Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Human Subject Protection Research Imperatives. History World War II - Nuremberg Tuskegee Study Belmont Report Modern Problems - Inadequacy of “Good Intentions”

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Human Subject Protection Research Imperatives. History World War II - Nuremberg Tuskegee Study Belmont Report Modern Problems - Inadequacy of “Good Intentions”"— Presentation transcript:

1 Human Subject Protection Research Imperatives

2 History World War II - Nuremberg Tuskegee Study Belmont Report Modern Problems - Inadequacy of “Good Intentions”

3 Belmont Report Respect for Persons - Informed Consent - Confidentiality Beneficence -Risk and Benefit Justice - benefits for all

4 Belmont Report Respect for Persons: In consideration of respect for persons, investigators are required to seek voluntary informed consent from potential subjects. Voluntary informed consent means that subjects are given free choice to decide about participation, and the study is fully described in terms that are easy to understand. The consent form should include adequate information about the study risks and benefits that will assist subjects in deciding whether to participate in the research. In addition, respect means honoring the privacy of individuals and maintaining the confidentiality of data obtained. Respect for minors and mentally disabled persons requires taking extra precautions to protect those individuals who are immature or incapacitated, perhaps even to the extent of excluding them from participation in certain research. The extent of protection depends upon the level of autonomy the person possesses. Beneficence: The principle of beneficence requires that researchers maximize the potential benefits to the subjects and minimize the risks of harm. Benefits to the subjects, or generalized knowledge gained from the research, should balance or outweigh the risks. Justice: The principle of justice means that subjects are selected fairly and that the risks and benefits of research are distributed equitably. Investigators should take precautions not to select subjects simply because of the subjects’ easy availability, their compromised position, or because of social, racial, gender, economic or cultural biases. Investigators should base inclusion criteria on those factors that most effectively and soundly address the research problem. (Dunn & Chadwick, 1999)

5 Specific Problems Coercion Vulnerable Populations Populations unable to give consent

6 Protection of Privacy Recruitment of Subjects Publication Protection of data HIPAA and protecting “Personal Health Information”

7 The IRB - Review, Audits Facilitation Required Role New Problems of Internet Authority for Sanctions and Referral

8 IRBs at Case Case IRB (Behavioral Emphasis) UH IRB (Clinical Trial Emphasis) - UH patients - all med school Cleveland Clinic IRB Metro IRB VA IRB

9 IRB Process Exempt and Non Exempt Expedited Review Full Board Review Role of Staff Responsible Investigator

10 Mechanics - Case IRB CWRU website for application Manual also available Use consent templates Discuss problems with staff Respond to queries - you can disagree

11 Our Experience Combined Informed and HIPAA consents Separate consents for patients, and practitioners Consents for parents or guardians - assents for children Under 18 are children in Ohio Coding and separation of consents from data


Download ppt "Human Subject Protection Research Imperatives. History World War II - Nuremberg Tuskegee Study Belmont Report Modern Problems - Inadequacy of “Good Intentions”"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google