Classification and Supervision in Probation and Parole

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Advertisements

Virginia Juvenile Justice Association EFFECTIVE PAROLE TRANSITION & RE-ENTRY: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN & HOW November 2, 2006 David M. Altschuler, Ph.D.
What is the term that defines the men and women we supervise? Parolee Probationer Offender Supervised Releasee Restored Citizen Returning Citizen Client.
COMPAS is the Pathfinder ! NYS Probation Officers Association Annual Conference August 9, 2012 Presenters: Sharon Lansing, DCJS Nancy Andino, DCJS Gary.
Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
California Static Risk Assessment (CSRA)
Classification and Supervision: Techniques of Evidence-Based Practices
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Headlines: Offender Rehabilitation Act 2014 – amends the existing framework to give greater flexibility Clause 1 extends release on licence to custodial.
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8 th Chapter 10 Incarceration.
Managing drug- involved offenders with HOPE Presented by: Angela Hawken, PhD October 22, 2010 ACJRCA.
WISP Assessing Implementation and Early Outcomes Seattle City Council Presented by: Angela Hawken, PhD December 12, 2011.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry.
Chapter 8 Probation.
Evidence-Based Sentencing. Learning Objectives Describe the three principles of evidence- based practice and the key elements of evidence-based sentencing;
Chapter 8 Residential Intermediate Sanctions. Introduction Intermediate Sanctions are sentencing options between prison and probation that provide punishment.
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Juvenile Probation Commission.
Break-Out Session Probation Part II. Evidence-Based Electronic Monitoring of Sex Offenders: Technology, Evidence, and Implications for Community Supervision.
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
Offender Supervision Control and Public Safety Issues.
Probation and Parole in the United States Your presenter:
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections.
NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES.
Risk/Needs Assessment Within the Criminal Justice System.
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
UCLA’s Statewide Evaluation of Proposition 36 Darren Urada, Ph.D. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Association for Criminal Justice Research (California)
Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.
Juvenile Probation What is Probation? Probation is defined as “A court imposed criminal sanction that, subject to stated conditions, releases a criminal.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions Alternatives to incarceration Operated by probation/parole agencies No need to create new bureaucracies More punitive.
RISK AND NEED TRACKS SAMHSA 2013 Orleans Parish Drug Court Expansion Grant.
Community-Based Corrections for Juveniles
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Probation Statistics Part 1 Crime, Justice & Security Statistics Produced in Collaboration between.
Chapter 4 Probation Goals and ideologies Setting and enforcing conditions Revoking liberty Legal basis and imposing the sentence Agency organization.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections. JUSTIFICATION Reintegration Preparing offenders to return to the community unmarred by further criminal.
Chapter 14 Prevention and Corrections in the Community 1.
This slide pack can be adapted for local use by YOTs to meet local conditions and the local audience. It is designed to be used in conjunction with the.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System CJUS 101 Community-Based Corrections.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Connecticut Department of Correction Parole & Community Services Division Assessments Overview.
Viola Läänerand & Taavi Kruus
“Key Issues Facing Probation and Parole” NPAMC November 10, 2009 Carl Wicklund American Probation and Parole Association.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
Created by Jonathan Lee and Allen Lim
Unit 3 Jeff Collins.  Supervision is an officer’s oversight of clients committed to his or her custody.  Classification consists of the supervising.
Department of Corrections Joint Judiciary Hearing July 25, 2013.
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Board of Supervisors,
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Classification & Supervision
Department of Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population?
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Chapter 8 Parole: Early Release and Reentry
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
Pretrial, Probation, and Parole in the United States
Understanding the Criminal Justice System
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
July 21 – 27, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Classification and Supervision in Probation and Parole Chapter 6 Classification and Supervision in Probation and Parole

Introduction Supervision is an officer’s oversight of clients committed to his or her custody Probationers nationwide: 60%-direct sentence to probation 30%-suspended sentence 9%-split sentence Most sentenced for drug or alcohol violation 77% men/23% women 55% white/31% African American/12% Hispanic/2% Native American or Asian/Pacific Islander

Neighborhood-Based Probation Supervision In NBS, probation officers are in the community more than the office and engage community groups as partners and collaborators Emphasis is on public safety Probation officers are community organizers NBS and traditional probation supervision share involvement in surveillance and development of prosocial behaviors

The Surveillance Function in Probation Supervision requires the officer to: Notify the offender of the conditions and consequences for noncompliance Provide surveillance to ascertain compliance Methods of surveillance include: Unannounced and announced visits Curfew Electronic monitoring Phone verifications Graduated sanctions Collection of urine samples for drug testing

Developing Prosocial Behaviors Supervision must address the barriers that result in recidivism and assist in positive behavioral change, such as: - building on an offender’s strengths - assisting with employment - integrating family as informal social controls

Classification: The First Step in Supervision Classification requires the probation officer to: Use an objective assessment scale to compute the risks posed by the offender Identify offender needs requiring intervention Select appropriate supervision strategies Highest priority is placed on identifying risks that would jeopardize public safety

Classification: The First Step in Supervision, cont. Actuarial Risk Assessment The LSI-R, CMC and COMPAS are among the available assessment tools The LSI-R includes static and dynamic factors Identifying Treatment Needs - The officer identifies those characteristics, conditions or behaviors that limit motivation and may lead to criminal behavior

Classification: The First Step in Supervision, cont. Identifying Treatment Needs, cont. Treatment needs include drug or alcohol abuse, mental illness, anger management or education or vocational deficiencies The officer identifies treatment activities to address the needs and bring about law-abiding behavior

Classification: The First Step in Supervision, cont. Developing the Case Plan Supervision issues addressed in the plan may involve: Conditions imposed by the court Risk control Treatment

Classification: The First Step in Supervision, cont. Levels of Supervision Most classification systems use the traditional categories of maximum, medium and minimum The categories specify the smallest amount of contact requirements Factors of contacts include: Type of contact Location of contact Frequency of contact

Classification: The First Step in Supervision, cont. Caseload and Workload Standards - A caseload is the number of individuals or cases one officer can effectively supervise - The more intensive the supervision, the lower the caseload - The APPA recommends a workload standard of 120 hours per month - The workload standard concept is preferable to allow for comparison, research and interpreting work to legislators and others

Specialized Caseloads Specialized Caseloads have proven to be effective for: Drug offenders Gang members Sex offenders Offenders with mental illness About 5% of probationers and parolees are classified under a “special” caseload

Interstate Compacts on Probation The original compact was signed in 1937 by 25 states and was ratified by all states by 1951 The Interstate Compact for Juveniles was established in 1955 The Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision began in 2000 Under provisions of the compact, there is no requirement for an extradition hearing