Isolated Rural Areas US EPA Conformity Training Summer 2004 Eddie Dancausse FHWA NC Division 919-856-4330x112

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP Development Process Overview For the Great Smoky Mountain National Park Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe,
Advertisements

Danville Area Transportation Study. Fundamentals of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Adam Aull Danville Area Transportation Study MPO ASCE Presentation.
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Centralina Nonattainment Area Elected Officials and City and County Managers and Planners.
SIP Development Process Overview For Rocky Mount Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
SIP Development Process Overview For Metrolina Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
SIP Development Process Overview For Hickory Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
Overview of the Transportation Conformity Process.
SIP Development Process Overview For Triad Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ Eddie.
Transportation Conformity Basics. What is Transportation Conformity? Transportation conformity (conformity) is a way to ensure that Federal funding and.
Transportation Conformity Basics Eddie Dancausse FHWA NC Division x112
Environmental Planning
Guidance on New CEs Emergency Repair Projects Operational Right-of-Way Limited Federal Funds EUM – March questions to:
1 Item 11, Presentation to the TPB, September 15, 2010.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Requirements for SIPs Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) Reducing Regional Transport of Emissions and Helping States Achieve the PM2.5 and Ozone NAAQS Beth Murray Clean Air Markets.
Transportation Planning for Federal Land Management Agencies (FLMAs) SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006 SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006.
KEEA Conference October 2013 Carbon Pollution Standards for Power Plants under Section 111 of the CAA: How Energy Efficiency Can Help States Comply 1 Jackson.
1 SAFETEA-LU Changes to the Transportation Conformity Rule February 21, 2008.
Presentation for Federal Land Management Agencies February 22, 2006 Presentation for Federal Land Management Agencies February 22, 2006 This is the Federal.
Session 6: What do I include in my PM 2.5 conformity analysis? FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Overview and Considering Greenhouse Gas Emissions in MTC’s 2035 RTP Joan Sollenberger, Chief Lisa Klein Division of.
Air Quality-Related Features of SAFETEA-LU Review by Michael Brady, Caltrans Air Quality/Conformity Coordinator (916)
Tribal Transportation Improvement Program (TTIP) Tribal Transportation Planning U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration November,
Session 7: Other Conformity Rule Changes FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
Summary of Air Quality Field Survey Eddie Dancausse Air Quality Specialist FHWA NC Division.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Transit Urban Roundtable September 30,
First home-interview survey (1944). Gravity model Where do the trips produced in TAZ 3 go? ? ? ? ?
Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments Net Conference June 23, 2004 Hosted by the Federal Highway Administration Office of Natural and Human Environment.
Transportation & Air Quality Planning AMPO MPO Educational Series November 8,
UNLOCK THE MYSTERIES TO AIR QUALITY Bernadette Dupont, FHWA-KY June 2007.
2015 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Transportation Conformity Wade Hobbs FHWA CADO January 15, 2014.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
1 Fugitive Dust Estimation Methods & On Road Mobile Sources An MPO’s Perspective.
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Virginia Association of Planning District Commissions October 4, 2012.
Module X: Cooperative Revenue Forecasting. Federal Requirements “For the purpose of developing the metropolitan transportation plan, the MPO, public transportation.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
Introduction to the Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process MPO 101 Michigan Transportation Planning Association 35 th Annual Conference July 14,
1 MOBILE6 -Input and Modeling Guidance -SIP and Conformity Policy North American Vehicle Emission Control Conference Atlanta, April 4, 2001 Gary Dolce.
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Transportation Conformity in North Carolina. Transportation Planning Framework Required by NCGS §136 ‑ In MPOs, includes 20 year fiscally constrained.
FTIP/FSTIP Development and Public Participation Environmental Justice and Self-Certification Scott Carson, FHWA-California Division Caltrans 2013 FSTIP/FTIP.
May 21, 2008 Bringing Transit Planning to the MPO Planning Table Bringing Transit Planning To The MPO Planning Table Daniel Rudge.
Industrial System Natural System Industrial System.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Measure Update.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
SAFETEA-LU: Workshop on Planning and Environmental Issues AASHTO Center for Environmental Excellence October 17-19, 2005 Arlington, Virginia.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY.
ODOT STIP Process and Funding Jerri Bohard –Planning Section Manager –Transportation Development Division Steve Leep –Program and Funding Services Manager.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.
Timely Implementation of TCMs. History  RACM developed for Severe Ozone Rate of Progress (ROP) Plan  2003 Incorporated in 2003 PM-10 Plan.
Truck Stop Electrification And Air Quality Conformity Presented by Bob Dickinson South East Texas Regional Planning Commission Air Innovation Conference.
Survivor’s Guide to Ozone Conformity Breakout Session 9: Air Quality 2015 California Transportation Planning Conference: Partnering for Sustainable Transportation.
Session 2: Background FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
Reasonable Further Progress Policy and Mid-Course Reviews John Summerhays EPA Region 5 June 20, 2007.
Statewide and Nonmetropolitan Planning Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPOs) State Programs Meeting 8/7/13 John Sprowls Community Planner,
Air Quality, Transportation Conformity, and the FSTIP FTIP/FSTIP Workshop February 9, 2016.
Session 3: When Do You Do Conformity? FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
HANDOUT 2017 FSTIP Development Workshop Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Requirements Wade Hobbs Federal Highway Administration California.
PROJECT SELECTION & EXPEDITED PROJECT SELECTION FOR MPO FTIPS AND THE STATEWIDE FSTIP 2013 FTIP/FSTIP WORKSHOP January 18-19, 2012 Wade Hobbs, FHWA CADO.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING PROCEDURES FOR REVISIONS STATEWIDE AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS (STIP & TIP) State of Alabama Department.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Federal Performance Update MPO Coordination Meeting May 10, 2016.
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
NC RPO Meeting July 25, 2018.
Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Transit
Uinta Basin General Conformity
PM2.5 Status - TEA-21 (Group 1 = data, Group 2 = data)
Presentation transcript:

Isolated Rural Areas US EPA Conformity Training Summer 2004 Eddie Dancausse FHWA NC Division x112

2 Outline of this Session l Types of Areas l Metropolitan vs. Isolated Rural Areas l Test Requirements l Regional Emissions Analyses l Flexibility

3 Refresher: Types of Areas l Isolated rural areas: those nonattainment or maintenance areas which dont have an MPO and whose projects arent part of any MPOs regional emissions analysis (population less than 50,000) l Metropolitan areas: areas that have an MPO and have a plan/TIP (population of at least 50,000) lDonut areas: outside the metropolitan planning boundary but inside the nonattainment/maintenance area boundary

4 Grace Period in Isolated Rural Areas l Isolated rural areas have 1-year grace period for new standards l Projects can be approved during grace period without conformity determination l After grace period, new project or project phase approvals require a conformity determination

5 What actions require conformity? l Isolated Rural Areas: l Conformity only done for FHWA/FTA projects in the nonattainment or maintenance area l Conformity not done on statewide plans and statewide TIPs (STIPs) l Conformity does not change DOTs requirements for statewide plans and STIPs

6 What actions require conformity? l Metropolitan Areas: l transportation plans and TIPs l FHWA/FTA projects l Isolated Rural Areas: l no plan or TIP l FHWA/FTA projects Continued

7 Who Does Conformity? l Metropolitan Areas: l MPO and US DOT make the plan or TIP conformity determination l Project conformity determination prepared by sponsor (e.g., MPO, state DOT) for US DOT conformity determination l Isolated Rural Areas: l Project conformity determination often prepared by state DOT for US DOT conformity determination

8 When and How Often is Conformity Done? l Metropolitan Areas: l Subject to frequency requirements for plan/TIP conformity determinations l Isolated Rural Areas: l Not subject to frequency requirements for plan/TIP conformity determinations (i.e., isolated rural areas do not lapse) l Conformity done when an FHWA/FTA project needs approval

9 Test Requirements for Isolated Rural Areas (93.109(l)) l latest planning assumptions l latest emissions model l consultation l (d) -- timely implementation of TCMs l hot spots l PM 10 and PM 2.5 control measures l / budget test or interim emissions test(s)

10 Refresher: Regional Emissions Analysis l Regional emissions analysis for an isolated rural area must: »include all regionally significant projects, including regionally significant non-federal projects (see definition in ) »estimate VMT from entire transportation system including all FHWA/FTA projects (non-regionally significant FHWA/FTA projects must be estimated through reasonable professional practice, (a)(1)) »cover the transportation planning horizon (generally 20 years)

11 Regional Emissions Analysis Metropolitan Areas: l FHWA/FTA projects in the plan/TIP and regionally significant non-federal projects l plan covers at least 20 years Isolated Rural Areas: l projects funded or approved by FHWA/FTA in statewide plan or STIP are grouped together and analyzed with all other regionally significant projects expected in the area l over timeframe of the statewide transportation plan (or at least 20 years)

12 Regional Conformity Tests for Years of SIP l Metropolitan and isolated rural areas both demonstrate conformity with the budget test and applicable SIP budgets

13 Regional Test Options after the SIP (93.109(I)(2)(ii)) Metropolitan Areas: l must continue to demonstrate conformity to latest SIP budget(s) Isolated Rural Areas: l have flexibility to choose: »budget test »interim emissions test(s), or »demonstrate through modeling used in the SIP that project conforms