Polarized Electrons for Linear Colliders J. E. Clendenin, A. Brachmann, E. L. Garwin, R. E. Kirby, D.-A. Luh, T. Maruyama, R. Prepost, C. Y. Prescott,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advances in Polarized Electron Sources for High-Energy Accelerators Jym Clendenin CharlieFest SLAC, January 27, 2006.
Advertisements

Record Values of Electron Beam Polarization and Quantum Efficiency for Semiconductor Photocathodes Yu.A.Mamaev St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University.
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Polarized Electron Source R&D at CEBAF/JLab P. Adderley, J. Brittian, J.Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M.Poelker, M. Stutzman, R. Suleiman Students:
K 2 CsSb Cathode Development John Smedley Triveni Rao Andrew Burrill BNL ERL needs – 50 mA, 7 mm dia., 1.3 mA/mm 2.
JCS e + /e - Source Development and E166 J. C. Sheppard, SLAC June 15, 2005.
GaAs and CsKSb Photocathodes for DC Gun
ILC Polarized Electron Source Annual DOE HEP Program Review June 5 – 8 International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center A. Brachmann,
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
PST 2007 BNL 1 Development of High- performance Polarized e- source at Nagoya University. Nagoya University M.Yamamoto, S.Okumi, T.Konomi N.Yamamoto, A.Mano,
AESOP: Accurate Electron Spin Optical Polarimeter Marcy L. Stutzman, Matt Poelker; Jefferson Lab Timothy J. Gay; University of Nebraska.
Polarized photoemission
PST'05 (XIth Workshop on Polarized Source and Target)1 Generation of Polarized Electrons by Filed Emission M. Kuwahara A, T. Nakanishi A, S. Okumi A, M.
1 High Polarization and Low Emittance Electron Source for ILC Nagoya University Dept. of Physics (SP-Lab) Masahiro Yamamoto.
1) Source Issues 2) SLAC’s ITF Jym Clendenin SLAC.
/SC-PAC Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Joe Grames CEBAF Operations
1 Polarized photocathode R&D Feng Zhou SLAC Collaborators: Brachmann, Maruyama, and Sheppard ALCPG09/GDE09 09/28-10/03/09.
Introduction Current and proposed linear colliders, energy recovery linacs and light sources require high quality electron sources. In particular, low-emittance.
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
P. Adderley, D. Bullard, E. Forman, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, C. Hernandez-Garcia, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman, R. Suleiman, J. Zhang, Graduate student: M.
Summary Session 9B Polarized electron (positron) sources.
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
PESP2008 Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University M.Yamamoto, T.Konomi, S.Okumi, Y.Nakagawa, T.Nakanishi Graduate School of Engineering,
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Strained Superlattice.
High Intensity Polarized Electron Sources
Compton polarimetry for EIC Jefferson Lab Compton Polarimeters.
D.-A. Luh, A. Brachmann, J. E. Clendenin, T. Desikan, E. L. Garwin, S. Harvey, R. E. Kirby, T. Maruyama, and C. Y. Prescott Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Dept. of Energy M. Poelker,
Polarization comparison of InAlGaAs/GaAs superlattice photocathodes having low conduction band offset K. Ioakeimidi, T. Maruyama, J.E. Clendenin, A. Brachmann.
SUPERLATTICE PHOTOCATHODES: An Overview Tarun Desikan PPRC, Stanford University
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Polarized Photocathode Research Collaboration PPRC R
9/24-26/07 e- KOM Slide 1/20 ILC Polarized e- source RDR Overview A. Brachmann.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility G0 Collaboration Meeting, June 18-19, 2003 Updates G0 Tiger Laser High Polarization Photocathodes Mott polarimeter.
Field enhancement coefficient  determination methods: dark current and Schottky enabled photo-emissions Wei Gai ANL CERN RF Breakdown Meeting May 6, 2010.
Recent Polarized Cathodes R&D at SLAC and Future Plans Feng Zhou Axel Brachmann, Jym Clendenin (ret.), Takashi Maruyama, and John Sheppard SLAC Workshop.
R&D opportunities for photoinjectors Renkai Li 10/12/2015 FACET-II Science Opportunities Workshops October, 2015 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
09/10/2007 Polarized Source for eRHIC Evgeni Tsentalovich MIT.
LDRD: Magnetized Source JLEIC Meeting November 20, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center 9/13/2006 Americas Regional Team FY08-09 Planning Meeting 1 1/11 ILC-Americas FY08-09.
Non-conservation of the charge lifetime at high average current R.Barday University Mainz, Germany INFN Milano-LASA 4-6 October 2006.
September 10-14, 2007 XIIth International Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets & Polarimetry, Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) 1 Polarized Electron.
Spectral Response of GaAs(Cs, NF 3 ) Photocathodes Teresa Esposito Mentors: I. Bazarov, L. Cultrera, S. Karkare August 10, 2012.
김 귀년 CHEP, KNU Accelerator Activities in Korea for ILC.
Page 1 Polarized Electron Sources for Linear Colliders October, 2010 A. Brachmann, J. C. Sheppard, F. Zhou SLAC SLAC October 18-22, 2010.
1 Challenges for ILC and CLIC polarized electron sources Feng Zhou SLAC Major contributors: Brachmann, Maruyama, Sheppard, and Zhou SLAC Accelerator Seminar.
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
When circularly-polarized light with near- bandgap energy illuminates a negative electron affinity (NEA) GaAs photocathode, spin-polarized electrons are.
TILC Electron Source Update A. Brachmann, J. Sheppard, F. Zhou -SLAC – M. Poelker - Jlab - TILC, Tsukuba, April 2009.
Quantum Efficiency Improvement of Polarized Electron Source using Strain compensated Superlattice photocathode N. Yamamoto 1, X.G. Jin 1, T. Miyauchi 3,
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility M. Baylac,
X-band Based FEL proposal
Beam Polarization I. Koop BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia Workshop on Physics at HIEPA, Hefei, China January 2015.
November 17, 2008 A. Brachmann Slide 1 ILC polarized Electron Source R&D Update LCWS 2008 A. Brachmann, J. Sheppard, F. Zhou - SLAC National Accelerator.
A bit of CEBAF polarized source history…
An Electron source for PERLE
MBE Growth of Graded Structures for Polarized Electron Emitters
high performance photocathodes for microscopy and accelerators
Polarized e- Source Design and R&D 10/24/05
Polarized Electron Source for eRHIC (the ring-ring option)
Source Parameter Comparison
Electron Source Configuration
ELIC Injector Working Group High-P, high-I source issues (DC)
Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab
Larry Cardman’s Contributions to Polarized Electron Sources and Accelerator Physics at JLab Charlie Sinclair 12/8/2018 Cardman Symposium.
Strained Superlattice GaAs
Studies of Emittance & Lifetime
High Current Prospects for Polarized Electron Sources
Wei Liu Brookhaven National Laboratory
MEIC Polarized Electron Source
Presentation transcript:

Polarized Electrons for Linear Colliders J. E. Clendenin, A. Brachmann, E. L. Garwin, R. E. Kirby, D.-A. Luh, T. Maruyama, R. Prepost, C. Y. Prescott, J. C. Sheppard, and J. Turner

Outline 1. Charge 2. Polarization 3. Other 4. Conclusions

1.Collider Charge Requirements ParameterILCILC at SourceSCRFNCRF N e,  pulse nC6.4*2.4*  zns20.5 I  pulse, avg A *Twice the IP requirement

Generating Polarized Electrons from GaAs Illuminate p-doped GaAs (or its analogues) crystal with circularly polarized monochromatic light tuned to the band-gap edge. Absorbed photons promote e - from filled VB states to CB. CB e - eventually reach surface. with Cs(O) lowers it several additional eV, resulting in the vacuum level being lower than the CBM in the bulk (NEA surface). If the cathode is biased negative, CB electrons at the surface are emitted into vacuum. In p-doped materials, band-bending lowers work function by ~1/3 of the 1.4 eV band gap. Treating surface

Space Charge Limit (SCL) (Child’s Law) (Child’s Law) SLC DC gun: ● Cathode bias -120 kV to keep max fields <8 MV/m ● Low fields necessary to minimize the dark current that degrades the QE ● GaAs crystal 2-cm dia. decreases j e, but increases beam emittance at source

For SLC, low-energy beam transport (various apertures in the 3-4 cm range) designed for 20 nC in 3 ns with beam interception in first m <0.1%, in first 3-m <1%. Laser 3 ns, thick GaAs cathode dia=1.5 cm, bias -160 kV, 20 nC, thus I  pulse,avg =6.7 A [Eppley et al., PAC91, p. 1964] cath-dia -bias SCL cmkVA Eppley SLC SLC

ParameterILCILCILCSLC at SourceSCRFNCRFNCRF-Inj/Design SCRF-Linac(2-cm) n e nC  zns I  pulse, avg A I  pulse, peak A11 (SCL) Conclusion: Space charge limit a problem for ILC source only if try to operate with NCRF injector S-band linac

Surface Photovoltaic (SPV) Effect [Clendenin et al., to be published in NIM A (2004)]  Elsevier B.V.

Higher doping solves the SPV problem: can be restricted to last few nm at surface (“gradient doping”) to avoid depolarization effects in bulk* * Creates the practical problem of how to clean the surface at low T prior to Cs(O) activation Four samples with different doping levels: 5  cm -3 1  cm -3 2  cm -3 5  cm -3 [Clendeni n et al, to be published in NIM A (2004) ]  Elsevier B.V.

SLAC Experimental Results Using High-Polarization Gradient-Doped Cathodes and Long Pulse Laser [a] Maruyama et al., NIM A 492 (2002), 199, Fig. 18 [b] Clendenin et al., to be published in NIM A (2004)

Very high current densities achieved by reducing the laser spot diameter at the cathode

2.Polarization Highest polarization from thin (~100 nm) epilayer having a biaxial compressive strain. Strain produced by lattice mismatch with substrate and/or by quantum confinement associated with short-period superlattice structures. Highest polarization from thin (~100 nm) epilayer having a biaxial compressive strain. Strain produced by lattice mismatch with substrate and/or by quantum confinement associated with short-period superlattice structures. Strain breaks the degeneracy of hh and lh energy bands at the VBM. A separation of meV now readily achieved. Strain breaks the degeneracy of hh and lh energy bands at the VBM. A separation of meV now readily achieved.

On absorption of photon, VB electron promoted to CB. The hh-lh splitting sufficient to select electrons from hh band only, resulting in CB electrons of 1 spin state only. [Alley et al., NIM A 365 (1995) 1]  Elsevier B.V.

Accuracy of SLC Polarimeters The CTS (Cathode Test System) Mott at SLAC is a compact low-energy (20 kV) retarding-field polarimeter located in the Cathode Test Lab The CTS (Cathode Test System) Mott at SLAC is a compact low-energy (20 kV) retarding-field polarimeter located in the Cathode Test Lab The GTL (Gun Test Lab) Mott at SLAC is a medium-energy (120 kV) multiple-foil polarimeter located in the GTL The GTL (Gun Test Lab) Mott at SLAC is a medium-energy (120 kV) multiple-foil polarimeter located in the GTL SLC Compton polarimeter was located at the IP (50 GeV) SLC Compton polarimeter was located at the IP (50 GeV) Same Mott polarimeters in operation at SLAC today

RunCTS-Mott GTL-Mott Compton ’ % 72.92%±0.38% ’ %±0.40% For ’96 and ‘97/’98, error of SLC Compton polarimeter measurements ~0.5%, dominated by systematic uncertainties. [Abe et al., PRL 84 (2001) 5945] Known depolarization in NDR and NARC: ~2% (NDR 0.8%; NARC 0.7% energy spread, 0.3% synchrotron radiation, 0.4% beam emittance). Thus, during SLC, the Mott measurements (in lab) were consistently ~2% higher than Compton corrected for known depolarization effects. Some of the difference may be spin de- tuning in NARC.

E-158 Results E-158 an experiment ( ) to measure parity violation at 50 GeV in electron-electron scattering at SLAC E-158 an experiment ( ) to measure parity violation at 50 GeV in electron-electron scattering at SLAC Moller polarimeter at 50 GeV, similar to JLab’s. Depolarization in A-line ~1%. Moller polarimeter at 50 GeV, similar to JLab’s. Depolarization in A-line ~1%. Runs 1,2 used GaAsP/GaAs strained-layer cathode Runs 1,2 used GaAsP/GaAs strained-layer cathode Run 3 used GaAsP/GaAs superlattice (SL) Run 3 used GaAsP/GaAs superlattice (SL)

GaAsP/GaAs Superlattice (SL) Data showing high polarization from MOCVD- grown version first presented by Nishitani et al. at the PESP 2000 Workshop in Nagoya. Data showing high polarization from MOCVD- grown version first presented by Nishitani et al. at the PESP 2000 Workshop in Nagoya. SVT Associates and SLAC collaborated to explore parameter space for MBE-grown version. SVT Associates and SLAC collaborated to explore parameter space for MBE-grown version. –Results show an amazingly stable high polarization over a wide range of parameter space [Maruyama et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 (2004) 2640] while maintaining a high QE. –One of these SL wafers used for E-158-III.

Comparison of 3 photocathodes representing 2 structures

aT. Nishitani et al., in SPIN 2000, AIP Conf. Proc. 570 (2001), p bT. Maruyama et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 (2004) 2640 cOn line, preliminary value of P emax. dT. Maruyama et al., Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. A 492 (2002) 199, Fig. 13 eP.L. Anthony et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004)

“Spin Dance” at Jefferson Lab Relative analyzing power for 5 JLab polarimeters operated simultaneously to measure polarization of common beam on pulse-to-pulse basis. Error bars represent fits to the data only, statistical (much larger) and systematic errors not included. The Moller A value reduced to 1.04 if data set limited to within 25% of max measured polarization (but error bars increase). [Grames et al., PRST-AB 7 (2004) ]  American Physical Society

Maximum Polarization of SVT SL CTS Mott(86±5)% CTS Mott(86±5)% E-158-III Moller(91±5)% E-158-III Moller(91±5)% (corrected for source) Average(88±4)% Average(88±4)%

3. Other Issues Cathode QE, QE uniformity, anisotropy, lifetime Cathode QE, QE uniformity, anisotropy, lifetime –QE determines required laser energy—the higher the QE the more reliable the laser system can be –QE non-uniformity affects low-energy beam optics, thus needs to be stable –QE anisotropy very low for SL –QE lifetime must be >100 h to ensure stable operating conditions  Cannot always compensate for low QE with more laser energy because of SPV effect  Can restore QE by re-cesiating, takes ~15 min.  SLC lifetimes typically >400 h [J.E. Clendenin et al, in AIP CP-421 (1998), p. 250]

Source Vacuum Source Vacuum –Critical for high QE and long lifetime –Affects ion back bombardment  JLab 10,000 C/cm 2 equivalent to 1/e lifetime [C. Sinclair, PAC99, p. 65]  ILC maximum 1000 C/cm 2 per year (SLC type source) High voltage cathode bias High voltage cathode bias –Beam loading effects: each  pulse ~1 mJ, 1-ms pulse train ~3 J –Pulsed HV can be shaped Laser system Laser system –Laser to be modulated at  pulse frequency, i.e., at ~3 MHz –The pulse train envelope can be shaped

Next Generation Polarized Electron Sources Higher voltage Higher voltage RG guns RG guns

4. Conclusions High probability that required charge for ILC can be produced using SLC type PES. Numerous problems introduced if  bunch spacing is reduced to significantly <300 ns. High probability that required charge for ILC can be produced using SLC type PES. Numerous problems introduced if  bunch spacing is reduced to significantly <300 ns. P e  85% is assured using well-tested GaAs/GaAsP SL structure. P e  85% is assured using well-tested GaAs/GaAsP SL structure. Various relatively minor issues remain. Various relatively minor issues remain.