Student Growth Working Group Initial Meeting June 16, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Survey of Super LEAs Evaluation Systems Performance Evaluation Advisory Council July 16 th, 2010.
Advertisements

Superintendents Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2009.
Technology Integration Plan (TIP) Overview Meeting Welcome TIP Teams.
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
Principals Changing Schools Through Leadership and Advocacy 2009 NAESP-NASSP National Leaders’ Conference.
STIMULUS AND STATE FISCAL STABILIZATION BOROUGH ASSEMBLY MEETING AUGUST 20, 2009 NANCY WAGNER, FNSBSD SUPERINTENDENT TRACI GATEWOOD, GRANTS AND SPECIAL.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Teacher Preparation Strategy U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION September 30, 2011 Prepared by: Office of the Under Secretary & Office of Planning, Evaluation,
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
STATE STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENTS. 1969The National Assessment for Educational Progress (NAEP) administered for the first time, Florida participated in the.
Michigan and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 April 13, 2010 State Board of Education.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Phase II Kick-off Introduction by Commissioner Virginia M. Barry, Ph.D.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
Next Generation Professionals Opportunities, Practice & Outcomes Opportunities, Practice & Outcomes Interim Joint Committee on Education July 12, 2010.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
LCFF and LCAP Phase II Gathering Input. LCFF and LCAP This is the second in a series of three presentations. Presentation 1 Nov./Dec.
The Common Core: Moving Ohio Forward Stan W. Heffner Superintendent of Public Instruction February 15, 2012.
CEC’s Position SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION CEC CONVENTION SAN ANTONIO, TX 2013.
State Performance Plan: A Two-Way Street Ruth Ryder Larry Wexler Division of Monitoring and State Improvement Planning.
The Educator Preparation Reform Act S Sponsored by Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) H.R Sponsored by Representative Mike Honda (D-CA) 1.
The Federal Stimulus: An Overview
Greeneville City Schools Opening Convocation August 5, 2010 Support Systems for Success.
1 Michigan and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 August 11, 2009 State Board of Education.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
Module IV: Implementing and Monitoring the LEA Plan Systemic Local Educational Agency (LEA) Plan Development.
Timberlane Regional School District
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Developing Talent Enhancing Careers Improving Student Learning REIL “Update” Rewarding Excellence in Instruction and Leadership Education Service Agency.
WELCOME Professional Growth and Evaluation System.
Debra Tica Sanchez Vice President, Government Relations Association of Public Television Stations (APTS)
Elementary and Secondary Education Act: Chad Fenwick, LAUSD PE Coordinators Mini-Conference.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW September 26, 2011.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Recognition that Education is the key to a better economy.
Ohio’s goals for Pre-K to 12 education Linda T. Keller Superintendent Mid-Ohio Educational Service Center.
Ali Caglar GULLUCE Ataturk University. the process of decision-making and the process by which decisions are implemented (or not implemented) the exercise.
Race to the Top General Assessment Session Atlanta, Georgia November 17, 2009 Louis M. (Lou) Fabrizio, Ph.D. Director of Accountability Policy & Communications.
Russell Frank, Ph.D. Director II Assessment and Accountability Services Mike Barney Director II Instructional Services Getting LTELs Ready for College.
Welcome to the Forum Guide to a Quality-Data Curriculum.
Application for Funding for Phase II of the Education Fund under the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Program CFDA Number:
1. ►The State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF) is a new one- time appropriation of $48.6 billion to Governors to maintain support for public education.
How to move a large district forward with efficiency and effectiveness Jeff Heller & Mike Jaszczak Parma City Schools November 1, 2012.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act K-12 Agenda Office of the Deputy Secretary September 2009.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM September 29, 2011 Carmel Martin, Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING WRITING SESSION #3 January 2011 Cyndie Mutka McCarley.
An Affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Primer on NCLB Reauthorization Implications from Federal Stimulus Programs September 20, 2010.
The Statewide System of Support & Regional Roundtables.
1 School Board and Superintendent Continuous Improvement and Evaluation Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Misty Zyvoloski  To provide/equip staff, community members and students with current knowledge and equipment necessary to effectively utilize the current.
S TUDENT G ROWTH “IT” M ATTERS Tom Townsend, Superintendent Putnam County School District.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
State Performance Plan ESC-2 Presentation For Superintendents September 19, 2007.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Michele Winship, Ph.D.  Compliance with HB 153/SB 316 requirements?  Seek out and get rid of “bad” teachers? OR  Improve teaching.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title III Accountability Update Bilingual Coordinators Network.
FEDERAL PROGRAMS FINANCE
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Presentation transcript:

Student Growth Working Group Initial Meeting June 16, 2010

Our Charge 1.Identify and coordinate the various uses and timelines for assessing and using student growth information including, but not limited to: a) Public Act ; b) the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Phase II; c) the Race to the Top Application; d) the Race to the Top Assessment Consortium; and e) ESEA reauthorization

Our Charge (continued) 2.Develop a rigorous process to assessing student growth utilizing peer benchmarking, empirical analysis, stakeholder input, and expert review. 3.Advise the Superintendent and the State Borad on the selection and use of growth information for instructional improvement, evaluation of teachers, principals and school effectiveness, resource allocation, school and district accountability and policy making; and 4.Evaluate progress and effectiveness of the development and use of student growth information at state, regional and local levels.

Membership Representatives of Key Stakeholder Groups including: Principals and Superintendents Principals and Superintendents Teachers Teachers Bilingual Education Bilingual Education Students with Disabilities Students with Disabilities Higher Education Higher Education Policy makers Policy makers Assessment experts Assessment experts

Our Challenges So many uses, so little time! Changing standards and assessment systems Functional longitudinal data collection systems Reliability, validity and legal defensibility associated with high stakes uses Communication and roll out

Goals for this Meeting Get to know each other Understand our charge and timeline Expand the group if necessary Learn about the local, state, and federal factors surrounding the use of student growth information Develop a work plan Schedule future meetings