Chartpack Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Progress Report: Findings from the Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center 2006 National Survey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Progress Report: Findings from the Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center 2006 National Survey of Seniors.
Advertisements

Chartpack Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Progress Report: Findings from the Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center 2006 National Survey.
Exhibit 1 NOTES: Other setting of usual care includes: neighborhood or family health center, free standing surgery center, rural health clinic, company.
REACHING THE REMAINING UNINSURED IN MASSACHUSETTS: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS MARCH 2013 Sharon K. Long Dana Goin Victoria Lynch.
Language Attributes and Older Adults: Implications for Medicare Policy Ninez Ponce, PhD,MPP 1,2 ; Leighton Ku, PhD 4 ; William.
Uninsured now 15% 24 million 17% 30 million 18% 32 million 20% 37 million 19% 36 million 16% 29 million Insured now 85% 138 million.
DataBrief: Did you know… DataBrief Series ● February 2011 ● No. 12 Dual Eligibles Across the States In 2008, dual eligibles as a percent of the total Medicare.
Challenges of Serving Low-income Medicare Beneficiaries: Impact of Cost Sharing Cindy Parks Thomas Brandeis University Schneider Institute for Health Policy.
The Michigan Healthcare Marketplace Eileen Ellis Health Management Associates Initial Observations.
Medicaid and Health Reform: How Will They Work Together? Jocelyn Guyer Center for Children and Families
Exhibit 1. The Uninsured Rate Among Latinos Fell Sharply Between July–September 2013 and April–June 2014, Following the First Open Enrollment Period Percent.
Uninsured On The Rise What The 2011 Colorado Health Access Survey Tells Us About Vulnerable Coloradans March 7, 2012 CHI/AHEC Conversation Series.
Overview of the U.S. Health Care System American Medical Student Association.
Health Care Coverage and Access for Men, JAMA, June 23, 2015.
Note: FPL refers to federal poverty level. * A composite of the following four indicators measures access to a medical home: 1) having a regular doctor.
Distribution of U.S. Population by Race/Ethnicity, 2010 Total U.S. Population = million SOURCE: 2010 U.S. Census.
Medicare and the New Prescription Drug Benefit Presented by Tricia Neuman, Sc.D. Vice President and Director, Medicare Policy Project The Henry J. Kaiser.
Presented by Tricia Neuman, Sc.D. Vice President and Director, Medicare Policy Project The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation for NASI Annual Conference.
Exhibit 1 NOTE: *Amount corresponds to the estimated catastrophic coverage limit for non-low-income subsidy enrollees ($6,734 for LIS enrollees), which.
INFORMATION NOT RELEASABLE TO THE PUBLIC UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY LAW: This information has not been publicly disclosed and may be privileged and confidential.
MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFIT Presented by Juliette Cubanski, Ph.D. Principal Policy Analyst Medicare Policy Project The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
Exhibit 1. Fifteen Million Young Adults Ages 19–25 Enrolled in or Stayed on Their Parents’ Health Plan in Past 12 Months Distribution of 15 million adults.
Figure 1. Uninsured Rates Are Highest Among Hispanics and African Americans, 2005 Percent of adults ages 19–64 Note: Because of rounding, totals above.
Medicare: An Overview September 30, 2014 Society for Financial and Professional Development 7 th Annual Financial Literacy Leadership Conference Christina.
Chart 7.1: U.S. Population Trends and Projections by Age, 1980 – 2060 (1) Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Projections of the.
NOTES: Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding. People with disabilities under age 65 were not eligible for Medicare prior to SOURCE: Centers.
The Impact of Health Expenses on Older Women ’ s Financial Security Juliette Cubanski, Ph.D. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation AcademyHealth 2007 Annual.
Medicare, Medicaid, and Health Care Reform Todd Gilmer, PhD Professor of Health Policy and Economics Department of Family and Preventive Medicine 1.
Figure 0 K A I S E R C O M M I S S I O N O N Medicaid and the Uninsured Immigrants’ Health Care: Issues Related to Coverage and Access Dataspeak Audioconference.
Gaps in Drug Benefits: Impact on Utilization and Spending for Drugs Used by Medicare Beneficiaries with Serious Mental Illness Linda Simoni-Wastila, PhD.
Percent of total Medicare population: NOTE: ADL is activity of daily living. SOURCES: Income and savings data from Urban Institute/Kaiser Family Foundation.
The New Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit: An Overview Prepared by: Michelle Kitchman, M.H.S. Kaiser Family Foundation For the: California Senate Health.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Medicare Part D: What Are The Concerns? Stuart Guterman Director, Program on Medicare’s Future The Commonwealth Fund Association.
Return to Tutorials Tricia Neuman, Sc.D. Director, Medicare Policy Project Vice President, Kaiser Family Foundation For KaiserEDU June 2009 Medicare 101:
0 Beneficiary Choices in Medicare Part D and Plan Features in 2006 Supported by PhRMA September 13, 2006.
Chartbook 2005 Trends in the Overall Health Care Market Chapter 1: Trends in the Overall Health Care Market.
Veterans Using and Uninsured Veterans Not Using VA Health Care Karin Nelson, MD, MSHS Gordon A. Starkebaum, MD Gayle E. Reiber, PhD, MPH VA Puget Sound.
Figure 1. Distribution of Individuals Covered by Private Health Insurance, by Type of Health Plan Comprehensive = health plan with no deductible or
DataBrief: Did you know… DataBrief Series ● February 2011 ● No. 11 Eligibility Pathways for Dual Eligibles In FY 2008, over 9 million Medicare beneficiaries.
Exhibit ES-1. The Percentage of Young Adults Uninsured Declined over 2010–2012, While Rates Rose in Other Age Groups Note: Totals may not equal sum of.
Exhibit 1. Two of Five Insured Adults with Incomes Below the Federal Poverty Level Spent 5 Percent or More of Their Income on Medical Out-of-Pocket Costs.
MEDICARE ADVANTAGE: WHAT CONGRESS INTENDED? by Marsha Gold, Sc.D. Senior Fellow Mathematica Policy Research June 3, 2007 For presentation at Panel on “Medicare.
Exhibit 1 NOTES: LIS is Low-Income Subsidy. PDP is prescription drug plan. MA-PD is Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan. Analysis includes non-LIS.
APHA Annual Meeting Philadelphia 11/12/02 State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) Created in 1997 with enactment of Title XXI of the Social.
Figure 1 K A I S E R C O M M I S S I O N O N Medicaid and the Uninsured Dual Eligibles: The Basics Barbara Lyons, Ph.D. Director, Kaiser Commission on.
SOURCE: Kaiser Family Foundation estimates based on the Census Bureau's March 2014 Current Population Survey (CPS: Annual Social and Economic Supplements).
Dual eligible beneficiaries comprise 20% of the Medicare population and 15% of the Medicaid population in 2008 Dual Eligible Beneficiaries 9 million Medicare.
DataBrief: Did you know… DataBrief Series ● October 2011 ● No. 21 Dual Eligibles, Chronic Conditions, and Functional Impairment In 2006, 37% of seniors.
Inside Deficit Reduction: What it Means for Medicare Karen Davis President The Commonwealth Fund Alliance for Health.
Rx Coverage, Use and Spending Among US Seniors: Where Did Things Stand on the Eve of Part D Implemention & How Can This Inform Us Now? Presented at: AcademyHealth.
Exhibit 1. Uninsured Rates Declined Among Whites, Blacks, and Latinos in 2014 Source: The Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Surveys (2010, 2012,
Chapter 7: Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Coverage in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease 2015 A NNUAL D ATA R EPORT V OLUME 1: C HRONIC K IDNEY D.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Prescription Drug Coverage Enrollment in Beneficiaries With Glaucoma Blumberg.
1 WOMEN AND HEALTH REFORM: LESSONS FROM MASSACHUSETTS November 9, 2010 American Public Health Association Annual Meeting Tracey Hyams, JD, MPH, Director.
Comparing New York and Massachusetts: Implications for Reform Elise Hubert United Hospital Fund June 9, 2006.
Medicare Beneficiaries Are at Risk for High Costs Nearly one in four is underinsured (average 2013–14) BeneficiariesPercent of Medicare population Millions.
Overview of the Medicare Drug Benefit Presented by Tricia Neuman, Sc.D. Vice President and Director, Medicare Policy Project The Henry J. Kaiser Family.
Study of C.H.I.L.D. G.A.P.S.* *Children’s Health Insurance Lapses and Discontinuities to Gain better Access through Policy Solutions Jennifer DeVoe Alan.
Medicare Household Spending Non-Medicare Household Spending
Median Per Capita Home Equity of Medicare Homeowners, by Federal Poverty Level and Race/Ethnicity, 2012 Median per capita home equity, among beneficiaries.
Florida State University College of Nursing Tallahassee, Florida
Medicare Enrollment, NOTES: Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding. People with disabilities under age 65 were not eligible for Medicare.
The Latest Trends in Income, Assets, and Personal Health Care Spending Among People on Medicare November 2015.
Dual Eligibles Across the States
Characteristics of the Medicare Population
Characteristics of the Medicare Population
Medicare Part D: What Are The Concerns?
Median Per Capita Savings of the Medicare Population, by Federal Poverty Level and Race/Ethnicity, 2012 Median per capita savings, among all beneficiaries.
Presented by Tricia Neuman, Sc.D.
Vice President, Health Care Coverage and Access
Presentation transcript:

Chartpack Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Progress Report: Findings from the Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center 2006 National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs August 2007

The National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, 2006 was designed and analyzed by researchers at the Kaiser Family Foundation, The Commonwealth Fund, and Tufts–New England Medical Center. The survey of 16,072 seniors was administered in English and Spanish between October 5 and December 20, 2006, primarily by mail with telephone follow-up. The study used an augmented longitudinal design that included respondents to our 2003 national survey of seniors and a randomly selected nationally representative sample of non-institutionalized Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older that was provided by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in June After accounting for beneficiaries excluded because of death, institutionalization, relocation, non-English/Spanish language, or severe cognitive or physical impairment, the final study sample had a response rate of 56 percent. The survey had a margin of sampling error of less than 1 percent. Bivariate and multivariate methods were used to examine seniors’ prescription drug coverage, use, out-of-pocket spending, adherence, and experiences in a Part D plan. This chartpack is based on an article (published online 21 August 2007) in Health Affairs, “Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Progress Report: Findings from a 2006 National Survey of Seniors” available at The charts were prepared by Tricia Neuman, Michelle Kitchman Strollo, and Kim Boortz of the Kaiser Family Foundation; Stuart Guterman and Sophie Kasimow of the Commonwealth Fund; Angela Li of the Tufts-New England Medical Center; and Dana Gelb Safran of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts. Methodology

Prescription Drug Coverage of Non-Institutionalized Seniors

Share of Seniors Who Said They Were Without Drug Coverage in 2005 and 2006 SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, Chart 1 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. Numbers are rounded.

Distribution of Seniors’ Drug Coverage in 2006 Among Those Who Did Not Have Drug Coverage in 2005 Yes No Drug coverage in 2005: SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, Source of Drug Coverage in 2006: No Rx Coverage Other Part D VA Employer NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. VA is Department of Veterans Affairs. Numbers are rounded. Chart 2

Part D Employer VA Other Coverage None Distribution of Seniors by Primary Source of Drug Coverage, 2006 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. VA is Department of Veterans Affairs. Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, Chart 3

Part D Coverage Rates Among Seniors with Selected Characteristics, 2006 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. Weighted percentages. In 2006, federal poverty level: $9,800/individual and $13,200/couple. Reference groups for statistical significance include: white, >200% poverty, and no chronic conditions (*p < 0.05). Numbers are rounded. Total White African American Non-White Hispanic ≤ 100% % % >200% 1 or 2 3 or more None Race/Ethnicity % Poverty Chronic Conditions 50% SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, Chart 4

Lack of Any Drug Coverage Among Seniors with Selected Characteristics, 2006 Total White African American Non-White Hispanic ≤ 100% % % >200% 1 or 2 3 or more None Race/Ethnicity % Poverty Chronic Conditions Rural Urban Urban/Rural Location * * * * * * NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. Weighted percentages. In 2006, federal poverty level: $9,800/individual and $13,200/couple. Reference groups for statistical significance include: white, >200% poverty, and no chronic conditions (*p < 0.05). Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, Chart 5

Seniors’ Drug Coverage in Selected States, 2006 SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. VA is Department of Veterans Affairs. Seven state rural region includes: IA, MN, MT, ND, NE, SD, WY. Reference group for statistical significance is Total (*p<0.05). Numbers are rounded. Chart 6

Low-Income Seniors’ Drug Coverage in Selected States, 2006 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. VA is Department of Veterans Affairs. Seven state rural region includes: IA, MN, MT, ND, NE, SD, WY. Low-income refers to seniors at or below 150% of poverty (<$14,700/individual and <$19,800/couple). Reference group for statistical significance is Total (*p<0.05). Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, Chart 7

Characteristics of Non- Institutionalized Seniors with Various Sources of Drug Coverage

Income Distribution of Seniors, by Source of Drug Coverage, 2006 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. VA is Department of Veterans Affairs. "Other coverage" is not shown. In 2006, federal poverty level (FPL): $9,800/individual and $13,200/couple. The reference group for statistical significance is Part D coverage (*p < 0.05). Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, Chart 8

Race/Ethnicity of Seniors, by Source of Drug Coverage, 2006 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. VA is Department of Veterans Affairs. "Other coverage" is not shown. Reference group for statistical significance is Part D Coverage (*p < 0.05). Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, Chart 9

Rural/Urban Residence of Seniors, by Source of Drug Coverage, 2006 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. VA is Department of Veterans Affairs. "Other coverage" is not shown. Reference group for statistical significance is Part D coverage (*p < 0.05). Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, Chart 10

Number of Prescriptions Taken by Seniors, by Source of Drug Coverage, 2006 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. VA is Department of Veterans Affairs. "Other coverage" is not shown. Reference group for statistical significance is Part D coverage (*p < 0.05). Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, Chart 11

Prescription Drug Use, Out-of-Pocket Spending, and Non-Adherence

Mean Number of Prescriptions Filled by Seniors, by Source of Drug Coverage, 2006 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. VA is Department of Veterans Affairs. Reference group for statistical significance is Part D coverage (*p<0.05). Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, (Among Seniors Taking 1 or More Rx) Chart 12

Share of Seniors Spending More Than $300 on Prescriptions in the Last 30 Days, by Source of Drug Coverage, 2006 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. VA is Department of Veterans Affairs. Reference group for statistical significance is Part D coverage (*p<0.05). Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, (Among Seniors Taking 1 or More Rx) Chart 13

Share of Seniors Who Did Not Fill or Delayed Filling Prescriptions Due to Cost, by Source of Drug Coverage, 2006 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. “Did not fill/delayed filling” refers to not filling or delayed filling or refilling a prescription because of cost in the past twelve months. VA is Department of Veterans Affairs. Reference group for statistical significance is Part D coverage (*p<0.05). Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, (Among Seniors Taking 1 or More Rx) Chart 14

Notes: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. Findings based on three separate models each of which controlled for demographics, health measures, self- reported diseases, number of duals, and source of coverage. Among seniors taking one or more prescription medications. VA is Department of Veterans Affairs. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Dugs, Chart 15 Source of Coverage vs. Reference Group None vs. Part D Part D vs. Employer Part D vs. VA Spent >$100 in the Last 30 Days Spent >$300 in the Last 30 Days Did Not Fill/Delayed Fill or Refill Due to Cost in the Past 12 Months Multivariate Results Showing Association Between Sources of Drug Coverage, Out-of-Pocket Spending, and Non-Adherence, 2006 (Odds Ratios)

Share of Seniors Who Purchased Prescriptions From Canada or Mexico, by Source of Drug Coverage, 2006 SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. VA is Department of Veterans Affairs. Reference group for statistical significance is Part D coverage (*p<0.05). Numbers are rounded. Chart 16 (Among Seniors Taking 1 or More Rx)

Characteristics and Cost-Related Experiences of Non-Institutionalized Seniors in Part D Plans

Part D Enrollment Among Seniors, by Plan Type, 2006 Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan (MAPD) Stand-Alone Prescription Drug Plan (PDP) SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, Chart 17 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. Numbers are rounded.

Share of Seniors in Part D Plans (PDP vs. MAPD) with Selected Characteristics, 2006 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. Weighted percentages. Significance testing: PDP versus MAPD plan (*p<0.05). In 2006, federal poverty level: $9,800/individual and $13,200/couple. Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, (per month) Chart 18

Race/Ethnicity of Seniors in Part D Plans, by Part D Plan Type, 2006 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. Weighted percentages. Significance testing: PDP versus MAPD plan (*p<0.05). Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, Chart 19

Prescription Out-of-Pocket Spending and Non-Adherence Among Seniors in Part D Plans, by Part D Plan Type, 2006 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. “Did not fill/delayed filling” refers to not filling or delayed filling or refilling a prescription because of cost in the past twelve months. Weighted percentages. Significance testing: PDP versus MAPD plan (*p<0.05). Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, (Among Seniors Taking 1 or More Rx) Chart 20

The Part D Low-Income Subsidy (LIS)

Drug Coverage Among Seniors with Incomes At or Below 150% of Poverty Who Were Not Receiving the Low- Income Subsidy (LIS), 2006 Part D Employer/ VA Other No Rx Coverage SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. VA is Department of Veterans Affairs. Numbers are rounded. Chart 21 Nearly half of all seniors at or below 150% of poverty without the low-income subsidy are in a Part D plan

Out-of-Pocket Spending on Prescriptions and Non-Adherence Among Low-Income Seniors in Part D Plans, With and Without the Low-Income Subsidy (LIS), 2006 Without LISWith LIS (excluding Dual Eligibles) NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. “Did not fill/delayed filling” refers to not filling or delayed filling or refilling a prescription because of cost in the past twelve months. Weighted percentages. Excludes seniors for whom LIS status is unknown (n=686). Significance testing: with LIS versus without LIS (*p < 0.05). Low-income is defined as at or below 150% of poverty. In 2006, federal poverty level: $9,800/individual and $13,200/couple. Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, (Among Seniors Taking 1 or More Rx) Chart 22

Share of Seniors With Incomes At or Below 150% of Poverty Who Said That They Were Not Aware of the Part D Low-Income Subsidy (LIS), Among Those Not Receiving The LIS, % - 150% 101% - 134% ≤100% Non-White Hispanic African American White % Poverty Race/Ethnicity NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. Weighted percentages. Reference Groups: % of poverty, white, and Part D Rx Coverage (*p<0.05). In 2006, federal poverty level: $9,800/individual and $13,200/couple. Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, Chart 23

Seniors in Part D Plans Who Spent More Than $100 on Prescriptions in the Last 30 Days, by Income Level and Low-Income Subsidy (LIS) Status, 2006 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. Weighted percentages. Excludes seniors for whom LIS status is unknown (n=686). Significance testing: >200% poverty as reference group, except as indicated (*p < 0.05). In 2006, federal poverty level: $9,800/individual and $13,200/couple. Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, (Among Seniors Taking 1 or More Rx) Chart 24

Seniors in Part D Plans Who Spent More Than $300 on Prescriptions in the Last 30 Days, by Income Level and Low-Income Subsidy (LIS) Status, 2006 NOTES: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. Weighted percentages. Excludes seniors for whom LIS status is unknown (n=686). Significance testing: >200% poverty as reference group, except as indicated (*p < 0.05). In 2006, federal poverty level: $9,800/individual and $13,200/couple. Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, (Among Seniors Taking 1 or More Rx) Chart 25

Seniors in Part D Plans Who Did Not Fill or Delayed Filling a Prescription Due to Costs, by Income Level and Low-Income Subsidy (LIS) Status, 2006 NOTE: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. “Did not fill/delayed filling” refers to not filling or delayed filling or refilling a prescription because of cost in the past twelve months. Weighted percentages. Excludes seniors for whom LIS status is unknown (n=686). Significance testing: >200% poverty as reference group (*p < 0.05). In 2006, federal poverty level: $9,800/individual and $13,200/couple. Numbers are rounded. SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, (Among Seniors Taking 1 or More Rx) Chart 26

Part D Enrollees’ Experiences Since Enrolling in a Part D Plan, by Income Level and Low-Income Subsidy (LIS) Status, 2006 SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, NOTE: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. Weighted percentages. Excludes seniors for whom LIS status is unknown (n=686). Significance testing: >200% poverty as reference group (*p < 0.05). In 2006, federal poverty level (FPL): $9,800/individual and $13,200/couple. Numbers are rounded. (Among Seniors Taking 1 or More Rx) Chart 27

Share of Part D Enrollees’ Who Started Ordering Prescriptions by Mail, by Income Level and Low-Income Subsidy (LIS) Status, 2006 SOURCE: Kaiser/Commonwealth/Tufts-New England Medical Center National Survey of Seniors and Prescription Drugs, NOTE: Sample excludes institutionalized seniors. Weighted percentages. Excludes seniors for whom LIS status is unknown (n=686). Significance testing: >200% poverty as reference group (*p < 0.05). In 2006, federal poverty level: $9,800/individual and $13,200/couple. Numbers are rounded. (Among Seniors Taking 1 or More Rx) Chart 28