Rating Teacher Performance on Standard 7 Using Student Achievement Goal Setting Greater than or equal to 50 percent of students exceeded the goal. Greater.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

NCLB Accountability Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) Presented.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Why Consider Student Achievement Goal Setting?
Student Achievement Goal Setting: An Option for Connecting Teacher Performance to Academic Progress One approach to linking student achievement to teacher.
THREE HANDBOOKS TEACHER PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM EDUCATIONAL SPECIALISTS PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOR PROFESSIONAL EVALUATION.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Adult Education Leader Proposed Adaptations.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Fairfax County Teacher Performance Evaluation System
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Principal Performance Evaluation System
Student Growth Percentile Model Question Answered
Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives AMAOs are achievement objectives for English learners that corporations must meet that receive Title III funds.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Essential Questions: 1. How does an SLO factor into teacher evaluation? 2. How will the SLO process be organized at Lower.
Snapshot of the Kansas Teacher Evaluation Requirements Kansas Components of Teacher EvaluationSome Potential Sources of Evidence Learner and Learning-Observations.
FY 2010 Leadership Performance Management Process and Form Who should take this course? All Leaders Content Expert: Jane Pettit
GOAL SETTING CONFERENCES BRIDGEPORT, CT SEPTEMBER 2-3,
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
New Teacher Performance Evaluation Program
S Specific The goal is focused; for example, by content area, by learners’ needs M Measurable An appropriate instrument/ measure is selected to assess.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
WRITING A SLO October 17, ASSUMPTIONS IN WRITING AN SLO  Goal: Impact Student Achievement  Who to include?  Timeframe  Data for initial goal.
Teacher Evaluation Training June 30, 2014
1. 2 What tests will students have to take? High School COURSES with EOCs MathEnglishScienceSoc. Studies Algebra I Geometry Algebra II Eng. I-R&W Eng.
Interim Evaluation Documents evidence of meeting standards
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission July 18, 2014 School Year Data.
Virginia Supporting and Evaluating Educators (VSEE) Webinar Date: November 1, 2011 Time: 3:30 – 4:30 p.m. Participants : elementary school teachers and.
ESL Education Program Report Hudson ISD ESL/Content-Based An English program that serves students identified as students of limited English proficiency.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
The levels of performance considered at the element level are not intended to be used to label teachers as Not Evident, Emerging, Proficient, and Exemplary.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
Virginia Department of Education May 8, English Language Proficiency Targets: Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) 2.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Using Data to Inform Growth Targets and Submitting Your SLO 1.
Davis Junior High Action Plan English Department Tier II Indicator: Writing 2010 – 2011.
2012 Readiness Area Points Possible Points Earned Growth of English Language Learners Special Education Students in General Education.
SGP Logic Model Provides a method that enables SGP data to contribute to performance evaluation when data are missing. The distribution of SGP data combined.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
Summative Jeopardy Summing Up Summative Decision- Making.
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System (Summary)
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
Creating Your School Improvement Plan in ASSIST. Click on the “Goals & Plans” Tab.
Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs): LEA Reports and Responsibilities Presented by the Pennsylvania Department of Education Bureau.
Azra S. Haq Illinois State University.  What is the value of specific instructional elements to help English Language Learners achieve passing grades.
Virginia Supporting and Evaluating Educators (VSEE) Webinar Date: November 2, 2011 Time: 3:30 – 4:30 p.m. Participants : Secondary school teachers and.
Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Student Growth Goals for Coaching Conversations. Requirements for Student Growth Goals Time line Reference to an Enduring Skill Proficiency and Growth.
Student Growth Measures ODU Leadership Conference June 19, 2014.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
1 Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013 Roanoke Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure.
One Team. One Vision. Unlimited Success Gerald Oehler Old Court Middle School
Evaluating Student-Teachers Using Student Outcomes
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
Talent Management Director
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) for K-12 Administrators Session 1 Local District.
Goal Setting Why do we need to set goals?
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
How to Use Academic Goal Setting
Presentation transcript:

Rating Teacher Performance on Standard 7 Using Student Achievement Goal Setting Greater than or equal to 50 percent of students exceeded the goal. Greater than or equal to 40 percent of students met the goal. No more than 10 percent of students not meeting the goal. Exemplary At least 80 percent of students met or exceeded the goal. Proficient

Rating Teacher Performance on Standard 7 Using Student Achievement Goal Setting Less than 50 percent of students failed to meet the goal and 50 percent or more met or exceeded the goal. Developing/ Needs Improvement Greater than 50 percent of students did not meet the goal. Unacceptable

Professional’s Name: Teacher H Worksite Yourtown High School Job Title: English Teacher School Year I. Setting (Describe the population and special learning circumstances) This goal is based on one of my English Grade 10 classes which has 30 students. Five of the students qualify for special services and have IEPs. II. Content/Subject/Field Area (The area/topic addressed is based on learner achievement, data analysis, or observational data) I will focus on essay writing. Our school is focusing on increasing writing scores. Over the past three years, the percent passing has been 74 percent, 78 percent, and 81 percent. We are seeing a positive trend in writing and will continue to focus on this area. III. Baseline Data (What does the current data show?) I administered a writing prompt at the beginning of the year and used a four- point rubric to score the responses, scoring both according to critical element and holistically. The data indicate that six students scored at performance level 1, 11 students scored at performance level 2, ten students scored at performance level 3, and three students scored at performance level 4. Data attached IV. Goal Statement (Describe what you want learners/program to accomplish) For the current school year, 100 percent of my students will make measurable progress in writing. Students scoring at a “1” will increase by two performance levels. Students scoring at a “2” or “3” will increase by one performance level. Students scoring at a “4” will maintain high performance. V. Means for Attaining Goal (Activities used to accomplish the goal) StrategyMeasurable ByTarget Date Use modified pacing to attend to student needs. Copies of modified pacingOngoing (September – May) Use frequent formative assessment with students to provide feedback and modify instruction. Lesson Plans Copies of teacher-made formative assessments Ongoing (September – May) Incorporate focused instruction in key content areas as prescribed by the Virginia Standards of Learning. Lesson PlansOngoing (September – May) 3

Calculating Rating: Teacher H Question Response (Yes/No)Action 1. Did 50 percent or more of the students exceed the goal AND no more than 10 percent fail to meet the goal? 20 percent exceeded goal and 17 percent did not meet the goal.  Yes Rating=Exemplary √ NoContinue 2. Add the percentage of students who exceeded or met the goal (meet + exceed). Is this total 80 percent or higher? 20 percent + 63 percent = 83 percent √ Yes Rating=Proficient  NoContinue 3. Do more than 50 percent of the students fail to meet the goal?  Yes Rating=Unacceptable  NoContinue 4

Teacher H NumberPercent (%) Did not meet goal517 Met goal1963 Exceeded goal620 End of Year Data Results