Polk County Family Drug Court The Honorable Karla Fultz Todd Beveridge, M.S.W., M.S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

Overview of Child Protection Process Presented to: Task Force on Child Protection August 3, 2007 Bill Navas Office of Attorney General 13 th Judicial Circuit.
1 NM Behavioral Health Collaborative New Mexico Behavioral Health Plan for Children, Youth and Their Families March 2007.
Truancy Court Of Randolph County
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Dallas CASA Court Appointed Special Advocates. Allegations of abuse and neglect Investigation by DFPS DFPS has arranged for a residence for the child.
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Denver Family Integrated Drug Court
1 C hildren and F amily Research Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign School of Social Work TM Integrating Substance Abuse Treatment and Child.
A Successful Collaboration Among Systems : El Paso County Family Treatment Drug Court: A Program Model Putting the Pieces Together: 1 st National Conference.
Tribal & State Partnership Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs.
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline.
Dependency Court – A Team Approach Presen Presented by: Judge Brantley S. Clark and Carol A. Dunaway, M.S. 1.
AN OUTLINE OF IT’S ROLES AND STRUCTURE IN MATTERS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES RI’s Family Court System.
An Introduction To Grayson County’s Juvenile Problem Solving Court Honorable Brian Gary 397 th District Court.
Background on the Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Richard P. Barth, PhD, MSW
Treatment Plans and Administrative Case Reviews In a Nutshell.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
A Home Visiting Program that Works. The Importance of Prevention Diverse communities and service providers across the U.S. have come to the same conclusion.
Keeping Families Together: An evaluation of implementation and outcomes of a pilot supportive housing model for families involved with the child welfare.
S.T.A.R.T. Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services Sobriety Treatment and Recovery Teams.
Family Dependency Treatment Court An Introduction.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
Shared Family Care: An Innovative Model for Supporting & Restoring Families through Community Partnerships Amy Price, Associate Director National Abandoned.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
AB429: Family Reunification Program Presented by Phyllis Dobbins-Powell.
Community & Family Resource Center. (CFRC) CFRC is dedicated to strengthening families and communities by providing information, education and support.
A Case Study of the Intersection Between the Child Welfare and Criminal Justice Systems Charlene Wear Simmons, Ph.D. Parental Incarceration, Termination.
Working with Families in THP- Plus Julie Jackson, Bill Wilson Center Angela Martinez, Bill Wilson Center Amber Goggia, St. Anne’s Peggy Perry, Larkin Street.
Addressing the Needs of Multi- System Youth: Strengthening the connections between Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice. DOUGLAS COUNTY CROSSOVER YOUTH PRACTICE.
LINKAGES IN STANISLAUS COUNTY VOICES OF FAMILIES AT TEAM MEETINGS.
 Specialized program within Dependency court designed to treat parents when substance abuse is a core issue.
I am for the child ™ A new initiative to fight for the rights of neglected and abused children. I am for the child ™ A new initiative to fight for the.
CHMDA/CWDA Partnership Series Child Welfare Services “It Takes a Village” Danna Fabella, Interim Director Contra County Employment and Human Services Department.
C.P.S. Safety Plan Model. MISSION: To protect abused and neglected children, to support the efforts of families to care for and parent their own children.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Cobb Douglas Community Services Board Tod Citron, CEO Stacy Hull, LPC Director of Residential Services and Addictive Diseases.
AB 490 and McKinney-Vento Bridging education for homeless families and foster youth Alameda County Office of Education Student Programs and Services Foster.
Family Support Program of Albemarle County February, 2010.
Families Achieving Independence Through Recovery Detroit Department of Health and Wellness Promotion/Bureau of Substance Abuse Prevention Treatment & Recovery.
Pennsylvania Permanency Barriers Project Anne Marie Lancour Heidi Redlich Epstein Mimi Laver Kathleen McNaught Elizabeth Thornton Cristina Cooper Jeffrey.
Vermont Treatment Court Dockets Compassion & Accountability ~~~~~ Innovative Practices Conference Vermont Law School November 15, 2013.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
SUBSTANCE ABUSE Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
A.J. (Tony) Brandenburg August 21, 2015 TCAP Tribal Court Conference Protecting Indian Children (760)
DISPOSITION. Dispositional Hearing  What is it?  A dispositional hearing is required whenever a petition for dependency or neglect has been sustained.
 Child in need of Protection or Services (CHIPS) › Reasonable efforts to reunite › Timelines › Permanency petition  Egregious harm › Can move right.
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
Pennsylvania Permanency Barriers Project Anne Marie Lancour Heidi Redlich Epstein Mimi Laver Brenda Shum Andrea Khoury Debra Jenkins David Kelly Kathleen.
Child In Need of Care (CINC) Code Guardians ad litem Nuts and Bolts October 2015.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Prosecuting a DEC Case Outside of Drug Court…… You mean I have to work with THEM!!!!
Hon. Carlos Villalon, Jr.. TODAYS FOCUS What is a Foster Care Case? Aren’t All Courts the Same? What is the Judge’s Role? What are the Educational Issues.
Purpose Of Training: To guide Clinicians in the completion of screens and development of Alternative Community Service Plans.
Brooke County SCHOOL BASED PROBATION OFFICER. Pre- Trial Diversion Meeting An initial assessment is done during or after the Pre-Trial Diversion Meeting.
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Pennsylvania Permanency Barriers Project
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
UNLOCKING THE MYSTERIES
The Current State of Foster Care in Virginia
Court Appointed Special Advocates for Children
Treatment Court Dockets
Wraparound Oregon Designing a coordinated service system for children, youth and their families.
What does prevention services act mean for Iowa juvenile court judges?
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Presentation transcript:

Polk County Family Drug Court The Honorable Karla Fultz Todd Beveridge, M.S.W., M.S.

Background First Iowa Drug Court began in Polk County in 1996, followed by drug courts in four other counties These courts target convicted or admitted felons or misdemeanants who are drug dependent with no history of violence or weapon use

Background Iowa has one Family Drug Court (begun in November of 2002) and it is atypical of the drug court system – All of the participants have been referred to the Court following adjudication of the children to the Child in Need of Assistance (CINA) program – Not all participants are convicted or admitted felons and misdemeanants

Background – Some of the women choose to participate to prevent termination of parental rights and others are involved as an effort to obtain custody of the child removed through the CINA program – All of the women are court ordered after participation is mandated by provider

Background Begun as a pilot program – The foundations of the program were the CINA children on the docket of Judge Karla Fultz (Polk County Juvenile Court) whose mothers resided in one of House of Mercy’s residential treatment programs. No federal or state funding was used.

Background Current program participants include: – House of Mercy clients (outpatients & residential). – Polk County Juvenile Court – Assistant County Attorney – Department of Human Services Case Manager – Attorneys representing the mothers & other advocates – Clients of other treatment providers

Purpose To foster and facilitate communication and collaboration between families, providers, and attorneys to aid parents in reunification with their children

Requirements Parents with a Child in Need of Assistance Adjudication History of drug or alcohol problems as determined by a substance abuse evaluation resulting in a recommendation for treatment services at a minimum outpatient level of care

Requirements Child or children out of parental custody with reunification as the goal Referrals made by: Department of Human Resources; Treatment Providers; Attorney for children and parents; and Juvenile Court Judges

The Process The CINA system forms the basis of Family Drug Court and consists of the judge, county attorney, a guardian ad litem and attorney appointed for the child, the parents, an attorney for the parents, and child protective service worker with the Iowa Department of Human Services

The Process – A removal hearing to determine the safety of the child and the need for the removal from the home – An adjudication hearing where the state is required to prove that the child is in need of assistance within the meaning of one or more of the CINA statutory grounds

The Process – A disposition hearing when the judge determines what service should be provided to the parent(s) to help them overcome whatever problems let to the need for adjudication and what service should be provide to the child – A review hearing is held before the juvenile judge every six months so that the judge can review the progress of the parents, the condition of the child and the placement of the child (if the child was removed from the parents)

The Process Family Drug Court review hearings are held every Wednesday from 9:00 to 11:00 – The purpose of the hearings is to facilitate the timely communication between the providers, families, attorneys, and the court – Outpatient and residential treatment participants initially attend weekly with the frequency decreasing as progress is made

The Process – The judge inquires into progress made and the need for additional and/or different services – Personnel from House of Mercy, other providers and DHS are present to give information – Attorneys for the children and parents are present and participate – All women are present during the time that has been allotted for the review hearings

Key Program Elements Judicial oversight and coordination of services to promote accountability, communication, collaboration, and reduce duplication of effort Intensive supervision of participants Evidenced/Best Practice-Based substance abuse counseling services

Key Program Elements Non-adversarial approach Immediate response by the Court to the needs of the child and family Alcohol and drug testing Self-sufficiency emphasis and support Intensive parenting services and assistance Readily accessible child care support

Key Program Elements Strength-Based treatment approach Long term support with permanent housing option

Program Specifics Program capacity Duration 40 – 50 participants 12 – 24 months, focusing on recovery, parenting, education, job training & compliance with treatment provider & DHS court approved plans

Program Specifics Drugs of Choice – Marijuana18% – Alcohol6% – Cocaine11% – Methamphetamine71% – (some participants abuse multiple drugs) Average Education at admission is 10 th grade. Average age at admission is 28 years old.

Outcomes Participation: – Total of 116 families have participated or are participating. 32 families (27%) of color 22 families currently involved – Reunification Rate: 82%

Outcomes Terminations have decreased: Clean & sober at program completion: Self-sufficiency involvement: Education Employment 50% 82% 95% 47% 48%