The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children www.dec-sped.org Evidence-Based Practices in Early Childhood: How Professional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute American Institutes for Research PACER Center University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Disabilities Presentation.
Advertisements

Action Research Not traditional educational research often research tests theory not practical Teacher research in classrooms and/or schools/districts.
Policies and Procedures: Issues for Implementation, Policy and Scaling up Barbara J. Smith, U. of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center Policy.
US Office of Education K
From Evidence-based Practice to Practice-based Evidence: Behavior Analysis in Special Education Ronnie Detrich Wing Institute.
Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice Belva C. Collins Victoria Knight Ann Katherine Griffen University of Kentucky.
DEC Recommended Practices: How Do We Ensure Application and Use? Mary McLean DEC Recommended Practices Commission Judy Swett DEC Recommended Practices.
A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.
Bridging Research, Practice, and Policy in the Field of Early Childhood Education Wingspread Recommendations and Next Steps.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
Summarizing Community-Based Participatory Research: Background and Context for the Review Lucille Webb, MEd Eugenia Eng, DrPH Alice Ammerman, DrPH Meera.
USDE and DHHS Listening and Learning Panel on Family Engagement
+ Evidence Based Practice University of Utah Training School Psychologists to be Experts in Evidence Based Practices for Tertiary Students with Serious.
Diane Schilder, EdD and Jessica Young, PhD Education Development Center, Inc. Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Wisconsin Departments of Health and Family Services (DHFS) And Public Instruction (DPI) OSEP Child Outcomes.
Trina D. Spencer ABA 2009 Research Based Principles What Practice Can’t Do Without.
Engaged to Learn Scaling Up Recommended Practices
Building Blocks for Including and Teaching Preschoolers with Special Needs Susan Sandall, Ph.D. University of Washington
Connecting Practice-Based Preparation with State Systems of Professional Development: What Role Can Higher Ed Faculty Play? Christy Kavulic, OSEP | Pam.
Using Implementation Research to Inform Technical Assistance Practice Sam Morgan Peggy Malloy
An Evidence-Based Practice Approach to School Counselor Education John Carey, Carey Dimmitt, Natalie Kosine National Center for School Counseling Outcome.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
V Implementing and Sustaining Effective Programs and Services that Promote the Social-Emotional Development of Young Children Part I Karen Blase, Barbara.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
TOGETHER WE’RE BETTER Collaborative Approaches to Including Children With and Without Disabilities Camille Catlett & Jennie CoutureNovember 9, 2012.
Barbara J. Smith, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver OSEP, July, 2014 Promoting Social Emotional Competence in All Young Children Through Collaboration.
National MEDICAL HOME Autism Initiative Poster Presentation for DEC Conference 2005 Linda Tuchman Ginsberg, PhD
The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children What Do I Do with the Evidence? Putting DEC’s Recommended Practices.
1 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Early Intervention System Presentation for Financing Systems Workshop OSEP National Early Childhood Conference.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
EARLY LEARNING COUNCIL AND SICC COLLABORATION: Addendum to September 30, 2012 Report on EI/ECSE Unique Complexities and Recommendations to Improve Service.
V Technical Assistance Center on Social Emotional Intervention (TACSEI)
Maria E. Fernandez, Ph.D. Associate Professor Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences University of Texas, School of Public Health.
Family & Professional Networks in Disability Policy: A Qualitative Inquiry.
Implementation of Interventions to Promote Young Children’s Social and Behavioral Outcomes.
Policy Challenges, Opportunities and Strategies Identified by State/Local Leaders, Families and 2004 Policy Maker’s Summit Participants Barbara Smith,
DEC Recommended Practices: Building the Evidence Base for our Practice Mary McLean, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Rashida Banerjee, Ph.D. University.
Revising the Recommended Practices: Process and Outcomes OSEP Project Directors’ Conference July, 15-17, 2013 Rashida Banerjee, Ph.D. University of Northern.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Evidence-based Education and the Culture of Special Education Chair: Jack States, Wing Institute Discussant: Teri Palmer, University of Oregon.
Nursing Research as the Basis of Nursing. Importance of Nursing Research Nurses ask questions aimed at gaining new knowledge to improve pt. care Nurses.
Revising the DEC Recommended Practices: Purpose, Process and Outcomes WRRC Regional Leadership Forum October 29, 2013 Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International.
THE DIVISION FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD. DEC is a division of The Council For Exceptional Children (CEC) DEC supports those who work with or on behalf of children.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Measuring Fidelity in Early Childhood Scaling-Up Initiatives: A Framework and Examples Carl J. Dunst, Ph.D. Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute Asheville,
Early Childhood Outcomes Center New Tools in the Tool Box: What We Need in the Next Generation of Early Childhood Assessments Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI.
An Expanded Model of Evidence-based Practice in Special Education Randy Keyworth Jack States Ronnie Detrich Wing Institute.
Vermont Agency of Education 4 December 2015
CEC’s Evidence Based Practice Effort Rachelle Bruno Northern Kentucky University.
Connecticut Part C State Performance Plan Indicator 11 State Systemic Improvement Plan Phase II.
The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children Making Inclusion Really Work Practices that Strengthening Services.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Assessing the Three Child Outcomes.
Training Personnel Using Autism online ebp Modules
MUHC Innovation Model.
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Improving Outcomes, Improving Data 2016
Philadelphia Infant Toddler Early Intervention
OSEP “Hot Topics in Early Childhood” Meeting
NC Preschool Pyramid Model Leadership Team Summit January 9-10, 2019
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
DEC Recommended Practices are Here!
Recommended Practices for Engaging Families
Using Evidence-Based Discipline Practices in Preschool Programs
Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise.
Welcome to the Webinar Series: Recommended Practices for Engaging Families Webinar 2: Resources and Materials That Support Family Use of the Recommended.
Recommended Practices for Engaging Families September 11, 2019
Presentation transcript:

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children Evidence-Based Practices in Early Childhood: How Professional Organizations Promote Research- Policy-Practice Connections Dale Walker, PhD DEC Research Chairperson OSEP/NECTAC Early Childhood Conference December 2008

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children The Division for Early Childhood (DEC) of the Council for Exceptional Children International Membership Organization (over 4,000) International Membership Organization (over 4,000) Birth through 8 years with disabilities and other special needs, their families and professionals Promotes policies and advances evidence-based practices

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children How DEC and CEC Define Evidence-Based Practices?  DEC Evidence-based Practices  Integration of Best Available Research with  Professional and family wisdom & experience  Consumer values  Consensus  CEC Definition of Evidence-based Practices  Is a strategy or intervention designed for use by special educators and intended to support the education of individuals with exceptional learning needs

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children Criteria for What Constitutes Evidence?  Fields of Special Education including Early Childhood Special Education/EC have not determined criteria for evidence-based practice  There is not consensus as to the type of scientific information that is acceptable as evidence

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children DEC Recommended Practices Resource designed to bridge the gap between research and practice, offering guidance to parents and professionals. Set of practices designed to inform decisions about services. Best available research evidence supporting practices determined through consensus used to identify practices.

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children Investigators/Authors  Barbara Smith  University of Colorado – Denver  David Sexton and Marcia Lobman  LSU Health Sciences Center  Mary McLean  University Of Wisconsin – Milwaukee  Susan Sandall  University of Washington  Mary Louise Hemmeter  Vanderbilt University

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children History of Recommended Practices  DEC Task Force on RP 1991/1993  Focus Groups of stakeholders  Support from OSEP for synthesis of research and knowledge of EI/ECSE practices  Coding Research  Synthesis of practices  Field Validation

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children How were Practices Derived and Criteria to Determine “Evidence”?   Extensive review of scientific literature on effective practices   Second source: Knowledge and experience   Original research report   Birth to 5 children with disabilities   Process of validation guided by:   Theoretical base for practice   Methodological integrity   Consensus in literature   Evidence that desired outcomes were produced   Evidence of social validity

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children Identifying Research-Based Practices  Identify Published Research  48 Journals Across Disciplines  1,019 Articles For Coding; 82% had at least one RP  Focus Groups by Topical Area (e.g., assessment)  Focus Groups by Role (e.g., family, practitioner, administrator)  Coded to:  determine technical adequacy  identify practices

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children The Results  1,019 Articles Reviewed  843 (82%) Had at Least One Recommended Practice  Articles by Methodology  Quantitative – 454 (54%)  Single Subject – 179 (21%)  Qualitative – 74 (9%)  Mixed Method – 13 (2%)  Descriptive/Survey – 123 (15%)

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children Number of Journal Articles Supporting Each Strand  Child-Focused – 390  Family-Based – 218  Policies, Procedures & Systems Change – 106  Assessment – 104  Personnel Preparation – 93  Technology Applications – 30  Interdisciplinary Models - 28

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children Synthesize And Categorize Practices  Integrate literature based practices and stakeholder focus group information  Evaluated for evidence using criteria:  Design, sample, setting, measures, duration, fidelity, findings and the RP supported  Which practices have research evidence to support?  Which practices are supported only by Experience or Values?

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children Field Validation of Practices  Verification Among Experts  Field Validation  200 Family Members  400 Practitioners  200 Administration/Higher Education  Respond to:  The importance of the recommended practice  Extent to which they see the practice (usage)

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children Recommended Practices  Assessment (46)  John Neisworth & Stephen Bagnato  Child-Focused Practices (27)  Mark Wolery  Family-Based Practices(17)  Carol Trivette & Carl Dunst  Interdisciplinary Models (19)  Robin McWilliam  Technology Applications (22)  Kathleen Stremel

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children Recommended Practices  Policies, Procedures, & Systems Change (43)  Gloria Harbin & Christine Salisbury  Personnel Preparation (66)  Patricia Miller & Vicki Stayton

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children Why are Recommended Practices Important?  Represents collective wisdom  Identifies what practices work  Provides a framework to define quality  Supports positive outcomes  Applies to all settings

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children Assessment Practice Example A24. Professionals assess not only immediate mastery of a skill, but also whether the child can demonstrate the skill consistently across other settings and with other people.

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children What does A24 look like? The team assesses the child’s ability to walk in the classroom, on the playground, to and from the car …and on the grass

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children How does DEC work with Practitioners, Families, Policymakers and Researchers to understand and implement latest recommended practices?   DEC RP supporting materials facilitate professional development and dissemination:   Guide for Practical Application in Early Intervention/ECSE (Sandall, McLean & Smith, 2000)   DEC recommended practices workbook (Hemmeter, Smith, Sandall & Askew (2005)   Series of published articles (e.g., Smith, Strain, Snyder, Sandall, Mclean et al. 2002)   DEC Recommended Practices Video   National TA efforts related to Recommended Practices   DEC sponsored journals publishing research and innovative practices

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children Next Steps for identifying and implementing latest recommended practices.. Two initiatives for DEC to provide field with evidence-based practices:  Long-term: DEC submitting a proposal to CEC Evidence-Based Practice Project for classifying the evidence base of identified early childhood special education practices generated from the DEC RP to determine the quality of the evidence base  Addressing Who it Works For? and Under What Conditions?

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children Next Steps.. Short Term  Short-term: Updating literature-base for selected DEC RP using the criteria described in the 2005 Exceptional Children special issue for coding studies for evidence  Will be available to field and to support the DEC RP resource materials while more formal process is underway to establish the evidence-base for selected DEC RP  Will be used to inform DEC efforts for the CEC Evidence-Based Practice Project  Research published in JEI, YEC & YEC Monographs, Exceptional Children, etc

The Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children What are Needs? Suggestions?   What early childhood practices would you suggest should have an identified evidence base?   Would you use DEC RP more often in practice if evidence-base for practices were clearly specified?   Thank you