Human Research Protection Program 101 July 19-20, 2007 Milwaukee, WI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
Human Subjects & Research Understanding the protection of human subjects, HSRC, and the nature of the process.
THE ETHICS OF HUMAN PARTICIPANT RESEARCH Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University.
Pediatric Ethics Subcommittee of Pediatric Advisory Committee, September 10, 2004 Analysis of Research Protocols Involving Children: Combining Subparts.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
Ethical Principles and Guidelines for Research Involving Human Subjects Based on guidelines from the University of North Carolina Institutional Review.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Scientific Data Management for the Protection of Human Subjects Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
ETHICAL RESEARCH © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Ethics in research involving human subjects
R ESEARCH P ARTICIPATION History, Informed Consent, Participation, Protection.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
DO THE CODES APPLY TO MY RESEARCH?
Human Subject Research Ethics
IRB Discussion Consent and Assent Issues in Vulnerable Populations December
METHODS IN BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH NINTH EDITION PAUL C. COZBY Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
The Good, the Bad, and the Obscure: Assessing Risks and Benefits Rebecca M. Thomas IRB Program Manager Research Integrity Office.
A History of Human Research Protections and Institutional Review Boards Roger L. Bertholf, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pathology Chair, University of.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Ethics and Informed Consent
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
Consideration of Risks and Benefits at Initial Review.
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
HUMAN RESEARCH HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. Objectives Identify the history events that lead to the development of principles, regulations, and guidance.
Risk by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
1 Protection of Vulnerable Subjects in Research Melody Lin, Ph.D. December 2012.
Eugenics Movement Nuremberg Code Declaration of Helsinki WWII – Time Line for Human Subject Research and.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
Slide 1 Mosby items and derived items © 2006, 2002 by Mosby, Inc. LEGAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES: Informed Consent Chapter 13.
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research. Ethics in Nursing Research Scientific Misconduct – a fabrication, falsification, plagiarism or other practice that.
The ethical conduct of research with human participants Nancy E. Kass, ScD Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of.
Human Subject Protection Research Imperatives. History World War II - Nuremberg Tuskegee Study Belmont Report Modern Problems - Inadequacy of “Good Intentions”
Chapter 5 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research.
Research Ethics. Ethics From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character Implies a judgment of character.
Human Research Protection Program & IRB Responsibilities Marisue Cody, PhD Director Center on Advice & Compliance Help.
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research Back to Class 2.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Regulatory requirements: children, assent, and consent waivers and waiver of documentation Bob Craig, 2007.
Betsy Ripley, MD, MS Professor of Medicine Division of Nephrology VCU IRB Senior Chair VCU Clinical Research Compliance Officer Associate Chair Faculty.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Chapter 10 Research in the Schools: Ethical-Legal Issues Jacob, Decker, & Hartshorne 1.
Privacy/Confidentiality – Principles and Regulations in the Social Sciences and Behavioral Research Moira Keane, MA, CIP University of Minnesota May 4,
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Pediatric Research Ethics and the Research Subject Advocate Tomas Jose Silber, MD, MASS RSA and Director, Office of Ethics, CNMC Professor of Pediatrics,
Human Specimen Repositories Requirements of 21 CFR Parts 50 & 56 PRIM & R May 5, 2004 Sally A. Hojvat, Ph.D. Director of Microbiology Devices Office of.
Exempt Unless otherwise required by Department or Agency heads, research activities in which the only involvement of human subjects will be in one or more.
Legal Responsibilities for Studies Conducted or Supported by HHS Michael A. Carome, M.D. Associate Director for Regulatory Affairs Office for Human Research.
0 Ethics Lecture Research. ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY Disclosures  The speaker has no financial interest in the subject matter of this.
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
Research Ethics Dr Nichola Seare Aston Health Research & Innovation Cluster.
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Criteria for Approval Is an IND Required? Devices
Research Methods: Concepts and Connections First Edition
Today’s Agenda: Ethics Cont. HW: Read & 1.6 (1.5 optional…)
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
Ethical Considerations for Pediatric Clinical Investigations
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Presentation transcript:

Human Research Protection Program 101 July 19-20, 2007 Milwaukee, WI

Consideration of Risks and Benefits at Initial Review Presented by: John C. Hudson MS Presented by: John C. Hudson MS

A story of two investigators…

Consideration of Risks and Benefits Fulfill regulatory requirements set forth in Common Rule (VA: 38 CFR ; DHHS: 45 CFR ) And as described in (Para.7: IRB Responsibilities and Authority) More than just regs: CONSIDERATION OF RISKS TO SUBJECTS AND POSSIBLE BENEFITS OF RESULTS IS CENTRAL TO THE REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

Why Consider Risks & Benefits  The main charge of an IRB is their responsibility to protect the RIGHTS and WELFARE of human subjects in research  Practical aspect: in addition to the ethical/moral responsibilities there is a legal aspect  NOT protecting the rights and welfare of human subjects invites bad press, lawsuit, even the shutting down of an institution  Point to consider: Weighing of Risks and Benefits is WHY we have IRB review

BUT WHAT DO WE MEAN BY THE RISKS AND BENEFITS OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH?

Risk: What is it?  The probability of harm or injury occurring as a result of participation in a research study  Prediction of some future occurrence of harm  Consideration of probabilities: what has happened before?

Risks: Types of Risk  Physical  Psychological  Social  Economic  Legal

Risks: Types of Risk  Physical  Psychological Emotional Loss of dignity Embarrassment  Social Loss of confidentiality Loss of social status Threat to privacy Harassment  Economic Threat to employment Insurability and insurance costs

Social and Psychological Risks are REAL Risks  Social and Psychological risks are TIME and SITUATION specific Pregnancy in minors v. in adults Known Alzheimer’s at less risk than some one not yet identified Offspring at risk if genetically-linked  Social and Psychological risks are subjective

Benefit: What is it?  A valued or desired outcome; an advantage  The probability of hoped for benefits

Benefit: Hoped for benefits?  Two Major Categories: Benefits to participants Benefits to society  Research may have: Therapeutic intent (intend to affect a medical condition or understand that condition) Nontherapeutic (increase knowledge; basic research)

Risk/Benefit Analysis  Risks and benefits are not parallel ideas Risks: often individual, immediate, measurable Benefit: often elusive, future, potential  Need to maintain a favorable balance

What the Codes and Regulations Say  The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment (Nuremberg 6)  Biomedical research involving human subjects cannot legitimately be carried out unless the importance of the objective is in proportion to the inherent risk to the subject (Helsinki I.4)  Risks to the subjects [must be] reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits, if any, to subjects, and the importance of the knowledge that may reasonably be expected to result (45 CFR a)

Belmont Report: it’s all about risk Three basic ethical principles in the Belmont Report guide the conduct of research with human subjects: 1.Respect for Persons: Includes honoring the privacy of individuals and maintaining their confidentiality. 2.Beneficence: Should maximize potential benefits to subjects; minimize potential risks. If any risks may result from participation then there must be benefits: to the subject, to humanity, or to society in general. 3.Justice: Subjects selected fairly and that the risks and benefits of research are distributed equitably. Precautions to not select subjects simply because of the subjects’ easy availability, their compromised position, or because of racial, sexual, economic, or cultural biases in society.

Identifying risks and benefits?  NO ONE can be objective about their own work  Underestimate risks  Overestimate benefits  IRB acts as objective referee

The Role of the IRB  Review potential risks, discomforts, hazards, or inconveniences of protocol Probability, magnitude, duration, reversibility of risks  Separate risks of research from standard of care risks e.g. Risks of surgery already scheduled  Give special consideration to risks for research involving vulnerable populations Children, mentally impaired, prisoners, others

The Role of the IRB (cont.)  Consider hoped for benefits Benefits can take the form of therapy, education, information, resources or empowerment Benefits can be directed at participants, their community, society, medical knowledge, medical technology  Consider if risks reasonable in relation to possible benefits Balancing potential risks to participant/others against possible benefits to participant/society

The IRB: Balancing potential risks  No benefit requires no risk to participants  Little benefit requires low risk  High risk studies require showing of significant benefit to participants  To determine balance consider type of risk Physical, psychological, social, economic

Special Categories of Risk

Minimal Risk Risk level is determined by the IRB A risk is minimal where the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the proposed research are not greater, in and of themselves, than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine or psychological examinations or tests. (45 CFR i)  For research to be exempt from IRB review it MUST be minimal risk

Significant/Non-significant Risk  FDA Device studies rules: Significant risk is when there is a potential serious risk to health of subject and the device is An implant Used in supporting/sustaining life Important to diagnose, mitigate, or treat disease or prevent impairment of human health  Otherwise: Non-significant

Worth keeping in mind: IRB review of research is NOT an adversarial enterprise 1.With proper review, consideration of regulations, and inclusion of safeguards human subjects research relatively safe to participants 2.Human subjects research can be beneficial to improving health care at large and/or basic knowledge

All share the same mission The IRB should be working with investigators as part of a cooperative “Research Enterprise” whose goal is to advance society and its health Consideration of Risks and Benefits is part of the overall review of Hum Sub research focusing on subject safety and welfare

Consideration of Risks and Benefits