POSSIBLE MODALITIES FOR THE SPECIAL SAFEGUARD MECHANISM (SSM) By: Raul Q. Montemayor National Business Manager Federation of Free Farmers Cooperatives,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation on the Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures By Shashank Priya, Director, Department of Commerce.
Advertisements

WTO AGREEMENT ON AGRICULTURE: LEGAL AND CONCEPTUAL ISSUES
WTO Symposium Geneva, May 2004 Trade, agriculture, and world poverty: Will the Doha Agenda deliver pro-development trade rules?
The Benefits of a New WTO Agreement for Agri-food Trade Shiferaw Adilu Alberta Agriculture and Food.
International Economics Tenth Edition
Non-Agricultural Market Access Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
International Economics
State of WTO Agricultural Negotiations Meeting on the Integrated Assessment of Trade Liberalization in the Agriculture Sector February 2003 Note:
International Economics Tenth Edition
Chapter 6: Trade Policy Analysis
WTO Forum Kaliningrad State Technical University March 2014 Clem Boonekamp Aspects of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture.
Non Agricultural Market Access Prabhash Ranjan National University of Juridical Sciences (NUJS), Kolkata, India. E mail –
Twenty-Five Ways to Improve the Derbez Draft International Food and Agriculture Trade Policy Council
Agriculture: the Dog that Didn’t Bark? Tim Josling and Stefan Tangermann.
Resource Schizophrenia: Deciding a Trade Policy for Natural Resources The Case of Agricultural Commodities in Times of Food Insecurity Ellen Terpstra International.
Theories of International Trade and Investment
32 nd IPC SEMINAR New Delhi, India The Role of South-South Trade November 2003 Shishir Priyadarshi Development Division, WTO.
Tariff and Non-tariff barriers, enforcement of WTO rules DG Trade - F3, C. Hallberg.
Origins of WTO General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) –Established in 1947 as a forum to reduce trade barriers WTO replaced GATT in 1995 as legal.
WTO AGRICULTURAL NEGOTIATIONS Portfolio Committee Agriculture and Land Affairs April 2003 Günter Müller Directorate: International Trade National Department.
1 UNCTAD Virtual Institute Study Tour Course on Economics of Commodity Production and Trade Agriculture and the WTO Geneva, February 2010 United Nations.
WTO Agriculture Negotiations Outstanding Issues for Developing Countries Tim Ruffer Oxford Policy Management
Some aspects of the Doha work program Baku, Azerbaijan February 2015.
EU-LDC NETWORK CONFERENCE Trade and Poverty Reduction ISSUES FACING DEVELOPING COUNTRIES IN THE ONGOING WTO NEGOTIATIONS IN AGRICULTURE ’ ‘A POVERTY REDUCTION.
1 [Giovanni Anania, IAAE Congress, Durban, August 2003] The Fischler reform of the CAP and the WTO negotiations Giovanni Anania Department of Economics.
Developing Countries and the Doha Round Agricultural Negotiations Lecture 29 Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
Implementation of the Uruguay Round Agreement Lecture 20. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
What needs to be done to make Doha a Development Round? ATDN - Meeting, , Berlin Marita Wiggerthale Deutschland.
Reinert/Windows on the World Economy, 2005 Trade Policy Analysis CHAPTER 6.
WTO’s Doha round in an era of high food prices Kym Anderson University of Adelaide, Australia Review session for Ch. 3 of the Monterrey Consensus, on International.
International Trade McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 37 – Comparative Advantage recap,
The Ongoing Negotiations on Agriculture: Some Observations
Trade Remedy Laws and Agriculture Anita Regmi David Skully 1 Paper presented at the Free Trade Area of the Americas, The WTO, and New Farm Legislation:
1 Chapter 9 part 1 International Trade These slides supplement the textbook, but should not replace reading the textbook.
WTO Agreement on Agriculture: What’s it all about? What should be our advocacy?
Negotiations on Agriculture State of Play by Surabhi Mittal WTO &The Doha Round : The Way Forward 6-7 April, 2006.
1 Agriculture in July Package: Nepal Presentation by South Asia Watch on Trade Economics and Environment (SAWTEE), Kathmandu.
Options for Modalities and Treatment of Special Products.
Agreement on Anti-Dumping Measures Anti - Dumping Importers would like to import goods if available at a price lower than that of the good in the importing.
1 Nepal’s WTO Membership and the Agriculture Sector Navin Dahal South Asia Watch on Trade Economics and Environment.
Chapter 11 Pushing Exports.
What should a Doha Round SSM look like? Discussion on SSM triggers and remedy Ramesh Sharma Trade and Markets Division FAO, Rome ICTSD/World bank Institute.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright  2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 11: Pushing Exports.
The Foreign Economic Activity of Enterprises Of Dadoboeva Farangis.
WORKSHOP ON MARKET ACCESS IN THE DOHA WORK PROGRAMME Ministry of Foreign Trade & International Cooperation and UNCTAD Guyana, September 2002 WTO NEGOTIATIONS.
Breaking the Deadlock on the SSM ICTSD Geneva, December 2, 2008 Jaime de Melo.
Agriculture Negotiations: Moving Forward Ashok Gulati IFPRI Director in Asia WTO and The Doha Round: The Way forward ICRIER-SRTT Conference 6-7 April,
“July Package” & South Asian Agriculture Prof. J. George Faculty of Economics & Development Planning (FEDP), Haryana Institute of Public Administration,
Special Treatment for LDCs in SAFTA Dr Selim Raihan Assistant Professor Department of Economics University of Dhaka, Bangladesh Presented at the Seminar.
AG -1 © WTO – OMC 2012 The WTO Agreement on Agriculture Serafino Marchese, Chief, Training and Capacity Building Section WTO Institute for Training and.
Modalities for an SSM: product eligibility and alternative triggers Informal ICTSD Dialogue on Special Products and SSM 25 November 2005 Geneva Jamie Morrison.
Softwood Lumber Dispute Canada vs. USA. Brief Introduction Since 1982 Canada and the USA have been involved in four softwood lumber disputes British Columbia.
Textiles and Clothing, The Doha Development Agenda and Market Access Will Martin World Bank 6 May 2003.
Ag Policy, Lecture 6 Knutson, Penn, & Flinchbaugh, Chapter 5 World Trade Organization Review.
GATS NEGOTIATIONS AND THE DOHA DEVELOPMENT AGENDA African Regional Workshop on WTO Negotiations Cape Town, 31 August – 2 September 2005.
An Assessment of Special and Differential Treatment (S&DT) in SAFTA Presented at Regional Seminar on Economic Cooperation in South Asia Organized by CUTS.
1 Development Dimension in July Package : Concerns of South Asia Posh Raj Pandey CUTS, New Delhi 17 September 2005.
International Economics Tenth Edition
Expectations from LDCs WTO 10 th Ministerial Conference in Nairobi
1 CHAPTER VI BUSINESS- GOVERNMENT TRADE RELATIONS INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS.
Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
WTO Hong Kong Ministerial Gains & Losses for India Pradeep S. Mehta CUTS International Jaipur, India
International Economics International Economics Tenth Edition Trade Restrictions: Tariffs Dominick Salvatore John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Salvatore: International.
Non-agricultural market access negotiations Marc Bacchetta ERSD WTO.
The Political Economy of International Trade
International Economics Tenth Edition
PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE OF SPECIAL SAFEGUARDS MECHANISMS
The EU-US Agricultural Framework Agreement
Agriculture in the July Framework
Monitoring progress on MDG
Presentation transcript:

POSSIBLE MODALITIES FOR THE SPECIAL SAFEGUARD MECHANISM (SSM) By: Raul Q. Montemayor National Business Manager Federation of Free Farmers Cooperatives, Inc. (FFFCI) – Philippines Chairman, Asian Farmers Committee International Federation of Agricultural Producers (IFAP)

OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION Background Limitations of UR AoA Special Safeguard (SSG) Duty Provisions Proposed Special Safeguard Mechanism (SSM) Modalities Related Issues

THE NEED FOR TRADE REMEDIES Developing countries forced to open up markets in Uruguay Round despite uncompetitiveness of sensitive products Developed countries maintained most support and protection to sensitive sectors Available trade remedies were inadequate and difficult to use

THE GATT-UR AoA SPECIAL SAFEGUARD DUTY (SSG) UR-AoA required “tariffication” of products previously protected by import restrictions Lower in-quota tariffs imposed on imports of “tariffied “ products within tariff rate quota (TRQ); imports in excess of TRQ charged higher out-quota tariff Additional SSG duty could be imposed on imports of “tariffied” products if: – import volumes exceeded a trigger volume, or – Import prices fell below a trigger price

DATA ON SSG USAGE Only 39 WTO member-countries had SSG privileges for 6,156 tariff lines Only 22 were developing countries who accounted for half of SSG tariff lines Only 10 countries invoked SSG between Most developing countries had no SSG option or did not invoke SSG

MAJOR LIMITATIONS OF SSG Complicated formulas – the case of price- based SSG

SOURCE: FAO (Ramesh Sharma)

MAJOR LIMITATIONS OF SSG Complicated formulas – the case of price- based SSG Biases against developing countries – the case of SSG volume triggers

SSG Volume Trigger Volume Trigger V = (I x S) + C I - Average Historical Imports (in last 3 years where data is available) S - Scaling factor (based on ratio of imports to consumption) C - Change in consumption (C) (between 2 years where data is available) Scaling factor S ranges from 100% to 125%; S is higher if historical import/consumption ratio is smaller Developing countries usually have smaller import-to-consumption ratio and end up with higher S and larger V, making it more difficult to breach trigger Developing countries often lack data on consumption at specific tariff line level; if no data, S is set to maximum of 125% Consumption of basic foods normally rising in developing countries, resulting in higher C and V

MAJOR LIMITATIONS OF SSG Complicated formulas – the case of price- based SSG Biases against developing countries – the case of SSG volume triggers SSG duties often not enough to control import surge or price decline – SSG duty based on applied, not bound, tariff – Volume SSG cannot exceed 1/3 of applied rate – Price SSG disproportionate to price variance

SOURCE: FAO (Ramesh Sharma)

MAJOR LIMITATIONS OF SSG Volume-based SSG can be applied only up to end of current year Only products “tariffied” in the UR and marked with SSG could be given SSG protection Least-developed countries (LDCS) exempted from tariffication, and therefore had no SSG privilege

OTHER CONSTRAINTS TO USAGE OF SSG BY DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Inability to promptly enact necessary domestic legislation and regulations Lack of administrative capacity to implement SSG rules Phobia against WTO disputes in case of erroneous application of SSG rules Lobbying by influential importers and users Weak counteraction by producer groups

SPECIAL SAFEGUARD MECHANISM (SSM) Part of proposed special and differential treatment (SDT) package for developing countries under Doha Development Round Exclusive for developing countries Improved version of UR SSG

PROPOSED SSG IMPROVEMENTS IN SSM PROPOSALS BY G33 Expanded coverage – All listed products (criteria-based?, limits?) – All developing countries (including LDCs) Simplified and more developing country- friendly formulae and rules for triggers and safeguard duties Longer and more flexible period and method for applying special safeguards Higher levels of special safeguard protection

VOLUME-BASED SSM MODALITIES Volume trigger set to average annual import volume during most recent three (3) preceding years for which data is available SSM duty can be imposed if cumulative import volume during a year exceeds volume trigger Additional SSM duty can be maintained for up to 12 months from imposition SSM duty to depend on degree of import surge and will be a percentage of bound tariff, or absolute percentage points, whichever is higher

VOLUME TRIGGER-BASED SSM DUTY Excess Imports (E)SSM Duty (whichever is higher) As Percent OverAs Percent ofAbsolute Trigger VolumeBound TariffPercentage Points E < X00 X1 < E < XYZ X2 < E < X1Y1Z1 E > X2Y2Z2

PRICE-BASED SSM MODALITIES Price trigger is average monthly price of product for most recent three preceding years for which data is available SSM duty can be imposed if C.I.F. price of import of product (in local currency) exceeds price trigger Price of import can be adjusted in case of significant currency depreciation SSM duty can last a maximum of 12 months

PRICE-BASED SSM MODALITIES Price-based SSM can be imposed on: – A shipment-by-shipment basis, with the SSM duty not exceeding the difference between the import price of each succeeding shipment and the trigger price; or – An ad valorem basis, with the SSM duty not exceeding the difference between the import price of subsequent shipments and the trigger price, expressed as a percentage of the trigger price (or bound tariff?) A country may shift from ad valorem to shipment- by-shipment SSM duty if import prices of at least two subsequent shipments fall below trigger price by certain percentage

OTHER PROPOSED SSM MODALITIES Temporary re-imposition of quantitative restrictions (QRs) Simplified countervailing measure Konandreas maximum contingency level (MCL) proposal

SIMPLIFIED COUNTERVAILING DUTY MEASURE (SDCM) Product- Specific AMS Product Output Value Non-Product- Specific AMS Total Agricultural Output Product- Specific Export Subsidy Total Exports of Product SDCM in % =+ + *Figures for product and non-product specific AMS and export subsidies shall be based on preceding year bound commitment levels in the absence of formal notifications of actual usage from exporting country

MAXIMUM CONTINGENCY LEVY Countries start year with an MCL allowance per product computed as a percentage of value of 3-year historical imports Countries can impose price or volume- based SSM based on SSM triggers and modalities Cumulative value of total SSM tariffs imposed must not exceed MCL allowance for the year

RELATED SSM ISSUES Can developing countries use SSM instead of SSG for sensitive products previously enjoying SSG privileges under UR-AoA? Can special products (SPs) automatically enjoy SSM privileges? To what extent will SSM and other SDT privileges deter South-South and total trade?