Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Advertisements

Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
S-1 SUPERVISION. S-2 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Educator Effectiveness Framework Associate Executive Director, AWSA
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
LCAP Update, Feedback, & Input Vision Quality Indicator 5: Professional Learning For All December 9, 2014.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Module 1: System Overview, Expectations, and Goal Setting.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
DPS Educator Effectiveness: Stakeholder Engagement Lessons Learned February 6, 2013.
1 Principal Practice and School Learning Objectives July 29, 2013 Joe Schroeder, AWSA Associate Executive Director Patty Polczynski, Templeton Middle School.
Evaluating principal effectiveness Focal Point 2012.
District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar November 17, 2014 Lisa Colón, Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Mid-Year Conferences.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
LOGO Driving the Working Conditions Growth Goal Back to the Principal Performance Standards TELL KY Survey and PPGES.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Professional Performance Process Presented at March 2012 Articulation Meetings.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Overview.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
Rationale for the Evaluation Frameworks Project Previous Paradigm in Our State A Compliance Exercise, Often Based Solely on Positional Authority.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
1 SUPPORTING SSPS IN THE MIDYEAR PROCESS ActionDescriptionSupport Resources Available online Reflect on SSP performance to date Review beginning of year.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
TESS & LEADS Implementation Awareness for End-of-Year Success Office of Educator Effectiveness Arkansas Department of Education Spring, 2016.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Student Achievement Teacher & Leader Effectiveness Overview of Stronge & MyLearningPlan/OASYS Interim Report #1 January 27,
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.
1 Instructional Framework & Teacher Evaluation. 2 Welcome Name School, Assignment, Years in Education One thing you are hoping to get out of today!
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Principal Observation May 2014 Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Growing Leadership to Provide Teacher Feedback Matthew.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Growing Leader Practice: Observing Data Discussions
State Board of Education Progress Update
Presentation transcript:

Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for Research August 2015

Agenda Overview of Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Principal Observation – Instructional Feedback Observation Tool

IDAHO PRINCIPAL EVALUATION PROCESS OVERVIEW

Principals Matter: How They Influence Student Learning Direct OutcomesIndirect Outcomes Leadership Practice School Conditions Community Contexts Teacher Effectiveness Instructional Quality Student Learning Clifford, Sherratt, & Fetters (2012).

Principals Matter: How Jobs Have Changed New Tasks Layered Onto the Old Disciplinarian Manager Isolated Disciplinarian Manager Community engaged Disciplinarian Manager Instructional leader 1950s 1990s 2010s

Principals Matter: They Need Support 50 states changed educator evaluation requirements And… Many states have adopted new, ambitious academic standards Most states are creating new equity plans

Principal Evaluation: Cycle Observation & Stakeholder Feedback Observation & Stakeholder Feedback Preparation: Develop IPLP select artifacts, student achievement measures June-Sept Initial Meeting: Sept/Oct Implementation and Progress Monitoring: Oct–Dec Midyear Check-In: Dec/Jan Implementation and Progress Monitoring: Jan–April Summative Meeting: Reflection on future goals April

Principal Evaluation Measures Individual Professional Learning Plan (IPLP) Professional Practice – Artifacts – Observation – Stakeholder Feedback Student Achievement – ISAT – District Determined Measure

Three Phases for Scoring

Principal Evaluation: Framework Domain 1: School Climate 1a. School Culture 1b. Communication 1c. Advocacy Domain 2: Collaborative Leadership 2a. Shared Leadership 2b. Priority Management 2c. Transparency 2d. Leadership Renewal 2e. Advocacy Domain 3: Instructional Leadership 3a. Innovation 3b. Instructional Vision 3c. High Expectations 3d. Continuous Improvement of Instruction 3e. Evaluation 3f. Recruitment and Retention

Principal Evaluation: Framework Terminolo gy Domain Component Levels of Performance

Idaho Principal Evaluation Framework Partner Activity – Choose one component and read the levels of performance. – Discuss with your partner what a distinguished, proficient, basic and unsatisfactory level of performance would “look like”. – Discuss what artifacts may be used as evidence.

PRINCIPAL OBSERVATION Instructional Feedback Observation Tool

Think of a time when you received feedback that impacted your performance. What was the situation? What did the feedback provider do? What did you do? Take 5 minutes and share with a colleague. Be prepared to share responses. Feedback Is Key to Instructional Leadership

Different Roles for Different Types of Feedback Consulting Collaborating Reflecting Level of teacher need Level of evaluator support

The Idaho Statewide Model: Aligns with evaluation framework Supports teacher evaluation Encourages superintendents to observe principals in schools Principal Observation: Supporting Teacher Growth With Feedback

The Idaho Statewide Model: Offers formal observations Offers coaching for superintendents and principals Contributes to principal evaluation Principal Observation: Supporting Teacher Growth With Feedback

The Instructional Feedback Observation tool includes a manual that: Outlines a transparent procedure. Includes forms to be completed by supervisors and principals. Principal Observation: Supporting Teacher Growth With Feedback

Prepare (and schedule) CollectAnalyzeGather EvidencePlan Principal Observation: Supporting Teacher Growth With Feedback Principal observations must be scheduled to correspond to teacher postobservation conferences. Observation evidence can be collected by scripting or video. Observation results can be shared at the midyear check-in meeting.

DomainWhat It MeasuresEvidence Evidence useCenters conversation on observation evidence Aligns data to teacher framework Observation Professional interactions Focuses attention Offers appropriate communication Depersonalizes comments Observation Differentiated questionsAsks reflective questions Leading conversationsSets goals for the meeting Paces conversation Defines next steps with the teacher Observation Written feedbackCompletes forms Connects to teacher framework Document review Principal Observation: Supporting Teacher Growth With Feedback

Take 5 minutes to read the Behavioral Indicator Quick Reference. Meet in small groups and answer the following:  What was interesting or surprising?  What points are important to highlight?  What does this look like in practice? Report out. Principal Observation: Supporting Teacher Growth With Feedback

Activity: You Are the Observer Make notes when watching this short video of a teacher’s postobservation conference. Discuss your overall impressions of the feedback session at your table: – What does the principal do well? – How could the principal improve? Share key reflections: How does this support principals’ work to grow teacher talent? observation-examples/ Principal Observation: Supporting Teacher Growth With Feedback

 What do you see as the potential benefits from the Instructional Feedback Observation process  What are the challenges that you in using the Instructional Feedback Observation process?  What supports need to be in place to support principal growth as feedback providers? Principal Observation: Supporting Teacher Growth With Feedback

Questions

Lisa Colon Director Teacher Certification and Professional Standards Idaho Department of Education Matthew Clifford Principal Researcher American Institutes for Research Thank You!