Oklahoma Strategic Highway Safety Plan – Expanded Background Data presented to SHSP Leadership Group SHSP Working Group presented by Sam Lawton, Cambridge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Radio Maria World. 2 Postazioni Transmitter locations.
Advertisements

EcoTherm Plus WGB-K 20 E 4,5 – 20 kW.
Números.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
PDAs Accept Context-Free Languages
/ /17 32/ / /
Reflection nurulquran.com.
EuroCondens SGB E.
Worksheets.
Slide 1Fig 26-CO, p.795. Slide 2Fig 26-1, p.796 Slide 3Fig 26-2, p.797.
Slide 1Fig 25-CO, p.762. Slide 2Fig 25-1, p.765 Slide 3Fig 25-2, p.765.
Sequential Logic Design
Addition and Subtraction Equations
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
1 When you see… Find the zeros You think…. 2 To find the zeros...
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
CHAPTER 18 The Ankle and Lower Leg
Summative Math Test Algebra (28%) Geometry (29%)
2.11.
ASCII stands for American Standard Code for Information Interchange
The 5S numbers game..
突破信息检索壁垒 -SciFinder Scholar 介绍
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
MM4A6c: Apply the law of sines and the law of cosines.
Figure 3–1 Standard logic symbols for the inverter (ANSI/IEEE Std
MCQ Chapter 07.
Regression with Panel Data
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
1 Prediction of electrical energy by photovoltaic devices in urban situations By. R.C. Ott July 2011.
Dynamic Access Control the file server, reimagined Presented by Mark on twitter 1 contents copyright 2013 Mark Minasi.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
Biology 2 Plant Kingdom Identification Test Review.
Visual Highway Data Select a highway below... NORTH SOUTH Salisbury Southern Maryland Eastern Shore.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Facebook Pages 101: Your Organization’s Foothold on the Social Web A Volunteer Leader Webinar Sponsored by CACO December 1, 2010 Andrew Gossen, Senior.
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
Midterm Review Part II Midterm Review Part II 40.
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Subtraction: Adding UP
Numeracy Resources for KS2
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
ANALYTICAL GEOMETRY ONE MARK QUESTIONS PREPARED BY:
Converting a Fraction to %
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
Select a time to count down from the clock above
UNDERSTANDING THE ISSUES. 22 HILLSBOROUGH IS A REALLY BIG COUNTY.
A Data Warehouse Mining Tool Stephen Turner Chris Frala
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Introduction Embedded Universal Tools and Online Features 2.
úkol = A 77 B 72 C 67 D = A 77 B 72 C 67 D 79.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Presentation transcript:

Oklahoma Strategic Highway Safety Plan – Expanded Background Data presented to SHSP Leadership Group SHSP Working Group presented by Sam Lawton, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Oklahoma City, OK February 21, 2007

1 AASHTO SHSP Emphasis Areas Drivers Young Unlicensed/suspended/ revoked drivers Older Aggressive Impaired Distracted/fatigued Seat belt use Speed Special users Pedestrians Bicyclists Vehicles Motorcycles Heavy trucks

2 AASHTO SHSP Emphasis Areas (continued) Highways Trees Run off the road Horizontal curves Utility poles Unsignalized intersections Head-on collisions Head-on crashes on freeways Work zones EMS Rural emergency medical services Management Data Integrated safety management process

3 General Data

4 Oklahoma Fatalities Number of Fatalities Source: FARS

5 Incapacitating Injuries Number of Incapacitating Injuries (In Thousands) Source: OHSO

6 Fatal and Incapacitating Injury Crash Trends Number of Fatal Crashes Number of Incapacitating Injury Crashes (In Thousands) Fatal Collisions Incapacitating Injury Collisions Source: OHSO

7 Fatality and Injury Rate per 100 Million VMT Source: OHSO Year Rate Fatality and Injury RateTrend Line

8 Fatality Rate Compared to U.S. Average Fatality Rate per 100 Million VMT Oklahoma Fatality Rate per 100 Million VMT U.S. Fatality Rate per 100 Million VMT Source: FARS

9 Drivers

Fatal Crashes Drivers Under 16 to % 6.8% 13.4% 14.7% 35.5% 0.4% 2.9% 5.1% 7.2% 15.6% Drivers Under 16 Drivers Age Drivers Age Drivers Age Total Under Percent of Fatal Crashes Percent Drivers Licenses Percent

Fatal Crashes Drivers 65 and Older 4.4% 4.7% 3.1% 4.9% 17.1% 5.3% 4.3% 3.5% 3.9% 17.0% Drivers Age Drivers Age Drivers Age Drivers Age 81+ Total Percent of Fatal Crashes Percent Drivers Licenses Percent

12 Younger and Older Drivers in Fatal Crashes 41.9% 41.1% 38.1% 41.3% 43.9% 38.3% 39.0% 37.6% 42.8% 35.5% 18.0% 18.2% 19.7% 20.1% 17.4% 18.0% 19.1% 18.2% 16.1% 17.1% Percent Under 16 to 24 Percent Under 65 to 85+ Percent

13 Alcohol/Drug-Related Fatalities Year Fatalities Trend Line Source: OHSO

14 Alcohol/Drug-Related Fatalities Percent of Total Fatalities 20.9% 23.6% 22.4% 19.4% 22.7% 26.2% 22.3% 25.2% 21.5% 20.8% Year Rate (Percent) ProportionTrend Line Source: OHSO

15 Alcohol Related Fatalities as Percent of Total Fatalities Oklahoma Compared to U.S. Average 40% 34% 39% 36% 35% 41% 39% 40% Percent of Fatalities OKU.S. Source: NHTSA/NCSA 2005.

16 Alcohol Related Fatality Rate per 100 Million VMT Rate per 100 Million VMT OKU.S. Average Source: FARS

17 Fatal Crashes with Fatigued/Distracted Drivers Year Number of Fatal Crashes Fatal Crashes Linear (Fatal Crashes) Source: OHSO

18 Incapacitating Crashes with Fatigued/Distracted Drivers Year Number of Incapacitating Crashes Incapacitating Crashes Linear (Incapacitating Crashes) Source: OHSO

19 Fatigued/Distracted Driver Fatal and Injury Crashes as a Percent of Total Injury Crashes Year Percent of Total Injury Crashes Linear (Percent of Total Injury Crashes) Source: OHSO 6.58% 6.67% 6.37% 6.18% 6.02% 5.58% 5.53% 5.24% 5.45% 5.14%

20 Driver Error Fatalities Year Fatalities Trend Line Source: OHSO

21 Driver Error Fatalities Percent of Total Fatalities 41.7% 32.9% 36.3% 39.7% 39.4% 41.8% 44.4% 41.7% 41.4% 44.6% Year Fatalities (in Percent) Percent of Total OK FatalitiesTrend Line Source: OHSO

22 Safety Belt Use Rate Compared to U.S. Average Safety Belt Use Rate (in Percent) OK Belt Use RateU.S. Average Belt Use Rate Source: NHTSA, OHSO % 83.7% 79% 80% 69% 67% 71% 75% 47.4% 67.5% 67.9% 70.1% 76.7% 80.3% 56.0% 60.7% 82% 81%

23 Child Restraint Compliance 86.7% 82.7% 80.6% 75.7% 77.4% 66.0% 76.8% 62.5% 54.4% 51.8% 53.0% Year RateTrend Line Source: OHSO Percent

24 Unsafe Speed Fatalities Year Fatalities Trend Line Source: OHSO

25 Unsafe Speed Fatalities Percent of Total Fatalities 24.0% 28.6% 26.9% 24.5% 30.6% 28.1% 30.1% 30.8% 29.9% 26.3% Year Fatalities (in Percent) Percent of Total OK FatalitiesTrend Line Source: OHSO

26 Speeding Related Fatalities as Percent of Total Fatalities Oklahoma Compared to U.S. Average Fatalities (in Percent) 42% 41% 36% 31% 32% 31% 30% OKU.S. Source:NHTSA/NCSA, Traffic Safety Facts, Oklahoma 2005.

27 Special Users

28 Oklahoma Pedestrian Fatalities Pedestrian Fatalities Pedestrian Linear (Pedestrian) Source: FARS

29 Pedestrian Fatalities Percent of Total Fatalities Oklahoma Pedestrian Fatalities as Percent of Total Fatalities U.S. Pedestrian Fatalities as Percent of Total Fatalities Source: FARS Percent of Total Fatalities 11.2% 10.9% 11.1% 11.3% 11.6% 11.4% 12.7% 13.0% 12.6% 11.8% 6.1% 7.9% 6.2% 6.5% 5.5% 7.3% 7.2% 6.6% 8.2% 8.1%

30 Bicycle Fatalities Year Fatalities Trend Line Source: OHSO

31 Vehicles

32 Vehicles Involved in Fatal Crashes Oklahoma Compared to U.S. Average, 2005OKU.S. 35.1% 45.3% 10.4% 7.8% 2.8% 1.2% 42.2% 38.5% 8.3% 7.8% 4.7% 2.8% Passenger CarsLight TrucksLarge TrucksMotorcyclesBusesOther/Unknown Percent of Fatal Crashes Source: FARS

33 Oklahoma Motorcycle Fatalities Motorcycle Fatalities Motorcycle Linear (Motorcycle) Source: FARS

34 Motorcycle Fatalities as Percent of Total Fatalities Oklahoma Compared to U.S. 9.6% 9.4% 10.1% 10.9% 3.9% 3.3% 3.7% 3.2% 5.7% 4.5% 5.3% 10.5% 5.0% 5.1% 5.5% 6.0% 6.9% 7.6% 8.7% Percent of Fatalities Motorcycle Fatalities as Percent of all Fatalities Motorcycle Fatalities as Percent Involvement in U.S. Fatal Crashes Source: FARS

35 Fatal Truck Crashes Year Number of Fatal Crashes Single Unit TrucksTruck Tractors/Semi Trailers Source: OHSO

36 Injury Truck Crashes ,000 1,200 1,400 1, Year Number of Injury Crashes Single Unit TrucksTruck Tractors/Semi Trailers Source: OHSO ,262 1,

37 Fatal Truck Crashes as a Percent of Total Fatal Crashes 15.0% 17.0% 16.2% 5.6% 18.4% 13.4% 16.7% 16.0% 14.3% 14.7% Percent of Total Fatal Crashes Year Source: OHSO Single Unit Plus Truck Tractors/Semi Trailers

38 Highways/Roadways/Railroad

Urban/Rural Fatal Crashes Rural 69.1% Urban 30.9% Source:ODOT Traffic Engineering Division

40 Fatal Crashes by Road Function Class Source: FARS Principal Arterial

Fatal Crashes on Urban Roadways Principal Arterial – Interstate 37 Principal Arterial – Other Freeways and Expressways 17 Principal Arterial – Other 68 Minor Arterial 37 Collector 8 Local 52 Source:ODOT Traffic Engineering Division

Fatal Crashes on Rural Roadways Principal Arterial – Interstate 57 Principal Arterial – Other 87 Minor Arterial 81 Major Collector 110 Minor Collector and Local 155 Source:ODOT Traffic Engineering Division

43 Fatal Single Vehicle Crashes Year Number of Fatal Crashes Fatal Crashes Linear (Fatal Crashes) Source: OHSO

44 Incapacitating Single Vehicle Crashes ,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1, Year Number of Incapacitating Crashes Incapacitating Crashes Linear (Incapacitating Crashes) Source: OHSO 1,163 1,190 1,213 1,263 1,268 1,274 1,251 1,359 1,473 1,571

45 Fatal and Injury Single Vehicle Crashes as a Percent of Total Injury Crashes Year Percent of Total Injury Crashes Linear (Percent of Total Injury Crashes) Source: OHSO 18.57% 17.54% 17.89% 17.62% 17.49% 17.13% 16.67% 16.86% 16.91% 17.19%

46 Fatal Roadway Departure Crashes Year Number of Fatal Crashes Fatal Crashes Linear (Fatal Crashes) Source:ODOT Traffic Engineering Division

47 Incapacitating Roadway Departure Crashes ,000 1,200 1, Year Number of Incapacitating Crashes Incapacitating Crashes Linear (Incapacitating Crashes) Source:ODOT Traffic Engineering Division ,052 1,117 1,204

48 Fatal and Injury Roadway Departure Crashes as a Percent of Total Injury Crashes Year Percent of Total Injury Crashes Linear (Percent of Total Injury Crashes) Source:ODOT Traffic Engineering Division % 13.79% 13.97% 13.77% 13.58% 13.36% 13.01% 13.24% 13.03% 13.18%

49 Roadway Departure Fatalities as Percent of Total Fatalities Oklahoma Compared to U.S. Average 56% 67% 65% 63% 72% 55% 59% 60% 58% Percent of Fatalities OKU.S. Source: FARS

50 Fatal Intersection Crashes Year Number of Fatal Crashes RuralUrban Source:ODOT Traffic Engineering Division

51 Injury Intersection Crashes 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6, Year Number of Injury Crashes RuralUrban Source:ODOT Traffic Engineering Division ,000 1, ,494 4,613 4,631 4,825 4,486 4,537 4,726 4,709 4,977 5,038

52 Fatal and Injury Intersection Crashes 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6, Year Number of Fatal and Injury Crashes RuralUrban Source:ODOT Traffic Engineering Division ,012 1,067 1,144 1,049 4,571 4,699 4,706 4,899 4,552 4,591 4,795 4,790 5,056 5,111

53 Persons Killed in Construction/Maintenance Zones Number of Fatalities Source: FARS

54 Construction/Maintenance Zone Fatalities Oklahoma Compared to U.S. Average 1.38% 1.91% 3.38% 1.79% 2.33% 1.00% 2.45% 2.34% 2.76% 2.55% 2.48% 2.47% Total Fatalities (in Percent) OKU.S. Source: FARS

55 Railroad-Related Fatalities Year Fatalities Trend Line Source: OHSO