdotal Data (Student “Stories”)

M ARKETING AND P ROMOTION  Challenges  External  Reaching non-traditional student populations (18-24 year olds who have “stopped out” of education)  Getting too caught up in attempting to compete directly with other community colleges  Remember that we all share the same missions, so our “messages” tend to be similar  Successfully communicating the “message” of one institution can be of benefit to all community colleges.

M ARKETING AND P ROMOTION  Challenges  Internal  “ Everyone’s an expert” syndrome  Marketing often a target in budget planning discussions  Focus on single “message” can result in sense that other programs and services are considered less important.

E NROLLMENT S ERVICES  Outreach  More than recruitment—partnership with your community  You have to be seen to be known  Relationship with feeder high schools—creating personal relationships with counselors and students  High School Dual/Concurrent Enrollment  Community events (literacy fairs, church fairs, community gatherings, etc.)  Host students on campus  Workshops/information booths for campus events  Participate in national college fairs and national organizations  Develop international student outreach and recruitment plan

E NROLLMENT S ERVICES  Financial Aid  Plays key role in both access and retention  No access to education for many students without financial aid  Timeliness of disbursement critical to student success  Are student award letters distributed in time for students to make decisions about their education?  What happens to student success if students cannot afford to buy textbooks?  Statewide campaign—icanaffordcollege.com

E NROLLMENT S ERVICES  Admissions and Registration  Not a passive process—requires daily active monitoring (in concert with Instruction)  Student Flow—New Students  Unknowns—never contacted the college  Prospects—contacted the college, have not enrolled  Applicants—applied, have not enrolled  Students—applied, enrolled  Alumni—left the college, but may return and/or encourage others to attend the college

E NROLLMENT S ERVICES  Admissions and Registration  Student Flow—Continuing Students  Non-committed—enrolled, dropped all courses before census  Short-timers—enrolled, completed at least one course, have not re-enrolled  Stop-outs—enroll, stop, come back  Committed—enroll, carry at least a partial load, persist through number of terms with limited stop out, may complete degree/certificate/transfer requirement

E NROLLMENT S ERVICES  Active monitoring of enrollment  Not just overall headcount numbers  Monitor, assess, and act based upon what categories of students may not be registering  New students?  Continuing students?  Returning students?  Nonresident students?

S TUDENT R ETENTION /P ERSISTENCE  Don’t forget about student retention and persistence  Not just the “right thing to do” as educators  Also a key part of Enrollment Management  Welcoming approach to service delivery should not be limited just to outreach/orientation of new students  At-Risk Student Populations  Probation (academic and progress)  Targeted services for special populations  “Early Alert” activities

R EPORTING AND C OMPLIANCE  CCFS-320 Report  Primary basis for college funding  Needs to be cooperative effort among Fiscal, Instruction, and Enrollment Services staff  Reporting of Total WSCH for each attendance type and for each semester/intersession to arrive at total FTES number  Weekly Census  Daily Census  Positive Attendance  Independent Study/Work Experience

R EPORTING AND C OMPLIANCE  CCFS-320 Report  Three regular reporting periods (the first two requiring use of annualizers)  P1 (First Principal Apportionment)—January 15  Gives System Office initial idea of total system enrollment  In turn, System Office gives districts initial take on how various funding streams (growth, etc.) may be allocated.  P2 (Second Principal Apportionment)—April 15  Although still an estimate, used as the basis for initial funding allocation (subject to Recalculation/Prior Year Adjustments in February of the following year)

R EPORTING AND C OMPLIANCE  CCFS-320 Report  Annual Report—July 15  Any changes from P2 submittal reflected in Recalculation of Apportionment in February of following year  Recal Report—November 1  Opportunity to submit amended/corrected report prior to Recalculation of Apportionment in February of following year

O NLINE R EFERENCES AND R ESOURCES  Student Attendance Accounting Manual: links/manuals/saa_manual.htm  Student Attendance Accounting Manual Addendum: manuals/SAAM_Compressed_Calendar_and_Course Scheduling_Addendum_FINAL_ pdf [Divisions/Fiscal Services Unit/Manuals and Publications]